The Poverty of Philosophy Quotes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42b5c/42b5c1f908e4af63a9f5235c774be3fbe0d62348" alt="The Poverty of Philosophy"
1,274 ratings, 3.95 average rating, 110 reviews
Open Preview
The Poverty of Philosophy Quotes
Showing 1-16 of 16
“When the economists say that present-day relations – the relations of bourgeois production – are natural, they imply that these are the relations in which wealth is created and productive forces developed in conformity with the laws of nature. These relations therefore are themselves natural laws independent of the influence of time. They are eternal laws which must always govern society. Thus, there has been history, but there is no longer any.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“في مجتمع يقوم على البؤس فإن لأبأس المنتجات حقا محتوما في أن يستخدمها أكبر عدد”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Finally, there came a time when everything that men had considered as inalienable became an object of exchange, of traffic and could be alienated. This is the time when the very things which till then had been communicated, but never exchanged; given, but never sold; acquired, but never bought – virtue, love, conviction, knowledge, conscience, etc. – when everything, in short, passed into commerce. It is the time of general corruption, of universal venality, or, to speak in terms of political economy, the time when everything, moral or physical, having become a marketable value, is brought to the market to be assessed at its truest value.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“The windmill gives you society with the feudal lord; the steam mill, society with the industrial capitalist”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Economists have a singular method of procedure. There are only two kinds of institutions for them, artificial and natural. The institutions of feudalism are artificial institutions, those of the bourgeoisie are natural institutions. In this, they resemble the theologians, who likewise establish two kinds of religion. Every religion which is not theirs is an invention of men, while their own is an emanation from God. When the economists say the present-day relations--the relations of bourgeois production--are natural, they imply that these are the relations in which wealth is created and productive forces developed in conformity with the laws of nature. These relations therefore are themselves natural laws independent of the influence of time. They are eternal laws which must always govern society. Thus, there has been history, but there is no longer any. There has been history, since there were institutions of feudalism, and in these institutions of feudalism we find quite different relations of production from those of bourgeois society, which the economists try to pass off as natural and, as such, eternal.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Economists have a singular method of procedure. There are only two kinds of institutions for them, artificial and natural. The institutions of feudalism are artificial institutions, those of the bourgeoisie are natural institutions. In this, they resemble the theologians, who likewise establish two kinds of religion. Every religion which is not theirs is an invention of men, while their own is an emanation from God. When the economists say that present-day relations — the relations of bourgeois production — are natural, they imply that these are the relations in which wealth is created and productive forces developed in conformity with the laws of nature. These relations therefore are themselves natural laws independent of the influence of time. They are eternal laws which must always govern society. Thus, there has been history, but there is no longer any. There has been history, since there were the institutions of feudalism, and in these institutions of feudalism we find quite different relations of production from those of bourgeois society, which the economists try to pass off as natural and as such, eternal.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“This is what distinguishes the philosopher from the Christian. The Christian, in spite of logic, has only one incarnation of the Logos; the philosopher has never finished with incarnations.”
― Poverty of Philosophy
― Poverty of Philosophy
“In a future society, in which class antagonism will have ceased, in which there will no longer be any classes, use will no longer be determined by the minimum time of production; but the time of social production devoted to different articles will be determined by the degree of their social utility.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Legislation, whether political or civil, never does more than proclaim, express in words, the will of economic relations.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“The working class, in the course of its development, will substitute for the old civil society an association which will exclude classes and their antagonism, and there will be no more political power properly so-called, since political power is precisely the official expression of antagonism in civil society.
Meanwhile the antagonism between proletariat and the bourgeoisie is a struggle of class against class, a struggle which carried to its highest expression is total revolution. Indeed, is it at all surprising that a society founded on the opposition of classes should culminate in brutal contradiction, the shock of body against body, as its final dénouement?
Do not say that social movement excludes political movement. There is never a political movement which is not at the same time social.
It is only in an order of things in which there are no more classes and class antagonisms that social evolutions will cease to be political revolutions. Till then, on the eve of every general reshuffling of society, the last word of social science will always be:
― The Poverty of Philosophy
Meanwhile the antagonism between proletariat and the bourgeoisie is a struggle of class against class, a struggle which carried to its highest expression is total revolution. Indeed, is it at all surprising that a society founded on the opposition of classes should culminate in brutal contradiction, the shock of body against body, as its final dénouement?
Do not say that social movement excludes political movement. There is never a political movement which is not at the same time social.
It is only in an order of things in which there are no more classes and class antagonisms that social evolutions will cease to be political revolutions. Till then, on the eve of every general reshuffling of society, the last word of social science will always be:
'Le combat ou la mort; la lutte sanguinaire ou le néant. C'est ainsi que la question est invinciblement posée.' -George Sand.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Economists are the scientific representatives of the bourgeois class.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“they see in poverty nothing but poverty, without seeing in it the revolutionary, subversive side, which will overthrow the old society.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Time is everything, man is nothing; he is, at most, time's carcass.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Владельцы капитала будут стимулировать рабочий класс покупать все больше и больше дорогих товаров, зданий и техники. Толкая их тем самым для того, чтобы они брали все более дорогие кредиты, до тех пор, пока кредиты не станут невыплачиваемыми. Невыплачиваемые кредиты ведут к банкротству банков, которые будут национализированы государством, что в итоге и приведет к возникновению коммунизма.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“It is the bad side that produces the movement which makes history by providing a struggle.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy
“Time is everything, man is nothing; he is, at the most, time’s carcass.”
― The Poverty of Philosophy
― The Poverty of Philosophy