Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Forbes
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 15:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails WP:NOT#PLOT, since it is almost entirely plot summary and character history without real-world context or importance, and WP:FICT, since reliable secondary sources are not provided to establish notability. Google returns only non-WP:RS fansites and unrelated hits, which indicates that this article likely cannot pass notability guidelines no matter what. I both tagged the article and raised my concerns on the talk page a month and a half ago and it has not been improved so I am bringing it to AFD. Doctorfluffy (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per the guidelines of WP:FICT into List of Adventures in Odyssey characters: I'm not finding anything that supports her notability, though if anything appears before the end of this AfD, the article of course should be kept. Add to this a hearty "thank you" to the nom for following the process and tagging and waiting first, before bringing it here. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to List of Adventures in Odyssey characters. No notability or real world significance asserted; Wikipedia is not a fansite. Eusebeus (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as fails WP:V. --Gavin Collins (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lacks media coverage Addhoc (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.