-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.4k
[blazor] fix multiple calls to OnConnectionDownAsync #62518
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
pavelsavara
merged 5 commits into
dotnet:main
from
pavelsavara:blazor_dedup_OnConnectionDownAsync
Jul 18, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ebf208f
fix multiple calls to OnConnectionDownAsync
pavelsavara c25fdf7
Merge branch 'main' into blazor_dedup_OnConnectionDownAsync
pavelsavara 89b709a
fix other scenarios where OnConnectionDownAsync needs to me more expl…
pavelsavara 273fcf1
Merge branch 'main' into blazor_dedup_OnConnectionDownAsync
pavelsavara 4f774f6
feedback
pavelsavara File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is the right change to fix the metric issue. It's changing an existing behavior of the system that users might be relying on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this event is called twice. That's a bug not a feature
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is causing the 2nd call?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The proper event is
Hub.OnDisconnect()
CircuitHost.OnConnectionDownAsync()
is called fromCircuitHost.DisposeAsync()
regardless if it's connected or not, creating dis-balance.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@javiercn does this make sense or you have another proposal for the fix ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just tested the "close tab" and "navigate to non-interactive page". Both behave as expected, that is, they call the event once.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Terminate it's not being fired in those cases.
unload
to fire.navigate to non-interactive page
https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/blob/main/src/Components/Server/src/CircuitDisconnectMiddleware.cs#L81-L87
https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/blob/main/src/Components/Server/src/Circuits/CircuitRegistry.cs#L391
If we check for the circuit to be connected it won't fire when we want to eagerly terminate the circuit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we need to call that event from places that call
circuitHost.Client.SetDisconnected()
rather than relying thatcircuitHost.DisposeAsync()
would always call it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also I'm not sure that the new
PauseAndDisposeCircuitHost
is callingSetDisconnected()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made the calls to
OnConnectionDownAsync
more explicit now, instead of relying on theDisposeAsync
.@javiercn please review again.