Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod Thomas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely failing notability. Lacking independent sources to verify notability. Most coverage appears to be primary, such as profiles published by institutions he is connected with (e.g. university or NGO profiles), contributor profiles for various newspapers or blogs. The Books appear to be publications by his place of work (such as World Bank reviews) where he was a contributing author for section(s) as part of his role. Divisional organisational leadership roles are not inherently notable. There is a lack of coverage about Thomas. His output seems largely verifiable in primary sources, but that does not pass the threshold test for NAUTHOR, NPROF or GNG. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy