Skip to content

XiangLi1999/PrefixTuning

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

13 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Prefix Tuning

Files:

.
├── gpt2                          # Code for GPT2 style autoregressive LM
│   ├── train_e2e.py              # high-level scripts to train.
│   ├── train_control.py          # code that implements prefix-tuning.
│   ├── trainer_prefix.py         # trainer code for the training loop. 
│   ├── run_language_modeling.py  # training code (contains data loading, model loading, and calls trainer)
│   ├── gen.py                    # high-level scripts to decode. 
│   └── run_generation.py         # decoding code. 
│
├── seq2seq                       # Code for encoder-decoder architecture
│   ├── train_bart.py             # high-level scripts to train.
│   ├── prefixTuning.py           # code that implements prefix-tuning.
│   ├── finetune.py               # training code (contains data loading, model loading, and calls trainer)   
│   ├── lightning_base.py         # helper code
│   ├── utils.py                  # helper code
│   └── callbacks.py              # helper code
└── ...

To run the code for GPT2 style autoregressive LM, the code is in gpt2/. This corresponds to the table-to-text experiments in the paper.

To run the code for encoder-decoder architecture like BART, the code is in seq2seq. This corresponds to the summarization experiments in the paper.

The two primary scripts I used to run my codes are gpt2/train_e2e.py (for table-to-text) and seq2seq/train_bart.py(for summarization). they are set to default of good hyperparameters, and can be used to tune hyperparameter :)


Setup:

cd transformer; pip install -e .


Train via prefix-tuning:

cd gpt2;

python train_e2e.py --optim_prefix yes --preseqlen 5 --epoch 5 --learning_rate 0.00005 --mode webnlg --bsz 5 --seed 101
cd seq2seq; 

python train_bart.py --mode xsum --preseqlen 200 --do_train yes --fp16 yes --bsz 16  --epoch 30  --gradient_accumulation_step 3 --learning_rate 0.00005  --mid_dim 800

Other baseline approaches

cd gpt2;

python train_e2e.py --tuning_mode {finetune/adaptertune} --epoch 5 --learning_rate 0.00005 --mode webnlg --bsz 5 --seed 101
cd seq2seq;

python train_e2e.py --tuning_mode finetune --epoch 5 --learning_rate 0.00005 --mode webnlg --bsz 5 --seed 101

Decode:

cd gpt2;

python gen.py {data2text/webnlg/...} yes test {checkpoint_path} no
cd seq2seq; 

python train_bart.py --mode xsum --do_train no --prefix_model_path {checkpoint_path} --preseqlen {same as training} --mid_dim {same as training}

For details of the methods and results, please refer to our paper.

@misc{li2021prefixtuning,
      title={Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation}, 
      author={Xiang Lisa Li and Percy Liang},
      year={2021},
      eprint={2101.00190},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL}
}

About

Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy