Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Vanish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 23:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Team Vanish

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Team Vanish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Forbes reference is from a "contributor", Esports Insider is a very niche site, and DTS in not independent of the subject. A draft of this page exists at Draft:Team Vanish. — Pbrks (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — Pbrks (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Pbrks (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable, sources limited to press releases and primary sources Dexxtrall (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.