Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steel Front

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steel Front

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not exactly sure how to classify this, but I don't think it is either notable as a subject or salvageable in its writing. BD2412 T 17:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment no English sources for this, unsure how RS the ones given in the article are. Oaktree b (talk) 22:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reasonably reliable. All mainstream Ukrainian media are tabloid-style, clickbait, url in the title etc, but if we assume any Ukrainian media could be RS than most of these probably are. Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NEVENT/WP:GNG. What makes this a significant, enduring, notable, err, "PR-initiative", as the lead describes it? No ukrainian interwiki makes it even more dubious as to whether it's significant. Leaning weak delete. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added an interwiki link and this seems to just be a translation of the Ukrainian article. Coverage seems to be focused on the azovstal bracelets and there is no reason that that can't be covered in Akhmetov's article—blindlynx 22:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I hope I will develop this article better. - BorborNeoneo (talk) 14:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to improve this article by finding English sources soon. - BorborNeoneo (talk) 14:42, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference in English, summarizing the results of the Steel Front's bracelet fundraising company. There are several Interfax articles in English, perhaps you could use them too. ThegaBolt (talk) 13:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: G11 - promotional UtherSRG (talk) 01:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've looked at the various sources and even using online translation, it is clear that the sources rely on PR/Announcements, etc. I am unable to locate any sources that meet WP:ORGIND criteria for "Independent Content", topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Steel Front

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.