Facebook and Philosophy: What's on Your Mind?
By Open Court
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Related to Facebook and Philosophy
Titles in the series (100)
Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5U2 and Philosophy: How to Decipher an Atomic Band Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy: I Link Therefore I Am Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeinfeld and Philosophy: A Book about Everything and Nothing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Baseball and Philosophy: Thinking Outside the Batter's Box Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pink Floyd and Philosophy: Careful with that Axiom, Eugene! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lord of the Rings and Philosophy: One Book to Rule Them All Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Zombies, Vampires, and Philosophy: New Life for the Undead Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsiPod and Philosophy: iCon of an ePoch Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreaking Bad and Philosophy: Badder Living through Chemistry Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Hitchcock and Philosophy: Dial M for Metaphysics Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Mr. Monk and Philosophy: The Curious Case of the Defective Detective Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Woody Allen and Philosophy: [You Mean My Whole Fallacy Is Wrong?] Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5James Bond and Philosophy: Questions Are Forever Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Quentin Tarantino and Philosophy: How to Philosophize with a Pair of Pliers and a Blowtorch Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupervillains and Philosophy: Sometimes, Evil is its Own Reward Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInception and Philosophy: Ideas to Die For Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMel Gibson's Passion and Philosophy: The Cross, the Questions, the Controverssy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPoker and Philosophy: Pocket Rockets and Philosopher Kings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFacebook and Philosophy: What's on Your Mind? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bruce Springsteen and Philosophy: Darkness on the Edge of Truth Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Johnny Cash and Philosophy: The Burning Ring of Truth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMartial Arts and Philosophy: Beating and Nothingness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wire and Philosophy: This America, Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Star Trek and Philosophy: The Wrath of Kant Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy: Mission Accomplished or Mission Frakked Up? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnime and Philosophy: Wide Eyed Wonder Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
iPod and Philosophy: iCon of an ePoch Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStar Trek and Philosophy: The Wrath of Kant Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ultimate Walking Dead and Philosophy: Hungry for More Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51984 and Philosophy: Is Resistance Futile? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rolling Stones and Philosophy: It's Just a Thought Away Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsZombies, Vampires, and Philosophy: New Life for the Undead Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChuck Klosterman and Philosophy: The Real and the Cereal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSteve Jobs and Philosophy: For Those Who Think Different Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Red Sox and Philosophy: Green Monster Meditations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPoker and Philosophy: Pocket Rockets and Philosopher Kings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGirls and Philosophy: This Book Isn't a Metaphor for Anything Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Onion and Philosophy: Fake News Story True Alleges Indignant Area Professor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStephen Colbert and Philosophy: I Am Philosophy (And So Can You!) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpongeBob SquarePants and Philosophy: Soaking Up Secrets Under the Sea! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Supervillains and Philosophy: Sometimes, Evil is its Own Reward Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJurassic Park and Philosophy: The Truth Is Terrifying Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Princess Bride and Philosophy: Inconceivable! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJeopardy! and Philosophy: What is Knowledge in the Form of a Question? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Devil and Philosophy: The Nature of His Game Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSouth Park and Philosophy: Bigger, Longer, and More Penetrating Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5It's Always Sunny and Philosophy: The Gang Gets Analyzed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSuperheroes and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mister Rogers and Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeinfeld and Philosophy: A Book about Everything and Nothing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Orange Is the New Black and Philosophy: Last Exit from Litchfield Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5James Bond and Philosophy: Questions Are Forever Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Ultimate Star Wars and Philosophy: You Must Unlearn What You Have Learned Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How I Met Your Mother and Philosophy: Being and Awesomeness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5THE EMERALD TABLETS OF THOTH THE ATLANTEAN Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Source: The Secrets of the Universe, the Science of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Communicating Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Happiest Man on Earth: The Beautiful Life of an Auschwitz Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato's Republic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Antidote: Happiness for People Who Can't Stand Positive Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Laws of Connection: The Scientific Secrets of Building a Strong Social Network Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Facebook and Philosophy
4 ratings3 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This is an anthology of essays about facebook utilizing a variety of philosophical perspectives. I have a passing familiarity with most of the philosophers the writers refer to, but I don't consider myself an expert. I found the essays mainly readable and interesting.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A growing trend in social communication is the use of Social Networking sites. This transcends the day to day personal interaction with a more accessible and faster communication. The sphere of the virtual world has caught reality into a next level. Facebook and Philosophy is a compilation of essay/analysis on Facebook not only as a virtual fanaticism but as a social medium. It is seen through a philosophical perspective of both ancient (Aristotelian, Platonic, Socratic) and Modern/Contemporary thinking. It gives a guide on how and why people use such a social networking like Facebook, link it with ordinary interactions as friendship, consumerism, security, relationships and psychology.Facebook and Philosophy by D.E.Wittkower is a handy material for scholarly reference. Though Facebook in general updates easily, brings more features and enhances its processes, this book is still a good one and not outdated. Though there might be citations on features no longer in use, these are negligible and can still be used for learning.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I've decided I'm just not the right audience for this pop culture and philosophy series. Though I enjoyed some of the Facebook-related essays -- the more specific the scope, the better -- there was just too much repetition/overlap for my tastes. (I probably should've realized that since the focus was Facebook, which with all its bells and whistles is just a website instead of a book or movie series, many of the pieces would discuss the News Feed, friending, and similar functions over and over.) I'm also not fond of ivory-tower arguments that have more to do with the writer's own opinions and biases than any sort of concrete considerations (such as what actual Facebook users say). When it comes down to it, any social media, or technology for that matter, is a tool whose uses are partly determined by its designers and partly by its users. But I guess that would've been too short for a book!
Book preview
Facebook and Philosophy - Open Court
facebook Itself
The Medium Sent You a Message on facebook
To Reply to this Message,
Follow the Link Below
1
The Privacy Virus
JAMES GRIMMELMANN
039How many times have you heard someone (probably someone over forty) say, Kids these days don’t care about privacy
? Facebook is their Exhibit A: over four hundred million users and growing, telling the world all sorts of scandalously personal details. And it’s not just keg stands, either. There are things federal law considers so private it’s illegal to ask you about them in a job interview. Age. Sex. Birthplace. Religion. They’re all questions on the first page of the Facebook profile form. Yea, verily, privacy is dead and the kids these days killed it.
It’s a neat theory, except for one inconvenient detail: the actual behavior of Facebook users. If privacy
is on the list of words nobody uses any more, Facebook users didn’t get the memo. College students spend the wee hours of weekend nights untagging photos of themselves on Facebook, removing the evidence of their drunken revels earlier in the evening. A Facebook stalker
is a creep, not a contradiction in terms.
In fact, as you look closer and closer, the idea that Facebook is privacy’s tombstone becomes stranger and stranger. If over four hundred million users don’t care about privacy, why are they using a site that allows them to reject friend requests? If they wanted to broadcast every last detail about their lives to everyone everywhere, why don’t you ever see credit card numbers on Facebook profiles? And why did hundreds of thousands of users sign petitions protesting Facebook’s decision to introduce real-time news feeds? For people who allegedly don’t care about privacy, Facebook users sure spend a lot of time worrying about it.
Challenge a Facebook skeptic on the lack of evidence for her claim and she’ll usually retreat to one of a few related backups:
1. Actions speak louder than words. Anyone can say they care about privacy, but when it comes time to actually doing something about it, there they are on Facebook, posting incriminating photos and salacious stories.
2. Actions have consequences. Wanting privacy on Facebook is like training for a marathon by drinking gasoline; you’d only try it if you hadn’t thought things through.
3. Youthful indiscretions. Facebook users care about privacy only after they’ve learned their lesson the hard way.
These replies may sound more plausible, but they all have something in common: contempt for Facebook users. If you say you care about privacy but don’t, then you’re a hypocrite. If you don’t reconcile your desire for privacy with the facts of Facebook, then you’re stupid. If you haven’t yet had a bad experience on Facebook, then you’re young, lucky, and foolish. These attitudes—which, to be fair, are rarely stated so baldly and insultingly—all presume that Facebook users simply haven’t seen the truth about privacy that the dismissive skeptic has. She’s right, you’re wrong, end of story.
Actually, it’s the skeptic who has things wrong about privacy on Facebook. Facebook users do care about privacy, and they do try to protect it on Facebook. The skeptic goes wrong when she assumes that privacy
can only mean something like keeping things secret.
It doesn’t—privacy is much richer and subtler than that. Privacy is a key component of being free to be yourself, building healthy relationships, and fitting into a community that values you. Facebook users care about contextual privacy:¹¹ they want others to respect the rules of the social settings they participate in.
Private and Public
Let’s start by asking what the skeptic is thinking of when she talks about privacy.
If we pressed her for an explanation, she might say something like the right to be let alone,
or I don’t want my personal life on Entertainment Tonight,
or you can’t come in without a search warrant.
These ideas all depend on an implicit theory of what privacy is: private
is the opposite of public.
The underlying idea is that the world can be divided into two spheres: one that’s out in the open and shared with others, and one that’s behind closed doors and shared with almost no one. The daytime world is the public sphere. That’s where politics, news, work, and the mass media are. The nighttime world is the private sphere. That’s where home, family, and friends are. The public is extroverted and loud; the private is introverted and quiet. Public is visible; private is hidden. Everything is one or the other.
As a theory, it has a natural logic to it. Things you do in public
—that is, in public places or where all sorts of strangers can see you—are fair game for anyone. Things you do in private
—that is, in your home where no one can see—are off limits. When a celebrity pleads with the paparazzi to stop following her, she’s typically upset that her private
time with friends and family is being turned into public
news and entertainment. The police can trail you freely when you’re out walking in public,
but they need a search warrant to enter the private
space of your home.
Drawing this bright line between private
and public
means that privacy is a close relative of secrecy. Private information is secret information: just you and a few close friends and family. If someone tries to make it public without your consent—the paparazzi, a blackmailer, a creepy neighbor who steals your diaries—the legal system will step in and protect your desire for privacy. But once you voluntarily choose to give up secrecy, by going out in public or publishing your writings, the cat is out of the bag and the legal system won’t help you put it back in. The choice is yours: you can keep your secrecy or give it up. But you have to choose one or the other, no