Scribd
Upload
196 views2 pages

Formation Evaluation Exercise 1 Report

1) Four members conducted an exercise to analyze well data and determine reservoir type. 2) They converted velocity data, calculated S-wave velocities for different rock types, and plotted logs. 3) By comparing P-wave and S-wave logs, and also looking at density and porosity, they found the reservoir contains sandstone above 1935m depth and shale below, with a possible fracture in the shale.

Uploaded by

Tajul Rijal Annuar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
196 views2 pages

Formation Evaluation Exercise 1 Report

1) Four members conducted an exercise to analyze well data and determine reservoir type. 2) They converted velocity data, calculated S-wave velocities for different rock types, and plotted logs. 3) By comparing P-wave and S-wave logs, and also looking at density and porosity, they found the reservoir contains sandstone above 1935m depth and shale below, with a possible fracture in the shale.

Uploaded by

Tajul Rijal Annuar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Formation Evaluation Exercise 1 Report

Date of Exercise: 15 August 2013



Members:
1)Mohamad Rashad bin Amir Rashidi (7e1a8699)
2)Muhammad Rakin bin Zaid (7e1a8715)
3)Muhammad Shafiq bin Razak (7e1a8713)
4)Azrul Nisyam bin Kamaruzaman (7e0a7653)

Objective

To develop the skills needed to produce logs from well data provided.
To analyze and interpret the logs obtained, in order to determine the type of reservoir.
To present the results accurately in a clear and concise manner.

Methodology

1. Converting DT (us/ft) data to velocity (m/s).
2. Using the formulas given, the S-wave velocity data for shale, sandstone and dolomite were
obtained.

Formula:
S wave velocity(sand) = 0.8042 x V
p
0.85
S wave velocity(shale) = 0.77 x V
p
0.867
S wave velocity(dolomite) = 0.58 x V
p
0.0077

3. Logs for the depth data against P-wave, S-waves, density and porosity were plotted using excel.
4. Logs between P-wave and S-waves (shale, sandstone and dolomite) were compared. The
similarity in the wave pattern is taken into consideration.
5. Density and porosity logs were used to assist in confirming the type of reservoir.

Results and Interpretation

By comparing the P-wave log to the S-wave logs, we were able to predict the type or reservoir. The S-
wave logs for sandstone and shale were found to be similar in pattern to the P-wave log. To further
confirm this result, the density and porosity logs were analyzed and results showed that the reservoir
has a boundary (at 1935m depth) between the relatively high porous sandstone and relatively lower
porosity shale. The spike that is present in the shale layer might indicate the presence of a fracture,
possibly due to compaction.






Report by :Muhammad Shafiq bin Razak



P wave Velocity Log
1880.00
1900.00
1920.00
1940.00
1960.00
1980.00
2000.00
0.00 0.50 1.00
1880.00
1900.00
1920.00
1940.00
1960.00
1980.00
2000.00
0.002.004.00
P wave velocity Log S wave velocity Log(Sand) S wave velocity Log(Shale) S wave velocity Log(Dolomite)
Density Log Porosity Log
Plotted Log

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy