Simon McGrath
Related Authors
Muqtedar Khan
University of Delaware
Judith L Green
University of California, Santa Barbara
George K. # Zarifis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Andreas Umland
National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Paul R Carr
Université du Québec en Outaouais
Oludamini Ogunnaike
University of Virginia
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Leesa Wheelahan
University of Toronto
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
InterestsView All (13)
Uploads
Papers by Simon McGrath
The purpose of this paper is to explore the complexity of developing into an international institution from the perspective of higher education leaders through the case study of one institution engaged in institutional transformation.
Design/methodology/approach
This study employs the qualitative approach and involves in-depth interviews with key institutional managers.
Findings
Findings suggest internationalization is a dynamic change process that goes beyond the rational and predictive elements of internationalization and cannot be confined to the rational planning and grand plans solely at institutional level. Reciprocal influence of different levels of analysis – institution, society and the nation – needs to be acknowledged and internationalization efforts need to go beyond the confines of the institution and extend into the society and the nation as a whole.
Originality/value
Internationalization of higher education has been widely examined, but the reciprocal influence of different levels of analysis on the internationalization efforts of higher education institutions is thin to which this paper contributes.
For the full-text: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JOCM-10-2015-0185
The purpose of this paper is to explore the complexity of developing into an international institution from the perspective of higher education leaders through the case study of one institution engaged in institutional transformation.
Design/methodology/approach
This study employs the qualitative approach and involves in-depth interviews with key institutional managers.
Findings
Findings suggest internationalization is a dynamic change process that goes beyond the rational and predictive elements of internationalization and cannot be confined to the rational planning and grand plans solely at institutional level. Reciprocal influence of different levels of analysis – institution, society and the nation – needs to be acknowledged and internationalization efforts need to go beyond the confines of the institution and extend into the society and the nation as a whole.
Originality/value
Internationalization of higher education has been widely examined, but the reciprocal influence of different levels of analysis on the internationalization efforts of higher education institutions is thin to which this paper contributes.
For the full-text: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JOCM-10-2015-0185
The moment is ripe to go beyond critique to develop a new approach. There are two major global policy moves that support this. First, the arrival of the SDGs forces us to ask how VET might fit into a global vision for sustainable development. Second, UNESCO’s new TVET Strategy, 2016-20 seeks to balance the traditional focus of VET on youth employment with a strong commitment to equity and reducing gender inequality, and to promoting sustainable development. Moreover, this is all underpinned by an emphasis on human development and the need to think more seriously about skills for life as well as for work.
If we are going to talk about VET quality in the light of the SDGs, it becomes necessary to ask very different questions than have characterised the debate in recent decades. The logic of the SDGs and the vision of UNESCO fundamentally change understandings of the purpose of VET and require us to think about quality in ways that talk to how far this transformed vision is being achieved. Moreover, in thinking about quality not just as a summative evaluation but as a process of improvement, the new vision suggests the need to revisit existing processes of improving VET quality.
Whilst we are critical of the existing focus on employability and human capital, this is not because we think that these are unimportant. Rather, it is because we insist on these being a partial rather than the exclusive answer so many of their proponents imply. To make it clear that we are not rejecting employability as a component of the quality VET debate, we will organise this paper around the search for an expanded notion of employability. This is informed by a range of work in the employability literature that rejects the narrow “initiative employability” account that has predominated in Anglophone accounts.
Through exploring what “expanded employability” looks like, we can then start to ask what this implies for thinking, and action, about VET quality. Drawing on the human development and capabilities approach, here we offer a five-part characterisation of what an expanded employability notion might look like:
1. a broader awareness of who accesses public VET and why, focusing on data on motivations for accessing VET;
2. a broader conception of what is valued, with a particular emphasis on what learners value. This leads to an exploration of capability lists but also questions of aspirations;
3. a broader understanding of what is in the way of achieving successful outcomes from VET, with a particular emphasis on the multi-dimensional nature of poverty, of endowments and the challenges of conversion;
4. a broader sense of shared responsibility for employability, grounded in an insistence on a political economy of skills reading; and
5. a broader engagement with questions of sustainability, with particular attention to notions of sustainable work, production and consumption.