-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 667
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Locating identifiers in tactics (including ltac2, ssr) #13103
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
65fa7aa
Add temporary support for generic argument identref.
herbelin 7777367
Using located identifiers for HypLocation.
herbelin 220080a
Using located identifiers when parsing inversion lemmas commands.
herbelin 8759d44
Using preident or located identifiers when parsing Ltac.
herbelin f521337
Adding Ltac interning/interpreting/subst/printing for identref.
herbelin f8b002f
Using located identifiers in tactic rename_hyp.
herbelin bcb3147
Using a located identifier in tactic instantiate_tac_by_name.
herbelin be1a48b
Using located identifiers in tactic intro_move.
herbelin e0af06f
Using a located identifier in tactics fix and cofix.
herbelin cd5acea
Using located identifiers in NamedHyp/AnonHyp tactic arguments.
herbelin 96b55bd
Using located identifiers when parsing a couple of tactics or tactic …
herbelin 5facd93
Using located identifiers in ssrvernac and ssrparser grammars.
herbelin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev
Previous commit
Using located identifiers in ssrvernac and ssrparser grammars.
- Loading branch information
commit 5facd932395c436cd84886a9fb5a47f02088f5ad
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this diff hunk supports @ppedrot thesis. Here the loc is already in the AST, the copy in the ident is just getting in the way. It would feel more natural to pass loc to interp_wit frankly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say that it is expected that
interp_wit
takes a loc since it goes from user-facing syntax to "abstract" syntax (the first line of the diff). What is more questionable (and what @ppedrot questions, afaiu) is thatinterp_wit
continues to return the loc (the second line of the diff).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I meant is that if you don't put the loc in the ident in the fist place, then interp_wit is not going to return it, you can still pass the loc as you pass ist and gl if you need to