-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 904
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a schema migration that drops the query cache #1019
Conversation
This is a force fix for potential existence filter mismatches caused by firebase/firebase-ios-sdk#1548 The essential problem is that when resuming a query, the server is allowed to forget deletes. If the number of incorrectly synthesized deletes matches the number of server-forgotten deletes then the existence filter can give a false positive, preventing the cache from self healing. Dropping the query cache clears any client-side resume token which prevents a false positive existence filter mismatch. Note that the remote document cache and mutation queues are unaffected so any cached documents that do exist will still work while offline.
|
||
// Brand new clients don't need to drop and recreate--only clients that | ||
// potentially have corrupt data. | ||
if (fromVersion !== 0 && fromVersion < 3 && toVersion >= 3) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should wait for p
(or get rid of the target count migration) before you continue with the migration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
); | ||
|
||
return PersistencePromise.resolve().next(() => | ||
targets |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can just do:
return targets.put({...}).next(() => ...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM With nit.
btw, we should add a changelog entry for this bug and the cache clearing we're doing at some point (in this PR or a subsequent one)...
); | ||
|
||
return PersistencePromise.resolve() | ||
.next(() => targets.get(targetId)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per Sebastian's comment above, you could do return targets.get(...).next() => ...)
here too, I think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
This is a force fix for potential existence filter mismatches caused by #1548 The essential problem is that when resuming a query, the server is allowed to forget deletes. If the number of incorrectly synthesized deletes matches the number of server-forgotten deletes then the existence filter can give a false positive, preventing the cache from self healing. Dropping the query cache clears any client-side resume token which prevents a false positive existence filter mismatch. Note that the remote document cache and mutation queues are unaffected so any cached documents that do exist will still work while offline firebase/firebase-js-sdk#1019
This is a force fix for potential existence filter mismatches caused by #1548 The essential problem is that when resuming a query, the server is allowed to forget deletes. If the number of incorrectly synthesized deletes matches the number of server-forgotten deletes then the existence filter can give a false positive, preventing the cache from self healing. Dropping the query cache clears any client-side resume token which prevents a false positive existence filter mismatch. Note that the remote document cache and mutation queues are unaffected so any cached documents that do exist will still work while offline firebase/firebase-js-sdk#1019
This is a force fix for potential existence filter mismatches caused by #1548 The essential problem is that when resuming a query, the server is allowed to forget deletes. If the number of incorrectly synthesized deletes matches the number of server-forgotten deletes then the existence filter can give a false positive, preventing the cache from self healing. Dropping the query cache clears any client-side resume token which prevents a false positive existence filter mismatch. Note that the remote document cache and mutation queues are unaffected so any cached documents that do exist will still work while offline firebase/firebase-js-sdk#1019
* Add @davideast as a CODEOWNER (#996) * Embed metadata directly into the RPC call (#979) * Embed metadata directly into the RPC call * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Use ...args * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Minimize diff * Add the OAuth assertion back in * Added missing type for optional database url. (#1001) * RxFire Realtime Database (#997) * initial database code * test setup * database tests * auditTrail and database tests * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * [AUTOMATED]: License Headers * Josh's comments. Database docs * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Firestore docs * auth docs * declaration fixes * switch to peerDeps * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * test config * Expose array transforms and array contains queries. (#1004) Also remove test code that was combining multiple array contains queries since those were disallowed in 04c9c3a. * Move fieldFilter (free function) to Filter.create() (#988) This is a refactoring to unify filter creation across platforms. * Enable firestore sdk to talk to emulator (#1007) * Enable firestore sdk to talk to emulator * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Revert firestore sdk changes * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Revert credentials.ts * Cleanup * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Set webSafe=false * Combine initializeTestApp and initializeFirestoreTestApp * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Cleanup * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Update major version since this is a breaking change that will cause the testing sdk to no longer work with old versions of the RTDB emulator * Completely remove admin sdk * Change version back to 0.1.0 * Setting GarbageSource in SyncEngine's constructor (#1010) * b/72533250: Fix issue with limbo resolutions triggering incorrect manufactured deletes. (#1014) This fixes an issue occurring when a limbo target receives a documentUpdate, then a global snapshot, and then a CURRENT. Because there was a global snapshot before the CURRENT, WatchChangeAggregator has no pending document updates and calls SyncEngine.targetContainsDocument() to see if we previously got any document from the backend for the target. See: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-js-sdk/blob/6905339235ad801291edc696dd75a08e80647f5b/packages/firestore/src/remote/watch_change.ts#L422 Prior to this change, targetContainsDocument() returned false because it relies on our Views to track the contents of the target, and we don't have Views for limbo targets. Thus WatchChangeAggregator incorrectly manufactures a NoDocument document update which deletes data from our cache. The fix is to have SyncEngine track the fact that we did indeed get a document for the limbo resolution and return true from targetContainsDocument(). * Updating yarn.lock * Add @firebase/util as a dep of @firebase/testing * Allow remote updates from watch to heal a cache with synthesized deletes in it (#1015) * Write a spec test for the busted cache * Modify spec test to demonstrate deletedDoc issue. (#1017) * Allow updates for targets where the document is modified * Fix getRemoteKeysForTarget() method name in comment. (#1020) While porting I noticed this was slightly wrong. targetContainsDocument() is the method in WatchChangeAggregator. The SyncEngine method I meant to reference is getRemoteKeysForTarget(). * Making sure we don't export 'experimental' (#1023) * Add a schema migration that drops the query cache (#1019) * Add a schema migration that drops the query cache This is a force fix for potential existence filter mismatches caused by firebase/firebase-ios-sdk#1548 The essential problem is that when resuming a query, the server is allowed to forget deletes. If the number of incorrectly synthesized deletes matches the number of server-forgotten deletes then the existence filter can give a false positive, preventing the cache from self healing. Dropping the query cache clears any client-side resume token which prevents a false positive existence filter mismatch. Note that the remote document cache and mutation queues are unaffected so any cached documents that do exist will still work while offline. * Implement review feedback * Add a release note for the fix to #1548 (#1024) * Ensure that we create an empty TargetGlobal row. (#1029) Ensure the v3 migration unconditionally creates the TargetGlobal row. Remove the no-longer-necessary v2 schema migration. * Remove unnecessary `any` (#1030) * Fix an errant any usage * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Publish firebase@5.3.0 * Unify local.QueryData with the other platforms (#1027) This makes it line up with it's own docs, and also the other platforms. * Fix to #1027 to allow SnapshotVersion == 0 (#1033) * Add iat to fake access token payload (#1022) * Add iat to fake access token payload * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Simpler tests * [AUTOMATED]: Prettier Code Styling * Do not clobber iat * catch server error RESET_PASSWORD_EXCEED_LIMIT (#1037) * Merging Master into Multi-Tab (#1038)
This is a force fix for potential existence filter mismatches caused by
firebase/firebase-ios-sdk#1548
The essential problem is that when resuming a query, the server is
allowed to forget deletes. If the number of incorrectly synthesized
deletes matches the number of server-forgotten deletes then the
existence filter can give a false positive, preventing the cache from
self healing.
Dropping the query cache clears any client-side resume token which
prevents a false positive existence filter mismatch.
Note that the remote document cache and mutation queues are unaffected
so any cached documents that do exist will still work while offline.