Stacia (the 2010 club)'s Reviews > Reflected in You
Reflected in You (Crossfire, #2)
by
2.5 stars. I apologize in advance. I actually spent an hour typing out a review, hit post, then decided to scrap the entire thing and start over because I didn't want to subject you all to my extreme ranty side that comes when I am so wrapped up in the negative that I fail to see the positive. The sarcasm was out in full force tonight. There were to be no fun headers or witty scripts. It was just a rant-o-rama with a side of 'fetch me my gun.'
Take TWO! Let me start with the positives first this time, so those of you who want to exit the show before it goes south can make haste and leave while the getting is still good.
*pause for a moment of reflection and a sip of liquid refreshment* There. I'm feeling better already.
Positive Number 1 : Gideon is still sexy as all get-out. In case you forgot, your memory will be refreshed until your mind has been beaten into submission and you are able to recite details about his person for memory. This one is actually sort of a plus-minus for me. I like being refreshed as long as we're not consumed with repetitiveness.
Positive Number 2 : Gideon can kick ass. And when he's not personally kicking ass, he has the money to hire someone to kick ass for him. Because sometimes, it's just not worth it to get that suit dirty.
Positive Number 3 : Gideon can talk the talk and walk the walk. Dirty talk coupled with dirty sex is always rewarding.
Positive Number 4 : I thoroughly enjoyed the middle section of this book. The restaurant scene and the concert scene (which was quite yummy) were top-notch.
...and end positives. If you want a story with a sexy, protective, alpha-male who can satisfy his woman to mu-mu-mu-mulllltiples, there you go. Get on this asap. I have to stick around and finish this review.
Negative Number 1 : The first half of the book probably contained more romance cliches than any romance book I've read in a while. My all time non-favorite showed up in this status update. I was also not-vibing over Gideon using the word "milked" in reference to what a girl part does to a boy part. That is romance lingo 101 - not actually something a MAN would ever say.
Negative Number 2 : The story was all over the place. There was more running away and then return makeup-fucking than needed for one book. Compare this book to putting every single kidnap scene from the Kristen Ashley Dream Man series in one book (oh snap...I did go there, guess the snark didn't fully go away). That's how much running and re-coupling happened.
Negative Number 3 : Gideon was a controlling jackass. Alpha is fine. Protective is fine. Controlling is not fine. I didn't think Eva's counter-reacting was enough of a get-out-of-jail-free card for his behavior. Eva did give it back to him, but she should have stressed harder boundaries if he wasn't fully ready to heal/change just yet...it is possible to love someone through their flaws as they're learning to change, while still maintaining self-dignity. Her little games with Gideon to prove that she knew what he was up to were just that - games.
Negative Number 4 : The story could have been stronger overall. HOT MAN plus HOT SEX does not equal greatness in storytelling. It equals "hell yeah, that was an enjoyable chapter 3, 7, 14, and 29" (I don't actually recall which chapters had the hot sex, but you get my point). I hated that we didn't really get to start learning more about why our characters needed therapy and healing until the end of the book. I could have used a few more breadcrumbs of substance to balance out all of the extreme obsessing and jealousy issues. Just a few!
...and phew. I managed to point out my negatives without turning this review into a hate-filled rant. Overall, the book was alright with a few glaring issues. I do find myself more invested than I was with book 1 (which felt like a better-written version of Fifty and left me underwhelmed), so I'll probably give book 3 a shot.
So, I managed to snag a small portion of my commentary from the original review. I couldn't bear to send it all to the void. Here you go :
I'm a little alarmed over the "new" romance standard that's crept in over the past year or so. Oh, who are we kidding? This hasn't been a creep...this has been a steamroll.
The first few "extreme drama" books that I read were fun before it got old, fast. I'm ready for this high/low style of writing to die out soon. When the trend started, the style was new and different - it quickly became the kind of story which made us raise an eyebrow and excitedly start comparing notes with our friends about what the hell was going on. Now it's just turned into a free-for-all of storytelling which has become prone to an over-saturation of carnal obsession and unwise decisions.
What happened to smart characters and engaging stories? How are we falling for this recurring story of ultimate dominance wrapped up in a smooth-talking, panty-dropping package? Do the 'golden' attributes of wealth and sex appeal give a person license to be a total controlling jackass? Are trust, honesty and good character no longer valued qualities for the contemporary woman?
You can chew on that and spit it out if you want. My opinion does not reflect the general population. Most people love these books. What can I say? I did rate this one higher than the first, so something must be growing on me.
This book was provided from the publisher through Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6078/a607862fbfb0d3c6767561123627fabb5eb00aff" alt="4013351"
Stacia (the 2010 club)'s review
bookshelves: adult, contemporary-romance, bdsm-or-person-in-control, romantica-or-erotica, slow-as-molasses
Sep 27, 2012
bookshelves: adult, contemporary-romance, bdsm-or-person-in-control, romantica-or-erotica, slow-as-molasses
This won't be a greatest hits review.
2.5 stars. I apologize in advance. I actually spent an hour typing out a review, hit post, then decided to scrap the entire thing and start over because I didn't want to subject you all to my extreme ranty side that comes when I am so wrapped up in the negative that I fail to see the positive. The sarcasm was out in full force tonight. There were to be no fun headers or witty scripts. It was just a rant-o-rama with a side of 'fetch me my gun.'
Take TWO! Let me start with the positives first this time, so those of you who want to exit the show before it goes south can make haste and leave while the getting is still good.
*pause for a moment of reflection and a sip of liquid refreshment* There. I'm feeling better already.
Positive Number 1 : Gideon is still sexy as all get-out. In case you forgot, your memory will be refreshed until your mind has been beaten into submission and you are able to recite details about his person for memory. This one is actually sort of a plus-minus for me. I like being refreshed as long as we're not consumed with repetitiveness.
Positive Number 2 : Gideon can kick ass. And when he's not personally kicking ass, he has the money to hire someone to kick ass for him. Because sometimes, it's just not worth it to get that suit dirty.
Positive Number 3 : Gideon can talk the talk and walk the walk. Dirty talk coupled with dirty sex is always rewarding.
Positive Number 4 : I thoroughly enjoyed the middle section of this book. The restaurant scene and the concert scene (which was quite yummy) were top-notch.
...and end positives. If you want a story with a sexy, protective, alpha-male who can satisfy his woman to mu-mu-mu-mulllltiples, there you go. Get on this asap. I have to stick around and finish this review.
Negative Number 1 : The first half of the book probably contained more romance cliches than any romance book I've read in a while. My all time non-favorite showed up in this status update. I was also not-vibing over Gideon using the word "milked" in reference to what a girl part does to a boy part. That is romance lingo 101 - not actually something a MAN would ever say.
Negative Number 2 : The story was all over the place. There was more running away and then return makeup-fucking than needed for one book. Compare this book to putting every single kidnap scene from the Kristen Ashley Dream Man series in one book (oh snap...I did go there, guess the snark didn't fully go away). That's how much running and re-coupling happened.
Negative Number 3 : Gideon was a controlling jackass. Alpha is fine. Protective is fine. Controlling is not fine. I didn't think Eva's counter-reacting was enough of a get-out-of-jail-free card for his behavior. Eva did give it back to him, but she should have stressed harder boundaries if he wasn't fully ready to heal/change just yet...it is possible to love someone through their flaws as they're learning to change, while still maintaining self-dignity. Her little games with Gideon to prove that she knew what he was up to were just that - games.
Negative Number 4 : The story could have been stronger overall. HOT MAN plus HOT SEX does not equal greatness in storytelling. It equals "hell yeah, that was an enjoyable chapter 3, 7, 14, and 29" (I don't actually recall which chapters had the hot sex, but you get my point). I hated that we didn't really get to start learning more about why our characters needed therapy and healing until the end of the book. I could have used a few more breadcrumbs of substance to balance out all of the extreme obsessing and jealousy issues. Just a few!
...and phew. I managed to point out my negatives without turning this review into a hate-filled rant. Overall, the book was alright with a few glaring issues. I do find myself more invested than I was with book 1 (which felt like a better-written version of Fifty and left me underwhelmed), so I'll probably give book 3 a shot.
So, I managed to snag a small portion of my commentary from the original review. I couldn't bear to send it all to the void. Here you go :
I'm a little alarmed over the "new" romance standard that's crept in over the past year or so. Oh, who are we kidding? This hasn't been a creep...this has been a steamroll.
The first few "extreme drama" books that I read were fun before it got old, fast. I'm ready for this high/low style of writing to die out soon. When the trend started, the style was new and different - it quickly became the kind of story which made us raise an eyebrow and excitedly start comparing notes with our friends about what the hell was going on. Now it's just turned into a free-for-all of storytelling which has become prone to an over-saturation of carnal obsession and unwise decisions.
What happened to smart characters and engaging stories? How are we falling for this recurring story of ultimate dominance wrapped up in a smooth-talking, panty-dropping package? Do the 'golden' attributes of wealth and sex appeal give a person license to be a total controlling jackass? Are trust, honesty and good character no longer valued qualities for the contemporary woman?
You can chew on that and spit it out if you want. My opinion does not reflect the general population. Most people love these books. What can I say? I did rate this one higher than the first, so something must be growing on me.
This book was provided from the publisher through Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Reflected in You.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
September 27, 2012
– Shelved
Started Reading
September 30, 2012
–
15.0%
"He was my drug, and I had no desire to kick the habit.
Oh good god, no...EVERY FLIPPING TIME!!! When will this ever stop?!?"
Oh good god, no...EVERY FLIPPING TIME!!! When will this ever stop?!?"
September 30, 2012
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 128 (128 new)
message 1:
by
Karla
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Sep 27, 2012 04:21PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9207/e9207c2e05815a4721e30e6d7878dd6b817e8572" alt="Karla"
reply
|
flag
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67fb/b67fba7498095317eb7d942582b147a2cba10375" alt="Ian"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
Sara wrote: "lol love your preliminary review. You have a way with words. Thanks I really enjoyed this."
Haha, it's about to go poof in a minute. I just erased it on the edit screen. Now you see, it now you don't!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbf09/cbf0961f8c4ee2e118587c15d0c39a8d14512e17" alt="Natasha is a Book Junkie"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9207/e9207c2e05815a4721e30e6d7878dd6b817e8572" alt="Karla"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1ad3/d1ad35517e13556cc74135e5472d7245e7ecaf53" alt="Carina"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeefe/eeefe0c3252c67e331d2c41d71740ca70ce9e739" alt="Bared to You (Crossfire, #1) by Sylvia Day"
But I think I made the right decission in not picking it up. I know exactly what you mean when you say:
"The story could have been stronger overall. HOT MAN plus HOT SEX does not equal greatness in storytelling. It equals "hell yeah, that was an enjoyable chapter 3, 7, 14, and 29""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b8f3/1b8f343f01e6f87a8e2daee0e633c2b509bc6656" alt="Kristen"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1ad3/d1ad35517e13556cc74135e5472d7245e7ecaf53" alt="Carina"
Not alone, Kristen. The mixed reviews have actually kept me from giving them a try.
I just feel like its gonna be the same old story again. I don't know... =/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aea32/aea321c4d21288648828979d54c5d386f39089cb" alt="Baba"
It was just a rant-o-rama with a side of 'fetch me my gun.'
Lol Loved it!!
And your very best paragraph? Hell yes, I agree. But a majority of the readers are loving these kind of books.
What happened to smart characters and engaging stories? How are we falling for this recurring story of ultimate dominance wrapped up in a smooth-talking, panty-dropping package? Do the 'golden' attributes of wealth and sex appeal give a person license to be a total controlling jackass? Are trust, honesty and good character no longer valued qualities for the contemporary woman?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/595f2/595f2fc33d934615f98b4f6888f084f8274a1adb" alt="Sara"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1907/d1907aed7c5f960830459d7cfba815620f2c3404" alt="Jen"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b945/1b9453dd01e0812db1f247bf1998b5f98a8687b7" alt="Lisa Jo"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68e6b/68e6bbab231ddac7cc1b0341c86eebe7b916194b" alt="Sara"
It was just a rant-o-rama with a side of 'fetch me my gun.'
Lol Loved it!!
And your very be..."
;) that was my favourite paragraph as well!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbf09/cbf0961f8c4ee2e118587c15d0c39a8d14512e17" alt="Natasha is a Book Junkie"
Jen, that's exactly where my addicted head's at!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
To Kristen and Carina, it's probably not a bad idea to wait and distance yourself so the reviews aren't fresh in your head and you can go in without bias.
To everyone else, I completely get why these types of books do work for people. They are sexy. Sometimes that's all you need. I read straight up porn-without-plot erotica at times because that's all I'm in the mood for and it fits the bill quite nicely. I think I'm harder on books when they try to market themselves as mainstream but don't offer as much in the story department.
Giedre wrote: "Ha, I gave the first one 2 stars and a tagline that says, "The Hills on acid." It was entertaining, as in it had entertaining sexytimes, but that was it. I couldn't care less about their emotional ..."
I only gave the first book a 2 star rating as well but mainly because I felt like it was relying too hard on the Fifty phenomenon and wasn't original enough, so I felt kind of blah about it...not that the book itself seemed bad or anything. The writing was at least polished.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c433c/c433c018d91f7cb8cbb7169b56e1e75bd7258362" alt="Georgana ~ Valentine PR & Literary Managment"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
Georgana, I'm surprised. I thought I was being pickier than everyone else. I'll have to check out your thoughts when I get a free second.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b08a7/b08a7ccbb29c632b1a1adfd3c53baa27c0a9d537" alt="Kelly| Just Another Horror Reader"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64439/644391a8703f5b8e87f50bee36bac8da3ce45b43" alt="Lucia"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8a67/f8a6757740a63e40f5fbe7702c008f11e142cc85" alt="Brunhilde"
As always, a wonderful review.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbf09/cbf0961f8c4ee2e118587c15d0c39a8d14512e17" alt="Natasha is a Book Junkie"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a9b0/1a9b03a2c0b4b438f50ce386d2680aaf3e6c6fda" alt="Amanda (.---.--.-...-)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9138/b9138a0e0cdb29352091111ae6ac650ac45ea880" alt="FV Angela"
"What happened to smart characters and engaging stories? How are we falling for this recurring story of ultimate dominance wrapped up in a smooth-talking, panty-dropping package? Do the 'golden' attributes of wealth and sex appeal give a person license to be a total controlling jackass? Are trust, honesty and good character no longer valued qualities for the contemporary woman?"
I completely agree!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
Thanks Lucia and Kelly. :)
Natasha is a Book Junkie wrote: "Brunhilde, if you really liked the first one you're undoubtedly going to like this one as well. It all depends on what you expect to get from it... For me it was awesome buy I get Stacia's POV as w..."
I actually liked book 2 better than the first, so there is a good chance that you might really enjoy it if you loved the first.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8a67/f8a6757740a63e40f5fbe7702c008f11e142cc85" alt="Brunhilde"
I think sometimes in trilogies the middle one is usually the worst. You have to bridge the honeymoon to the climax and that tends to be the least interesting part. With that said I try not expect too much from the middle.
Maybe this is opening a can of worms too--but what about the law of diminishing returns. I mean Bared to You was probably the grittiest book I have ever read so sure I am wowed by it. But if you have read other gritty books you don't have that first high caring you along. You need a better plot, or characters of dialogue to make it good for you.
I remember the days when I thought Julie Garlock books were so wonderful and I had to read everyone! But now, I don't like them at all. When I have gone back to look over them I can't believe I even liked them so much. I was truly carried away but the sex of it all.
So I probably will read this book. But I most likely will wait until I really, really, really want a gut tinglier. And I will most likely have a small tinge of guilt the whole time because it really isn't art like say the Iliad or Grapes of Wrath but it will feel good while it lasts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a1f1/5a1f1ee9ff43cc2562e50e9bbfcae1a5d344c6a5" alt="How to Kill a Rock Star by Tiffanie DeBartolo"
I just finished
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10989/10989ff3e9e728268ab26880ff8bac50d862d443" alt="Taking Chances by Molly McAdams"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a9b0/1a9b03a2c0b4b438f50ce386d2680aaf3e6c6fda" alt="Amanda (.---.--.-...-)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
Stay on the Dimitri high for a while, so you can appreciate (view spoiler) more when you get a chance to read it.
Okay, as for TC and HTKARS...it's not the same shocking moment, but they're both those type of jaw-droppers. I just think that HTKARS did it better in every single way.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a9b0/1a9b03a2c0b4b438f50ce386d2680aaf3e6c6fda" alt="Amanda (.---.--.-...-)"
I did read Bloodlines 0.5, Adrian's Lost Chapter, this morning so maybe that is why I feel I'm not ready to dive in to that series. I do like Adrian and (view spoiler) will be happy reading about him again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a9b0/1a9b03a2c0b4b438f50ce386d2680aaf3e6c6fda" alt="Amanda (.---.--.-...-)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a9b0/1a9b03a2c0b4b438f50ce386d2680aaf3e6c6fda" alt="Amanda (.---.--.-...-)"
So, is there anything as dumb as (view spoiler) in Reflections?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c433c/c433c018d91f7cb8cbb7169b56e1e75bd7258362" alt="Georgana ~ Valentine PR & Literary Managment"
So, is there anything as dumb as [spoilers removed] in Reflections?"
But he does (view spoiler) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/595f2/595f2fc33d934615f98b4f6888f084f8274a1adb" alt="Sara"
So, is there anything as dumb as [spoilers removed] in Reflections?"
But he does [spoilers removed]."
LMAO at the spoiler! Because it's true! They don't live in Manhattan they live (view spoiler)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766b/a766b2e873c20d8de4de1560a375d773a0551fd2" alt="Stacia (the 2010 club)"
I'm probably the only person on the planet who isn't impressed by white-collar rich boys that can hire people to do everything for them. Give me a hot, blue-collar man who can do things for himself.