Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waggle Foundation
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Waggle Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the notability guideline for organisations. PROD contested, citing four sources which, upon investigation, all turned out to contribute nothing to notability:
- Parade, CMT and People are puffy tabloid pieces based on a press release (People is the most honest/shameless about this:
"It was such an unexpected major expense at an already tough time," Lambert, 36, said in a press release.
) They don't even cover Waggle beyond the barest of passing mentions; they're about a separate fund Miranda Lambert set up in partnership. - The Day a local Connecticut newspaper writing about a local business, exactly the sort of coverage WP:AUD excludes from notability considerations.
These sources are so flimsy I am honestly a bit ticked off that the PROD was contested. – Teratix ₵ 15:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations, Websites, and Connecticut. – Teratix ₵ 15:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - this does not pass GNG. The Day is a moderately-sized regional paper that can count towards notability for some topics, but local-interest pieces like this do not. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet NORG, references are primary. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.