Decommissioning at a Multifacility Site
By IAEA
()
About this ebook
Read more from Iaea
Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Guide for the Practitioner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClimate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Assessment of Climate, Land, Energy and Water Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX): A Collective View on the First Two Decades Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Decommissioning at a Multifacility Site
Titles in the series (62)
Terms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Review on the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsset Management for Sustainable Nuclear Power Plant Operation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Wireless Technologies in Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecommissioning at a Multifacility Site Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis and Collection for Costing of Research Reactor Decommissioning: Final Report of the DACCORD Collaborative Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInitiating Nuclear Power Programmes: Responsibilities and Capabilities of Owners and Operators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Design Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplicability of IAEA Safety Standards to Non-Water Cooled Reactors and Small Modular Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractices for Interim Storage of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVendor and User Requirements and Responsibilities in Nuclear Cogeneration Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnical Approaches for the Management of Separated Civilian Plutonium Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProject Management in Construction of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuidelines for Ageing Management, Modernization and Refurbishment Programmes for Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsset Management for Sustainable Nuclear Power Plant Operation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDigital Instrumentation and Control Systems for New and Existing Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus of Molten Salt Reactor Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResearch Reactor Spent Fuel Management: Options and Support to Decision Making Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFatigue Assessment in Light Water Reactors for Long Term Operation: Good Practices and Lessons Learned Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Resource Management for New Nuclear Power Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecific Considerations in the Assessment of the Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure for a New Research Reactor Programme Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSustaining Operational Excellence at Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Siting Activities for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuidebook on Spent Fuel Storage Options and Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Industries For You
Unreasonable Hospitality: The Remarkable Power of Giving People More Than They Expect Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All You Need to Know About the Music Business: Eleventh Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWeird Things Customers Say in Bookstores Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Uncanny Valley: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All the Beauty in the World: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Study of the Federal Reserve and its Secrets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Artpreneur: The Step-by-Step Guide to Making a Sustainable Living From Your Creativity Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5YouTube Secrets: The Ultimate Guide to Growing Your Following and Making Money as a Video I Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Not All Diamonds and Rosé: The Inside Story of The Real Housewives from the People Who Lived It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sweet Success: A Simple Recipe to Turn your Passion into Profit Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Waiter Rant: Thanks for the Tip—Confessions of a Cynical Waiter Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Writing into the Dark: How to Write a Novel Without an Outline: WMG Writer's Guides, #6 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bottle of Lies: The Inside Story of the Generic Drug Boom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Setting the Table: The Transforming Power of Hospitality in Business Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shopify For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary and Analysis of The Case Against Sugar: Based on the Book by Gary Taubes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBurn Book: A Tech Love Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5INSPIRED: How to Create Tech Products Customers Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Becoming Trader Joe: How I Did Business My Way and Still Beat the Big Guys Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary and Analysis of The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals 1: Based on the Book by Michael Pollan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow We Do Harm: A Doctor Breaks Ranks About Being Sick in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Illusion of Choice: 16½ psychological biases that influence what we buy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Marilyn: The Passion and the Paradox Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ladies Who Punch: The Explosive Inside Story of "The View" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Decommissioning at a Multifacility Site
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Decommissioning at a Multifacility Site - IAEA
DECOMMISSIONING AT
A MULTIFACILITY SITE:
AN INTEGRATED APPROACH
IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES No. NW-T-2.13
DECOMMISSIONING AT
A MULTIFACILITY SITE:
AN INTEGRATED APPROACH
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
VIENNA, 2022
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at:
Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna International Centre
PO Box 100
1400 Vienna, Austria
fax: +43 1 26007 22529
tel.: +43 1 2600 22417
email: sales.publications@iaea.org
www.iaea.org/publications
© IAEA, 2022
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
June 2022
STI/PUB/1996
IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Names: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Title: Decommissioning at a multifacility site: an integrated approach / International Atomic Energy Agency.
Description: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2022. | Series: IAEA nuclear energy series, ISSN 1995–7807 ; no. NW-T-2.13 | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: IAEAL 22-01492 | ISBN 978–92–0–119522–7 (paperback : alk. paper) | ISBN 978–92–0–119622–4 (pdf) | ISBN 978–92–0–119722–1 (epub)
Subjects: LCSH: Nuclear reactors — Decommissioning. | Nuclear facilities — Decommissioning. | Decision making.
Classification: UDC 621.039.59 | STI/PUB/1996
FOREWORD
The IAEA’s statutory role is to seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world
. Among other functions, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on peaceful uses of atomic energy
. One way this is achieved is through a range of technical publications including the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series.
The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises publications designed to further the use of nuclear technologies in support of sustainable development, to advance nuclear science and technology, catalyse innovation and build capacity to support the existing and expanded use of nuclear power and nuclear science applications. The publications include information covering all policy, technological and management aspects of the definition and implementation of activities involving the peaceful use of nuclear technology.
The IAEA safety standards establish fundamental principles, requirements and recommendations to ensure nuclear safety and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
When IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications address safety, it is ensured that the IAEA safety standards are referred to as the current boundary conditions for the application of nuclear technology.
Information and guidance on the decommissioning of nuclear facilities provided in over 100 IAEA technical publications — including IAEA Safety Standards and conference proceedings — and brochures also apply to multifacility sites. However, much of this material does not specifically address decommissioning at such sites. With the growing body of experience in the decommissioning of nuclear installations, which includes the completion of several large scale decommissioning projects in recent years, it is now appropriate to consolidate this technical and organizational information and experience. This publication thus provides additional, specific information and guidance on this subject.
The IAEA expresses its appreciation to all contributors to this publication, in particular to M. Laraia (Italy) for the preliminary draft. The IAEA officer responsible for this publication was V. Michal of the Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology.
The authoritative version of this publication is the hard copy issued at the same time and available as pdf on www.iaea.org/publications. To create this version for e-readers, certain changes have been made, including a the movement of some figures and tables.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Objective
1.3. Scope
1.4. Structure
2. MULTIFACILITY SITES AROUND THE WORLD
2.1. Multi-reactor nuclear power plant sites
2.2. Mixed sites housing nuclear fuel cycle facilities and/or non-power reactors and/or industrial and support facilities
2.3. Mineral processing sites
2.4. Decommissioning activities at multifacility sites around the world
3. OVERARCHING CONSIDERATIONS
3.1. Development of a site-wide decommissioning strategy
3.2. Implementation of an integrated approach to decommissioning
4. TECHNICAL ASPECTS
4.1. Site layout
4.2. Shared infrastructure including utilities and structures, systems and components
4.3. Waste management facilities and provision
4.4. Development and deployment of decommissioning technologies
4.5. Ground contamination
4.6. Site cleanup
4.7. Area and component reutilization
4.8. Compliance with end state requirements
4.9. Safety assessment and emergency preparedness
4.10. Environmental monitoring during decommissioning
5. ORGANIZATIONAL and managerial ASPECTS
5.1. Human resources
5.2. Organizational structures and systems
5.3. Regulatory approaches
5.4. Nuclear security considerations
5.5. Safety and environmental impact assessment
5.6. Emergency preparedness
5.7. Independent owners/operators
5.8. Knowledge management, learning from experience and record keeping
5.9. Human factors
5.10. Asset management including post-decommissioning site reuse
5.11. Stakeholder engagement
5.12. Supply chain engagement and commercial arrangements
6. FINANCIAL ASPECTS
6.1. Cost estimation
6.2. Short term funding
6.3. Long term funding
6.4. Optimization of scope to reflect funding shortfalls
7. INTEGRATED PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING
7.1. Prioritization
7.2. Integrated oversight
8. CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
ANNEXES: SUPPLEMENTARY FILES
GLOSSARY
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
Multifacility sites accommodate independent or interdependent facilities with separate or combined licences and organizational structures. The need to install several facilities at a site is the result of a number of factors. First, ancillary facilities are often needed to support a major facility at the same site. Second, production lines often need several facilities of similar type (e.g. nuclear power reactors) to be commissioned in sequence. Third, multifacility sites benefit from the grouping of resources (and facilities) at one site in support of national nuclear programmes. These benefits include economies of scale and the availability of shared services and infrastructure.
Numerous multifacility sites exist in both developed and developing Member States. These sites may house a wide range of nuclear and/or radiation facilities, such as nuclear reactors, medical, research, industrial, isotope production, fuel cycle, and waste processing and storage facilities. Typical examples include nuclear power stations (with five power reactors, such as Bohunice in Slovakia (Fig. 1)) and nuclear research centres (including research reactors, hot cells, laboratories, waste treatment and decontamination stations, such as Pelindaba in South Africa (Fig. 2), and the Dounreay and Sellafield sites in the United Kingdom (UK) (Figs 3 and 4)).
Some sites have facilities which may be interconnected in terms of production routes and/or services, may include several units of effectively the same design, may have single independent facilities, or may be a combination of the above. Even those facilities at sites that are notionally independent will probably share services and infrastructure such as utilities, nuclear security and/or waste disposal routes.
These sites tend to have been gradually developed over the years and changing demands, regulatory environments and objectives can result in a lack of coordination regarding facility purpose and life cycle management. This lack of coordination may become acute when one or more such facilities reach the decommissioning stage and require the mobilization of significant resources in a short time, while others remain operational.
It would be unreasonable to consider the decommissioning of one particular facility without recognition of the other facilities on the site. Therefore, when addressing the decommissioning at a multifacility site, many questions arise such as:
— Should the entire site be decommissioned at once?
— Does that make good business sense?
— Will the site remain profitable if one unit is shut down and a reduced staff is refocused on operating the remaining units?
To understand how decommissioning activities on-site will be dealt with, organizational requirements for each facility will have to be considered. The focus of site personnel is safe, continuous operation. Do you maintain one operations department with staffing for both the operating units and for the decommissioning unit, or do you split responsibilities? Where do you draw the nuclear security boundary: is the site physically divided by a fence between the operating plant and the decommissioning area? Could the shutdown areas be reused for the purposes of the operating plant? Is the solid waste arising from decommissioning stored separately from the operational waste being generated? What costs need to be considered that would otherwise not be included if the entire site was in operation? How are decommissioning related costs accounted for in a site where other facilities are still in operation? Are there any cost savings possible?
To answer these and other related questions, an integrated approach to decommissioning at multifacility sites needs to be implemented. Any decommissioning approach that focuses only on individual facilities is likely to incur logistical and technical mismatches, which may result in delays of planned activities and increased decommissioning costs.
In particular, unplanned end of operation and shutdown facilities may quickly lose priority and the focus of the site staff. In this situation, plant modifications may be stopped in midstream and existing operational capacities might be still in place while sustainable funding of forthcoming decommissioning activities might not be yet well established. With