Skip to main content
Bioinformatics logoLink to Bioinformatics
. 2015 Jul 23;31(22):3676–3678. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv423

CRISPR-ERA: a comprehensive design tool for CRISPR-mediated gene editing, repression and activation

Honglei Liu 1,2, Zheng Wei 1, Antonia Dominguez 3, Yanda Li 1, Xiaowo Wang 1,*, Lei S Qi 2,3,4,*
PMCID: PMC4757951  PMID: 26209430

Abstract

Summary: The CRISPR/Cas9 system was recently developed as a powerful and flexible technology for targeted genome engineering, including genome editing (altering the genetic sequence) and gene regulation (without altering the genetic sequence). These applications require the design of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) that are efficient and specific. However, this remains challenging, as it requires the consideration of many criteria. Several sgRNA design tools have been developed for gene editing, but currently there is no tool for the design of sgRNAs for gene regulation. With accumulating experimental data on the use of CRISPR/Cas9 for gene editing and regulation, we implement a comprehensive computational tool based on a set of sgRNA design rules summarized from these published reports. We report a genome-wide sgRNA design tool and provide an online website for predicting sgRNAs that are efficient and specific. We name the tool CRISPR-ERA, for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-mediated editing, repression, and activation (ERA).

Availability and implementation: http://CRISPR-ERA.stanford.edu.

Contact: stanley.qi@stanford.edu or xwwang@tsinghua.edu.cn

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

1 Introduction

The bacterial adaptive immune system, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats), was recently developed as a powerful and multi-purpose technology for genome engineering, including editing (modifying the genomic sequence) (Cong et al., 2013; Mali et al., 2013), and regulation (repressing or activating expression of genes) (Gilbert et al., 2013, 2014; Qi et al., 2013). The system is highly programmable, utilizing a single protein, the nuclease Cas9 for editing or the nuclease-deficient dCas9 for regulation. A single guide RNA (sgRNA) is required for precise and programmable DNA targeting (Doudna and Charpentier, 2014). Effective and specific genome engineering requires careful design of sgRNAs, which remains a major challenge. Computational tools have been used to facilitate the design of sgRNAs for CRISPR editing but not for other applications such as transcriptional regulation. These computational tools should enable automated sgRNA design and off-target site validation (Bae et al., 2014; Doench et al., 2014; Heigwer et al., 2014; O'Brien and Bailey, 2014; Xiao et al., 2014). A major goal of our designer tool is to address the discrepancy for designing sgRNAs that allow efficient and highly specific repression or activation of genes and for generating genome-wide sgRNA libraries for genetic screening in different organisms.

Here, we describe CRISPR-ERA webserver, an automated and comprehensive sgRNA design tool for CRISPR-mediated editing, repression, and activation (ERA) (Fig. 1). CRISPR-ERA utilizes a fast algorithm to search for genome-wide sgRNA binding sites and evaluates their efficiency and specificity using a set of rules summarized from published data for CRISPR editing, repression and activation (Cong et al., 2013; Doudna and Charpentier, 2014; Gilbert et al., 2014; Qi et al., 2013; Ran et al., 2013). The design features are annotated and the target sites can be visualized in a genome browser. We also provide a local version for the generation of whole-genome sgRNA libraries.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

CRISPR-ERA workflow and example. The CRISPR-ERA algorithm takes input information, including types of genome manipulation, organism, and gene name or genome location, and then computes and evaluates sgRNAs within the targeted genome region. By default, for editing, the algorithm chooses sgRNA sequences within coding region; for repression, the algorithm computes sgRNA binding sites within a 3 kb region centered at TSS (or the sense strand of the 5′ end of the gene for bacteria only); for activation, the algorithm computes sgRNA binding sites up to 1.5 kb upstream of TSS. In this figure, mouse gene Sox2 is shown as an example. E, efficacy score; S, specificity penalty score (Supplementary Methods)

2 Methods

For each target gene or genomic site, CRISPR-ERA first searches all targetable sites in that particular organism for patterns of N20NGG (N = any nucleotide). Each target sequence is then calculated for two scores (Supplementary Methods): (i) an efficacy score (E-score) based on the sequence features such as GC content (%GC), presence of poly-thymidine (which is a terminator for effective transcription of sgRNAs), and location information such as the distance from target gene transcriptional start sites (TSS); and (ii) a specificity score (S-score) based on the genome-wide off-target binding sites. For each sgRNA design, we compute the genome-wide sequences that contain an adjacent NRG (R = A or G) protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site and zero, one, two, or three mismatches complementary to the sgRNA using Bowtie (Langmead et al., 2009), which are regarded as off-target binding sites. The penalty score for NAG off-target is smaller than NGG off-target. The sgRNAs are finally ranked by the sum of E-score and S-score (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1).

We implement a user-friendly web server (http://CRISPR-ERA.stanford.edu) that hosts the web application for the sgRNA designer tool. The webserver will host a broad category of sequenced organisms. Currently, it provides sgRNA design service for nine most commonly used prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms including Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Danio rerio, Rattus norvegicus, Mus musculus, and Homo sapiens, etc. (Supplementary Table S1.). The web application enables rapid searching in the pre-assembled sgRNA database using an indexing searching approach (Supplementary Methods). The program outputs the sequence, target location, off-target details of the possible sgRNAs, their E- and S-scores etc. Results can be visualized using the UCSC genome browser to highlight the custom tracks (Supplementary Fig. S2 and S3).

3 Conclusions

CRISPR-ERA enables easy, fast, and predictive design of sgRNAs for broad applications of CRISPR in genome editing, gene repression and activation. The tool can be applied to other types of CRISPR applications such as genome imaging (Chen et al., 2013) and CRISPR synthetic circuit design (Kiani et al., 2014), and expanded to other organisms. We also provide the source code for the generation of whole-genome sgRNA libraries, useful for genome-wide screening based on CRISPR, CRISPRi or CRISPRa (Gilbert et al., 2014, Shalem et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Funding

L.S.Q. acknowledges support from NIH Office of The Director (OD), and National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR). H.L., Z.W., Y.L. and X.W. are supported by the 973 program (2012CB316503>), NSFC (grant number 61322310>, 31371341>) and FANEDD (grant number 201158>). This work was also supported by NIH Director’s Early Independence Award (grant number OD017887>, L.S.Q.) and NIH R01 (grant number DA036858>, L.S.Q.).

Conflict of Interest: none declared.

References

  1. Bae S., et al. (2014) Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics, 30, 1473–1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen B., et al. (2013) Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell, 155, 1479–1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cong L., et al. (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 339, 819–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doench J.G., et al. (2014) Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 1262–1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doudna J.A., Charpentier E. (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346, 1258096–1258096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilbert L.A., et al. (2013) CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell, 154, 442–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilbert L.A., et al. (2014) Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell, 159, 647–661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heigwer F., et al. (2014) E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification. Nat. Methods, 11, 122–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiani S., et al. (2014) CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods, 11, 723–726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Langmead B., et al. (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol., 10, R25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mali P., et al. (2013) RNA-guided human genome Engineering via Cas9. Science, 339, 823–826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Brien A., Bailey T.L. (2014) GT-Scan: identifying unique genomic targets. Bioinformatics, 30, 2673–2675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Qi L.S., et al. (2013) Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell, 152, 1173–1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ran F.A., et al. (2013) Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell, 155, 479–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shalem O., et al. (2013) Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science, 343, 84–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang T., et al. (2013) Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science, 343, 80–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Xiao A., et al. (2014) CasOT: a genome-wide Cas9/gRNA off-target searching tool. Bioinformatics, 30, 1180–1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy