Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 183 views

    Marcia Vs CA Case Digest

    Uploaded by

    John Leo Solinap
    1. In 1956, a bus collision in Pampanga resulted in the death of Clemente Marcia and injuries to petitioners. The driver of the bus, Felardo Paje, was charged with homicide and physical injuries through reckless imprudence. 2. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision dismissing the civil case for damages. 3. Reckless imprudence or criminal negligence is not one of the three crimes listed in the Civil Code that allow for independent civil actions. Since injuries were alleged to be from criminal negligence, not inflicted with malice, no independent civil action for damages is permitted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Marcia Vs CA Case Digest

    Uploaded by

    John Leo Solinap
    183 views1 page
    1. In 1956, a bus collision in Pampanga resulted in the death of Clemente Marcia and injuries to petitioners. The driver of the bus, Felardo Paje, was charged with homicide and physical injuries through reckless imprudence. 2. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision dismissing the civil case for damages. 3. Reckless imprudence or criminal negligence is not one of the three crimes listed in the Civil Code that allow for independent civil actions. Since injuries were alleged to be from criminal negligence, not inflicted with malice, no independent civil action for damages is permitted.

    Original Description:

    Case digest for Marcia vs CA

    Original Title

    Marcia vs CA Case Digest

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. In 1956, a bus collision in Pampanga resulted in the death of Clemente Marcia and injuries to petitioners. The driver of the bus, Felardo Paje, was charged with homicide and physical injuries through reckless imprudence. 2. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision dismissing the civil case for damages. 3. Reckless imprudence or criminal negligence is not one of the three crimes listed in the Civil Code that allow for independent civil actions. Since injuries were alleged to be from criminal negligence, not inflicted with malice, no independent civil action for damages is permitted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    183 views1 page

    Marcia Vs CA Case Digest

    Uploaded by

    John Leo Solinap
    1. In 1956, a bus collision in Pampanga resulted in the death of Clemente Marcia and injuries to petitioners. The driver of the bus, Felardo Paje, was charged with homicide and physical injuries through reckless imprudence. 2. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision dismissing the civil case for damages. 3. Reckless imprudence or criminal negligence is not one of the three crimes listed in the Civil Code that allow for independent civil actions. Since injuries were alleged to be from criminal negligence, not inflicted with malice, no independent civil action for damages is permitted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Marcia vs.

    CA
    MARCIA VS. CA
    G.R. No. L-34529 January 27, 9!3
    Appeal by Certiorari from the decision of the CA
    RELOVA, J.:
    FACT: In 1956, a passenger bus in Pampanga operated by private respondent Victory Liner, Inc.
    and driven by its employee Felardo Paje, collided it! a jeep driven by "lemente #arcia,
    resulting in t!e latter$s deat! and in p!ysical injuries to !erein petitioners. %!ereupon, an
    in&ormation &or !omicide and serious p!ysical injuries t!ru rec'less imprudence as &iled against
    Paje in t!e "FI o& Pampanga. ( mont! later, an action &or damages as &iled in t!e "FI o& )i*al
    by petitioners against t!e Victory Liner, Inc. and Paje, alleging t!at, t!e mis!ap as due to t!e
    rec'less imprudence and negligence o& t!e latter in driving t!e passenger bus. Paje as convicted
    by t!e "FI but as ac+uitted on appeal ruling t!at appellant as not even guilty o& civil
    negligence and t!at it as a pure accident. %!e "FI o& )i*al subse+uently dismissed t!e civil
    case.
    !"E: ,-. t!e civil action is an independent one, entirely separate and distinct &rom t!e
    criminal action.
    R"L!#$: /ecision a&&irmed.
    )ec'less imprudence or criminal negligence is not one o& t!e t!ree crimes mentioned in (rticle
    00 o& t!e "ivil "ode. %!e above article spea's only o& de&amation, &raud and p!ysical injuries.
    %!e injuries su&&ered by !erein petitioners ere alleged to be t!e result o& criminal negligence1
    t!ey ere not in&licted it! malice. 2ence, no independent civil action &or damages may be
    instituted in connection t!ereit!.
    %!e c!arge against Felardo Paje as not &or !omicide and p!ysical injuries but &or rec'less
    imprudence or criminal negligence resulting in !omicide and p!ysical injuries su&&ered by 3dgar
    #arcia and )enato 4ap. %!ey are not one o& t!e t!ree crimes mentioned in (rticle 00 o& t!e "ivil
    "ode and, t!ere&ore, no civil action s!all proceed independently o& t!e criminal prosecution.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy