Tox Exposure Guidelines
Tox Exposure Guidelines
Tox Exposure Guidelines
"All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a
poison and a remedy."
This early observation concerning the toxicity of chemicals was made by Paracelsus (14931541). The classic connotation of toxicology was "the science of poisons." Since that time, the
science has expanded to encompass several disciplines. Toxicology is the study of the interaction
between chemical agents and biological systems. While the subject of toxicology is quite
complex, it is necessary to understand the basic concepts in order to make logical decisions
concerning the protection of personnel from toxic injuries.
Toxicity can be defined as the relative ability of a substance to cause adverse effects in living
organisms. This "relative ability is dependent upon several conditions. As Paracelsus suggests,
the quantity or the dose of the substance determines whether the effects of the chemical are toxic,
nontoxic or beneficial. In addition to dose, other factors may also influence the toxicity of the
compound such as the route of entry, duration and frequency of exposure, variations between
different species (interspecies) and variations among members of the same species (intraspecies).
To apply these principles to hazardous materials response, the routes by which chemicals enter
the human body will be considered first. Knowledge of these routes will support the selection of
personal protective equipment and the development of safety plans. The second section deals
with dose-response relationships. Since dose-response information is available in toxicology and
chemistry reference books, it is useful to understand the relevance of these values to the
concentrations that are actually measured in the environment. The third section of this chapter
includes the effects of the duration and frequency of exposure, interspecies variation and
intraspecies variation on toxicity. Finally, toxic responses associated with chemical exposures
are described according to each organ system.
Routes of Exposure
There are four routes by which a substance can enter the body: inhalation, skin (or eye)
absorption, ingestion, and injection.
Inhalation: For most chemicals in the form of vapors, gases, mists, or particulates,
inhalation is the major route of entry. Once inhaled, chemicals are either exhaled or
deposited in the respiratory tract. If deposited, damage can occur through direct contact
with tissue or the chemical may diffuse into the blood through the lung-blood interface.
Upon contact with tissue in the upper respiratory tract or lungs, chemicals may cause
health effects ranging from simple irritation to severe tissue destruction. Substances
absorbed into the blood are circulated and distributed to organs that have an affinity for
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
that particular chemical. Health effects can then occur in the organs, which are sensitive
to the toxicant.
Skin (or eye) absorption: Skin (dermal) contact can cause effects that are relatively
innocuous such as redness or mild dermatitis; more severe effects include destruction of
skin tissue or other debilitating conditions. Many chemicals can also cross the skin barrier
and be absorbed into the blood system. Once absorbed, they may produce systemic
damage to internal organs. The eyes are particularly sensitive to chemicals. Even a short
exposure can cause severe effects to the eyes or the substance can be absorbed through
the eyes and be transported to other parts of the body causing harmful effects.
Ingestion: Chemicals that inadvertently get into the mouth and are swallowed do not
generally harm the gastrointestinal tract itself unless they are irritating or corrosive.
Chemicals that are insoluble in the fluids of the gastrointestinal tract (stomach, small, and
large intestines) are generally excreted. Others that are soluble are absorbed through the
lining of the gastrointestinal tract. They are then transported by the blood to internal
organs where they can cause damage.
Injection: Substances may enter the body if the skin is penetrated or punctured by
contaminated objects. Effects can then occur as the substance is circulated in the blood
and deposited in the target organs.
Once the chemical is absorbed into the body, three other processes are possible: metabolism,
storage, and excretion. Many chemicals are metabolized or transformed via chemical reactions in
the body. In some cases, chemicals are distributed and stored in specific organs. Storage may
reduce metabolism and therefore, increase the persistence of the chemicals in the body. The
various excretory mechanisms (exhaled breath, perspiration, urine, feces, or detoxification) rid
the body, over a period of time, of the chemical. For some chemicals elimination may be a matter
of days or months; for others, the elimination rate is so low that they may persist in the body for
a lifetime and cause deleterious effects.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
The period of time over which a dose has been administered is generally specified. For example,
5 mg/kg/3 D is 5 milligrams of chemical per kilogram of the subject's body weight administered
over a period of three days. For dose to be meaningful it must be related to the effect it causes.
For example, 50 mg/kg of chemical "X" administered orally to female rats has no relevancy
unless the effect of the dose, say sterility in all test subjects, is reported.
Dose-Response Curves. A dose-response relationship is represented by a dose-response curve.
