Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikicollecting
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 06:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wikicollecting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (websites) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. PRODed 10 years ago by User:Noq, for the same reason, deprodded by creator, little improvement since: [1], website died few years back and is not likely to become more notable. All it has going for it is that it was cited by a few media sources a few times during it's short lifespan. Far cry from what is required to be notable, I am afraid. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Of the refs provided, ref 3 is derived from ref 2 - Refs 1 and 2 are both from around launch and likely derived from a press release. ref 4 is the sites own about page. noq (talk) 10:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete It's tragic that so much apparent effort was put into the wiki, and then it died. Other than some brief mentions in some books that don't add significant coverage, I found no other sources than those already mentioned. Hence this fails notability thresholds. Without a good redirect target, delete seems the only alternative. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}22:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.