Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 141 views

    Stub Angles PDF

    Uploaded by

    ristymavonda
    The document provides calculations to verify the anchorage capacity of stub angles used to connect concrete towers to their foundations. It includes the dimensions, material properties, and loads used for the calculations. It also shows example calculations for determining the shear capacity provided by the stub angles for different groups of towers. The calculations show the shear capacity of the stub angles exceeds the maximum loads on the foundations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Stub Angles PDF

    Uploaded by

    ristymavonda
    141 views5 pages
    The document provides calculations to verify the anchorage capacity of stub angles used to connect concrete towers to their foundations. It includes the dimensions, material properties, and loads used for the calculations. It also shows example calculations for determining the shear capacity provided by the stub angles for different groups of towers. The calculations show the shear capacity of the stub angles exceeds the maximum loads on the foundations.

    Original Title

    Stub Angles.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides calculations to verify the anchorage capacity of stub angles used to connect concrete towers to their foundations. It includes the dimensions, material properties, and loads used for the calculations. It also shows example calculations for determining the shear capacity provided by the stub angles for different groups of towers. The calculations show the shear capacity of the stub angles exceeds the maximum loads on the foundations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    141 views5 pages

    Stub Angles PDF

    Uploaded by

    ristymavonda
    The document provides calculations to verify the anchorage capacity of stub angles used to connect concrete towers to their foundations. It includes the dimensions, material properties, and loads used for the calculations. It also shows example calculations for determining the shear capacity provided by the stub angles for different groups of towers. The calculations show the shear capacity of the stub angles exceeds the maximum loads on the foundations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 5
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The document analyzes different groups of towers and verifies the capacity of their concrete foundations and stub angles to resist various load cases.

    Three groups of towers are analyzed: Group 1 includes Towers A, A1, and A2. Group 2 includes Towers B2, B3, C, and D. Group 3 includes Towers E and F.

    When verifying the anchorages, the maximum and minimum reaction values for each tower are determined under different load cases. Factors like compressive strength of concrete, dimensions of the stub angles, number and size of clip angles are also considered.

    A

    COM/500/ITS/0057/CN Re v: a Page 223



    2.9. ANCHORAGES VERIFICATION STUB ANGLES
    2.9.1. Maximum reaction values for each Towers

    2.9.1.1. GROUP 1

    POTEAU A POTEAUX A1 POTEAUX A2
    FZ (daN) FZ (daN) FZ (daN)

    MAX 54799.1 MAX 56168.5 MAX 33105
    Node 928 Node 396 Node 609
    Case 102 (C) Case 102 (C) Case 102 (C)

    MIN -46800.4 MIN -48419.4 MIN -28268.1
    Node 927 Node 394 Node 607
    Case 110 (C) Case 110 (C) Case 110 (C)

    2.9.1.2. GROUP 2

    POTEAU
    B2
    POTEAUX B3
    FZ (daN) FZ (daN)

    MAX 132130.7 MAX 74319.3
    Node 222 Node 473
    Case 129 (C) Case 129 (C)

    MIN -112859.6 MIN -60688.1
    Node 224 Node 475
    Case 137 (C) Case 137 (C)

    POTEAUX C POTEAUX D
    FZ (daN) FZ (daN)

    MAX 148578.2 MAX 38408.3
    Node 1141 Node 1245
    Case 129 (C) Case 103 (C)

    MIN -135455.3 MIN -35595.3
    Node 1127 Node 1243
    Case 137 (C) Case 111 (C)

    2.9.1.3. GROUP 3

    POTEAU E FZ (daN) POTEAU F FZ (daN)

    MAX 18349 MAX 28549.5
    Node 290 Node 418
    Case 129 (C) Case 128 (C)

    MIN -14565.3 MIN -23785.9
    Node 294 Node 420
    Case 129 (C) Case 123 (C)

    A
    COM/500/ITS/0057/CN Re v: a Page 224

    2.9.2. Calculation example




    HYPOTHESES :
    Compressive strength of concrete (f'c) : 2.25 DaN/mm
    - Dimensions: a = 280 mm ( > 2.w )
    w = 80 mm
    Clip angles - Tower A
    inside ouside
    Qty = 3 3 -
    b = 110 160 mm
    Clip angles - Tower B
    inside ouside
    Qty = 4 4 -
    b = 140 160 mm
    Type of clip angles : L 120 x 80 x 10 Thickness (t) : 10 mm
    Yield stress (fy) : 23.5 DaN/mm Radius of fillet (r) : 11 mm
    - Acting loads on the foundations (including safety factors):
    Tower X Tower Y
    load (daN) Load case load (daN) Load case
    Compression -46801 .. -86798 ..
    Uplift 54799 .. 74477 ..
    CHECKING :
    - Angle shear connectors - According to ASCE Manual No.52 9.9.2
    - See Reference document [2] Appendix 3
    x = t [ fy / 1.19 f'c ]

    = 29.626 mm
    P = 1.19 f'c b ( t + r + x/2 ) inside clip outside clip
    Tower X 10548 15342 DaN
    Tower Y 13424 15342 DaN
    Total capacity of angle shear connectors = Qty x P [inside clip] + Qty x P [outside clip]
    Tower X (10548 x 4) + (15343 x 4) = 77670 daN > 54799 daN
    Tower Y (13425 x 4) + (15343 x 4) = 115067 daN > 86798 daN
    Note : We considere that the total acting load are taken by the clip angles.
    (The loads taken by the bonding between the concrete and the steel members are not considered
    , therefore adding to the safety factor)
    TOP OF CONCRETE
    TOWER Y
    b
    w
    a
    TOWER X
    b
    w
    a
    A
    COM/500/ITS/0057/CN Re v: a Page 225
    2.9.3. Calculation for GROUP 1


    Concrete foundation with stub angles
    Compressive strength of concrete (f'c) : 2.25 DaN/mm



    Units
    Tower A Tower A1 Tower A2
    Tower Lower angle L 150 x 150 x 12 L 150 x 150 x 12 L 120 x 120 x 10
    HYPOTHESES :
    a = mm ( > 2.w ) 340 340 330
    Thickness (t) : mm 12 12 10
    Radius of fillet (r) : mm 16 16 13
    Clip Angles
    Inside Qty = - 3 3 3
    b = mm 120 120 100
    Outside Qty = - 5 5 4
    b = mm 260 260 250
    Type of clip angles : L 150 x 150 x 12 L 150 x 150 x 12 L 120 x 120 x 10
    Yield stress (fy) : DaN/mm 23.5 23.5 23.5
    Loads
    Compression (daN) 54 800 56 169 33 105
    Uplift (daN) 46 801 48 420 28 268
    CHECKING :

    x = t [ fy / 1.19 f'c ] = mm 35.551 35.551 29.626
    P = 1.19 f'c b ( t + r + x/2 )
    Inside Clip DaN 14 708 14 708 10 124
    Outside Clip DaN 31 867 31 867 25 311

    Total Capacity DaN 203 456 203 456 131 617

    Ratio 0.27 0.28 0.25
    Result Design Correct Design Correct Design Correct



    A
    COM/500/ITS/0057/CN Re v: a Page 226
    2.9.4. Calculation for GROUP 2


    Concrete foundation with stub angles
    Compressive strength of concrete (f'c) : 2.25 DaN/mm

    Units
    Tower B2 Tower B3 Tower C Tower D
    Tower Lower angle L 180 x 180 x 18 L 150 x 150 x 14 L 180 x 180 x 18 L 120 x 120 x 8
    HYPOTHESES :
    a = mm ( > 2.w ) 340 340 340 340
    Thickness (t) : mm 18 14 18 8
    Radius of fillet (r) : mm 18 16 18 13
    Clip Angles
    Inside Qty = - 4 3 3 2
    b = mm 120 120 120 80
    Outside Qty = - 6 5 5 3
    b = mm 260 260 260 180
    Type of clip angles : L 180 x 180 x 18 L 150 x 150 x 14 L 180 x 180 x 18 L 120 x 120 x 8
    Yield stress (fy) : DaN/mm 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5
    Loads
    Compression (daN) 132 131 74 320 148 579 38 409
    Uplift (daN) 112 860 60 689 135 456 35 596
    CHECKING :

    x = t [ fy / 1.19 f'c ] = mm 53.326 41.476 53.326 23.701
    P = 1.19 f'c b ( t + r + x/2 )
    Inside Clip DaN 20 134 16 302 20 134 7 037
    Outside Clip DaN 43 623 35 321 43 623 15 832

    Total Capacity DaN 342 272 225 513 278 516 61 570

    Ratio 0.39 0.33 0.53 0.62
    Result Design Correct Design Correct Design Correct Design Correct
    A
    COM/500/ITS/0057/CN Re v: a Page 227
    Calculation for GROUP 3




    Concrete foundation with stub angles

    Compressive strength of concrete (f'c) : 2.25 DaN/mm




    Units Tower E Tower F
    Tower Lower angle L 120 x 120 x 8 L 120 x 120 x 8
    HYPOTHESES :



    a = mm ( > 2.w ) 340 280
    Thickness (t) : mm 8 8
    Radius of fillet (r) : mm 13 13
    Clip Angles
    Inside Qty = - 2 3
    b = mm 80 80
    Outside Qty = - 3 4
    b = mm 250 250
    Type of clip angles : L 120 x 120 x 8 L 120 x 120 x 8
    Yield stress (fy) : DaN/mm 23.5 23.5
    Loads
    Compression (daN) 18 349 28 550
    Uplift (daN) 14 565 23 786
    CHECKING :
    x = t [ fy / 1.19 f'c ] = mm 23.701 23.701
    P = 1.19 f'c b ( t + r + x/2 )
    Inside Clip DaN 7 037 7 037
    Outside Clip DaN 21 989 21 989

    Total Capacity DaN 80 041 109 066

    Ratio 0.23 0.26
    Result Design Correct Design Correct

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy