Cognition Switch #2
By Martin Rees, Michael Shermer, Peter Staudenmaier and
4/5
()
About this ebook
Issue #2: January 2019
Featuring Ideas by:
Michael Shermer, Peter Staudenmaier, Sabine Hossenfelder, Kate Raworth, Benjamin G Martin, Noah Charney, David Wengrow, Kimberley Brownlee, Tali Sharot, Robert Simpson, Thea Bechshoft, Martin Rees, Jon Butterworth, Bill Nye, Huw Price, and Henry Cowles
Related to Cognition Switch #2
Titles in the series (8)
Cognition Switch #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognition Switch #2 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cognition Switch #3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognition Switch #4 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cognition Switch #5 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognition Switch #6 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognition Switch #8 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognition Switch #7 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Mind and Nature: Selected Writings on Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTheologico-Political Treatise — Part 1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Physics of Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSaint Peter's Snow: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cognition Switch #4 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary of Carlo Rovelli's Helgoland Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Defenders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cognition Switch #6 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Meaning of Relativity: Including the Relativistic Theory of the Non-Symmetric Field - Fifth Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics Sixth Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Revelator: A Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Chasers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs Consciousness Everywhere?: Essays on Panpsychism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience and the Modern World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Goodbye Mr. Zen: An informal wander through Zen via James Hilton’s “Goodbye, Mr. Chips” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDouble, Double Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Future of Religion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Living Labyrinth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wild Ass's Skin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFashion, Faith, and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of All Skies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Lies the Wub Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Zoomable Universe: An Epic Tour Through Cosmic Scale, from Almost Everything to Nearly Nothing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letters and Sayings of Epicurus (Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniverse Within: The Surprising Way the Human Brain Models the Universe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Iron Heel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Source: The Secrets of the Universe, the Science of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5THE EMERALD TABLETS OF THOTH THE ATLANTEAN Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Communicating Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Antidote: Happiness for People Who Can't Stand Positive Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Laws of Connection: The Scientific Secrets of Building a Strong Social Network Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNo Man Is an Island Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plato's Republic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Cognition Switch #2
2 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Cognition Switch #2 - Martin Rees
COGNITION SWITCH #2
Featuring Ideas by:
Michael Shermer, Peter Staudenmaier, Sabine Hossenfelder, Kate Raworth, Benjamin G Martin, Noah Charney, David Wengrow, Kimberley Brownlee, Tali Sharot, Robert Simpson, Thea Bechshoft, Martin Rees, Jon Butterworth, Bill Nye, Huw Price, and Henry Cowles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Originally published by Aeon
Published 2019 by Cognition Switch
ISBN: 9788829559343
Thank you for your purchase. If you enjoyed this work, please leave us a comment.
1 2 3 4 10 8 7 6 5 00 000
CONTENTS
I. Utopia is a dangerous ideal: we should aim for ‘protopia’
II. The Nazis as occult masters? It’s a good story but not history
III. Beauty is truth, truth is beauty, and other lies of physics
IV. Monopoly was invented to demonstrate the evils of capitalism
V. ‘European culture’ is an invented tradition
VI. Does technological analysis destroy the romance of art history?
VII. A history of true civilisation is not one of monuments
VIII. The self-reliant individual is a myth that needs updating
IX. How your mind, under stress, gets better at processing bad news
X. ‘Free speech’ is a blunt instrument. Let’s break it up
XI. Polar bears need to be fat, and they can’t be without sea ice
XII. Black holes are simpler than forests and science has its limits
XIII. To think like scientists, students should work like scientists
XIV. If NASCAR embraced electric cars it could change the world
XV. Is the cold fusion egg about to hatch?
XVI. Orwell knew: we willingly buy the screens that are used against us
I. Utopia is a dangerous ideal: we should aim for ‘protopia’
Michael Shermer is the publisher of Skeptic magazine, a monthly columnist for Scientific American, and a presidential fellow at Chapman University in California. His most recent book is Heavens on Earth: The Scientific Search for the Afterlife, Immortality, and Utopia(2018).
https://aeon.co/ideas/utopia-is-a-dangerous-ideal-we-should-aim-for-protopia
Utopias are idealised visions of a perfect society. Utopianisms are those ideas put into practice. This is where the trouble begins. Thomas More coined the neologism utopia for his 1516 work that launched the modern genre for a good reason. The word means ‘no place’ because when imperfect humans attempt perfectibility – personal, political, economic and social – they fail. Thus, the dark mirror of utopias are dystopias – failed social experiments, repressive political regimes, and overbearing economic systems that result from utopian dreams put into practice.
The belief that humans are perfectible leads, inevitably, to mistakes when ‘a perfect society’ is designed for an imperfect species. There is no best way to live because there is so much variation in how people want to live. Therefore, there is no best society, only multiple variations on a handful of themes as dictated by our nature.
For example, utopias are especially vulnerable when a social theory based on collective ownership, communal work, authoritarian rule and a command-and-control economy collides with our natural-born desire for autonomy, individual freedom and choice. Moreover, the natural differences in ability, interests and preferences within any group of people leads to inequalities of outcomes and imperfect living and working conditions that utopias committed to equality of outcome cannot tolerate. As one of the original citizens of Robert Owen’s 19th-century New Harmony community in Indiana explained it:
We had tried every conceivable form of organisation and government. We had a world in miniature. We had enacted the French revolution over again with despairing hearts instead of corpses as a result. … It appeared that it was nature’s own inherent law of diversity that had conquered us … our ‘united interests’ were directly at war with the individualities of persons and circumstances and the instinct of self-preservation.
Most of these 19th-century utopian experiments were relatively harmless because, without large numbers of members, they lacked political and economic power. But add those factors, and utopian dreamers can turn into dystopian murderers. People act on their beliefs, and if you believe that the only thing preventing you and/or your family, clan, tribe, race or religion from going to heaven (or achieving heaven on Earth) is someone else or some other group, then actions know no bounds. From homicide to genocide, the murder of others in the name of some religious or ideological belief accounts for the high body counts in history’s conflicts, from the Crusades, Inquisition, witch crazes and religious wars of centuries gone to the religious cults, world wars, pogroms and genocides of the past century.
We can see that calculus behind the utopian logic in the now famous ‘trolley problem’ in which most people say they would be willing to kill one person in order to save five. Here’s the set-up: you are standing next to a fork in a railroad line with a switch to divert a trolley car that is about to kill five workers on the track. If you pull the switch, it will divert the trolley down a side track where it will kill one worker. If you do nothing, the trolley kills the five. What would you do? Most people say that they would pull the switch. If even people in Western enlightened countries today agree that it is morally permissible to kill one person to save five, imagine how easy it is to convince people living in autocratic states with utopian aspirations to kill 1,000 to save 5,000, or to exterminate 1,000,000 so that 5,000,000 might prosper. What’s a few zeros when we’re talking about infinite happiness and eternal bliss?
The fatal flaw in utilitarian utopianism is found in another thought experiment: you are a healthy bystander in a hospital waiting room in which an ER physician has five patients dying from different conditions, all of which can be saved by sacrificing you and harvesting your organs. Would anyone want to live in a society in which they might be that innocent bystander? Of course not, which is why any doctor who attempted such an atrocity would be tried and convicted for murder.
Yet this is precisely what happened with the grand 20th-century experiments in utopian socialist ideologies