Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-03

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests | Checkuser
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Sotiale in topic Requests

Requests

Latest comment: 3 years ago147 comments34 people in discussion

空友@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
空友 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
絆愛0630 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
給爺爬 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
芭 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
血小板0615 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
とある科学の血小板 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
自由联盟的血小板 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): All seven accounts posted disruptive edits in vitural YouTuber articles, and cursed other users in their block reviews or edit summaries. The 2nd through 4th were confirmed before, and the last three were another group of ducks. We'd like to know if 空友 is technically related to other accounts listed above. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 絆愛0630, 空友, 芭, 給爺爬
  •  Confirmed Group 2: とある科学の血小板, 血小板0615, 吃书
  • Likely Likely 哆啦美的壁橱 and Group 2
  • Likely Likely 自由联盟的血小板 and Group 2
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2
  • They used VPN or OPs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Ankeitte@bs.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Ankeitte (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BalkaNGameS (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These two accounts edit the same topics (politics and sports). Also, both accounts returned to Wikipedia at the same time, and Ankeitte’s account today added content to a page whose author is BalkaNGameS. The user page of BalkaNGameS contains the template "This user is a native speaker of English.", and the user Ankeitte mainly edits the pages on en.wikipedia. We would like to know if these accounts are linked due to possible abuse. Arnel (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Unlikely Unlikely Ankeitte, BalkaNGameS

From a technical point of view. There is insufficient data, but the data so far are as above. --Sotiale (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Tamj781@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Tamj781 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
There is a log (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts edited the article w:zh:鄧家禮 after they were registered. When a user reverted the version that Tamj781 made, the user "There is a log" quickly reverted it. So we want to have a sockpuppet investigation. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 08:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Possible Possible at best, no other accounts showing. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Yining Chen (Talk) 09:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Sallywong2021@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Sallywong2021 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
RightRight001 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Two days after Sallywong2021 was blocked, Rightright001 was created. Both of them created articles of Korean bands, and added bad links to them. Local admin Techyan thinks there must be more sleepers. Also, please compare these accounts to Randykobe2020 group. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 02:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Confirmed RightRight001, Sallywong2021, Randykobe2020, Johncena736, Vds1216. See also Special:Permalink/21161296#Randykobe2020@zh.wikipedia -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocau darius@ro.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Blocau darius (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Blocau (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Inserting fake data; see their contributions. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 20:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
It looks like a duck. Do they claim that they are not related to each other? --Sotiale (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: No. But I want to be sure. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 09:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@NGC 54: The need for an investigation is necessary to proceed with this. If their behavior patterns are the same, it is enough to block them. Or are you suspicious that they created another account? --Sotiale (talk) 12:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: It would be possible to exist another sockpuppet(s). --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 12:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Blocau darius, Blocaud, Blocau

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Emir2893@bs.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Emir2893 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Adnan3451 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): I'm seeing some overlap between these two; their first edit was on an article that Adnan3451 created that isn't even wikilinked anywhere else, and their general pattern of editing seems similar. Emir2893's account is already indef. blocked on hr.wiki, and Adnan3451 is glocked, so it might be worth comparing CU data on hr.wiki as well. – Srđan (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Emir2893, Adnan2223, WikiPisac119, Ado2215, WikiPisac, Adnan3451, Adnan7758, Ado11744 (bs wiki), Ado11744, Policajci nisu zli, Korisnik33, Korisnik11, Pomažem wikipediji, Bosanac 112, Bosanac 114, Suradničko ime 2, Drug 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiPanti@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
WikiPanti (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Auramstate (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): User WikiPanti is globally locked. An investigation was opened on enwiki en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raju sutharr/Archive but it was inconclusive regarding these two accounts. we need to be sure if the user WikiPanti and Auramstate are socks or not. --SM7--talk-- 17:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Every Time Wiki, WikiPanti
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Auramstate, Micromadmonkey, Ozoes, Rwpravaz
  • Unlikely Unlikely Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --SM7--talk-- 14:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Max CHT@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Max CHT (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
JudyVA4052 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jennylauk (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Users above posted deletion review request of the same article in the same day. Though they were all blocked, local admin thought they could be either tech socks or just MEATs, so a check might be of use. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Unrelated Unrelated Max CHT, JudyVA4052, Jennylauk

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

z2569875@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
z2569875 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
672shhs188w4 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
胡蝶47しのぶ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Z2569875 imitated the user name of User:A2569875. Then we want to know whether z2569875 is w:zh:LTA:X43's sockpuppet or w:zh:LTA:114.27's. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 11:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
I am not sure what this request is asking for. Are you requesting that this investigation be conducted to classify who the accounts are? --Sotiale (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes. It is conducted to classify who Z2569875 is. Itcfangye (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 Confirmed 1341041963296005radix, Z2569875, 彤蜜妡璃647. One of those is locked by Alaa as Xayahrainie43. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

For the record, the only reason I ran this check was because of the impersonation aspect. Otherwise I would have declined. Also I did only check the user Z2569875 and found the accounts there, I did not go further and didn't see any need to. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Amanda. And I apologize for none of us from local wiki having explained why we suspect Z2569875 as a sock of X43 or 114.27. They showed similar edit pattern, especially interest in math articles. I also apologize for none of us having explained who 672shhs188w4 and 胡蝶47しのぶ are. The former is a confirmed sock of 114.27 and the latter of X43. Itcfangye (talk) 13:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Sappho Norge@no.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Sappho Norge (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kappaqq (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Trym WS (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
John Caspian (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Polyanna80 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The editors mentioned are all involved in a slew of borderline transphobic edits. Suspect sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Possible Possible John Caspian & Trym WS
  • Unlikely Unlikely Sappho Norge
  • Unrelated Unrelated Kappaqq

from a technical standpoint. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP: Thanks! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 15:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

在小提琴上爬@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
在小提琴上爬 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
呼尔奇兰 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
伟大的阿卡扎曼扎拉克 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Cwithskin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The editing tendency is the same as the known LTA: PXD (using machine translation to create entrys), and the local community has reached a consensus, please check sleepers after confirming the above user relationship. Thanks! 海の向こうは敵だ！ 12:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
The account Cwithskin shared some similarities with SCP-458, another sockpuppet of PXD. These are a) made their first edits on the Draft namespace, b) editing Singapore-related articles. Furthermore, SCP-458 was omitted in CU results but later confirmed. I have suspected that it can be another sockpuppet of SiuMai (though no consensus has been made to compare Cwithskin and SiuMai).--Spring Roll Conan ( Teahouse · Contributions ) 13:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Possible Possible Cwithskin and PXD

From a technical point of view. It could not be judged as Likely Likely because it had different characteristics from previous data. PXD may have changed their patterns, or may be a different person. --Sotiale (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! --海の向こうは敵だ！ 13:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

中華民國育部@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
中華民國育部 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
潘春霞陳美鳳潘文忠邱秀雲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
葉品緯陳彥霖陳妍安江柔江祖平 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
陳孝盈總統方妙茹副總統 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
陳玉雪媽媽 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
譚哲文修孝賢侯孝賢 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
毘盧遮那佛釋迦牟尼佛 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
陳彥霖與劉定緯同班同學 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
張惠涵邱晨芳邱芳瑜鄭伊晴陳書晴陳宇書 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
美娟秀娟采鳳美珠淑美吳春嬌簡麗娟施美蓮陳妍安周明芳連少芳 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): More users:

The user name of the last user "劉彥緯" has relation with "葉品緯陳彥霖陳妍安江柔江祖平" and "陳彥霖與劉定緯同班同學", then the user 葉品緯陳彥霖陳妍安江柔江祖平 and 陳彥霖與劉定緯同班同學 have been confirmed that they are sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:SYA. A sleeper investigation is requested as well (the user from the first to the eleventh were confirmed that they were sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:SYA). Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 張慧如老師, 黃玉桂 陳玉雪
  • Unrelated Unrelated 劉彥緯

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Sonu Kumar Jha Pradesh Adhyaksh@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Sonu Kumar Jha Pradesh Adhyaksh (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Sonu Kumar Jha (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  • CU log
  • Discussion: Sockpuppets of Sonu Kumar Jha
Reason(s): Sonu Kumar Jha Pradesh Adhyaksh is a Sockpuppet Account of Sonu Kumar Jha and @Ruslik0 globally locked sonu Kumar jha. He gave Reason SpamBot. On 09 October 2020. --Karam06 (talk) 15:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 Declined It's too obvious to need a check. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

LaraSoftt@hr.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
LaraSoftt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lara Hard (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Trolling on the same hr.wiki article, same edits, see: page history, very similar username. Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 11:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 Confirmed--Sakretsu (炸裂) 12:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

CCF IP@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
CCF IP (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
糟糕123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
糟糕蟲飛 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
HA123HAHAHA (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Bookswith (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
蟲蟲進飛鼻孔怎麼辦? (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
CCF LANYONGKUILEI (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
CCF QUANWEIJIZUICHADEGUANLIYUAN (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
CCF KUAIXIATAI (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): We think that they are sockpuppets of a LTA, which opposes 蟲蟲飛 (CCF) and imitates the 蟲蟲飛 (CCF)'s user name, so please find additional sleeper accounts and if possible suggest a rangeblock to prevent them from coming back. Thank you. --AnYiLinTalk 10:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
In addition, maybe you will find some accounts in the name of "CCF IP 123 456". As such accounts have been oversighted in zhwiki, you can take a note instead of listing them. --Easterlies (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: C2569875, CCF KUAIXIATAI, CCF QUANWEIJIZUICHADEGUANLIYUAN, CCF LANYONGKUILEI, CCF XIATAI, BurebuNeko, WikiCatNews, LClightcat., 你 是 自 由 的, 糟糕蟲蟲, 蟲蟲進飛鼻孔怎麼辦?, 葉品緯陳彥霖, LClightcat., 自新世界, 光猫猫, 维猫报, 勇猛な猫, (some OSed accounts)
  • Group 1 used VPN.
  • Accounts not listed above are not listed separately because they belong to different users(seems Unrelated Unrelated) or do not have sleepers accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. But User:葉品緯陳彥霖 was blocked locally as zh:LTA:蘇俞安. I wonder if this group has any relationships with the LTA. --Easterlies (talk) 12:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, it looks like a different guy. --Sotiale (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

R125463268@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
R125463268 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Doris980302 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
F0911659798 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
S0963678577 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Huang Mingyi 980302 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Huang Mingyi Doraemon (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Neil like Nicole (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Community suspect the upper two are same person(sock), and want to check another 5. --Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 05:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
When summarizing your request, please at least explain how they are similar and why you doubt. From your explanation, we don't know why the community is suspicious of them. --Sotiale (talk) 09:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

In SRCU#R125463268@zh.wikipedia,they can create page via fake Taiwan episodes,TV station,TV company,edit similar to F0936244201 and Huang Mingyi (Their confirmed in last two SRCU request in this year),see their log,also,R125463268 can see in last two SRCU request in this year.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Moved by Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

  • I have taken a look at this case. Earlier CU confirmed Huang Mingyi and R125463268. R125463268, F0911659798, S0963678577 share similar usernames. Doris980302 edited w:zh:黃銘義 (that is, Huang Mingyi) and share similar idiomatic wording and username with Huang Mingyi 980302. Local admin ducked Doris980302 and Neil like Nicole by their deleted user contribution and suspected they are w:zh:LTA:XC. Itcfangye (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 1996 PTV, Neil980302, R125463268, 1998 鳳梨, 2021 PTV, 980302黃銘義, Doris980302, Nicole and Niccy, Neil like Nicole, Huang Mingyi Doraemon, Huang Mingyi 980302, S0963678577, F0911659798, TiMi980302, Huang Mingyi, F0936244201

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

温大善人@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
温大善人 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
YCLowB (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): 温大善人 created this account to state that his edits under IP were mistaken for w:zh:LTA:LHKS's, and we would like a CU to verify his words. That is, to verify whether he is LHKS or not. Itcfangye (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Unrelated Unrelated 温大善人 and YCLowB

