Skip to content

fix(nuxt): lazily access runtimeConfig #32428

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): lazily access runtimeConfig #32428

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2025

Conversation

danielroe
Copy link
Member

🔗 Linked issue

📚 Description

this addresses a regression spotted in CI (in runtime test environment), where useRuntimeConfig() is called ambiently before it's been correctly set.

on the client, useRuntimeConfig() just accesses an object anyway, so this should be safe.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 18, 2025 14:40
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The change modifies the way the application configuration is accessed in the publicPathTemplate by replacing the direct constant appConfig with a function getAppConfig that returns the app configuration object. In development mode, getAppConfig returns a JSON-parsed static config; in production mode, it returns the runtime config via useRuntimeConfig().app. All references to appConfig are updated to call getAppConfig() instead of accessing a constant. Inside the publicAssetsURL function, the app config is retrieved once by calling getAppConfig() and stored in a local variable before accessing its properties. There are no changes to exported or public entity declarations.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 241f6c3 and 32e2dae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/core/templates.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/core/templates.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (actions)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch fix/runtime-config

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/nuxt/src/core/templates.ts (1)

501-503: Consider memoising the dev-mode object to avoid needless allocations
Every call to getAppConfig() in dev mode returns a brand-new object literal. While harmless, this can become a minor hotspot because baseURL(), buildAssetsDir() and publicAssetsURL() can be invoked frequently. You can provide the same laziness while still returning a single shared object:

-const getAppConfig = () => ${JSON.stringify(nuxt.options.app)}
+const _devAppConfig = ${JSON.stringify(nuxt.options.app)}
+const getAppConfig = () => _devAppConfig

This keeps the change zero-cost in prod while removing redundant allocations during local development.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77d6edc and 241f6c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/core/templates.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (actions)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/nuxt/src/core/templates.ts (1)

504-506: Guard against missing runtime values to prevent unexpected undefined in URLs
baseURL(), buildAssetsDir() and publicAssetsURL() assume the relevant keys always exist on getAppConfig(). If either is empty/undefined in runtimeConfig.app, joinRelativeURL will happily concatenate the string "undefined", leading to broken asset URLs.

Recommend a defensive fallback:

-export const baseURL = () => getAppConfig().baseURL
-export const buildAssetsDir = () => getAppConfig().buildAssetsDir
+export const baseURL = () => getAppConfig().baseURL || '/'
+export const buildAssetsDir = () => getAppConfig().buildAssetsDir || ''

and inside publicAssetsURL:

-  const publicBase = appConfig.cdnURL || appConfig.baseURL
+  const publicBase = appConfig.cdnURL || appConfig.baseURL || '/'

Please double-check that an empty string is a valid value in all contexts, and add a small unit test to cover the undefined case.

Also applies to: 509-513

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the publicPathTemplate to lazily access runtimeConfig via a getAppConfig function, avoiding an ambient call to useRuntimeConfig() before it’s initialized.

  • Replace direct appConfig initialization with a getAppConfig() arrow function in both dev and prod.
  • Update exported URL helpers (baseURL, buildAssetsDir, publicAssetsURL) to call getAppConfig() at runtime.
  • Ensure publicAssetsURL pulls cdnURL or baseURL from the lazy config inside the function body.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

packages/nuxt/src/core/templates.ts:501

  • The dev-mode arrow function uses braces around the object literal without an explicit return, so it’s parsed as a function body, not a returned object. Wrap the JSON in parentheses (e.g., () => (${JSON.stringify(...)})) or add return inside a block to ensure the object is returned.
        ? `const getAppConfig = () => ${JSON.stringify(nuxt.options.app)}`

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@32428

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@32428

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@32428

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@32428

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@32428

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@32428

commit: 32e2dae

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jun 18, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #32428 will not alter performance

Comparing fix/runtime-config (32e2dae) with main (77d6edc)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

@danielroe danielroe merged commit d8994ce into main Jun 18, 2025
117 of 120 checks passed
@danielroe danielroe deleted the fix/runtime-config branch June 18, 2025 16:13
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy