Pledge of Shares - Law, Dislosures & Implications

Pledge of Shares- Law, Disclosures & Implications
March 2009
-Neha Gupta
Vinod Kothari & Company
neha@vinodkothari.com
Pledge of promoters’ shares has become an important way of private equity financing, and
important tool for corporate India, as recent events have highlighted. This article considers some
tricky issues regarding pledges, rights of pawnee and pawnor and the disclosure requirements.
Basic Law of Pledge:

As distinct from liens or hypothecations, a pledge is a possessory security against debt or
promise. Section 172 of Indian Contract Act 1872 defines Pledge as “the bailment of goods as a
security for the payment of a debt or performance of a promise”. A pawnee does not have the
right of ownership, though he has the right of possession but not the right of enjoyment; a
pawnee has the right of disposition which is limited to disposition of pledgee’s rights only and of
a sale only after notice and subject to certain limitation- Shatzadi Begum Saheba v. Girdharilal
Sanghi AIR (1976) Andhra Pradesh 273.
Rights of Pawnee:
As per section 176 of the Contract Act, if the pawnor makes default in payment of the debt, the
pawnee has two distinct rights:
Right to retain the pawn as a collateral security and sue for the claim, or
Right to sell the pawn to realise his dues
While right to retain or sell are not concurrent, right to sue and sell are concurrent rights (Kolkata
High Court Judgement dated 17th July 1962 in Haridas Mundra v. National Grindlays Bank
Ltd.). In case pawnee exercises right to sell, he may recover from the pawnor any deficiency
arising on the sale and hand over the surplus, if any, realised on the sale of the goods to the
pawnor. A significant ruling of Company Law Board dated 7th Nov, 2001, in the matter of
Maruti Udyog Limited v. Pentamedia Graphics Limited, Pentafour Products Limited and Shri
V.Ramakrishnan establishes that the pawnee has right to sue for the outstanding amount, enforce
the security by sale after due notice and file suit enforcing the security. And only in case of
mortgage of shares, the mortgagee can enjoy the shares and bring them in his name and not in
the case of pledge.
Rights of Pawnor:
Section 177 of the Contract Act allows the pawnor to redeem his property even if he has
defaulted. If a time is stipulated for the payment of a debt, and the pawnor makes default, he may
redeem the goods pledged at any subsequent time before the actual sale of that; but he must, in
that case, pay, in addition, any expense which has arisen from his default. J Shelat in Lallan
Prasad v. Rahmat Ali (AIR) 1967 also observed this.
Why would pledge of shares be a special case?

Shares are goods in law; hence, common law rules must be applicable to shares too. Shares are
one of the most common forms of movable property used in pledges – the reasons are obvious
as shares of a substantial value can be pledged to lenders without much of inconvenience. This
would not be possible with lots of other assets. Hence, pledge of shares has always been an
important form of commercial financing. To enable pledge of shares, laws have had provisions
of convenience – such as sec 108(1C)(B) of the Companies Act, 1956 avoiding the requirement
for pre-stamping of a transfer deed in case of pledge of shares to banks etc.
Of late, however, shares have been transformed from physical form into metaphysical form – in
form of demat shares. This throws some new challenges.
Depositories Act contains some specific provisions about pledge, and there is a degree of conflict
between the common law rules discussed above and the Depositories Act provisions.
Provisions in the Depositories Act and Regulation:

Sec 12 of the Depositories Act, 1996 provides that a beneficial owner may with the previous
approval of the depository create a pledge or hypothecation in respect of a security owned by
him through a depository. Every beneficial owner should give intimation of such pledge or
hypothecation to the depository participant and such depository is required to make entries in its
records accordingly. Any entry in the records of a depository should be evidence of a pledge or
hypothecation.
Further, Regulation 58 of SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulation, 1996 lays down the
manner of creating pledge or hypothecation:
o If a beneficial owner intends to create a pledge on a security he shall make an application
to the depository through his participant.
o The participant shall make a note in its records of the notice of pledge and forward the
application to the depository.
o The depository after confirmation from the pledgee shall within fifteen days of the receipt
of the application create and record the pledge and send an intimation of the same to both
the participants.
o On receipt of the intimation, both the participants shall inform the pledger and the pledge
respectively of the entry of creation of the pledge.
o If the depository does not create the pledge, it shall send along with the reasons an
intimation to the participants.
o The entry of pledge may be cancelled by the depository if pledger or the pledgee makes
an application to the depository through its participant
Provided that no entry of pledge shall be cancelled by the depository without prior
concurrence of the pledgee.
o The depository on the cancellation of the entry of pledge shall inform the participant of
the pledger.
o Subject to the provisions of the pledge document, the pledgee may invoke the pledge and
on such invocation, the depository shall register the pledgee as beneficial owner of such
securities and amend its records accordingly.
o After amending its record, the depository shall immediately inform the participants of the
change who in turn shall make the necessary changes in their records and inform the
pledger and pledgee respectively.
o No transfer of such security shall be effected by a participant without the concurrence of
the pledgee.
Conflict between the Contract Act and the Depositories Act:

A major conflict arises between the said Acts on the question: Can Pawnee sell pawn to himself?
The Contract Act does not permit this. Upon default of the pawnor, the pawnee cannot
appropriate the specific pawn, unless it be conveyed by way of mortgage, so as to pass the legal
title. But he may sell it, and apply the proceeds of such sale to the liquidation of his claim. He
cannot, however, become the purchaser himself. Because, where pawnee sells the pawn to
himself, he is seller and buyer both but sale proceeds go to credit of the pawnor. Hence, it is a
clear case of conflict between interests of the buyer and seller.
On the other hand, the Depositories Act provision that talks about pledgee getting the beneficial
ownership transferred in his own name effectively seems to enable a sale to the pawnee. In case
of shares with transparent market price, there is effectively no difference between a pawnee
selling in the market, or selling to himself. However, pawnee cannot, for instance, choose a date
of sale when the price of shares is the least, thus clearly benefiting himself at the cost of the
pawnor.
Invocation vis-à-vis Sale:

Strictly the procedure of the Depositories Act provides for invocation of a pledge which is
transfer of beneficial interest to the pawnee. Pawnee subsequently makes a sale of the shares in
the market. But, who is responsible for the change in price between the date of invocation and
actual sale? On proper construction, it appears that there is no difference under Depositories Act,
as under Contracts law, between invocation and sale. Invocation is for the purpose of sale.
Pawnee may invoke pledge and cause sale directly, as beneficial owner. If he chooses to invoke
pledge, transfer beneficial interest to himself, and not sell in the market, it is a case of sale to
himself. Hence, any change in price after the date of invocation should belong to the pawnee.
Generally, the practice of invoking pledge and not selling should be discouraged.
Recent Amendments:
Capital markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has recently made it
mandatory for promoters to disclose details of shares pledged by them in their listed entities.
SEBI Takeover Code- Event Based Disclosures:
The SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 has been
amended on 28th January 2009 by inclusion of Regulation 8A, which reads out as follows:
• A promoter or every person forming part of the promoter group of any company shall,
within seven working days of commencement of Securities and Exchange Board of India
(Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2009,
disclose details of shares of that company pledged by him to that company.
within 7 working days from the date of creation of pledge on shares of that company held
by him, inform the details of such pledge of shares to that company.
within 7 working days from the date of invocation of pledge on shares of that company
pledged by him, inform the details of invocation of such pledge to that company.
• The company shall disclose the information received to all the stock exchanges, on which
the shares of company are listed, within 7 working days of the receipt thereof, if, during
any quarter ending March, June, September and December of any year,:-
• aggregate number of pledged shares of a promoter or every person forming part of

promoter group taken together with shares already pledged during that quarter by
such promoter or persons exceeds twenty five thousand; or
• aggregate of total pledged shares of the promoter or every person forming part of
promoter group along with the shares already pledged during that quarter by such
promoter or persons exceeds one per cent of total shareholding or voting rights of
the company, whichever is lower.
Amendments to Equity Listing Agreement- Periodic Disclosures:

Capital market regulator SEBI has amended clause 35 and 41 in the Equity Listing Agreement to
enhance disclosures regarding shareholding of promoters and promoter group including details
of pledged shares.

Pledge of Shares - Law, Dislosures & Implications

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pledge of Shares - Law, Dislosures & Implications

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pledge of Shares - Law, Dislosures & Implications

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pledge of Shares- Law, Disclosures & Implications

Basic Law of Pledge:

Why would pledge of shares be a special case?

Provisions in the Depositories Act and Regulation:

Conflict between the Contract Act and the Depositories Act:

Invocation vis-à-vis Sale:

• aggregate number of pledged shares of a promoter or every person forming part of

Amendments to Equity Listing Agreement- Periodic Disclosures:

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.