Interpretation of Formation Pressure Data: Henderson Petrophysics November 2006

Download as pps, pdf, or txt
Download as pps, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Interpretation of

Formation Pressure Data


Henderson Petrophysics
November 2006

Raw Data Table


(With Initial Fluid Interpretation)

Step 1: Plot the Data

Pressure on the x-axis


Subsea (vertical) depth
on the y-axis

Step 2: Initial Visual Interpretation


?

Gas

Initial Interpretation;
3 Fluids
GOC near 10600 Ft SS
OWC (FWL) near 10700 Ft SS
Unknown fluid at 9626 Ft SS
Not in pressure communication
w/
underlying reservoirs

Oil

Water

Step 3: Initial Quantitative Interpretation

Gas

Remarks;
Gas gradient look realistic
?Oil gradient looks too low
Exclude data from 9626 Ft SS

Oil

Step 4: Detailed Look at GOC

Remarks;
Initial interpretation has oil zone
data points above the gas-oil
contact

Apparent GOC

Step 5: Revised Interpretation of Gas-Oil System

Remarks;
Oil gradient (density) more realistic that
initial interpretation

Detail of Revised Interpretation


Remarks;
Realistic oil gradient
But;
Only 2 data points in ?oil column,
Lowest data point at 10673.8 ft SS has
very low drawdown mobility (k/u). The
resultant apparent pressure and gradient
are therefore uncertain.
Apparent gradient should be checked for
conformance with other field data

GOC 10645

Step 6: Check for Realistic Data


Remarks;
Pressure gradient between bottom 2
points is not realistic far too high
A feasible but very high density water
gradient projects into the hydrocarbon
zone,
This is not possible if the fluids are in
pressure communication

Feasible but high water gradient

Step 7: Is the Interpretation Realistic


Are the fluid pressure gradients realistic and consistent with the
interpreted fluid
Utilize offset well and regional fluid pressure gradient data
Be prepared to eliminate data from the interpretation;
Remove data points with low drawdown mobility to improve
consistency of interpretation,
Eliminate data if there is an apparent pressure discontinuity (data at
9626 ft SS, for example)
Sometimes data cannot be used to determine fluid contacts. For
example, the gradient in the assumed water zone is unrealistic. Also, a
realistic water gradient plots into a known hydrocarbon zone.
Be prepared to change the interpretation as more data becomes
available. For our example no wireline log data or fluid sample data was
available.

Table for Fluid Pressure Gradient Conversion

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy