-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 613
creating axioms for lattices #39554
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
creating axioms for lattices #39554
Conversation
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit d60e631; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
+1 on doing this. Just let me know once all the doctests have been added and tests pass and I will do a proper review. |
for some reason, probably the heuristic algo used to name the categories, the doctests are flaky EDIT: this was the case. Now they are just failing |
now doctests are flaky again.. |
all_axioms += ("Distributive", "Semidistributive", | ||
"CongruenceUniform", "Trim", "Stone", "Extremal") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The doctests might be flaky because you define a number of axioms twice in the all_axioms
list.
I am not very satisfied : in the doctests, some implications between axioms are not used to remove the implied axiom in the name. |
361c12e
to
70bf0ca
Compare
as this would be a natural place to put some specific methods from #37601
📝 Checklist