However, it is judged that 温大善人 has used both the IP and the account. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Udha@sq.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Udha (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
185.248.103.164 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Pjeter1991 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Udha2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Udha3 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Glaukias (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
37.161.7.128 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Tllja rikes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
83.85.92.164 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
51.159.148.219 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Several of those IP adresses are open proxies. User:Udha (master) is a prolific sock creator and edit-warrior in both the Albanian (SQwiki) and the German Wikipedia (DEwiki). He refuses to block his new sockpuppets even when there is evident proof that they're sockpuppets. Ever since he was blocked in July he used his own IP adresses like open proxies such as user:185.248.103.164 to vandalize (1) and editwar in the article of Ismail Kadare and has been creating one sockpuppet after another. These include several open proxies (which were recently blocked) and User:Tllja rikes, User:Glaukias etc. As soon as his latest Ips continue to war, we suspect that he created a new sockpuppet. Thise Ips seem experienced and in just a few days he has edited a lot of articles Udha1 and his socks edited as well. He insults and attacks people all the time. I have behavioral evidence as well, this means that the case is confirmed. As one of the people attacked by him, I confirm Tllja rikes is just another sockpuppet of Udha1, created just 1 day after his latest socks were discovered and blocked. Please help us, as we don't know how to stop him. Another user already mentioned his vandalism here and here, but although some of his accounts are blocked indefinitely, at least two admins seem to back or encourage him (one of the admins didn't react at all). He is known for his nationalist, Islamophobic bias, obsession towards Ismail Kadare and adding of POV content (like changing the description from "leader of a uprising" to "analphabetic villager" in the article of Haxhi Qamili). Currently he keeps editing in this way with two IP adresses and has some "reserve" accounts (see above). With them, he frequently asks unaware user for approving his edits to make it more "blue" (here and here). This user might be a symptom for the nationalist bias in the smaller wikipedias. The problem is that Udha keeps editwarring and using open proxies with different IPs and accounts like here and here. His global account exists only for stalking and hounding against his "enemies" in order to abuse this wikipedia as a BATTLEGROUND. Franz Kasulke (talk) 08:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
To process your request, the admin of sqwiki needs to confirm your claim. Would you do that? --Sotiale (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: Unfortunately, most admins are inactive there, so this disruptive user can keep continuing his edit-wars. Do you know an admin whom you can inform? One user informed admins Klein Muçi and Liridon on their respective discussion pages in the Albanian wikipedia.--Franz Kasulke (talk) 10:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: I'm an admin of SqWiki. The problem is deeper than what we're seeing described here. Udha and Hatake are 2 users who have been edit warring in different IPs and accounts for more than 5 years now in our community. We have blocked more than 20 accounts of them and they keep coming back in different ways. The truth is they do help expanding articles but the disruption they bring forth in the community far outweighs the gain from that. No one from our community, normal user or administrator, wants to deal with them anymore now and they've started bringing their fights here. I'm 90% sure that the aforementioned user above Franz Kasulke is, again, just Hatake. If you check this page, you'll see some of his blocked accounts and I can confirm the list there is far from being complete because it hasn't been updated in a while. The real list is bigger than that. Even if he's not, this user most likely is. I do believe that the other user is in fact Udha but I'd like to have a deeper discussion in regard to this problem with the global community because as I said, what we're doing here is just an extension of what we have been doing all this time at SqWiki, one user is just using his chess moves to block the other one, and I don't know if this is the right place to have that discussion. I do mention the global community because more than 4 admins and bureaucrats have tried to solve this persisting problem in different ways over the years, even communicating with the 2 users privately, and the results have been totally unfulfilling as they always keep coming back in different ways and start the cycle all over again. On the other hand we always welcome them back for a short while somehow because of the help they bring in articles (before the cycle restarts). I can guarantee Liridon, one of the oldest users in our community, will say more or less the same when he sees the mentioning. - Klein Muçi (talk) 11:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: Nope, I am not him but I noticed that several open proxies are used there. I know that Udha is known as Turkophobic and Islamophobic.--Franz Kasulke (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
The problem is easier than Klein likes to bring it here: Hatake and Udha are two blocked users along with their sockets, having consumed all of the means to come to an agreement - as Klein stated - and given that it is so, it's a closed discussion. As it seems Kleini forgets his being practical in English and likes to romanize as if scrutinazation and retrospective solves things. The nowadays topic is regarding an avalange of mass-reverting IPs since the 5th of March: edit-warring, calling names and WP:Battlegrounding everything regarding their simingly "prefered" articles: being the writer's Ismail Kadare's page, his works, and his feuds alimented by his minions. Easily verifiable simply putting together the IPs editation maps and everybody will see the pattern clearly. And even if your leave these aside, last night in the most undignified way offending defunct individuals of our culture and then some (the verb për të ngordhur in Albanian is used only for animals, pretty much like the informal croak in English; alluding towards me being Nazimi's son ("kopil" used by him means bastard, he expressively uses one of the most offensive verbs in Albanian "i shkërdhyer", as most verbs in English can be used as adjectives, having an area of meanings nit mostly used instead of the 4th in this list) and the admin just stood there and yet has't blocked the IP for this undecent language. It is my first time writing here (here meaning in the Checkuser section, because I did write to our colleagues and neighbours) after 4 months of various contributions in Sq.Wiki, not as this old timer that keeps baby-sitting and dramatizing his editings, but it seems inevitable bringing things here due to the passivity of the admins in our community in the decision-making process and not having the lucidity to discern an honest contributor from a biased, most probably payed, curator of a writer's image.--Ikranjani (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
This again is just another chess move to divert attention to his original aim which is to block his "archnemesis". We've been playing this game as a community for years now, dealing with each complain separately by both parties until we understood that the list couldn't ever be exhausted. I didn't want to have this discussion here, not wanting to pollute the checkusers requests but given that it is happening anyway, I'm going on. What we are looking for as a community is either for technical advice on how to deal with cases like these where multiple accounts and proxies are used throughout the years or for help on the social manner on conflict/edit warring solving situations. Throughout the time we've failed in achieving satisfactory results in any of those subjects in regard to this conflict. Not only this but the conflict has escalated far outside of WikiWorld where me and other admins have been continuously emailed and messaged multiple times on social media and more in regard to this situation, the most problematic case being a whole list of emails making threats of suicide in regard to one of the blocks the community made in the past. The threats lasted for several hours in many emails straight and I was forced to contact the Wikimedia Foundation for them as mentioned here. I strongly insist on having a deeper conversation on the subject with 1 or more Stewards interested that covers the whole range of events, all the accounts included and their contributions while keeping in mind the off-wiki events. This is not only about 1 or 2, or 5 small edit wars but about giving a definitive solution to a bigger, persistent problem we've been having throughout the years as a community. - Klein Muçi (talk) 12:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Klein Muçi: Thanks. This request is a space for checkuser, so I'd like to make sure that what I understand is correct for you. Do you think this request is from one user in the dispute to investigate a user on the other? Also, do you think the handling of this request is inappropriate? For the solution to your community, it's a good to find a suitable place after concluding this checkuser request. --Sotiale (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: I believe so, yes. As for the request handling, this is where we step into a grey area. There's nothing wrong per se in using checkuser powers on one of the users mentioned (or even on all parties involved). The problem is that we sort of are already sure of their existence. We can block them even now for community disruption. But unfortunately, we've done that thing many times in the past and the problem persists. Given that we are discussing it on a global level now, I'd hope for a more definite solution of which, checkuser examination may just be one of the steps involved. If we are to be concise, then the best solution would be to have a checkuser examination performed even on user Ikranjani in regard to it being Hatake/his other accounts (which I mentioned above). This would make way for a double blocking. (Of which, unfortunately, I'm not to fond of because as I've said, we've already traveled that road many times now but what to do...) - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Klein Muçi: Thanks. This request is a space for checkuser, so I'd like to make sure that what I understand is correct for you. Do you think this request is from one user in the dispute to investigate a user on the other? Also, do you think the handling of this request is inappropriate? For the solution to your community, it's a good to find a suitable place after concluding this checkuser request. --Sotiale (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I see you've taken a liking in board games during this last year Klein, mentioning chess moves twice that is. In my four months of editing I didn't have one single enemy, and I dare say that some of my editings are exceptional for the Sq.Wiki standards, so at least a "thanks" or "good job pal" would be at order before implying me having an alleged archnemesis. But giving the Aristotelian subtrate the discussion is having, from nemesis comes catharsis; but we should expect a miracle for the admin staff tackling hubris. I'm sorry for the suicide threat e-mails you had, as it seems you have a honorable namus, but this whole year was a trying time for the human kind, so gayret. For it is in the times of need that we need courage and not wailing individuals. And if this wailing individual is the abovementioned Udha, in this case we have a 6 year old baby-sitting user. But I am curious, in that string theory of yours caretaking off-wiki events, what is the recommanded approach towards a defunct moral compass such as the one that offended a defunct individual? Or do you need technical advice here for that? --Ikranjani (talk) 13:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
The emails were sent before the pandemic started. As I mentioned yesterday in my talkpage, throughout the years I've grown forcibly used to this kind of rhetoric with both of you so I won't delve too much in addressing your overall message above or the irony on it. As for the specific approach to be taken, as established, this is not the place to discuss it. If @Sotiale: can help address the whole conversation in a more suitable place, I'd be happy to elaborate further. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, how would I know when you had the e-mails, I simply said I'm sorry, because I perceive you as sentimental guy. I guess that if the wailing individual would have needed a tissue or handkerchief in off-wiki situation, you would have lended one. But we are in-wiki Klein, not off, and in here you have some tools, so you have to take responsability towards that kind of language and use them. Given that the IP reestablished his PUSH-POV again for today.--Ikranjani (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that this is not a forum. What matters here is whether this checkuser request is suitable or not. First of all, looking at the comments of sqwiki admin, I don't think the handling of this request is appropriate. Therefore, I mark this request as Not done. Klein Muçi, you can make separate checkuser requests for both users, if necessary, with appropriate rationale. It's up to you. --Sotiale (talk) 12:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Sikakah800@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Sikakah800 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Hefaj70340 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
红细胞3803 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
白细胞3806 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ㄎㄎㄎㄎ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
+ㄢ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Community suspect the upper two belong to LTA:Yage Wu for behavior, and want to check another 4 for user name. --Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 04:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Please describe why you suspect them, as I requested further clarification in the request below. Explain how their behavior patterns are similar. --Sotiale (talk) 09:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

In SRCU#Sikakah800@zh.wikipedia,first two users and two IP 14.161.8.97,223.197.33.75 vandal in zh:User Talk:CRHK128[1][2],and 223.197.33.75 edit summary (Wrong infomation.) same to ชนไดร้ท์ฆ่าเอ็มซีซี214 (Comfirmed in January request,Yage Wu),in history via 母親,you can see WOO124 edit on it (Confirmed Yage Wu sock in last year),also,红细胞3803 edit similar to 223.197.33.75,and you can see 223.197.33.75 write edit summary is ㄎㄎㄎㄎ,白细胞3806 user name similar to 红细胞3803,+ㄢ user name similar to ㄎㄎㄎㄎ.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Moved by Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

  • I have taken a look at why MCC214 suspected these users: Sikakah800 triggered an abuse filter for w:zh:LTA:LC99 when writing a comment on CRHK128's talk page; Hefaj70340 wrote a suspicious comment on CRHK128's talk page, which may relate them to Yage Wu; 红细胞3803 wrote 爬爬爬爬爬爬爬 in his user page right after account creation, and this relates them to ㄎㄎㄎㄎ. 白细胞3806 shares a similar username to 红细胞3803, and got global locked along with C2569875 and CCF IP. All of the above were created around 3rd to 5th, March. (I did not see why Sikakah800/Hefaj70340 may be related to 红细胞3803/白细胞3806/ㄎㄎㄎㄎ/+ㄢ, though.)
    Note that the name 红细胞3803 is in Simplified Chinese, not Traditional. Itcfangye (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

If there are two groups in one request, they must be separated. If you request two groups in one request, you need to request them separately from each other. Please answer if it really is. --Sotiale (talk) 13:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Confirmed 白细胞3806, C2569875, WikiCatNews
  • Likely Likely HA123HAHAHA, ㄎㄎㄎㄎ
  • Unlikely Unlikely 红细胞3803, +ㄢ
  • Possible Possible Sikakah800, Hefaj70340
  •  Confirmed, Likely Likely, Unlikely Unlikely and Possible Possible are all individual groups and all Unrelated Unrelated to each other.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Meandkancil2020@ms.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Meandkancil2020 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BukanTeamBiasa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  • CU log
  • Discussion: No discussion
Reason(s): BukanTeamBiasa has been blocked because of he did mass articles translation using machine whole fully without fixing any of them and did not respond to the admin warning. He also did include copyrighted content in the articles. I suspect Meandkancil2020 is probably same user as the pattern of his contribution are same to that blocked guy. Please ping me once the result is out. Thanks. CyberTroopers (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
@CyberTroopers: Hello, this check cannot be performed because ms:User:BukanTeamBiasa's CU data is expired (i.e.: Stale

), as his last edit was done on May 2020. As such, we cannot compare whether Meandkancil2020 is technically related or not. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio Yeah that is because he has been blocked but I'm afraid that user is a same user, which he created another new account after being blocked. So, is it can't be done because of technical or guildliness? 13:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Because of technical limitations. We literally don't have the data anymore, it would have been wiped. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP That is very unfortunate. Thank you then. CyberTroopers (talk) 17:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Xsaorapa@en.wikiquote

Status:    Not done
List of users
Xsaorapa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Feitoria (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Numwide (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
LocusSolus2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Follow up on this request [5]. Xsaorapa and Feitoria both edited recently and the connection is very obvious from their edits. Last time, several sleeper socks were found across multiple wikis, it should be checked if there are more sleepers and if technical evidence shows the connection with User Numwide (enwiki) and User LocusSolus2 (frwiki, edits on Rene Guenon similar to socks), as explained in the last request, Numwide has done identical edits related to Rene Guenon.

Block evasion with multiple accounts on multiple individual wiki projects, user is blocked on wikiquote and user is indefinitely blocked on multiple individual wikis for abuse and having violated principles which are grounds for indefinite blocks. Banned user who continuously created dozens of sockpuppets and used a large number of IP over years on all projects where he was banned. User is indef blocked on multiple wikis like the English and French wikipedia and wikiquote, and has been evading his indef blocks on multiple wikipedias many times with many sock accounts.

See also for further information this recent discussion at enwq. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Not done The first two accounts have already been handled by a previous result. SRCU is not a global CU of sorts, but an individual CU request page for those wikis that don't have enough CUs. Given Numwide and LocusSolus2 edit on wikis with checkusers, it would be best to go through the local processes to get confirmation as checkusers have a mailing list they can confer on. If they need any data from enwq, I can gladly assist them on the list with that. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Note: Page of LTA at User talk:Xsaorapa (linked above) containing information on this case is being blanked by sock of LTA, the same information has been copied here [6] --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Leantack@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Leantack (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Toneworth (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Virusammo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Spaswent (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts were confirmed that they were an LTA's sockpuppets. Then a sleeper investigation is requested. For comparison: m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-01#Edamworla@zh.wikipedia. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Ekesyogi, Leantack, Hmdo9, Spaswent, Toneworth
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Virusammo, Rabbit2003, Masksmarsh, Sinotrans9
  • Possible Possible Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

पाकिस्तान हिन्दू@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
श्रीमान् गम्भीर (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
पाकिस्तान हिन्दू (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Account got active[7] after श्रीमान् गम्भीर got confirmed and blocked on wikidata and hiwiki[8]. Now doing similar edits on hiwiki[9]. A little background is on d:Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pseudo Nihilist. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed श्रीमान् गम्भीर, पाकिस्तान हिन्दू, History of Rajasthan, Pseudo Nihilist, भारत का प्रतिहार, Bheem singh 6969, Monarcho-fascist, F4E1C0, Niger banda, Aditya_Yadav2376

From a technical point of view. @1997kB: Here you are. --Sotiale (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Sotiale. @SM7: for blocks on hiwiki. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

XavierSachse@en.wikinews

Status:    Done
List of users
XavierSachse (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This user has been adding extensive copyright material recently. On 11 March they were asked to stop doing this or risk being blocked. Since then a number of similar draft articles have been posted by anonymous IPs. I am unable to carry out a CU on English Wikinews because I am an admin there and a LW CU proved inconclusive. Cheers. Please let me know when it is done. No need to publish the result here - let me know by email if you wish or on CU wiki. Green Giant (talk) 17:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Confirmed XavierSachse, Inconn

--Alaa :)..! 08:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Vinfort@sr.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Vinfort (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
РудиЧајевац (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Please check if there is a connection between the accounts User:РудиЧајевац and User:Vinfort. РудиЧајевац is known for his homophobic and chauvinistic statements on the Serbian Wikipedia Discord server, which is why he was banned from the server recently. I'm afraid on-wiki POV push can happen. – Aca 💬 09:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Note Note: I have sent an additional question to the requester. This is a question for evidence as to why Vonfort is associated with the user. --Sotiale (talk) 10:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Addition: I believe accounts are associated, because of the similar views, the same patterns of behavior on the server, even both use a stereotypical Discord avatar. Vinfort even made some POV edits on-wiki like this one on sh.wiki. Thanks in advance. – Aca 💬 11:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
@Aca: Please explain in more detail. If they have similar views, I think it will appear in the editing pattern. Can you compare the links and let me know? Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Not done srwiki has 3 checkusers. Therefore, this request must be processed locally, so it is marked as not done. --Sotiale (talk) 11:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Duygobyy@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Duygobyy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vivian Lim Fdyg (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ruffsberta (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vickson ng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Hen party (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lau Yoke Ying (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kenssnub (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Don0393 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
MarieChong (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Beansmuse (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Plus:

  1. Revsbooms (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser),
  2. Geldducts (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser),
  3. 一刀无情 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser).
These users participated in edit conflicts on Taiwanese TV drama series articles such as 炮仔聲 and 天之驕女, alike previously blocked sockpuppeteer Wen Ng Ng from this previous CheckUser request (group 1). Some of them harassed LuciferianThomas on LT's talk page/article talk page when LT cleaned up these articles per local policy. Currently, local blocked Ruffsberta, Beansmuse, Revsbooms and Geldducts as socks of Vivian Lim Fdyg, and Kenssnub as a sock of Lau Yoke Ying. These two groups share similarities in word choices but not sufficient to duck. Please check these users along with that previous group 1 (Wen Ng Ng). Itcfangye (talk) 13:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 方文雪, Vivian Lim Fdyg, Vickson ng, 一刀无情, Wen Ng Ng, Yun Ng Ng, Ken Ng Ng, Gen Ng Ng, Qen ng ng, Ten ng ng, Zhe Ng Ng, Hen party, Hen hen jen, Ren ng ng, Kenssnub, Geldducts, Beansmuse, Revsbooms, Ruffsberta
  • Unrelated Unrelated to above and each other: MarieChong, Lau Yoke Ying
  •  Declined given my confidence with the above results: Duygobyy, Don0393
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP: Thank you for handing the above request! --LuciferianThomas．Talk 05:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
May I know what exactly does declined mean in this case? Unrelated or unprocessed? LuciferianThomas．Talk 05:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Declined means unhandled or not checkusered. I felt the evidence wasn't strong enough given finding the large sock group and the other two being unrelated. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 10:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikieditor780@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Imtiyaz780 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Wikieditor780 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Salmank123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Infohab (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Account's got active[10] [11] after Imtiyaz780 got confirmed and blocked on enwiki[12]. Now creating similar promotional page on hiwiki[13]. A little background is on en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khan tabrez/Archive--Ts12rAc (talk) 14:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 Confirmed plus Riyaz903. All locked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks AmandaNP--Ts12rAc (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP:, can you run another cu as a another user Infohab got active[14] today and removing afd templates from promotional pages on hiwiki.--Ts12rAc (talk) 18:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Ya it's them and I locked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Manodestina@fr.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Manodestina (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): That user was banned indefinitely from Italian Wikipedia in 2020 for using multiple accounts. So the user went to edit on Wikipedia in French, and there are already 10,000 editions there, the problem is that the referred user, due to the editions he makes, should be banned from the project globally: he is an extreme left political activist who only posts partial news from newspapers and magazines, opinionated texts, aiming to defame the objects of the articles (including whole countries), in addition to chasing users who try to correct his latent bias. The case is so serious, that all of his 10,000 editions on French Wikipedia should be reverted to decontaminate the project with so much bias. I come here to request the banning of this user, which only brings harm to the project, since the Wiki administrators in French turn a blind eye to the user's actions. 2804:14D:5C8F:832B:3527:5F1D:8FDD:50E4 02:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Not done frwiki has it's own local checkusers and we can't intervene in that process. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Jutarnji@hr.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Konikasen (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Marka747 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Newuseracount (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jutarnji (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Čitatelj0 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): We are talking about single-purpose, always newly created accounts that commit edit-warring and trolling on the same page(s) for days now. The usernames "Konikasen" and "Marka747" are even parody troll-names of two active hr.wiki users. The editting pattern/edit-warring-style is literally always very similar or even same. --Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 18:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Everyone is blocked, I'm not seeing the need for a CU. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP: Please find sleepers and block an IP range to prevent them from creating more accounts if possible. Ivi104 (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok, I can see the point of sleeper checks since they are SPAs, and likely have more burried. Doing... -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
All are coming back either within the same country (with different information/networks) or are using proxies. CU will not be of help here. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Imhereformuffins@ro.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Boltasu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Imhereformuffins (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Pretty obvious DUCK. Boltasu was blocked and in a short time Imhereformuffins came to continue Boltasu's detrimental activity. Gikü (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Not done If it is a duck, and there is no chance at sleepers, and they are already blocked, I see no reason to check it. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Joker.tsang@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Joker.tsang (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jr.tsang (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts were confirmed that they were an LTA's sockpuppets. Then a sleeper investigation is requested. For comparison: m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-01#阿掟@zh.wikipedia. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
The use of proxies makes this difficult. I would say there is a chance they are related to the last check. Itsfine201 may also be related. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Nilsdustin@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Nilsdustin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Andythongchong (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Andythongchong2503 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Miosturge (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These users are involved in the edit conflict on 張韶涵 after C0800095590d was CUed and blocked (see group 2 of m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-02#C0800095590d@zh.wikipedia). All of them insisted that 張韶涵 has the nationality of Canada. We would like to see if they are socks of C0800095590d. Itcfangye (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Nilsdustin  Confirmed Leucohydro
  • Nilsdustin Possible Possible C0800095590d
  • Andythongchong Unrelated Unrelated to anything, I did not check 2503 as it was obvious and had no edits.
  • Miosturge  Confirmed Webstercam
  • Miosturge Likely Likely Nilsdustin
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

ARTC2024@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
ARTC2024 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
PRC1927 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts were confirmed that they were an LTA's sockpuppets. Then a sleeper investigation is requested. For comparison: m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-01#ECFA539@zh.wikipedia. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: ARTC2024 and PRC1927 account group
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 黃景翔125463, Eric125463268, Doris980302125463268, Neil125463268, 1998 Neil, previous confirmed group
  • Unlikely Unlikely Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

ŽIVIO KUBURAAA KRALJINA@hr.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
ŽIVIO KUBURAAA KRALJINA (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Naprijed Kuburo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vratite nam Kuburu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kubura je najbolji (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Nima boljeg od Kubure (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kuburin fan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
VOLIM KUBURUU (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kaficrazgovor (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ssuuradnik (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Yes, the SPA-troll accounts are already blocked. However, could you check if one or many users were behind this? We worry that this might be an LTA-user, could you please also check if there are any sleepers and if possible, who is behind this? --Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 11:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Also please check users Kaficrazgovor (villagepump-talk) and Ssuuradnik (Uuuser) on hrwiki and their connections with these accounts. We also suspect this is the work of a previous hrwiki LTA, user Lordluka99. User Lordluka is known for his open support of glocked hrwiki ex-admin Kubura, as well as creating numerous socks and disruptive behaviour, and his world-views reflect personal attack statements posted in hrwiki village pump by user Kaficrazgovor. Please verify and prevent this behaviour. Ivi104 (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Status:    Done
List of users
Istina250 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Istina500 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Objektivno (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): One of those three accounts is already indef-banned, but could you please check if this is the same user? There is a possibility that there might be an LTA-user behind this + all three seem to be SPA-accounts. Is it also possible to check if there are any sleepers? Best regards, Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 12:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

EDIT: I had to add another user to the request. It seems like another far-right SPA appeared and there is a chance that this account belongs to an LTA-user. --Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 16:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I've merged these requests, and will update the results as I go through them. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Kuburin fan, Nima boljeg od Kubure, Kubura je najbolji, Vratite nam Kuburu, Naprijed Kuburo, ŽIVIO KUBURAAA KRALJINA
  •  Confirmed on a proxy, Group 2: Ssuuradnik, Kaficrazgovor, Luk&češnjak
  •  Confirmed Group 3: Smrdiskroz, Objektivno
  •  Confirmed Group 4: Istina500, Bambus44, Istina200. Likely Likely Istina250, VOLIM KUBURUU to this group.
  • Possible Possible Group 1 & 4
  • Unlikely Unlikely Group 3 to Group 1 & 4
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive Group 2 to anything else, due to proxy
  • Sorry for the mess in results, but there was a lot of users to process. @Martin Urbanec: who may have input here. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello AmandaNP, thank you very much for your time and the results. Is it possible to have those compared to these previous ones? Best regards, Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 11:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Honestly, I don't think that would provide much information of help. I would only be able to give you Possible Possible or less to them if I checked them. I would have seen them if they were on the same network. Hope this helps. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:32, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hmsosndjxndj@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Hmsosndjxndj (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
AiNvZhuang (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
即係點啊 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts have a similar edit pattern as global locked LTA 名猿: They are interested in editing LGBT-related articles, with a perseverant use of the word 㚻 (an uncommonly used word in Chinese which means w:en:gay sexual practices, We would like a CU to see if it is just a coincidence or not. Itcfangye (talk) 00:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 喵了个好, AiNvZhuang, 黃嘉祺, 人俩关系, Hfvn, 叫我小仙女, 可採才以, ネスアイス, Honglvpo, Hmsosndjxndj, Fvbhhcghvfg, 攻めです, Ynsjd, Gfshbfgjfhhfgj, 迷路的鳄鱼, 重温一飞, 不知道是, 君が好きだ, Ghcgvdgcfxghdg, 即係點啊, 鹿茸茸, 克人儿, おっさんずラブ, 蓝鼠鼠

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser/2021-03&oldid=24893940"
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy