Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
()
About this ebook
The petitioner asked the Supreme Court two important questions:
1. On his petition to the California Supreme Court: is the petitioner entitled to a written and published opinion under his 1st Amendment right to petition, 5th Amendment right for due process and 14th Amendment right for equal treatment?
2. On his motion to void the trial court's judgment for lack of fundamental jurisdiction, did the California Appeal Court have discretion to avoid and not hear and decide the motion without a written and published opinion?
James Constant
writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be
Read more from James Constant
Related to Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
Titles in the series (3)
California Supreme Court Petition: S173448 – Denied Without Opinion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Supreme Court Eminent Domain Case 09-381 Denied Without Opinion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupreme Court Petition No 10-1275 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Petition for Extraordinary Writ Denied Without Opinion– Patent Case 94-1257 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1151 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStop Judicial Abuse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKeeter & Sinquefield's Habeas Cite Book Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow one of my Pro-se cases got destroyed by federal rogue judges Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 01-438 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Inexplicable Deception: A State Corruption of Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnti-SLAPP Law Modernized: The Uniform Public Expression Protection Act Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShocking Judgements Delivered by the Supreme Court of United States: Full Text Judgements with Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Process a Legal Appeal Successfully Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCourts and Procedure in England and in New Jersey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 96-1178 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsObtaining A Criminal Pardon: Clear Your Name Legally Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Book of Writs - With Sample Writs of Quo Warranto, Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, and Prohibition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Questions Presented Supreme Court Cases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Recusing a Judge - With Ultimate Loopholes and a Sample Motion to Recuse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Petition for Certiorari: Denied Without Opinion Patent Case 93-1413 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSelect Legal Topics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Conceptual Approach to California Summary Judgment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupreme Court Eminent Domain Case 09-381 Denied Without Opinion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInsolvency Law Made Clear: A Guide For Debtors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Guide to District Court Civil Forms in the State of Hawaii Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFederal Rules of Civil Procedure: Hyperlinked, #2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An Introduction To Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMotions, Affidavits, Answers, and Commercial Liens - The Book of Effective Sample Documents Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Constitutional Law For You
Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Constitutional Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The US Constitution with the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confede Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5U.S. Constitution For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution of the United States of America: 1787 (Annotated) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An Introduction To Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Second Amendment: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Supermajority: How the Supreme Court Divided America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law For Dummies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Constitutional Law, Law Essentials: Governing Law for Law School and Bar Exam Prep Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5United States Civics - The US Constitution for Kids | 1787 - 2016 with Amendments | 4th Grade Social Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGet Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unequal Protection: How Corporations Became "People"—and How You Can Fight Back Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reason in Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Ministry of Presence: Chaplaincy, Spiritual Care, and the Law Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Adversity of Diversity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Grandfather's Son: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Read the Constitution—and Why Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constitution of the United States: Including The Declaration of Independence and The Bill of Rights Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Bill of Rights Primer: A Citizen's Guidebook to the American Bill of Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When at Times the Mob Is Swayed: A Citizen’s Guide to Defending Our Republic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Fully Revised Second Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5California Bar Exam Answers Hyperlinked: Hyperlinked, #4 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take It Back Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275 - James Constant
Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275
Skipping Constitutional Mandates
By James Constant
Smashwords Edition
Copyright © 2012 by James Constant
Smashwords Edition, License Notes
This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.
No. 10-1275
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
JAMES CONSTANT, Petitioner,
v.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
acting by and through the Department of Transportation,
Real Party in Interest, Respondent.
On Petition For Writ of Certiorari To the Court of Appeal Of
California 4th Appellate District
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MOTION TO VOID JUDGMENT
James Constant, pro per
April 15, 2011
i
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. On his petition to the California Supreme Court: is the petitioner entitled to a written and published opinion under his 1st Amendment right to petition, 5th Amendment right for due process and 14th Amendment right for equal treatment?
2. On his motion to void the trial court's judgment for lack of fundamental jurisdiction, did the California Appeal Court have discretion to avoid and not hear and decide the motion without a written and published opinion?
ii
LIST OF PARTIES
All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OPINIONS BELOW
JURISDICTION
STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Motion to Void Judgment For Lack of Fundamental Jurisdiction
Petition Legal