Vandana Baweja
Phone: 352.294.1465
Address: School of Architecture
College of Design, Construction and Planning
University of Florida
1480 Inner Road, Room 242
Gainesville, FL 32611-5702
Address: School of Architecture
College of Design, Construction and Planning
University of Florida
1480 Inner Road, Room 242
Gainesville, FL 32611-5702
less
Related Authors
Rashmi Varma
University of Warwick
Tanu Sankalia
University of San Francisco
Treasa De Loughry
University College Dublin
Bill Ashcroft
The University of New South Wales
Sreya Mitra
American University of Sharjah
Debashree Mukherjee
Columbia University
Prashant Kidambi
University of Leicester
Uploads
Papers by Vandana Baweja
shaped the city, and the tensions between high-end and low-end globalization processes, using four films—Skyfall (2012, English Directed
by Sam Mendes), Meili xin shijie [Beautiful New World] (1999, Directed by Shi Runjiu), Yima de houxiandai shenghuo [The Postmodern
Life of My Aunt] (2006, Directed by Ann Hui), and Suzhou he [Suzhou River] (2000, Directed by Lou Ye). The lecture begins by examining
how Skyfall (2012, English Directed by Sam Mendes) represents Shanghai as a glitzy skyscraper city, in a perpetual present, and purged of
the historic processes that have shaped the city. Meili xin shijie [Beautiful New World] (1999) is set in the context of the 1990s consumer
revolution and the intense transformation of Shanghai through which the old city was torn down to build new skyscrapers. It is the story of
two people Zhang Baogen and Jin Fang who aspire to be consumers of this new world that is transforming Shanghai. They have been left at
the margins of this consumer revolution and globalization processes that have created the glossy Shanghai that we see in Skyfall. Thus, Meili
xin shijie [Beautiful New World] shows the globalization of Shanghai is an uneven process in which the benefits of globalization for the elite
few create social chasms that can be hard to bridge. Yima de houxiandai shenghuo [The Postmodern Life of My Aunt] (2006, Directed by
Ann Hui), represents Shanghai as an urban palimpsest, where drastic changes of political ideologies have resulted in radical transformation
of architecture and urbanism. Consequently, the characters constantly wander through older layers of Shanghai juxtaposed with the new. The
filmic representation of architecture and urbanism in The Postmodern Life of My Aunt depicts fragmentation and layering as visual tropes
that spatialize how the characters navigate the city. Suzhou he [Suzhou River] (2000, Directed by Lou Ye) represents how tensions between
high-end and low-end globalization processes, have shaped the Suzhou River Bank. In the film, the river functions as a metaphor for
globalization. It establishes Shanghai’s identity as the treaty port that brought China into contact with international trade. The film signifies
how global trade is closely tied to the globalization of culture.
Dharavi, located in Mumbai in India, is one of Asia’s largest slums and shot to global fame with its depiction in the Oscar winning film Slumdog Millionaire. In 2004, Dharavi Redevelopment Project was launched as a public-private alliance between the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) and global corporations. Its principal architect Mukesh Mehta listed the key goals of the Dharavi Redevelopment Project as: “sustainable development; rehabilitation of all the slum families and businesses; reestablishment of non-polluting industries; and the integration of slum dwellers with main stream residents.” The Dharavi Redevelopment Project has been marketed as a form of sustainable urbanism through the HIKES (health, income, knowledge, environment, and socio-cultural development) program. The HIKES program, which effectively realizes the “world-class city” urban vision of neoliberal urbanists is postured as sustainable urbanism, making it attractive to neoliberal urbanists and middle class environmentalists alike. In theory, the Dharavi Redevelopment Project would provide Dharavi residents with cross-subsidized materially upgraded permanent high-rise modern housing, piped water, sanitized waste disposal, drainage, and green parks. Yet Dharavi residents have rejected it as a hubristic unsustainable modernizing project, designed to evict and disenfranchise them. This paper examines why the Dharavi Redevelopment Project is a contested model of architecture and urbanism to argue that the project is emblematic of class warfare over architectural typologies, urban space, urbanism, and the role of the state in making world-class cities. The Dharavi Redevelopment Project reduces slum rehabilitation to a simplistic problem of numbers in terms of Floor Space Index (FSI). At the core of the battle over Dharavi Redevelopment Project is a cultural conflict over urban citizenship and what the ideal city should be.
shaped the city, and the tensions between high-end and low-end globalization processes, using four films—Skyfall (2012, English Directed
by Sam Mendes), Meili xin shijie [Beautiful New World] (1999, Directed by Shi Runjiu), Yima de houxiandai shenghuo [The Postmodern
Life of My Aunt] (2006, Directed by Ann Hui), and Suzhou he [Suzhou River] (2000, Directed by Lou Ye). The lecture begins by examining
how Skyfall (2012, English Directed by Sam Mendes) represents Shanghai as a glitzy skyscraper city, in a perpetual present, and purged of
the historic processes that have shaped the city. Meili xin shijie [Beautiful New World] (1999) is set in the context of the 1990s consumer
revolution and the intense transformation of Shanghai through which the old city was torn down to build new skyscrapers. It is the story of
two people Zhang Baogen and Jin Fang who aspire to be consumers of this new world that is transforming Shanghai. They have been left at
the margins of this consumer revolution and globalization processes that have created the glossy Shanghai that we see in Skyfall. Thus, Meili
xin shijie [Beautiful New World] shows the globalization of Shanghai is an uneven process in which the benefits of globalization for the elite
few create social chasms that can be hard to bridge. Yima de houxiandai shenghuo [The Postmodern Life of My Aunt] (2006, Directed by
Ann Hui), represents Shanghai as an urban palimpsest, where drastic changes of political ideologies have resulted in radical transformation
of architecture and urbanism. Consequently, the characters constantly wander through older layers of Shanghai juxtaposed with the new. The
filmic representation of architecture and urbanism in The Postmodern Life of My Aunt depicts fragmentation and layering as visual tropes
that spatialize how the characters navigate the city. Suzhou he [Suzhou River] (2000, Directed by Lou Ye) represents how tensions between
high-end and low-end globalization processes, have shaped the Suzhou River Bank. In the film, the river functions as a metaphor for
globalization. It establishes Shanghai’s identity as the treaty port that brought China into contact with international trade. The film signifies
how global trade is closely tied to the globalization of culture.
Dharavi, located in Mumbai in India, is one of Asia’s largest slums and shot to global fame with its depiction in the Oscar winning film Slumdog Millionaire. In 2004, Dharavi Redevelopment Project was launched as a public-private alliance between the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) and global corporations. Its principal architect Mukesh Mehta listed the key goals of the Dharavi Redevelopment Project as: “sustainable development; rehabilitation of all the slum families and businesses; reestablishment of non-polluting industries; and the integration of slum dwellers with main stream residents.” The Dharavi Redevelopment Project has been marketed as a form of sustainable urbanism through the HIKES (health, income, knowledge, environment, and socio-cultural development) program. The HIKES program, which effectively realizes the “world-class city” urban vision of neoliberal urbanists is postured as sustainable urbanism, making it attractive to neoliberal urbanists and middle class environmentalists alike. In theory, the Dharavi Redevelopment Project would provide Dharavi residents with cross-subsidized materially upgraded permanent high-rise modern housing, piped water, sanitized waste disposal, drainage, and green parks. Yet Dharavi residents have rejected it as a hubristic unsustainable modernizing project, designed to evict and disenfranchise them. This paper examines why the Dharavi Redevelopment Project is a contested model of architecture and urbanism to argue that the project is emblematic of class warfare over architectural typologies, urban space, urbanism, and the role of the state in making world-class cities. The Dharavi Redevelopment Project reduces slum rehabilitation to a simplistic problem of numbers in terms of Floor Space Index (FSI). At the core of the battle over Dharavi Redevelopment Project is a cultural conflict over urban citizenship and what the ideal city should be.
Vandana Baweja
Planning Perspectives
Vol. 31, Iss. 3, 2016
MODERN ARCHITECTURE
AS PLACE-MAKING IN FLORIDA
Date: Sunday, February 7, 2016, 1:00 to 6:00 PM
Location: The Historic Thomas Center, 302 NE 6th Ave, Gainesville, Florida 32601
Phone:(352) 393-8539
ORGANIZERS
VANDANA BAWEJA, PhD
Assistant Professor, School of Architecture, University of Florida.
MARTHA KOHEN
Professor, School of Architecture, University of Florida.
Founding Member and Board Member of DoCoMoMo Florida Chapter
JOHN NEMMERS
Archivist for the Architecture Archives; Associate Chair of the Department of Special and Area Studies Collections, University of Florida.
SPONSORS
FLORIDA HUMANITIES COUNCIL
CENTER FOR HUMANITIES AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
SAMUEL P. HARN MUSEUM OF ART
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE MODERN
GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM
COLLEGE OF DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND PLANNING
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
COLLEGE OF DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND PLANNING
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
Edwardian Shop Fronts” JSAH, volume 68, March 2009.
Deploying the deceptively narrow topic of storefront design in
England from the early 19th to the early 20th Centuries, Julia
Scalzo’s essay “All a Matter of Taste: The Problem of Victorian and
Edwardian Shop Fronts” uncovers a topic that will help define
the architectural landscape for much of the 20th Century: the
tension between the consumers of mass culture and the professional
arbiters of taste. Scalzo skillfully tracks how taste – understood
as disinterested aesthetic appreciation – was used to create a
desired distance between commerce and architecture, between lay
builder and professional architect, and between popular culture
and an artistic elite. The humble storefront played a key and
controversial role in this drama of early professionalization. Indeed,
the moralizing virtue of restraint, a sentiment that dominates
modernist debates, is traced back to the heavily contested territory
of that prime signifier of commerce: the shop front.
Julia Scalzo’s essay has a provocative and clear thesis, executes
a broad historical sweep, draws on diverse and original sourcematerial, and is presented with refined craft and delicate wit. While 2010 SAH
celebrating the excellence of Scalzo’s fine essay, the jury notes with
pleasure the overall strength of the selected finalists for the 2010
Founders’ Award.
Kent Kleinman, Cornell University
Vandana Baweja, University of Florida
Sevil Enginsoy Ekinci, Middle Eastern Technical University