Skip to content

refactor: Validate non-null value for right attribute in beforeInsertNode() method of NestedSetsBehavior class. #23

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2025

Conversation

terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jun 29, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved validation when inserting nodes to prevent invalid or missing values, ensuring more reliable node management.
  • Tests

    • Added tests to verify correct attribute updates when appending child nodes.
    • Added tests to ensure errors are raised when attempting to insert nodes with invalid values.

…nsertNode()` method of `NestedSetsBehavior` class.
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 29, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@terabytesoftw has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c12b8e7 and 04190e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The beforeInsertNode method in the nested sets behavior was updated to explicitly require a non-null value for node insertion, throwing an exception if null is provided. Corresponding tests were added to verify correct left/right attribute shifting and to ensure an exception is raised when attempting insertion with a null right value.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php Modified beforeInsertNode to throw an exception on null value and updated attribute setting.
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Added tests for correct attribute shifting and exception on null right value during insertion.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Case
    participant Parent as Parent Node
    participant Child as Child Node
    participant Behavior as NestedSetsBehavior

    Test->>Parent: Create root node
    Test->>Child: Create child node
    Test->>Behavior: Append child to parent
    Behavior->>Parent: Check right value
    alt right value is null
        Behavior-->>Test: Throw Exception ("Null value not allowed")
    else right value is valid
        Behavior->>Child: Set lft and rgt attributes
        Behavior->>Parent: Shift lft/rgt attributes
        Behavior-->>Test: Node inserted successfully
    end
Loading

Poem

A bunny hopped in nested sets,
Ensuring lefts and rights were met.
If nulls appeared, it gave a shout,
"No empty holes—throw errors out!"
With tests in tow, it bounced with glee,
For all the trees grew properly. 🌳🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5d549e and c12b8e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (3)
tests/TestCase.php (1)
  • createDatabase (93-127)
tests/support/model/Tree.php (1)
  • Tree (17-64)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (2)
  • makeRoot (831-836)
  • appendTo (294-300)
🪛 GitHub Actions: build
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

[error] 1740-1740: PHPUnit test failure in NestedSetsBehaviorTest::testReturnShiftedLeftRightAttributesWhenChildAppendedToRoot: Root node right value should be '4' after 'makeRoot' and appending a child. Failed asserting that 2 matches expected 4.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (3)

1052-1054: LGTM! Excellent defensive programming practice.

The explicit null validation with a clear error message prevents potential tree structure corruption that could occur if a null value was passed to the method. This validation ensures the integrity of the nested set operations.


1056-1057: LGTM! Clean unconditional attribute setting.

Since the value is now validated to be non-null above, the unconditional setting of left and right attributes is safe and clear. The logic correctly sets the right boundary as $value + 1 following nested set conventions.


1067-1067: LGTM! Consistent with the validation above.

Directly passing the validated $value to shiftLeftRightAttribute is correct since we've already ensured it's not null. This maintains consistency with the validation logic added earlier in the method.

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

1767-1782: Well-implemented test for null value validation.

This test correctly validates the new null-checking behavior in beforeInsertNode(). The test setup properly simulates a scenario where the parent node has a null rgt attribute and verifies that the appropriate exception is thrown with the expected message.

…er appending child to root in `NestedSetsBehaviorTest` class.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b5d549e) to head (04190e5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #23   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        89        89           
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            465       466    +1     
===========================================
+ Hits             465       466    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot June 29, 2025 20:06
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes a bug in the NestedSetsBehavior class by ensuring that a null value for the right attribute is properly validated during node insertion. The changes include:

  • Throwing an exception when a null value is provided to the beforeInsertNode() method.
  • Updating the attribute assignment and shiftLeftRightAttribute() call in response to the new validation.
  • Adding tests to confirm the proper exception is raised and the tree structure remains valid.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Added a test case to verify exception behavior for a null right attribute
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php Refactored the validation logic in beforeInsertNode() to throw an exception when a null value is provided, and adjusted subsequent computations accordingly
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:1052

  • Consider using a custom exception type (e.g., InvalidNodeValueException) instead of the generic Exception to allow for more granular error handling.
        if ($value === null) {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy