Skip to content

[CKS] Create Kubernetes ISO support for ARCH optional parameter #10986

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 25, 2025

Conversation

nvazquez
Copy link
Contributor

@nvazquez nvazquez commented Jun 6, 2025

Description

CloudStack supports Multi-Arch zones #9619 since 4.20.

This PR introduces an optional parameter ARCH for the create-kubernetes-binaries-iso.sh script to include the corresponding arch binaries. Also, the generated ISO will include the ARCH on its name

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested three scenarios:

  • Not passing the ARCH pameter -> observe the script downloads amd64 binaries on the ISO
  • Passing ARCH=arm64 -> observe the script downloads arm64 binaries on the ISO
  • Passing ARCH=aaarm -> ERROR

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.57%. Comparing base (b57994e) to head (441cfc4).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #10986      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     16.57%   16.57%   -0.01%     
  Complexity    14059    14059              
============================================
  Files          5772     5772              
  Lines        512938   512938              
  Branches      62304    62304              
============================================
- Hits          85026    85024       -2     
- Misses       418431   418432       +1     
- Partials       9481     9482       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.89% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.47% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes looks good. One minor comment

if [ -n "${8}" ]; then
ARCH="${8}"
if [ "$ARCH" != "amd64" ] && [ "$ARCH" != "arm64" ]; then
echo "ERROR: ARCH must be 'amd64' or 'arm64'. If the optional parameter ARCH is not set then 'amd64' is used."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In Java code/UI we've used aarch64, should that also translate to arm64 for consistency

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @shwstppr - fixed

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For sake of simplicity, check what arch type k8s uses in its urls (it that arm64 or aarch64) ? So the script can still take in aarch64 as input, but produce the output with arch-name as used by k8s urls.

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member

To be consistent to the systemvm template and packages, I think it would be better to use the following in the ISO name

  • x86_64
  • aarch64

refer to https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.20/
and https://download.cloudstack.org/el/9/4.20/

yes, I know some other projects use amd64/arm64

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13684

@nvazquez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @weizhouapache I have fixed the ISO naming

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13692

Co-authored-by: Wei Zhou <weizhou@apache.org>
Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@nvazquez can you resolve the conflicts.

Copy link
Contributor

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@nvazquez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @sureshanaparti - conflicts fixed

@nvazquez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14219

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14321

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13869)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 62359 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10986-t13869-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 142 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@nvazquez nvazquez merged commit 13892e2 into apache:main Jul 25, 2025
25 of 26 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Apache CloudStack 4.21.0 Jul 25, 2025
@nvazquez nvazquez deleted the 421-cks-iso-script-arch branch July 25, 2025 19:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy