Skip to content

fix(rspack): use ts-checker-rspack-plugin #32115

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

watsonhaw5566
Copy link
Contributor

🔗 Linked issue

No issue

📚 Description

Because before "fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin" Webpack plugin dependencies Webpack when the user using @nuxt/rspack-builder must be install the Webpack5 .

So I used the "ts-checker-rspack-plugin" replace "fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin".

But now I found the Type error in "webpack/configs/client.ts" and "webpack/configs/service.ts". I used the @ts-expect-error to solve them.

@watsonhaw5566 watsonhaw5566 requested a review from danielroe as a code owner May 15, 2025 05:08
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@danielroe danielroe changed the base branch from v3.17.4 to main May 15, 2025 09:25
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes replace the usage of the ForkTSCheckerWebpackPlugin with a new TsCheckerPlugin in both client and server Webpack configurations. This new plugin is imported from the #builder module instead of directly from fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin. Correspondingly, the #builder module and its type declarations have been updated to export TsCheckerPlugin from fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin, while the packages/rspack/builder.mjs module now exports TsCheckerRspackPlugin as TsCheckerPlugin from ts-checker-rspack-plugin. No other modifications to exported or public entities were made.

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/webpack/src/configs/client.ts (1)

128-138: Consistent implementation with server.ts.

The conditional logic mirrors the changes in server.ts, ensuring consistent behaviour across both client and server configurations. This approach properly handles TypeScript type checking for both Webpack and rspack-based builds.

The use of @ts-expect-error is again acceptable as an interim solution, though resolving the underlying type issues would be preferable in the long term.

Consider creating a shared utility function for both client and server configurations to reduce code duplication. For example:

// In a shared utils file
+export function addTypeCheckerPlugin(config: any, options: { builder: string, logger: any }) {
+  if (options.builder === '@nuxt/rspack-builder') {
+    // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
+    // @ts-expect-error
+    config.plugins!.push(new TsCheckerRspackPlugin({
+      logger: options.logger,
+    }))
+  } else {
+    config.plugins!.push(new ForkTSCheckerWebpackPlugin({
+      logger: options.logger,
+    }))
+  }
+}

// Then in both client.ts and server.ts
-if (ctx.nuxt.options.builder === '@nuxt/rspack-builder') {
-  // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
-  // @ts-expect-error
-  ctx.config.plugins!.push(new TsCheckerRspackPlugin({
-    logger,
-  }))
-} else {
-  ctx.config.plugins!.push(new ForkTSCheckerWebpackPlugin({
-    logger,
-  }))
-}
+addTypeCheckerPlugin(ctx.config, { 
+  builder: ctx.nuxt.options.builder, 
+  logger 
+})
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b55bf7 and a9450c8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • packages/rspack/package.json is excluded by !**/package.json
  • packages/webpack/package.json is excluded by !**/package.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml, !pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/webpack/src/configs/client.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/webpack/src/configs/server.ts (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/webpack/src/configs/server.ts (2)

4-4: Good addition of the required import.

The import of TsCheckerRspackPlugin is correctly added to support the use of rspack builder without Webpack dependencies.


101-111: Proper implementation of conditional plugin selection.

The conditional logic appropriately selects the right TypeScript type-checking plugin based on the builder configuration. This is essential to fix the rspack builder startup failure by removing the Webpack dependency when using rspack.

The use of @ts-expect-error annotation is acceptable as a temporary solution, but ideally, the type issues should be resolved more permanently in the future.

Could you verify if this approach works correctly by testing the rspack builder without Webpack installed? This would help confirm that the dependency issue is fully resolved.

packages/webpack/src/configs/client.ts (1)

7-7: Good addition of the required import.

The import of TsCheckerRspackPlugin is correctly added to support rspack builder integration.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9450c8 and 68c0fd9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml, !pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/rspack/builder.mjs (1 hunks)
  • packages/webpack/builder.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/webpack/builder.mjs (1 hunks)
  • packages/webpack/src/configs/client.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/webpack/src/configs/server.ts (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • packages/webpack/builder.mjs
  • packages/rspack/builder.mjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • packages/webpack/src/configs/server.ts
  • packages/webpack/src/configs/client.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/webpack/builder.d.ts

[error] 8-8: Shouldn't redeclare 'MiniCssExtractPlugin'. Consider to delete it or rename it.

'MiniCssExtractPlugin' is defined here:

(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)


[error] 9-9: Shouldn't redeclare 'TsCheckerPlugin'. Consider to delete it or rename it.

'TsCheckerPlugin' is defined here:

(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: code
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/webpack/builder.d.ts (1)

4-4: Ensure fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin remains a dependency
This declaration imports the TsCheckerPlugin type from fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin; if that package is removed or missing from your package.json, TypeScript consumers of #builder will break with “module not found” or missing type errors.

Please verify that fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin is still listed under dependencies (or peerDependencies) for the webpack builder package.


export const webpack: typeof Webpack
export const WebpackBarPlugin: typeof import('webpackbar').default
export const MiniCssExtractPlugin: typeof MiniCssExtractPlugin
export const TsCheckerPlugin: typeof TsCheckerPlugin
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Type declaration now only covers the Webpack plugin
You’ve added export const TsCheckerPlugin: typeof TsCheckerPlugin which refers to the Webpack plugin type, but packages/rspack/builder.mjs exports a different class (TsCheckerRspackPlugin) under the same alias. This mismatch forces @ts-expect-error in your configs.

Suggest refactoring the declaration to encompass both implementations (e.g. a union type) or to split out per-builder definitions so the correct type is picked up without suppression.

Example union-based refactor:

-import type TsCheckerPlugin from 'fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin'
+import type { TsCheckerPlugin as WebpackChecker } from 'fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin'
+import type { TsCheckerPlugin as RspackChecker } from 'ts-checker-rspack-plugin'

-export const TsCheckerPlugin: typeof TsCheckerPlugin
+export type TsCheckerPlugin = typeof WebpackChecker | typeof RspackChecker
+export const TsCheckerPlugin: TsCheckerPlugin
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export const TsCheckerPlugin: typeof TsCheckerPlugin
// before:
// import type TsCheckerPlugin from 'fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin'
// export const TsCheckerPlugin: typeof TsCheckerPlugin
import type { TsCheckerPlugin as WebpackChecker } from 'fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin'
import type { TsCheckerPlugin as RspackChecker } from 'ts-checker-rspack-plugin'
export type TsCheckerPlugin = typeof WebpackChecker | typeof RspackChecker
export const TsCheckerPlugin: TsCheckerPlugin
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 9-9: Shouldn't redeclare 'TsCheckerPlugin'. Consider to delete it or rename it.

'TsCheckerPlugin' is defined here:

(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/webpack/builder.d.ts at line 9, the type declaration for
TsCheckerPlugin only covers the Webpack plugin, but the same alias is used for a
different class in packages/rspack/builder.mjs, causing type mismatches and the
need for @ts-expect-error. Refactor this declaration to either use a union type
that includes both TsCheckerPlugin and TsCheckerRspackPlugin types or split the
type declarations into separate files per builder so that the correct type is
imported without suppressing errors.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented May 15, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@32115

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@32115

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@32115

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@32115

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@32115

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@32115

commit: 68c0fd9

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented May 15, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #32115 will not alter performance

Comparing watsonhaw5566:v3.17.4 (68c0fd9) with main (0b55bf7)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

@danielroe danielroe changed the title fix(rspack): fix rspack builder start fail fix(rspack): use ts-checker-rspack-plugin May 15, 2025
@danielroe danielroe merged commit 9c45060 into nuxt:main May 15, 2025
48 checks passed
@danielroe
Copy link
Member

Thank you ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy