Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toofan Salafzoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Toofan Salafzoon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Toofan Salafzoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Draft was rejected and the user proceeded to publish it to mainspace despite there being several issues that they failed to address. There don't appear to be any good sources. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Martial arts. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete. All the currently cited sources (ones in English anyway) are just boxing videos, other wikipedia pages and post-game interviews. The only English written citation seems to be this one, where the subject was only mentioned once as an participant. Searches on the subject produced no useful result. Unless the Iranian sources have something substantial, the subject does not seem to pass WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Probably could have just nominated it for speedy deletion, it would have passed. Nswix (talk) 01:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

  There isn't a criteria I can think of that fits. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like a vanity article without WP:RS to support it. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete I don't see any notability criteria that he meets. I don't think that any of the sources constitute significant independent coverage from a reliable source. Results and passing mentions do not make him WP notable. There's also the likely COI issue. Papaursa (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.Fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.