Rada Varga
Related Authors
Riccardo Vecchiato
Universität zu Köln
François Queyrel
EPHE
Vasiliki MACHAIRA
Academy of Athens
KALLIOPE BAIRAMI
Ministry of Culture
Holger Schwarzer
University of Münster
Thilo Rehren
The Cyprus Institute
Eftychia Stavrianopoulou
Universität Heidelberg
Marco Vitale
University of Basel
Sebastian Prignitz
Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities
InterestsView All (15)
Uploads
Books by Rada Varga
Rada Varga is a researcher at Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca (Romania) specialising in Latin epigraphy, digital classics, prosopography and provincial archaeology (co-directing the excavations at the fortress of ala I milliaria Batavorum from Dacia). Her main project is Romans1by1, a prosopographical database for people attested in ancient epigraphy. Currently, Dr Varga is a member of the executive committee of EADH (The European Association for Digital Humanities).
This monograph intends to cover a gap in historiography, but as well to open the way for appropriate conservation and historical and touristic recovery of the ancient vestiges from c.
The title directly refers to an inscription (IDRE II 411) found at Apamea, in which a soldier says he was born Dacia ad Vatabos. The geographical clue most probably hints at the Batavian troop stationed in the area of the studied settlement and the novel lexical form (reversal of v and b, Batavos being the correct form), could be the indicative of a regional or provincial phonetic specificity.
Regarding the prehistoric and protohistoric ages, the archaeological artifacts, mainly discovered and recovered by accident, highlight a continuous dwelling, starting from the Neolithic times. Except for an emergency survey from 1960, there were no actual archaeological excavations aiming at the pre- and protohistoric vestiges. This created considerable gaps in our knowledge, particularly regarding the details of habitat (the exact areas of housing, housing types etc.) and the exact sequence of cultural phases and sub-phases. The Petreşti, Wiettenberg and Coţofeni cultures are well represented by pottery and lithic material but there also are attested other cultural phases and cultures, that put more colour into picture of the settlement during prehistory. The Dacian period is not archaeologically attested at Războieni-Cetate, as it is in many villages around it.
But after the conquest, here was the garrison of the most important auxiliary troop from Roman Dacia: Ala I Batavorum milliaria. The fortress, today mainly covered by crops, is well visible on aerial photographs. Due to these photos, the coordinates of the fortress were established and we were able cu place it on the map. As well, its size can now be correctly determined, the camp being of about 6 ha large.
Our knowledge on the afferent civil settlement or settlements is still somehow lacunose. As no archaeological excavations have ever been made in the civil areas of the settlement, we can only remark – due to the same aerial photographs – the existence of two habitation cores, both situated rather close to the fortress’s walls. One of the areas might have been an “industrial” one, with workshops and craftsmen’s shops.
The Roman necropolis was identified through I. H. Crişan’s excavations during the ‘60s. Its area is not clearly delimited, but the discoveries connected to it suggest a large burial place, with a series of complex funerary monuments.
Establishing a nest of connections between the ethnic specificity of the troop and the material culture revealed by the existing artifacts appears at this point as challenging. Some archaeological pieces, such as the inscription of Hercules Magusanus, suggest a cultural and cult environment touched by the Batavian influences. On the other side, most of the artifacts show us no more than a Roman provincial society, mixed in essence and fundamentally unmarked by the ethnic specificity of the ala.
Economically, the site must have been one of the most prominent non-urban settlements of Dacia. Its most obvious proof is the large quantity of Roman artifact, as well as the ease of their discovery inside the borders of the village. For the future, the main stake is finding the proper ways for understanding the internal structures of this community, of its society and spiritual life, as well as the real engines of its economical and commercial activity.
For the post-Roman era, the archaeological discoveries made in Războieni-Cetate are scarce, almost absent. What we have are a few pottery fragments, dated during the migrations’ period. In the final chapter of the paper, we have offered a very succinct overview on the early medieval centuries as well. What we could draw are general considerations, as the history of the village for these years is practically unknown. The paper stops, chronologically, with the first written documentations of the medieval settlement – official Hungarian papers, dated 17th of September 1289 and 12th of March 1291, where the village of Feuldvar is mentioned. The name, slightly modified, will be conserved until modern times.
Lastly, we draw attention once more on the complexity of the discoveries from Războieni-Cetate. As well, we express our strong belief that this monograph comes as a first step on the way of the proper fructification of all the archaeological data that this site has to offer.
Papers by Rada Varga
Rada Varga is a researcher at Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca (Romania) specialising in Latin epigraphy, digital classics, prosopography and provincial archaeology (co-directing the excavations at the fortress of ala I milliaria Batavorum from Dacia). Her main project is Romans1by1, a prosopographical database for people attested in ancient epigraphy. Currently, Dr Varga is a member of the executive committee of EADH (The European Association for Digital Humanities).
This monograph intends to cover a gap in historiography, but as well to open the way for appropriate conservation and historical and touristic recovery of the ancient vestiges from c.
The title directly refers to an inscription (IDRE II 411) found at Apamea, in which a soldier says he was born Dacia ad Vatabos. The geographical clue most probably hints at the Batavian troop stationed in the area of the studied settlement and the novel lexical form (reversal of v and b, Batavos being the correct form), could be the indicative of a regional or provincial phonetic specificity.
Regarding the prehistoric and protohistoric ages, the archaeological artifacts, mainly discovered and recovered by accident, highlight a continuous dwelling, starting from the Neolithic times. Except for an emergency survey from 1960, there were no actual archaeological excavations aiming at the pre- and protohistoric vestiges. This created considerable gaps in our knowledge, particularly regarding the details of habitat (the exact areas of housing, housing types etc.) and the exact sequence of cultural phases and sub-phases. The Petreşti, Wiettenberg and Coţofeni cultures are well represented by pottery and lithic material but there also are attested other cultural phases and cultures, that put more colour into picture of the settlement during prehistory. The Dacian period is not archaeologically attested at Războieni-Cetate, as it is in many villages around it.
But after the conquest, here was the garrison of the most important auxiliary troop from Roman Dacia: Ala I Batavorum milliaria. The fortress, today mainly covered by crops, is well visible on aerial photographs. Due to these photos, the coordinates of the fortress were established and we were able cu place it on the map. As well, its size can now be correctly determined, the camp being of about 6 ha large.
Our knowledge on the afferent civil settlement or settlements is still somehow lacunose. As no archaeological excavations have ever been made in the civil areas of the settlement, we can only remark – due to the same aerial photographs – the existence of two habitation cores, both situated rather close to the fortress’s walls. One of the areas might have been an “industrial” one, with workshops and craftsmen’s shops.
The Roman necropolis was identified through I. H. Crişan’s excavations during the ‘60s. Its area is not clearly delimited, but the discoveries connected to it suggest a large burial place, with a series of complex funerary monuments.
Establishing a nest of connections between the ethnic specificity of the troop and the material culture revealed by the existing artifacts appears at this point as challenging. Some archaeological pieces, such as the inscription of Hercules Magusanus, suggest a cultural and cult environment touched by the Batavian influences. On the other side, most of the artifacts show us no more than a Roman provincial society, mixed in essence and fundamentally unmarked by the ethnic specificity of the ala.
Economically, the site must have been one of the most prominent non-urban settlements of Dacia. Its most obvious proof is the large quantity of Roman artifact, as well as the ease of their discovery inside the borders of the village. For the future, the main stake is finding the proper ways for understanding the internal structures of this community, of its society and spiritual life, as well as the real engines of its economical and commercial activity.
For the post-Roman era, the archaeological discoveries made in Războieni-Cetate are scarce, almost absent. What we have are a few pottery fragments, dated during the migrations’ period. In the final chapter of the paper, we have offered a very succinct overview on the early medieval centuries as well. What we could draw are general considerations, as the history of the village for these years is practically unknown. The paper stops, chronologically, with the first written documentations of the medieval settlement – official Hungarian papers, dated 17th of September 1289 and 12th of March 1291, where the village of Feuldvar is mentioned. The name, slightly modified, will be conserved until modern times.
Lastly, we draw attention once more on the complexity of the discoveries from Războieni-Cetate. As well, we express our strong belief that this monograph comes as a first step on the way of the proper fructification of all the archaeological data that this site has to offer.
was discovered at Războieni-Cetate (Alba County, RO), the site where the ala I Batavorum
milliaria was stationed in Dacia between (approx.) 130–271 AD. The monument
most probably dates from the first half of the 3rd century. Along with the ceramic imports
coming from the Rhine area discovered on site, the presence of this deity indicates a Batavian
cultural substratum of the settlement, preserved over time, even when the recruits of
the ala were not generally coming from that given region anymore.