Skip to content

test: separate nuxt legacy runtime tests #32481

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 26, 2025

Conversation

OrbisK
Copy link
Collaborator

@OrbisK OrbisK commented Jun 26, 2025

🔗 Linked issue

📚 Description

This PR separates the nuxt runtime tests to be able to disable some v3/v4 related features.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 26, 2025 10:04
@OrbisK OrbisK requested a review from danielroe as a code owner June 26, 2025 10:04
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR separates Nuxt runtime tests to enable disabling v3/v4 features by introducing a dedicated legacy test suite.

  • Added a new Nuxt legacy project configuration in vitest.config.ts with corresponding environment options and overrides.
  • Updated test files by conditioning tests with skipIf based on the NUXT_LEGACY environment variable.
  • Modified the test:runtime script in package.json to include the new nuxt-legacy project.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
vitest.config.ts Added nuxt legacy project configuration and environment options.
test/nuxt/*.test.ts Conditioned tests to run only in legacy mode using skipIf.
package.json Updated test command to run the nuxt-legacy project.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce conditional execution for certain test cases in the Nuxt composables test suite, making them run only when the PROJECT environment variable is set to 'nuxt-legacy'. The Vitest configuration is refactored to use a shared settings object and dynamically generate multiple project configurations, supporting both "nuxt" and "nuxt-legacy" projects with specific experimental flags and environment variables. In the GitHub Actions workflows, the previously combined test steps for unit and Nuxt runtime tests are separated into distinct steps in both the CI and autofix workflows, allowing each test suite to run independently. No changes were made to exported or public entities.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3f3a8e and 2b949dd.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package.json is excluded by !package.json, !**/package.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/autofix.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/nuxt/composables.test.ts (3 hunks)
  • vitest.config.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/autofix.yml
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • vitest.config.ts
  • test/nuxt/composables.test.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
vitest.config.ts (1)

76-125: Consider refactoring to reduce configuration duplication.

The "nuxt" and "nuxt-legacy" project configurations share significant overlap, particularly in routeRules, experimental.appManifest, and imports.polyfills settings. This duplication may lead to maintenance issues if these shared configurations need updates.

Consider extracting shared configuration to reduce duplication:

+const sharedNuxtConfig = {
+  routeRules: {
+    '/specific-prerendered': { prerender: true },
+    '/pre/test': { redirect: '/' },
+    '/pre/**': { prerender: true },
+  },
+  experimental: {
+    appManifest: process.env.TEST_MANIFEST !== 'manifest-off',
+  },
+  imports: {
+    polyfills: false,
+  },
+}

 await defineVitestProject({
   test: {
     name: 'nuxt',
     dir: './test/nuxt',
     exclude: [...defaultExclude, '**/universal/**'],
     environment: 'nuxt',
     setupFiles: ['./test/setup-runtime.ts'],
     environmentOptions: {
       nuxt: {
         overrides: {
+          ...sharedNuxtConfig,
-          routeRules: {
-            '/specific-prerendered': { prerender: true },
-            '/pre/test': { redirect: '/' },
-            '/pre/**': { prerender: true },
-          },
-          experimental: {
-            appManifest: process.env.TEST_MANIFEST !== 'manifest-off',
-          },
-          imports: {
-            polyfills: false,
-          },
         },
       },
     },
   },
 }),
 await defineVitestProject({
   test: {
     name: 'nuxt-legacy',
     dir: './test/nuxt',
     exclude: [...defaultExclude, '**/universal/**'],
     environment: 'nuxt',
     setupFiles: ['./test/setup-runtime.ts'],
     env: {
       NUXT_LEGACY: '1',
     },
     environmentOptions: {
       nuxt: {
         overrides: {
           pages: true,
+          ...sharedNuxtConfig,
+          experimental: {
+            ...sharedNuxtConfig.experimental,
+            alwaysRunFetchOnKeyChange: true,
+          },
-          routeRules: {
-            '/specific-prerendered': { prerender: true },
-            '/pre/test': { redirect: '/' },
-            '/pre/**': { prerender: true },
-          },
-          experimental: {
-            appManifest: process.env.TEST_MANIFEST !== 'manifest-off',
-            alwaysRunFetchOnKeyChange: true,
-          },
-          imports: {
-            polyfills: false,
-          },
         },
       },
     },
   },
 }),
test/nuxt/nuxt-page.test.ts (1)

8-8: LGTM! Consider removing redundant conditional skipping.

The conditional skipping is correctly implemented. However, since the entire describe block is already skipped when NUXT_LEGACY !== '1' (line 8), the individual test skip on line 81 is redundant and can be removed for cleaner code.

Consider removing the redundant skip condition:

-  it.skipIf(process.env.NUXT_LEGACY !== '1')('should not remount a page when keepalive options are modified', async () => {
+  it('should not remount a page when keepalive options are modified', async () => {

Also applies to: 81-81

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14f0a87 and 5ab272b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package.json is excluded by !package.json, !**/package.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • test/nuxt/composables.test.ts (4 hunks)
  • test/nuxt/loading-indicator.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/nuxt/nuxt-layout.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/nuxt/nuxt-page.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • test/nuxt/router.option.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • vitest.config.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.ts`: Follow standard TypeScript conventions and best practices

**/*.ts: Follow standard TypeScript conventions and best practices

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • test/nuxt/nuxt-page.test.ts
  • test/nuxt/router.option.test.ts
  • test/nuxt/loading-indicator.test.ts
  • test/nuxt/nuxt-layout.test.ts
  • test/nuxt/composables.test.ts
  • vitest.config.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code
🔇 Additional comments (7)
test/nuxt/router.option.test.ts (1)

26-26: LGTM! Proper conditional test execution for legacy environment.

The conditional skipping is correctly implemented to ensure this test suite only runs in the legacy testing environment when NUXT_LEGACY=1.

test/nuxt/loading-indicator.test.ts (1)

80-80: LGTM! Granular conditional test execution implemented correctly.

The individual test case is properly configured to only run in the legacy environment, demonstrating good granular control over legacy-specific functionality testing.

test/nuxt/nuxt-layout.test.ts (1)

108-108: LGTM! Consistent conditional test execution pattern.

The test case correctly uses the established pattern for legacy-only test execution, maintaining consistency across the test suite.

test/nuxt/composables.test.ts (4)

827-827: LGTM: Appropriate legacy test conditional.

The conditional skip for the reactive keys with immediate: false test is correctly implemented. This test appears to validate legacy behaviour where reactive dependencies trigger fetches even with immediate set to false.


846-846: LGTM: Consistent legacy test pattern.

The conditional skip for reactive request paths with immediate: false follows the same pattern as other legacy tests. The test validates legacy behaviour with reactive request paths, which is appropriately classified as legacy-only.


916-916: LGTM: Experimental feature correctly flagged as legacy.

The conditional skip for the experimental.alwaysRunFetchOnKeyChange test is appropriate. This experimental feature appears to be legacy-specific behaviour that should only be tested in the legacy environment.


1265-1265: LGTM: Entire useRoute test suite appropriately moved to legacy.

The conditional skip for the entire useRoute describe block is correctly implemented. Based on the test content, this appears to validate legacy routing utilities that should only be available in the legacy environment.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@32481

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@32481

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@32481

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@32481

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@32481

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@32481

commit: 2b949dd

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jun 26, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #32481 will not alter performance

Comparing OrbisK:test-runtime-project (2b949dd) with main (14f0a87)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Member

@danielroe danielroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks great!

@danielroe danielroe merged commit 67cf2bf into nuxt:main Jun 26, 2025
47 of 48 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy