UNIFIED PROOF THEORY OF NATHAN LARKIN COPPEDGE 2021/08/31 “UNIFIED PROOF THEORY”, LOCATED ON QUORA.COM BY NATHAN LARKIN COPPEDGE https://theoryofeverything.quora.com/Unified-Proof-Theory REPRODUCIBLE IF MY NAME STAYS WITH THE WORK FOR EDUCATIONAL AND OTHER PURPOSES THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT INTENTIONALLY MADE AVAILABLE ON USB TO BE DISTRIBUTED IN A PUBLIC AREA PERMISSION IS GRANTED TO KEEP ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS ON RECORD FOR ANY APPLICATION. PROPRIETARY OWNERSHIP IS NOT GRANTED. THESE MATERIALS MUST REMAIN FREE UNDER MY NAME DERIVATIVE WORKS MAY BE PROPRIETARY IF APPLICABLE LAW PERMITS UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS NATHAN COPPEDGE IN NO WAY GRANTS OTHERS TO USE HIS CONTENT AS AN EXCLUSIVE BRAND FURTHER MARKETING IS PERMITTED BUT CONDITIONS MUST GRANT SUFFICIENT DIGNITY TO THE AUTHOR UNIFIED PROOF THEORY --- NATHAN COPPEDGE June 3, 2021. Mostly completed August 31, 2021. An attempt to distill work on coherence into a concise linear proof process. A development of: • • Coherent Proof Theory (…) History of Coherence (…) See also: • • Theory of Everything on One Page (…) Premier Questions (…) NOTE THIS WORK NOW HAS SOME DEGREE OF COMPLETENESS, THEREFORE INTERPOLATE IF YOU WISH SYSTEMIC ARGUMENT FOR NATHAN COPPEDGE’S CATEGORICAL DEDUCTION (1) Every term has an opposite that can be imagined. (2) Opposites have associations. (3) Opposites can exist in a bounded Cartesian Coordinate System. (4) Opposites must be opposed along the diagonal, because it is the furthest possible distance. (5) Only opposites are contradictory. (6) Therefore, terms that are non-opposite can be compared. (7) Each opposite pair measures coherence, since it has an infinite span. (8) True opposites must remain in opposite positions during comparisons. (9) Contingent relations alternate while retaining opposites in opposite positions. (10) Exponential efficiency (fewer deductions than categories). (11) Optionally, it may be important to use a language in which states and qualities are roughly scientifically equivalent, since this makes sentence-forming easier. —Can philosophy be axiomatized? … QUADRA KNOWLEDGE A Adjective 1 (part of a polar opposite pair of adjectives). B Noun 1 (part of a polar opposite pair of nouns). C Polar opposite of Adjective 1. D Polar opposite of Noun 1. … For second deduction, reverse the positions of 4 and 2, keeping the other positions. With a few mostly standard neutral connectives (is, as, just as, when, so, as such, so that, and and as such), the steps can now be read, forming sentences. (Overall formula for objective knowledge is AB:CD and AD:CB, both equally valid where both opposites in both pairs are concerned. Polar opposites must be kept in diagonally opposite positions so as not to contradict one another). … PROBLEM-SOLVING Any half of such a diagram, and one half solves the other. (Terms like problem and solution must still be used in diagonally opposite positions if the context is not paradoxical. The general formula is Paroxysm: A solution to paradoxes is the opposite of every word in the same order as the problem). … RELEVANT QUESTION AT A GIVEN TIME 1. Polar opposite category of subject (Note: in this formula it is permitted to use a general opposite if no specific opposite can be found). 2. Add a collective description of the most unrelated opposite pair. {Thus, the meaning of guessing questions is just how to extend the set into the contingent axis}. … … SOULS OF PITHINESS … 1. {(Adj 1 to Opp Adj 1 summarized) + (Noun 1 to Opp Noun 1 summarized)} = Title. 2. Noun for (Adj 1 to Opp Adj 1 summarized) + Opp of (Noun 1 to Opp Noun 1 summarized) + (Result of Noun and Opposite together) + Opposite of same Noun = Soul. So, here is the general procedure for translating knowledge into souls: Knowledge: {AB:CD and AD:CB} Basic Questions Per Query: The question (A) is C: B-D The question (B) is D: C-A The question (C) is A: D-B The question (D) is B: A-C … Basic Souls of Information Per Query: The soul of A question is BCAD or DCAB. The soul of B question is CDBA or ADBC. The soul of C question is DACB or BACD The soul of D question is ABDC or CBDA … EXPERIMENTAL ADAPTATION A Difference Adjective 1 (part of a polar opposite pair of adjectives). B Efficiency Noun 1 (part of a polar opposite pair of nouns). C Efficiency Polar opposite of Adjective 1. D Difference Polar opposite of Noun 1. —Cutting Syntax at the Joints … FORMULA FOR PITHS OF INFORMATION (‘SOULS’) Title of book = '[quality of X] [opp qualifier]' Soul of the book = 'If you [X] qualifier [subject of X and qualifier] [opp X clarified]' —How do I find the soul of literature? Socrates observed that the soul is ironic. In a snap-judgment I observed that Socrates meant a formula for the soul. From this I could conclude the formula involved contradiction. I concluded the second element must be the contradiction, and the soul must have a name, and the soul must not contradict itself, so the second element must contradict the name, and if the first element of the name is the quality, and quality is nature, and nature means psyche, then if the name has two elements the second part of the soul contradicts the second part of the name. The third part of the soul must not contradict further, so it is the result or conjunction of the first two parts, and if there is a fourth element it must prove the soul by attempting to contradict the first element, which requires clarity. … DIFFERENCE FORMULA It has been shown by convention that a difference of 1 means unity. Intuitively this represents a system which has zero energy losses, and no definition could be more conservative in regards to perfect systems. Sensibly, from a difference of 1, we can subdivide and determine that a difference of 0.5 is normal for positive energy which is not over-unity, and -0.5 is normal for negative energies which are not hyper-negative. We can then surmise the existence of a negative energy of 1. Since the positive energies correspond with physical efficiency, the negative energy must refer to things such as antimatter and abstraction. We can then form the beginnings of a function spectrum: -1 fully abstract, -0.5 abstract, 0 neutral, +0.5 material, +1 unity Since there is no principle of ending a number line with ordinal numbers, we must assume that the function spectrum is theoretically-potentially infinite unless the entire universe is finite. —Difference Theories (…) … EFFICIENCY FORMULA It is known that if Difference of 1 in the TOE = zero energy loss, then a difference of 0.5 means normal energy. This type of measurement of energy has been identified with efficiency, and the TOE equation shows that the relation of this efficiency with the difference score is linear. Since efficiency means energy, and a difference of + 1 means a perpetual motion machine, the energy output may be gauged as a combination of an efficiency such as 0.5 and a difference level such as -1, 0, or 1. Therefore, the most universal Unified Energy Theory is given by: Max Energy = Function Spectrum Difference + / - 1 with positive for positive and negative for negative + 1. And Min Energy given by Function Spectrum Difference, which is always a whole number. —Unified Efficiency Theory (…) … RESULTS FORMULA (TOE) • • • • • • • • • • Everything is examples. Examples might have useful results, otherwise they are different. A useful result might be translated as an efficiency. And, efficiencies are not problematic in a technological age, so they are differences from differences. If we add Efficiency + Difference, we get an Example (this is similar to ‘difference from the difference’ with a difference). Since this applies to all examples, we get the TOE. However, this may not be precise enough. If we search for nothing, there is no efficiency (no effect) and the difference is what remains. If the efficiency is greater than the difference, and the difference is positive, any result greater than 1 will involve an efficiency which sums to > 1, because the efficiency is a result of some kind, and the efficiency is reached by subtracting the difference from the total results. Since efficiency is only <= 1 in a closed energy system, and efficiency is assumed to be positive, all other cases will involve an efficiency which sums to < 1 but > 0. If positive and negative are both seen as dimensional qualifiers on the result which is already quantified we get our result, expressed in limits we get Set 0 > Efficiency* + Difference, where efficiency sums to < 1 if topic is acted on (that is, less than unity), and efficiency sums to > 1 if topic is acting (that is, greater than unity). —The Shortest Proof of the TOE (…) … DIMENSIONS FROM ANTIFORCES Dimensions = # Forces + # Antiforces # Forces = Dimensions - Antiforces # Antiforces = Dimensions - Forces (Found to equal the Anti-Energy) The number of dimensions is shown to be the number of Forces + the number of Antiforces on the logic that adding a further dimension requires a further antiforce, and that in three dimensions there are three potential vectors equal in number to the categories of rotation necessary to get an object into any position (rotation being the minimum force) plus a vector of motion which can be curvilinear. By analogy, adding a further dimension of antiforce would still result in the same equation. Since this is simple arithmetic, equations for forces and antiforces can also be given in terms of dimensions and the alternate force. … GENERAL OVER-UNITY EQUATION FOR ORDINARY OBJECTS [(MIN EFF + 1) - ((MAX EFF + 1)] / [0.5 (MIN EFF + MAX EFF)] FOR PERPETUAL MOTION: [(MIN EFF + 1) - ((MAX EFF / 2) + 1)] / [0.5 (MIN EFF + MAX EFF)] It is shown if the formula for ordinary objects is correct, the additional modification of Max Eff / 2 simply reflects the use of a counterweight versus a gradient, which is not a large modification. —General Over-Unity Equation … FORMULA FOR ANTI ENERGY FOR ORDINARY OBJECTS [0.5 (MIN EFF + MAX EFF)] / [((MAX EFF + 1) - (MIN EFF + 1)] FOR PERPETUAL MOTION: [0.5 (MIN EFF + MAX EFF)] / [((2 * MAX EFF + 1) - (MIN EFF + 1)] The above is the revised updated version June 2021. It is thought to be correct because it is simple a reversal of the accurate main revised general OU formula mentioned earlier. … ANTITHEORY OF EVERYTHING (REVERSING) Because mathematical and coherent, Antitheory of Everything (Results) can be taken as Reverse of sign and reverse of contents of TOE (Results) assuming that logic is universal, as must be done if logic is coherently effectual, otherwise would be to forge the idea that some contents of universal logic are not universal logic, which is against the law of identity, E.g. universal logic in the case of a TOE can be redefined mathematically until it fits with any reality, at which point the benefit of the doubt is on the theory until an effective counterexample is produced. This is much characteristic of the best in my version of coherence theory. TOE: Results >= Efficiency + Difference AT (Results) <= Difference - Efficiency —The Antitheory (…) … FORMULA FOR ANTI-EFFICIENCY Anti Efficiency (Negates) = Difference - Results This formula assumes the TOE is standard math. Results = Efficiency + Difference is taken, then results is subtracted so 0 = Efficiency + Difference - Results, then efficiency is subtracted from both sides. … FORMULA FOR ANTI-DIFFERENCE Anti Difference (Analogy) = Efficiency - Results This formula assumes the Theory of Everything is standard math. Results = Efficiency + Difference is taken, then results is subtracted so 0 = Efficiency + Difference - Results, then difference is subtracted from both sides. … IDEAL MATHEMATICAL PRINCIPLE Ideal Mathematical Principle = Negative [(D - 1) ^ 2] This was an optional formula taking a tentative formula for perfection squared, negative as a form of limit, e.g. greater exaggerations of perfections would have greater limits. It was basically an earlier less successful version of the Value Theorem, and not very important. … FORMULA FOR IDEAL ELEMENTS Ideal Elements = Dimensions + 2 It was found in certain versions of the Function Spectrum that the value which corresponded to D + 2 was the simplest value to use in determining certain technologies. For example, D + 2 - 1 would produce a kind of perfect technology, perpetual motion. D + 2 - 2 would produce a kind of language of the universe, dimensions. D + 2 - 3 would produce a kind of immortal language, knowledge. D + 2 + 1 would produce a kind of perpetual motion, immortality, etc. With the understanding that these equations produce those things, then it is supported that ideal elements equals D + 2. … UN-IDEAL PRINCIPLE (SO-CALLED UGLINESS FORMULA) Un Ideal Principle (Ugliness) = [Sq rt 2 (1 - D)] This is the inverse of the mathematical perfection formula, and thus even less important, as the mathematical perfection formula was merely an early attempt at the Value Theorem. … FORMULA FOR UN-IDEAL ELEMENTS Un Ideal Elements (Opp) = 2 - Dimensions This is taken from ideal elements (Elements = Dimensions + 2), 0 = Dimensions + 2 - Elements. Then subtract elements and subtract two equals Minus Elements = - 2 - Dimensions … FORMULA FOR MEANING Basic Meaning = Value 0.15625 in other words 5/32 It was found in the Over-Unity Formula for TOE’s that certain systems occur with a pattern of 5/32 categories being especially emphasized. This was no more than an observation, and did not mean that these systems were especially coherent or universal. 5/32 simply corresponded to systems which communicate a basic sense of meaningfulness, a particular sometimes advanced sometimes basic stage in philosophical communication. … FORMULA FOR INCOMPLETE MEANING (OR MEANINGLESSNESS) Incomplete meaning = 160 (constant) This was simply the reverse of the formula for basic meaning. It’s thought the reverse of all parts of the meaning formula would produce a formula for meaninglessness. It happened to a constant, since the formula for meaning was seen as a constant. … FORMULA FOR MATHEMATICIZATION Math form Absolute = Absolute X 0.10 10 is associated with hypercubes and with the number of dimensions of string theory above the first dimension. Multiplying a proportional value by 10 arguably represents movement to a higher modular level. This formula is a placeholder which is not yet used in calculations. … FORMULA FOR HIGHER QUALITIES Above math Qualities = Qualities X 10 Since 10 represents hypercubes and levels above the 1st dimensions, multiplying qualities or objective categories by 10 is thought to represent superiority of any category or emotion to mathematics. Technically this represents two levels of higher separation in the case of emotions. However, this formula is a placeholder and it is not yet used in calculations. … LANGUAGE FORMULA • NOTE: In excel, given as: =ifs(Dimensions<=0,"0",Dimensions<4,(1.585*1.09^(Dimensions2)),Dimensions=4,(1.585*1.09^(Dimensions-2)+1.09^(Dimensions3)),Dimensions>4,(1.585*1.09^(Dimensions-2+N(1)+1.09^(Dimensions3+N(1))))) The ideal language we will assume at first has two dimensions and uses Cartesian space. If we put this into the formula for ranking objective systems, the outputted value is: (D =) 2 ^ X > 4 (Verbs) - 1 = differentiated value of 1.585. This value most easily separates into the value 1.03 and the value 0.555. An analysis of symbolism tells us that 0.555… represents magical details (or more specifically a compound of numbers explaining the idea of ‘math per souls minus answers per coherence’). So far this does not assume specific values if there is a variable remaining, the goal is to be able to calculate this symbolism for any dimension. This idea of ‘magical details’ might be confirmed by knowledge of Chinese. Trial and error reveals the values for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th dimension are: Test 2nd dimension: 1.585 X (1.09 ^ 0)) + (1.09 X 0) = 1.585 Test 3rd dimension: 1.585 X (1.09 ^ 1 ) + (1.09 X 0) = 1.72765 In the fourth dimension it is 1.585 X (1.09 ^ 2) + (1.09 ^ 1) = 2.9731385 With the final result up to at least four dimensions of: 1.585 X (1.09 ^ D - 2 minimum zero) + (1.09 X (D - 3 minimum zero)… This is ostensibly a formula for languages in any number of dimensions, with 1.585 representing the system of language in two dimensions. Reassessment of the formula reveals for excel purposes the exponent added after the subtraction from D is incremented one higher for every dimension after the fourth in both sets of brackets for each calculation. —Unified Language Formula (…) … ANTILANGUAGE FORMULA Anti Languages (madness?) = [1.09 rt of (2 minus D)] / 1.585 … CERTAINTY FORMULA Certainty = 0 Certainty is conjectured to be the TOE without uncertainty. Maximum uncertainty is represented by the Antitheory, so as to represent the problem coherently. When the antitheory is subtracted from the theory of everything, the result happens to be zero, so this is thought to be the result for certainty. Certainty = TOE - Antitheory = (Eff + Diff) - (Diff - Eff) = 0 —Certainty Resources (…) … UNCERTAINTY FORMULA Uncertainty = Antitheory The Antitheory was conjectured to represent uncertainty, however, supported by the previous proof based on the meaning of the Antitheory for the TOE, mathematical support is found when the Antitheory is combined with the value for Certainty which is zero, thus Uncertainty is not represented by the TOE but instead is represented by the Antitheory, as it has been shown that the Antitheory represents the maximum uncertainty for the TOE, assuming of course that the Antitheory is the correct Antitheory, which can be checked by math. Proof: Antitheory + Certainty = Antitheory —Certainty Resources (…) … EXPONENTIAL EFFICIENCY FORMULA Efficiency and energy and proportional length may be unified together. Separated by <: 2nd part minus first part. Separated by >: 1st part minus second part. Exponential efficiency with knowledge: in cases where Difference < Efficiency Resulting formula for EE with knowledge: Efficiency - Difference Exponential efficiency with physics in cases where Efficiency > Difference Resulting formula for EE with mechanics: Efficiency - Difference Unification of exponential efficiency! —Unification of Exponential Efficiency COHERENCE EQUATION This is the same method that was applied to the TOE to reach the disintegral, one of the only things more coherent than the TOE. Apply the Antitheory and negate. Apply the Antitheory and negate… TOE: Coherence degree 1: Efficiency + Difference Disintegral: Coherence degree 2: - (Difference - Efficiency) Coherence Degree 3: - [-(Difference - Efficiency) + (Difference - Efficiency)] Coherence Degree 4: -{-[-(Difference - Efficiency) + (Difference - Efficiency)] + (Difference Efficiency)} … And etc it keeps going. DEGREE <= -1: Incoherence. DEGREE 0: Art. DEGREE 1: Results >= Efficiency + Difference DEGREE 2: Results >= - (Difference - Efficiency) [=Disintegral] DEGREE 3: Zero or minus zero DEGREE 4: Disintegral DEGREE 5: Zero or minus zero DEGREE 6: Disintegral DEGREE 7: Zero or minus zero DEGREE 8: Disintegral DEGREE 9: Zero or minus zero DEGREE 10: Disintegral DEGREE 11: Zero or minus zero DEGREE 12: Disintegral —Coherence Equation (…) … QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS • • • Natural Speed = (Leverage X 2 X 1.1 lengths / second) - 1 Observed (Theoretical) = 2 / Avg Speed Detected = [Sq rt of 0.5 (Time) ] / Avg Speed By the Theory of Everything, QM Energy > Measured, observed (of effect) energy. 1 / total measurement = Q coherent observation. 1 / total observation = Q coherent measurement. 1 / (measurement + observation) = Q coherence. Classically, (Measurement + observation) ^2 = coherence. This leads to Sq rt. Of coherence = measurement + observation. (Not the nroot, the square root). Sq. rt. Of coherence - observation = measurement. Sq. rt. Of coherence - measurement = observation. If deductions are an expression of coherence, as far as expression, Observation of deductions = Sq. rt. 2 - measurement (1,0). Measurement of deductions = Sq. rt. 2 - observation (1,0). Measurement of deductions + observation = Sq. rt. Of 2. Observation of deductions + measurement = Sq. rt. Of 2. Sq. rt. Of deductions = observation + measurement. Quantitatively, Sq. rt. Of 2 = observation + measurement. … QUANTUM STATES Expanded Quantum States: (1) The first observer aims to refute, (2) The second observer acts passively, (3) The first particle responds quickly, (4) The last particle is a slave to the observer. Quantum physics arises from entropy. A token rule is that entropy involves eventual negation of everything. Therefore, in limits, the opposite of the mode of observation indicates the eventual outcome, as what is observed is by definition accurate (scientifically), and what is accurate for a given thing is ultimately opposed if it becomes opposite. Now we can compute: The first case is a case in which the observer is refuted. We can just say ‘the observer aims to refute’ to be more general. In the second case, we would predict an interaction, so the second case is generally a case that refutes interaction. In Newton we would call this an impact, but in quantum physics we would say that ‘the observer acts passively’, in other words ‘the observer is being refuted’. Thirdly, we would expect we left something behind, so now we are dealing with the first particle. Since we would normally think the thing left behind was slow, in this case the first particle is quick. Since we would normally expect to observe, in this case instead the particle ‘responds’. Thus we are left with ‘the first particle responds quickly’. The last particle we would expect to escape the observer, which means freedom from the observer. But, since the last particle is becoming its opposite, the reality is that the last particle is ‘slave to the observer’. Since it is defined so coherently, the opposite of these properties actually has largely the same effect, except possibly with different vectors. … GRAND THEORY NUMBER: Grand Theory number = (D^2 +1)^2 = 4, 25, 100, 289... It is assumed for the moment that knowledge from the 2nd dimension anticipates the Theory of Everything, as the Theory of Everything is given by 2-dimensions: Efficiency and Difference. Inputting the 2-dimensions results in (5)^2 = 25, which are the number of categories for the TOE. To confirm the functionality, using one dimension such as ‘everything’ results in (2)^2 = 4, which are the number of categories in the categorical deduction diagram representing 2dimensional philosophy. Inputting 3-dimensions results in 100 categories, which are the anticipated attributes of an immortal. … GOD AND PERPETUAL MOTION: Subjectively God exists? Y=1,N=0, Subjectively psychopathy? Y=1,N=0 Opportunity for pmms? TRUE, Dependent If GE + SP <= 1, 'TRUE' Desire for tiny PMMs?, Dependent if SP > GE, 'MAYBE' How this works, by process of elimination for all options. Whole values (1,0) are accepted. GE (1), SP (1) returns false for PMMs because belief in God and perpetual motion would draw a connection between God and perpetual motion which would mean God writing a blank check with magic to make perpetual motion work. This wouldn’t really be free energy physically and mechanically, it would be infinite magic. Since God is seen as infinite these people would tax the system asking for infinite free energy using magic power. GE (1), SP (0) returns true for PMMs because this type of person is realistic-minded but still believes in God. In principle, God could make the universe into a perpetual motion machine in this scenario. GE (0), SP (1) returns true for PMMs because this type of person is crazy but does not believe in unrealistic amounts of magic. This type of person would have a way to make perpetual motion work using physics, and their own insanity is capable of breaking the rules. If there is no God then there is no one to say that there are any absolute absolute rules to follow. GE (0), SP (0) returns true for PMMs because this type of person would quantumly realize a perpetual motion machine. They definitely don’t believe in perpetual motion or miracles, so a miraculous perpetual motion would probably appear, though they would not be concerned for it, and it might be somewhat hard to interpret. This person justifies God’s perpetual motion machine, or justifies that someone else sold their soul for one. Although some of the other types could actually be capable of inventing one without being hurt. In addition, if Subjective Psychopathy is (1) and Subjectively God Exists is (0) then nano perpetual motion is possible because this type of person is crazy enough to think microscopic things are possible, insane enough not to be a scientist, and also would not think that microscopic things are angels dancing on the head of a pin. … DISINTEGRAL FORMULA (MIN # OF PARTS) The equation simply takes the antitheory and negates it, to find a more coherent version of the Theory of Everything. Antitheory = Difference - Efficiency. Disintegral = - (Difference Efficiency) —Disintegrals (…) … SPECIAL VALUE THEORY / ASSOCIATED CONSTANTS Special Value Theory = Efficiency + (0.5 * Difference) - Dimensions A simplification is thought to be 0.75 * Dimensions. This is a kind of extraneous formula that is found helpful for discovering key mathematical constants. Although it is a bit casual for scientific constants. Efficiency is taken as 1 unit of energy of whatever efficiency because efficiency is judged in terms of whole units of mass in equilibrium. Equilibrium does not require resistance, so mass translates directly in a balance, but only in terms of efficiency. Difference is judged as * 0.5 because a difference of 1 creates an energy of 1.5, and if efficiency is taken as including levitation, a difference of 2 will accurately predict an energy of 3. The reason to subtract dimensions is that dimensions express maximum potential vectors of inefficiency. If the other measurements are made in proportional units of mass and energy, subtracting the dimensions will give a baseline efficiency number. A baseline efficiency is a good idea of what is important in math, because math concerns fundamentals and efficiency. … ANTI DISINTEGRAL Anti Disintegral = (Neg Eff) + Diff = Antitheory This is simply the negation of the entire disintegral formula, producing the anti-disintegral. … ANTIVALUE THEORY Antivalue Theory = Dimensions + (Difference / 0.5) - Efficiency This is simply the opposite of the Value Theorem, supposedly producing a value which is highly inconvenient or irrelevant to whichever subjects is being analyzed. It is not predicted to be useful in a lot of situations, but maybe cryptography or producing neutral reactions. … NECESSARY DIMENSIONS Necessary dimensions, This is constant (5) for our universe This was found by analyzing the OU Formula for TOE’s. It was found the number of dimensions necessary to produce knowledge of zero was five. Since the system was so conservative it gave coherence a value of 1 / infinity and most of science a value of below zero, it seemed objective enough to qualify as a kind of absolute standard under the assumption that what are involved are human systems and that in this case physical systems may not yet have been considered. … UNIVERSAL CONTRADICTIONS Ideal contradictions, Has been found = Necessary Dimensions X 2 It was found on statistical evidence that exactly 10 exceptions were found to Coherent Knowledge, Perfect Axiomatic Reasoning, and the Formula for Souls. Since the 10 consistent exceptions happened to be double the number previously found for the minimum number of dimensions to create positive knowledge in the Over-Unity Formula for TOE’s this was found to be too much of a coincidence and a tentative formula was drawn in a broadstrokes manner connecting contradictions with twice the minimum dimensions of knowledge. Therefore, it was thought to be a very long-term argument but very hard to prove, that other universes might have contradictions equal to twice their minimum number of dimensions of knowledge. … SIMPLE DISINTEGRAL Simple disintegral = 1 / Antivalue Theory, This is for realizing geometric typology [[Antivalue Theory = Dimensions + (Difference / 0.5) - Efficiency]] Since the Antivalue outputs what is not valuable about something, the Simple Disintegral is designed to output the value of something. For example, once Antivalue is calculated correctly… the Simple Disintegral outputs -0.75 for perpetual motion [= possible inefficiencies] and +0.75 for objective knowledge [= possible efficiencies]. Interestingly, this can tell us the deepest properties about the function spectrum: perpetual motion is on the ‘Difference’ end of the spectrum, which is defined as different from efficiency (not abstract efficiency) and objective knowledge is on the efficient end concerned with abstraction. This formula could be used to track complex variations on the Function Spectrum. … SIMPLEFORMS Nodes (simpleforms) = Minus Antivalue Theory, These are the 'simple forms' of the thing The negation of the antivalue theoretically produces the ‘simple value’ or ‘simpleform’ of a thing. … VERB THEORY Verbs = Difference + 5 The OU Formula for TOE’s is used. Verbs + 1 is thought to equal 5 with Difference = -1 for dimensions of abstract knowledge. + 1 and - 1 equals zero difference from 5. Other variable is Difference already included. Assuming linear equation, Verbs = Difference + 5 … ALTERNATE VERBS No longer appropriate as predicted by verbs formula … OU FORMULA FOR TOE’S OU Formula for TOEs = =((Dimensions^Results)-(Verbs-1)) This assumes that verbs is the number of set categories. In most cases it should be compatible with the Verbs formula. It was found 2 dimensions ^ 2 results = 4, luckily verbs for the quadratic knowledge is calculated to be 4, subtracting one and then subtracting the second half we get OU for TOE’s of 1, which means 1 degree of absolute knowledge. Calculating for science we get (3 dimensions ^ 1 result) - (0 + 5 - 1) , equals a value of - 1, which corresponds with incoherent knowledge. Since the formula is accurate for the major categories of knowledge, this shows a high degree of accuracy overall. … ALTERNATE OU FOR TOE’S (Alternate OU for TOEs) = No longer appropriate, as depends on alternate verbs … FLATLAND PROBLEMS FLATLAND PROB1 D NOT MANIFESTED IN: D-2 TO: D-1 FLATLAND PROB2 D+1 NOT MANIFESTED IN: D-1 TO: D FLATLAND PROB3 D+2 NOT MANIFESTED IN: D TO: D+1 … GENERAL POSSIBILITY EQUATION General Possibility =Absolute Value((2/Dimensions)-(Results/(OverUnity+(Dimensions^Results)-1))) The formula really shows us: (2/D) - (Results / OU Formula for TOE’s) This basically takes the degree of perfection of a dimension as having a value of 1 in the 2nd dimension meaning the left hand of the equation will measure perfection relative to the second dimension, with lower dimensions scoring higher in denominations of two. D minus Results is taken as an approximation of things not happening, in a similar manner to the Antitheory formula. This is then divided by absoluteness which I typically represent with the OU Formula for TOEs which has been known to rank relative to a value of one with only the best values in the TOE ranking above one. The OU Formula for TOE’s was previously defended above. … PERFECTION FORMULA Perfection =Dimensions - 1 It was found time was about uncertainty = zero certainty, where certainty is normally zero. Thus, time will output something similar to absolute zero. If time is the first dimension, it makes sense that time outputs zero. Knowledge (2 dimensions, associated with books) also outputs coherence (which is like a single category in a Venn diagram = 1), similarly 3 dimensions outputs design, which translates as art (and are tends to be 2-dimensional). 4 Dimensions outputs time-travel or immortality, which are much like the perfection of the 3rd dimension. Similarly, if knowledge has -1 dimensions, this might translate as language which has -2 dimensions. Nothingness, which might have 0 dimensions, translates as soullessness, which has 1 dimension. Given that we are not living in a super number of complex dimensions and much of our experience falls within these experiences, it makes sense that the equation of Perfection = Dimensions - 1 works for our experience. This formula also expresses how higher energy states are built on lower energy states. … FORMULA FOR IMPERFECTION Imperfection = 1 / Dimensions - 1 This is simply the reciprocal of the perfection formula. It is thought the sign should stay the same because energy levels may be involved. COHERENCE HEURISTIC Coherence Heuristic: If (Results<Efficiency, Perfection=Imperfection, (true, else) "FALSE") Perfection equals imperfection when there is symmetry. Results are < Efficiency when Difference is negative. Negative differences have been seen as related to abstraction. So, this formula simply outputs true if the numbers correspond easily with symmetry and abstraction. That is all it intends to measure, and that is what it does. Although if someone uses different standards concerning the meaning of ‘efficiency’ and ‘difference’ it might be possible to get this wrong. However, under the assumption that Nathan Coppedge’s standards for Efficiency and Difference are the best (e.g. -1 diff is philosophy, -2 diff is language, plus 1 diff is perpetual motion, plus 2 diff is flying machines, etc), this heuristic seems to work. The efficiency scores may be more flexible, but are analogous to leverage and other simple machines. … DEGREES INCOHERENT Degrees Incoherent: =If (Coherence = "FALSE", ABS(Efficiency - Results)-1, (true, else) "COHERENT") If coherence from the coherence heuristic returns false, it will return the Anti-Difference - 1, in other words an Anti-Difference of 1 will return a zero degrees incoherent. This is because an Anti-Difference of 1 corresponds with coherence (represented by ‘1’) having an Anti-Difference meaning no significance, which means incoherence. Thus, returning Anti-Difference roughly measures incoherence relative to the number one, and subtracting one thus makes it a more objective measure. … SAMPLES FROM THE FUNCTION SPECTRUM The values here are given by the Element Number, which equals D+2. The particular classifications are only a translation however there is evidence in some cases through the comparison between energy rankings and also added and subtracted amounts of additional mass. The Special Value Theorem has been found to provide possibly more accurate values although it must be used carefully. For basic math purposes the below type of calculation is more appropriate. However, for some engineering tasks the Special Value Theorem can make innovating easier with the correct table of numerically-assigned elements. One view is that this below calculation is for a ‘loose number of elements’ and with the Special Value Theorem it is for a ‘strict number of elements’. In either case it would be analogous to essential elements or essential categories. Impersonal Networks, =(Dimensions+2–9) Impossible Languages, =(Dimensions+2–8) Archaic Languages, =(Dimensions+2–7) Draconian Languages, =(Dimensions+2–6) Immortal Languages, =(Dimensions+2-5) Languages, =(Dimensions+2-4) Knowledge, =(Dimensions+2-3) Ordinary Objects, =(Dimensions+2-2) Perpetual Motion Machines, =(Dimensions+2-1) Flying Machines, =(Dimensions+2-0) Immortals, =(Dimensions+2+1) Antiforce Mechanisms, =(Dimensions+2+2) Reactive Mechanisms, =(Dimensions+2+3) … [END OF DOCUMENT] Works Cited Coppedge, Nathan. THE DIMENSIONAL PHILOSOPHER’S TOOLKIT (2013). Amazon. Coppedge, Nathan. PROGRAMMABLE HEURISTICS. Amazon, Quora.com. Coppedge, Nathan. SYSTEMS THEORY (2015). Amazon Independent Publishing, Nathancoppedge.com