Steward requests/Checkuser/2023-09

Requests

ChandanWise@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

ChandanWise (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CareWikipidia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

SupportWikiTeam01 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Er.Logitech (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Vandalism MP1999📞 10:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Explaining why they should be investigated helps in handling this. Can you explain the basis for thinking they are the same user? --Sotiale (talk) 13:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

अजीत सोनकर - विकिपीडिया (wikipedia.org) Because he was doing vandalism again and again in the same article. MP1999📞 17:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

@Hasley can you check it? MP1999📞 15:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

MP1999, all but the last of these accounts were confirmed and subsequently blocked on enwiki a couple days ago. I have locked them along with some other socks (Er.ajeet, Er.ajeetsonkar, Kanishk8528, and SM072), given the cross-wiki abuse. No need to ping other stewards to check this request, though. Sgd. —Hasley 16:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

SiuMai@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

臭臭貓 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

The Streif (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/SiuMai

Reason(s): Compare with Steward requests/Checkuser/2022-01#SiuMai@zh.wikipedia (臭臭貓), various similarities between The Streif and 臭臭貓 and further other SiuMai socks. A check is requested to look for technical similarities (if possible), and also requesting for further actions to prevent further socks if confirmed. LuciferianThomas 06:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed 臭臭貓 and The Streif

Checkmate. --Sotiale (talk) 13:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Grigoris-Encyclopedia-2003@el.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Grigoris-Encyclopedia-2003 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

User-User-1001 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Wiki-User-206.633 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

KonstantinosEncyclopedia-User (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Konstantinos-2002-Gamer (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Mixalis-Encyclopedia-2003 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Expert-Encyclopedia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:el:Βικιπαίδεια:Μαριονέτα

Reason(s): Hello, following his recent block the first user in this list (the main account) created a couple more accounts to use during his block period, as per his won words. As a result and following my question, he confirmed that he, wilingly, avoided his blocking through this technique or pattern of creating socks. The two accounts that he claimed to be his were blocked, however, since he also claimed to have created a couple others and also menaced to keep creating more during his block period, I would like to know whether it would be possible to run a check to see if such - other - accounts, indeed, exist, or if we're staying to those two alone mentionned above. Thank you in advance for your time and help, and sorry for any syntax or wording mistakes as English isn't my mother tongue. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 15:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

@Εὐθυμένης: I have also added the accounts "KonstantinosEncyclopedia-User", "Konstantinos-2002-Gamer", "Mixalis-Encyclopedia-2003", and "Expert-Encyclopedia", who have been tagged as their suspected socks; the last two are already blocked indef. based on their edit pattern. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 17:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

PS. Possibly there are many more sleepers. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 17:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Nick9.146.299, User-User-1001, Krazy-Wpedia, Grigoris-Encyclopedia-2003, Serezis, Kanellos-Studio,Artist Laboratory, Fact of Emcyclopedia, Studio-Kanelos-Art

This is an interim confirmation result, and I did this because of a sudden business meeting. I will publish more within the day. --Sotiale (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Wiki-User-206.633, Mixalis-Encyclopedia-2003, Expert-Encyclopedia, KonstantinosEncyclopedia-User, Dlsiphone23, Nick9.146.299, User-User-1001, Krazy-Wpedia, Grigoris-Encyclopedia-2003, Serezis, Kanellos-Studio,Artist Laboratory, Fact of Emcyclopedia, Studio-Kanelos-Art
• Stale Konstantinos-2002-Gamer

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Lehkožyfka těžkomorka@el.wiktionary

Status:    Done

List of users

Lehkožyfka těžkomorka (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Eurotschumil (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Sockpuppet

Reason(s): User Lehkožyfka těžkomorka, with few edits on el/Wiktionary, reappeared the other day, contibuting in a somehow problematic way, and was blocked for a day for an ironic and insultive comment they made against myself, while -at the same time- refrain from asking some questions concerning the quality of their edits. User Eurotschumil appeared today, out of the blue, for the first time on el/Wiktionary, making two problematic edits: the first one was on an article that I created a few days ago on a rather rare French "complex" male given name, and the second one on on an article about an extremely rare Greek surname of Turkish origin, an article that -̠by chance ?- I was editing yesterday, Quite impressive "finds" for a newbieǃ Furthetmore, both users are mostly active on cs/Wiktionary, and both accounts were created on the very same day, on March 31, 2022 (see [1] & [2]). ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 11:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Eurotschumil, Lehkožyfka těžkomorka

From a technical point of view. Of course, what kind of actual relationship they have will be determined on localwiki. --Sotiale (talk) 12:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

@Sotiale Thanx Sotiale. Don't you think that the sysops of cs/Wiktionary have to be warned on the results of the CU ? ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

If you think it's necessary, let them know. --Sotiale (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Lincoln229@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Deranng0712 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Carriagelau0414 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Lincoln229 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:維基百科:傀儡調查/案件/Lincoln229

Reason(s): Please note that Lincoln229 is stale yet was determined as the main account for this case. This check is primarily aimed to check for sleepers. Previous cases have deemed Deranng0712 as duck for the main account and is presented simply for comparison. Recently, Carriagelau0414 surfaced and conduct highly similar editing behavior align with the editing behavior with the main account as well, which makes the community suspect there may be other sleepers. Thanks in advance. $\int$（☎） 18:28, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Aquaria042978, 白卡仔伍令勤, Charlottemow0301, Carriagelau0414, Deranng0712, មៅ យុនស៊ី, Windyzhan0302, 力勤先生

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 23:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

GFREEEQ@ks.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

GFREEEQ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

AYAAN MANZOOR (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Haputq (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

ASTEWW (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Example

Reason(s): Users show same editing patterns and are interested in same topics. The users have amazing intrest in creating a non notable article which was deleted once. AYAAN MAZOOR seems to be blocked on Wikidata as a Sock.

_signed, 511KeV ^(talk) 02:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

See also d:Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/DBplus. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 07:42, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure if this is the same user as DBplus before and the data is different, but the accounts requested now (excluding Stale two accounts; AYAAN MANZOOR and Haputq) are a user called 'Wh+67' and an xwiki spammer. Everything will be handled accordingly. I will not list their accounts separately. Because all their accounts will be locked. Thank you for reporting. --Sotiale (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Oh, I found enough evidence. They are the same users as DBplus on wikidatawiki. --Sotiale (talk) 07:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

GreatCimgShot@sk.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

GreatCimgShot (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

I will cum inside your Pussy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Mrdavyclovek (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

92.52.57.120 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Long-term vandalism from ad-hoc created vulgar accounts, possible correlation. Teslaton (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Teslaton. Could you please explain in more detail how there is doubt between GreatCimgShot and the other two accounts? And as you may know, the IP is just a reference and will not be subject to investigation as we cannot reveal the relationship between the IP and their accounts. --Sotiale (talk) 08:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Hi. Username (GreatCimgShot) is similar to older abusive accounts (there is several year history of this kind of abuse from his side - see "Jednorázový provokačný účet, vulg." block summaries on skiwki, these are just few most recent cases), same interests, same articles, inserting of the same (copvio [3]) images. --Teslaton (talk) 08:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Group 1: I will cum inside your Pussy, Shrek is life, shrek is love, shrek is your mom, Di La Kwai, Tsing Schwanz Fotze
•  Confirmed Group 2: Mrdavyclovek and GreatCimgShot

---

• Possible Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. Personally, if group 1 and 2 had any overlap in contributions or patterns, I would consider them the same user. --Sotiale (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Vegan3x@ro.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Vegan3x (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Viktorbk0 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: ro:Wikipedia:Pagini_de_recuperat/Claudiu_Dumitrache_(3)

Reason(s): The article has been historically pushed byh the subject himself through numerous clones. I strongly suspect the same behavior is occuring here.. Strainu (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Possible. Further, Vegan2x = Vegan3x.  No comment with respect to IP address(es) -- Amanda (she/her) 04:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Johnathen04@sk.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Johnathen04 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

BusAllAroundFan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

GreatCimgShot (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Mrdavyclovek (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

I will cum inside your Pussy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Following the recent positive check [4] (GreatCimgShot, Mrdavyclovek, I will cum inside your Pussy). Long-term vandalism from ad-hoc created accounts, often vulgar, inserting of copyvio material (both text and images). --Teslaton (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

• Possible(Johnathen04, BusAllAroundFan) and recent check accounts

From a technical point of view. If their behavior patterns are similar, it is very likely that they are the same user. --Sotiale (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

589wesleywiki@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

589wesleywiki (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

HK TV I LOVE (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Tcshek(TC ) (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/589wesleywiki

Reason(s): Similar editing behaviour adding excessively detailed content on the same topics. Since there could be quite a chance of just being a bunch of fanatics posting fancruft, a check is requested to see if there is actual technical relations between the three. Please also lock account 3 for potential impersonation of Tcshek. LuciferianThomas 08:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed HK TV I LOVE, Tcshek(TC ), 589wesleywiki

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

HenryLam2023@hr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

HenryLam2023 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Henry2023 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Example

Reason(s): I don't know where exactly to post this. It seems that User:HenryLam2023 and User:Henry2023 are the same user. Henry2023's account has been previously globally locked (LTA). HenryLam2023 is already blocked on no., sr., is., ko., ro., zh-yue. wikis. Croxyz (talk) 13:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Ehh.. It's been a long time since I saw this guy; Henry425. If you find one, please post it on SRG immediately. This user is not meaningful enough to post here. --Sotiale (talk) 14:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

LeonChow99@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

林熙隆 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

林敬益 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Malaysia China (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/LeonChow99

Reason(s): Sleeper check for LTA:LeonChow99 socks as the first two accounts seem to be created almost at the same time. LuciferianThomas 00:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Leslie cheung jin hui, Leslie cheung jin ming, 林熙隆, 王维娜, 林敬益, 张国荣好声音, 林良实, 张明添, Xy pretty girl, Xy pretty, Joseph stalin corruption, Xy is a pretty girl, Datuk Seri Tan Ting Rui, 嗯嗯谢谢
• Stale Malaysia China

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 02:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Tommy860119@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

何闌力 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

公休 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

苟肅 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Tommy860119

Reason(s): Account 1 has similar editing activities with sock group Tommy860119 in bus-related articles (especially leaving HTML comments), but not enough to make me 100% confirm their relationship. Requesting a check with other reported sockpuppets. LuciferianThomas 00:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed 公休, 談義伍, 流煌肅, 戴摩王, 何闌力, 魏勇忠, 粉絲控, 聞財, 苟肅, 里車名, 龔優, 劉定堅, 畢賞覃寬

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 02:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Rahmat Fajri Maulana Terbaru@min.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

List of users

Rahmat Fajri Maulana Terbaru (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

HILMAN MAXADRASA 2020 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rahmot Fajro Maulano (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rahmatfajrimaulana.minangkabau (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rahmat Fajri Maulana 2007 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

MUHAMMAD ISI AKBAR 2023 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Vandal-only spam account, likely the same people editing in the same topic. dwadieff ✉ 10:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi. It would be helpful if you could explain why this investigation is necessary. If you suspect that they have hidden accounts, you can explain it with evidence. --Sotiale (talk) 12:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Please request again when needed. Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 11:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Thai-khmer learn@ro.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

List of users

Thai-khmer learn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Axion76 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Modafi89 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Gherdac (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Țapioy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): LTA ro.wikipedia.org vandal. I am quite sure that Axion76 is another sockpuppet, but I want to be certain. There is also the possibility of sleepers. --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 09:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Group 1: Myook, Caca-n pantaloni, Vhihik0, Politica numelui de utillizator, Modafi89, Irismeister suge pula, Modafi89 retardat și libidinos, Adormităl, Petrodav, Ochii din umbră, Noapte lină, Pafsanias - PRost, Adormităl2, Ionutzmovie - o mare varza, Țapioy, Victor Blacug, Andrei Stroe - un pampalau, Andrei Stroe - retardat, Gherdac, Uite încă un prost. Înjură și suge pula., Bhasrret, Omul retardat și libidinos, Adrianbacula, Adrianbaculabot, Alesaru, Axion76, AutoconfirmedBot, Nu-mi șterge paginile!, Romică Țociu, Dicta mamo chibori, Flaviu Blocau, User colaboration, Seniooooooooooooooooooooor, Axion76-bot, Romiicțociu, Axioil76, Ui90poik2, Ui90poik, Rettttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Bardddddddddddddddddddda, 315234juikaplioi67889090, Pulica34, Victor Blacus a murit, Victor Blacus, Pafsanias și Andrei Stroe se pregătesc să sugă pula, NGC 54 vrea să mă blocheze, NGC 54 suge pula, Adalbert E.Gyuris, Mișuleț, Tzociu, Țociu, Tzancă Uraganu, Þýù9ķľ⁹j, Iftode Marian Alesaru, Dino Moiranu, Tudor Adormitul
• Unlikely Thai-khmer learn and Group 1

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

TheGreekEditor2023@el.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

List of users

TheGreekEditor2023 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Grigoris-Encyclopedia-2003 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Today, the admin Εὐθυμένης blocked the former user in Greek Wikipedia, with the reasoning of being a sockpuppet of the latter account. Although the user was registered in 4th September 2023 (the day when Grigoris-Encyclopedia was banned for sockpuppeting), their editing pattern looks well different (former account is mostly adding links based on suggested links software, latter account didn't made any such edits) and the owner of the former account contacted me today in private, claiming that he has no relation with the other account. I kindly ask a CU check for the two accounts, in order to see if there's relationship. NikosLikomitros (talk) 15:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

• Unrelated TheGreekEditor2023 and Grigoris-Encyclopedia-2003

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

@Sotiale Thank you for checking. I lifted the ban accordingly. NikosLikomitros (talk) 17:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Artcriticarmenia@ta.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Artcriticarmenia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

VictorGevork (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Tigranhzor (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: local policy link is same as en.wiki policy

Reason(s): These three users are keen on editing a biography article which is not written as per guideline. Therefore, a delete tag was placed and these 3 users were removing deletion tag several times and ignore all warnings. These three user engage in similar draft article in en.wiki too. Could you check if there any more IDs? AntanO 13:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed from a technical point of view. Also found and confirmed Poovarasanthiru, who is already locally blocked, Editorialseer and Memoryjournalist. @AntanO: --Superpes15 (talk) 10:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)