Skip to content

creating axioms for lattices #39554

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

as this would be a natural place to put some specific methods from #37601

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit d60e631; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Feb 21, 2025

+1 on doing this. Just let me know once all the doctests have been added and tests pass and I will do a proper review.

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor Author

fchapoton commented Feb 24, 2025

for some reason, probably the heuristic algo used to name the categories, the doctests are flaky

EDIT: this was the case. Now they are just failing

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor Author

now doctests are flaky again..

@fchapoton fchapoton mentioned this pull request Mar 19, 2025
5 tasks
Comment on lines 20 to 21
all_axioms += ("Distributive", "Semidistributive",
"CongruenceUniform", "Trim", "Stone", "Extremal")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The doctests might be flaky because you define a number of axioms twice in the all_axioms list.

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am not very satisfied : in the doctests, some implications between axioms are not used to remove the implied axiom in the name.

@fchapoton fchapoton force-pushed the axioms_for_lattices branch from 361c12e to 70bf0ca Compare May 21, 2025 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy