Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Lorraine 1944: Patton versus Manteuffel
Lorraine 1944: Patton versus Manteuffel
Lorraine 1944: Patton versus Manteuffel
Ebook212 pages1 hour

Lorraine 1944: Patton versus Manteuffel

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A highly illustrated account of the Panzer offensive in Lorraine.

In the wake of the defeat in Normandy in the summer of 1944, Hitler planned to stymie the Allied advance by cutting off Patton's Third Army in the Lorraine with a great Panzer offensive. But Patton's aggressive tactics continued to thwart German plans and led to a series of violent armored battles.

The battle-hardened Wehrmacht confronted the better-equipped and better-trained US Army. The Germans managed to re-establish a fragile defensive line but could not stop the US Army from establishing bridgeheads over the Moselle along Germany's western frontier.

Campaigns 5, 24, 74 and 75 are also available in a single volume special edition as Into the Reich.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateFeb 20, 2013
ISBN9781472802095
Lorraine 1944: Patton versus Manteuffel
Author

Steven J. Zaloga

Steven J. Zaloga received his BA in History from Union College and his MA from Columbia University. He has worked as an analyst in the aerospace industry for three decades, covering missile systems and the international arms trade, and has served with the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federal think tank. He is the author of numerous books on military technology and history, including NVG 294 Allied Tanks in Normandy 1944 and NVG 283 American Guided Missiles of World War II. He currently lives in Maryland, USA.

Read more from Steven J. Zaloga

Related to Lorraine 1944

Titles in the series (100)

View More

Related ebooks

Wars & Military For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Lorraine 1944

Rating: 3.75 out of 5 stars
4/5

6 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Lorraine 1944 - Steven J. Zaloga

    LORRAINE

    THE STRATEGIC SITUATION

    In September 1944, Hitler sensed the opportunity to deal the Allies a crushing blow. Patton’s Third Army was spearheading the Allied advance eastward, and as his forces attacked into Lorraine, they seemed on the verge of penetrating the Westwall defenses into Germany itself. However, Patton’s right flank was exposed while the US 6th Army Group moved northward along the Swiss frontier, having landed a month earlier in southern France. So by massing several of the newly formed Panzer brigades, Hitler prepared for a major armored counteroffensive in Lorraine. His aim was to encircle and destroy Patton’s forces. To lead this audacious attack and head up the Fifth Panzer Army, he chose one of his youngest and most aggressive tank commanders, Gen. Hasso von Manteuffel. This would be the largest German panzer counterattack on the Western Front and one of the largest tank versus tank battles fought by the US Army in World War II. The tank battles in Lorraine in September 1944 are the focus of this book.

    Alsace-Lorraine had been a warpath between France and Germany for centuries: taken by Germany in the wake of the 1870 Franco-Prussian War, it was recovered by France after 1918 and then reabsorbed into Germany after 1940. As a traditional invasion route between the two countries, the area has also been fortified over the centuries with great fortress cities such as Metz. The Charmes Gap figured in French war plans in 1914, and the nearby Verdun forts were the center of the fighting in 1916. The French side of Lorraine was the site of portions of the Maginot Line, mirrored on the German frontier by the Westwall which was also called the Siegfried Line.

    During August, Patton’s Third Army raced across France as the Wehrmacht retreated in disorder. Here, on 21 August 1944, an M4 tank of the 8th Tank Bn., 4th Armd. Div. fires on German troops across the Marne River, trying to destroy one of its bridges. The 4th Armd. Div. was usually Patton’s spearhead, and would play the central role in the September tank fighting in Lorraine. (US Army)

    At the beginning of September 1944, the Allies were optimistic the war might soon be won. In August, German forces in northern France had been encircled and smashed in the Falaise Gap. German casualties had exceeded 300,000 killed and captured, and a further 200,000 had been trapped in the Atlantic ports and Channel Islands. For nearly a month, the Allied armies had advanced with little opposition, surging past Paris and into Belgium. In the east, the German forces had suffered an equally shattering setback with the destruction of Army Group Center in Byelorussia as a result of the Red Army’s Operation Bagration. A subsequent offensive through Ukraine had pushed the German forces completely out of the Soviet Union and into central Poland along the Vistula River. While the central region of the front had stabilized by the beginning of August, the Red Army had poured into the Balkans. Germany’s eastern allies – Finland, Romania, Hungary, and Bulgaria – were on the verge of switching sides, and Germany’s main source of oil in the Romanian fields near Ploesti was soon to be lost. On 20 July 1944, German officers attempted to assassinate Hitler, and some believed that this signaled the beginning of a German collapse, similar to that experienced by the German Army in the autumn of 1918.

    German forces in France lost most of their armored equipment in the Normandy campaign and the ensuing envelopment at Falaise. Of the 1,890 tanks and assault guns available on D-Day, about 1,700 were lost. This is a salvage yard in Travières, France, on 4 September 1944, showing some of the captured equipment. In the foreground are two tank destroyers based on captured French chassis, while to the right are three Panther tanks. (US Army)

    The Anglo-American forces under Gen. Dwight Eisenhower comprised three main elements. Gen. Bernard Montgomery’s 21st Army Group on the left flank was advancing from the regions of Dieppe and Amiens towards Flanders. The 21st Army Group consisted of the First Canadian Army, on the extreme left, and the Second British Army to its right. The main American element was Gen. Omar Bradley’s 12th Army Group, consisting of Hodges’ First Army, moving to the north-east into central Belgium, and Gen. George S. Patton’s Third Army moving through the Argonne into Lorraine. In addition, Gen. Jacob Devers’ 6th Army Group, consisting of the US Seventh Army and the French First Army, had landed in southern France and was advancing northward along the Swiss border towards the Belfort Gap.

    OPPOSING PLANS

    GERMAN PLANS

    From the German perspective, the strategic situation was an unrelieved disaster. The Wehrmacht was in headlong retreat from France, and the immediate tasks were to reconstitute German forces in the west and hold back the Allied forces while defenses in depth were strengthened along the Westwall. In the wake of the attempted military coup in July, Adolf Hitler was extremely suspicious of German military leaders, and he imposed an even tighter control on all military operations down to the tactical level. Hitler remained contemptuous of the Anglo-American armies, and was convinced that bold operations could derail the Allied advance. In spite of the utter failure of his panzer counteroffensive at Mortain a month earlier, Hitler was entranced with the concept of cutting off and destroying the lead elements of the Anglo-American forces. He expected that his panzer forces could win great encirclement battles in the west as they so often had on the Eastern Front. Not surprisingly, he selected veterans from the Eastern Front to conduct his offensive in Lorraine.

    At the beginning of September, German forces in the west were under the command of Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt. These included Generalfeldmarschall Walter Model’s Army Group B, with four armies from the North Sea to the area around Nancy, and the much smaller Army Group G, under Generaloberst Johannes Blaskowitz, with only a single army covering from Nancy southward to the Swiss frontier.

    Hitler believed that a violent panzer attack against Patton’s Third Army was both the most necessary and the most promising option. Patton’s Third Army had advanced the furthest east, and its momentum towards the Saar suggested that it would be the first Allied force to enter Germany. Besides blunting this threatening advance, a panzer counterattack towards Reims would have the added benefit of preventing the link-up between Devers’ 6th Army Group advancing from southern France and Bradley’s 12th Army Group in northern France. On 3 September 1944, Hitler instructed Rundstedt to begin planning this attack. Under Hitler’s initial plan, the attack would be carried out by the 3rd, 15th, and 17th SS Panzer Grenadier Divisions, the new Panzer Brigades 111, 112, and 113, and with later reinforcements from the Panzer Lehr Division, 11th and 21st Panzer Divisions and the new Panzer Brigades 106, 107, and 108. The Fifth Panzer Army headquarters would be shifted from Belgium to Alsace-Lorraine to control the panzer counteroffensive. On 5 September 1944, the newly appointed commander of Fifth Panzer Army, Gen. Hasso von Manteuffel, flew in straight from the fighting on the Eastern Front to be personally briefed by Hitler on the objectives of the counteroffensive. The date of the counterattack was initially set for 12 September 1944, but events soon overtook these plans.

    ALLIED PLANS

    The dilemma facing Allied planners in September 1944 was very different. Towards the end of August 1944, many Allied military leaders had begun to wonder whether the Germans might completely collapse, as they had done in 1918. Under such circumstances, a continuing string of bold advances could best take advantage of the German plight. Yet there remained the nagging doubt that the Germans might prove resilient and that their resistance might stiffen as the prewar German frontier was attacked.

    The advance through France in August 1944 had seen the Allied forces achieve far more than was originally planned: they had expected to be on the Seine River in early September when in fact they were now 150 miles beyond. Indeed, Patton’s Third Army was at the phase line expected for April 1945. The most immediate consequence of the unexpectedly speedy advance was that the Allied forces were beginning to experience serious logistical difficulties. Supplies landed on the Normandy beaches had to be trucked forward, since the French railroad network had been shattered by pre-invasion bombing. Shortages in fuel and ammunition would become a critical determinant of combat capabilities in the autumn of 1944. Ideally, a port closer to the front was needed. The most likely candidate was Antwerp, which was large enough to handle the necessary volume of supplies. This was in the British sector, and Montgomery’s 21st Army Group was given the vital assignment of securing it.

    Beyond the short-term need to improve the supply situation before pressing on into Germany, there remained controversy over how best

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1
    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy