Gretta Pecl
Address: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
less
Related Authors
Noel B. Salazar
KU Leuven
Julian D Reynolds
Trinity College Dublin
Eve Emshwiller
University of Wisconsin-Madison
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Jana Javornik
University of East London
Daniel Robledo
Centro de Investigacion y Estudios Avanzados del IPN
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Kevin Arbuckle
Swansea University
Simon Springer
The University of Newcastle
Cymene Howe
Rice University
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Gretta Pecl
The purpose of this meeting report is to provide an informal document that summarises much of the research activity currently occuring within the southeast region of Australia, and provide the contact details of key researchers, to facilitate better networking and communication between relevant researchers working in the region. Additionally, it was considered a priority to document the outcomes of the discussions held on the day.
Discussion topics included ‘synergies with regard to data requirements – project needs and wants’ and issues around ‘engagement, communication and extension’. Many participants felt that there was a miss-match between the spatial resolution of models and oceanographic data that was more readily available (better off-shore) and that which was required for many biological projects (most of which are concentrated closer to the coast). Many projects also require social and economic data although most of these projects were at initial stages and it was unclear to what extent projects could collaborate in the sourcing or production of suitable data.
Several participants noted that many current projects in the south-east, particularly those working in the adaptation area, involved participatory approaches (e.g. workshops and surveys with industry). With this in mind, and considering that adaptation options when/if implemented require the support of industry and community, ongoing community and industry engagement is essential. Support for the development of extension networks and stronger collaborations and communication between researchers and extension officers was identified as a need and incorporating financial support for extension officers in research grant budgets was considered an option.
Given this meeting brought together over 40 researchers working on marine climate change within the south-east, it presented a unique opportunity to conduct a ‘gaps analysis’ of the National Adapation Research Plan for Marine Biodiversity and Resources. The second two discussion items, ‘Identifying critical gaps and opportunities that deserve additional attention’ and ‘Potential for future collaboration’ related directly to this gaps analysis.
Improving monitoring capacity in the south-east was identified as critically important. This included establishing priorities for monitoring in a cost effective program and extension into social and economic domains, and better coordination of existing monitoring already being conducted. Long term datasets will be of key importance for addressing issues of attribution, validating the projection models presently being developed and in determining our success in decades to come in terms of developing and implementing adaptation options in the south-east region of Australia.
If participants at this meeting now have a greater awareness of each other’s projects and will consider synergies and future opportunities to address the challenges presented by climate change, then this workshop will have been valuable. Future meetings of a similar style may be convened in future.
Marine industries play important roles in sustaining the livelihoods of people in coastal rural towns. Increasing food production, minimising carbon emissions and prioritising carbon sequestration opportunities are key issues facing both countries and form the basis of this research plan.
In addressing these issues India and Australia are well placed to become leaders in the development of adaptation options, and pioneers of transformational industries.