Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snow fish
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Snow fish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is unclear just what fish is being referred to here; the article is apparently about the etymology of a corporate name of a non notable company DGG ( talk ) 09:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - not identifiable and not sourceable, sufficient reason for deletion. If DGG's suggested origins are correct, it's also cause for robust action against abuse of Wikipedia. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence that this is a notable term. Not possible to merge or redirect as it looks like "snow fish" is used about different species [1] [2]. Sjö (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT and WP:COAT/WP:SPAM. This exists, but it's another name for a variety of Silver fish (fish). Right now we have spam that is using this page as a coat-rack for something else entirely. I would not oppose a redirect to the dab page I've linked, as long as it's move-protected. Bearian (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.