Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Serbia

WP:DSSERBIA

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Serbia. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Serbia|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Serbia. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Serbia/archive

Purge page cache

watch

See also: Wikipedia:Serbian Wikipedians' notice board

Scan for Serbia related AfDs

Scan for Serbia related Prods
Scan for Serbia related TfDs

Serbia

Aleksandar Leposavić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Had a brief career in Serbia and then Montenegro. My searches did not yield any significant coverage so there is no evidence of meeting WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Serbia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 14:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 07:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mladen Ličina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Played only 26 mins in the top tier of Serbia before disappearing into the lower, local tiers. My Serbian searches did not yield anything that would count towards WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Serbia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 14:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 07:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Chameleon '93

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The supposed subject of this article is not mentioned in the comprehensive two-volume US history of the wars in the Balkans (Balkan Battlegrounds), and a Google Books search results in no hits. Even the village of Skabrnja isn't mentioned in BB. If this isn't a hoax, it is a non-notable firefight that hasn't been documented outside the village in which it allegedly occurred. It doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources, and is therefore not notable and should be deleted. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Croatia, and Serbia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be just one in a series of war-related articles created by this new user in a relatively short amount of time.

The leftover reference to Ante Nazor's mention in a Hrvatski vojnik article actually says the name was "Kameleon", so I don't know why we'd necessarily translate that and add a shortened year to it. --Joy (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained about this OP here in the edit section, i will fix typo and if add more content if needed. I tink that just this article needs to be renamed to operation steel 93 and added more reliable content. Balkan Battlegrounds is not the only reliable book about wars in the former Yugoslavia. This book(BB) briefly explains the events without a deeper analysis because they want to include all events in 400-500 pages(its impossible to do in one or two books). All the Best Wynnsanity (talk) 12:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gow is currently unverifiable because it hasn't got a full citation. I will look at the Sekulic book to see if it is reliable. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Sekulić was a major general in the VRS, and his book is published by a German press (not sure of their bona fides, but his book is cited extensively in Balkan Battlegrounds. I note there are some questions in BB about his point of view, being a VRS officer. I think it can be considered reliable in a general sense, but I think anything even slightly disputed or controversial cited to him needs to be attributed in-text, ie "According to the VRS major general Milisav Sekulić, ... then cited to his book at the end of the sentence, and thereafter "According to Sekulić, ... Coverage in this book can be used to establish notability, although I'm not seeing significant coverage, just mentions in passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, even if it happened at all does not seem to be notable enough to have its own article. Durraz0 (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then why don't you help the article expand and be even better, that's why you're here, I guess? Or maybe you are here to glorify the UÇK and others like that and spread your nationalism, as you have already done several times? We can delete all RSK and VRS victories but then we would be left with your ridiculous articles where you killed 1k soldiers in 10 minutes. I don't know, just asking. Cheers Wynnsanity (talk) 11:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. Iaof2017 (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dušica Bijelić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is cited almost entirely to non-independent sources; mainly to theaters employing the subject. Not clear the subject passes WP:SIGCOV. Additionally, the roles currently listed in the article are all insignificant comprimario parts. We need to see better more significant roles, and those roles covered in independent sources, to pass WP:NACTRESS and WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Women. 4meter4 (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Given the subject's roles and the ensembles they've performed in c6 of wp:Musicbio might apply in which case WP:SIGCOV may exist. Therefore, I would explore WP:AFT before taking a position.𝔓^420°𝔓^Holla 08:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think AFT has any relevance to this AFD. Additionally, the roles currently listed in the article are all tiny comprimario parts with no substantial singing (ie zero arias). To me, this does not meet the WP:SNG notability criteria at either WP:MUSICBIO or WP:NACTRESS.4meter4 (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need more participants here. I'm not sure what WP:AFT has to do with this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Serbia

Serbia

Aleksandar Leposavić

Mladen Ličina

Operation Chameleon '93

Dušica Bijelić

Others

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates

See also

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.