The curve is generated by plotting the dose of the chemical versus the response in the test
population. There are a number of ways to present this data. One of the more common methods
for presenting the dose-response curve is shown in Graph 1. In this example, the dose is
expressed in "mg/kg" and depicted on the "x" axis. The response is expressed as a "cumulative
percentage" of animals in the test population that exhibits the specific health effect under study.
Values for "cumulative percentage" are indicated on the "y" axis of the graph. As the dose
increases, the percentage of the affected population increases.
Dose-response curves provide valuable information regarding the potency of the compound. The
curves are also used to determine the dose-response terms that are discussed in the following
section.
Graph 1
Hypothetical Dose-Response Curve
Dose-Response Terms. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
defines a number of general dose-response terms in the "Registry of Toxic Substances" (1983, p.
xxxii). A summary of these terms is contained in Table 1.
Toxic dose low (TDLO): The lowest dose of a substance introduced by any route, other
than inhalation, over any given period of time, and reported to produce any toxic effect in
humans or to produce tumorigenic or reproductive effects in animals.
Toxic concentration low (TCLO): The lowest concentration of a substance in air to
which humans or animals have been exposed for any given period of time that has
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Limitations of Dose-Response Terms. Several limitations must be recognized when using doseresponse data. First, it is difficult to select a test species that will closely duplicate the human
response to a specific chemical. For example, human data indicates that arsenic is a carcinogen,
while animal studies do not demonstrate these results. Second, most lethal and toxic dose data
are derived from acute (single dose, short-term) exposures rather than chronic (continuous, longterm) exposures. A third shortcoming is that the LD50 or LC50 is a single value and does not
indicate the toxic effects that may occur at different dose levels. For example, in Graph 2
Chemical A is assumed to be more toxic than Chemical B based on LD50, but at lower doses the
situation is reversed. At LD20, Chemical B is more toxic than Chemical A.
TABLE 1
Summary of Dose-Response Terms
Category
TDLO
TCLO
LDLO
LD50
LCLO
LC50
Toxic Effects
Human
Animal
Acute or chronic All except inhalation Any nonlethal Reproductive, Tumorigenic
Acute or chronic Inhalation
Any nonlethal Reproductive, Tumorigenic
Acute or chronic All except inhalation Death
Death
Not
Death (statistically
Acute
All except inhalation
applicable
determined)
Acute or chronic Inhalation
Death
Death
Not
Death (statistically
Acute
Inhalation
applicable
determined)
Exposure Time Route of Exposure
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Graph 2
Comparison of Dose-Response Curves for Two Substances
Factors Influencing Toxicity. Many factors affect the reaction of an organism to a toxic
chemical. The specific response that is elicited by a given dose varies depending on the species
being tested and variations that occur among individuals of the same species. These must be
considered when using information such as that found in (Table 2).
Examples
Composition (salt, free base, etc.); physical characteristics (particle size, liquid,
Factors related
solid, etc.); physical properties (volatility, solubility, etc.); presence of
to the chemical
impurities; break down products; carrier.
Factors related Dose; concentration; route of exposure (ingestion, skin absorption, injection,
to exposure
inhalation); duration.
Factors related
Heredity; immunology; nutrition; hormones; age; sex; health status; preexisting
to person
diseases.
exposed
Factors related Carrier (air, water, food, soil); additional chemical present (synergism,
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Routes of Exposure. Biological results can be different for the same dose, depending on
whether the chemical is inhaled, ingested, applied to the skin, or injected. Natural barriers
impede the intake and distribution of material once in the body. These barriers can
attenuate the toxic effects of the same dose of a chemical. The effectiveness of these
barriers is partially dependent upon the route of entry of the chemical.
Interspecies Variation. For the same dose received under identical conditions, the
effects exhibited by different species may vary greatly. A dose which is lethal for one
species may have no effect on another. Since the toxicological effects of chemicals on
humans is usually based on animal studies, a test species must be selected that most
closely approximates the physiological processes of humans.
Intraspecies Variations. Within a given species, not all members of the population
respond to the same dose identically. Some members will be more sensitive to the
chemical and elicit response at lower doses than the more resistant members which
require larger doses for the same response.
Age and Maturity. Infants and children are often more sensitive to toxic action
than younger adults. Elderly persons have diminished physiological capabilities
for the body to deal with toxic insult. These age groups may be more susceptible
to toxic effects at relatively lower doses.
Gender and Hormonal Status. Some chemicals may be more toxic to one gender
than the other. Certain chemicals can affect the reproductive system of either the
male or female. Additionally, since women have a larger percentage of body fat
than men, they may accumulate more fat-soluble chemicals. Some variations in
response have also been shown to be related to physiological differences between
males and females.
Genetic Makeup. Genetic factors influence individual responses to toxic
substances. If the necessary physiological processes are diminished or defective
the natural body defenses are impaired. For example, people lacking in the G6PD
enzyme (a hereditary abnormality) are more likely to suffer red blood cell damage
when given aspirin or certain antibiotics than persons with the normal form of the
enzyme.
State of Health. Persons with poor health are generally more susceptible to toxic
damage due to the body's decreased capability to deal with chemical insult.
Environmental Factors. Environmental factors may contribute to the response for a
given chemical. For example, such factors as air pollution, workplace conditions, living
conditions, personal habits, and previous chemical exposure may act in conjunction with
other toxic mechanisms.
Chemical Combinations. Some combinations of chemicals produce different effects
from those attributed to each individually:
Synergists: chemicals that, when combined, cause a greater than additive effect.
For example, hepatotoxicity is enhanced as a result of exposure to both ethanol
and carbon tetrachloride.
Potentiation: is a type of synergism where the potentiator is not usually toxic in
itself, but has the ability to increase the toxicity of other chemicals. Isopropanol,
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
for example, is not hepatotoxic in itself. Its combination with carbon tetrachloride,
however, increases the toxic response to the carbon tetrachloride.
Antagonists: chemicals, that when combined, lessen the predicted effect. There
are four types of antagonists.
1. functional: Produces opposite effects on the same physiologic function.
For example, phosphate reduces lead absorption in the gastrointestinal
tract by forming insoluble lead phosphate.
2. chemical: Reacts with the toxic compound to form a less toxic product.
For example, chelating agents bind up metals such as lead, arsenic, and
mercury.
3. dispositional: Alters absorption, metabolism, distribution, or excretion.
For example, some alcohols use the same enzymes in their metabolism:
ethanol--------> acetaldehyde-------> acetic acid
methanol------> formaldehyde------> formic acid
The aldehydes cause toxic effects (hangover, blindness). Ethanol is more
readily metabolized than methanol, so when both are present, methanol is
not metabolized and can be excreted before forming formaldehyde.
Another dispositional antagonist is Antabuse which, when administered to
alcoholics, inhibits the metabolism of acetaldehyde, giving the patient a
more severe prolonged hangover.
4. receptor: Occurs when a second chemical either binds to the same tissue
receptor as the toxic chemical or blocks the action of receptor and thereby
reduces the toxic effect. For example, atropine interferes with the receptor
responsible for the toxic effects of organophosphate pesticides.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
TABLE 4
LD50 Values for Rats for a Group of Well-Known Chemicals
Chemical
Sucrose (table sugar)
Ethyl alcohol
Sodium chloride (common salt)
Vitamin A
Vanillin
Aspirin
Chloroform
LD50 (mg/kg)
29,700
14,000
3,000
2,000
1,580
1,000
800
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Copper sulfate
Caffeine
Phenobarbital, sodium salt
DDT
Sodium nitrite
Nicotine
Aflatoxin B1
Sodium cyanide
Strychnine
300
192
162
113
85
53
7
6.4
2.5
Health Effects
Human health effects caused by exposure to toxic substances fall into two categories: short-term
and long-term effects. Short-term effects (or acute effects) have a relatively quick onset (usually
minutes to days) after brief exposures to relatively high concentrations of material (acute
exposures). The effect may be local or systemic. Local effects occur at the site of contact
between the toxicant and the body. This site is usually the skin or eyes, but includes the lungs if
irritants are inhaled or the gastrointestinal tract if corrosives are ingested. Systemic effects are
those that occur if the toxicant has been absorbed into the body from its initial contact point,
transported to other parts of the body, and cause adverse effects in susceptible organs. Many
chemicals can cause both local and systemic effects.
Long-term effects (or chronic effects) are those with a long period of time (years) between
exposure and injury. These effects may occur after apparent recovery from acute exposure or as a
result of repeated exposures to low concentrations of materials over a period of years (chronic
exposure).
Health effects manifested from acute or chronic exposure are dependent upon the chemical
involved and the organ it effects. Most chemicals do not exhibit the same degree of toxicity for
all organs.
Usually the major effects of a chemical will be expressed in one or two organs. These organs are
known as target organs which are more sensitive to that particular chemical than other organs.
The organs of the body and examples of effects due to chemical exposures are listed below.
Respiratory Tract. The respiratory tract is the only organ system with vital functional elements
in constant, direct contact-with the environment. The lung also has the largest exposed surface
area of any organ on a surface area of 70 to 100 square meters versus 2 square meters for the skin
and 10 square meters for the digestive system.
The respiratory tract is divided into three regions: (1) Nasopharyngeal--extends from nose to
larynx. These passages are lined with ciliated epithelium and mucous glands. They filter out
large inhaled particles, increase the relative humidity of inhaled air, and moderate its
temperature. (2) Tracheobronchial--consists of trachea, bronchi, and bronchioles and serves as
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
conducting airway between the nasopharyngeal region and alveoli. These passage ways are lined
with ciliated epithelium coated by mucous, which serves as an escalator to move particles from
deep in the lungs back up to the oral cavity so they can be swallowed. These ciliated cells can be
temporarily paralyzed by smoking or using cough suppressants. (3) Pulmonary acinus--is the
basic functional unit in the lung and the primary location of gas exchange. It consists of small
bronchioles which connect to the alveoli. The alveoli, of which there are 100 million in humans,
contact the pulmonary capillaries.
Inhaled particles settle in the respiratory tract according to their diameters:
In general, most particles 5-10 microns in diameter are removed. However, certain small
inorganic particles, settle into smaller regions of the lung and kill the cells which attempt to
remove them. The result is fibrous lesions of the lung.
Many chemicals used or produced in industry can produce acute or chronic diseases of the
respiratory tract when they are inhaled (Table 5). The toxicants can be classified according to
how they affect the respiratory tract.
Not only can various chemicals affect the respiratory tract, but the tract is also a route for
chemicals to reach other organs. Solvents, such as benzene and tetrachloroethane, anesthetic
gases, and many other chemical compounds can be absorbed through the respiratory tract and
cause systemic effects.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
TABLE 5
Examples of Industrial Toxicants that Produce Disease of the Respiratory Tract
Toxicant Site of Action
Acute Effect
Ammonia Upper Airways Irritation, edema
Chronic Effect
Bronchitis
Cancer, bronchitis,
laryngitis
Arsenic
Asbestos
Lung
parenchyma
--
Fibrosis, cancer
Chlorine
Upper airways
--
Phosgene Alveoli
Edema
Toluene
Xylene
Upper airways
Lower airways
--Emphysema,
bronchitis
Bronchitis, fibrosis,
pneumonia
---
Skin. The skin is, in terms of weight, the largest single organ of the body. It provides a barrier
between the environment and other organs (except the lungs and eyes) and is a defense against
many chemicals.
The skin consists of the epidermis (outer layer) and the dermis (inner layer). In the dermis are
sweat glands and ducts, sebaceous glands, connective tissue, fat, hair follicles, and blood vessels.
Hair follicles and sweat glands penetrate both the epidermis and dermis. Chemicals can penetrate
through the sweat glands, sebaceous glands, or hair follicles.
Although the follicles and glands may permit a small amount of chemicals to enter almost
immediately, most pass through the epidermis, which constitutes the major surface area. The top
layer is the stratum corneum, a thin cohesive membrane of dead surface skin. This layer turns
over every 2 weeks by a complex process of cell dehydration and polymerization of intracellular
material. The epidermis plays the critical role in skin permeability.
Below the epidermis lies the dermis, a collection of cells providing a porous, watery,
nonselective diffusion medium. Intact skin has a number of functions:
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
The ability of skin to absorb foreign substances depends on the properties and health of the skin
and the chemical properties of the substances. Absorption is enhanced by:
Absorption of a toxic chemical through the skin can lead to local effects through direct contact,
such as irritation and necrosis, and systemic effects.
Many chemicals can cause a reaction with the skin resulting in inflammation called dermatitis.
These chemicals are divided into three categories:
Primary irritants: Act directly on normal skin at the site of contact (if chemical is in
sufficient quantity for a sufficient length of time). Skin irritants include: acetone, benzyl
chloride, carbon disulfide, chloroform, chromic acid and other soluble chromium
compounds, ethylene oxide, hydrogen chloride, iodine, methyl ethyl ketone, mercury,
phenol, phosgene, styrene, sulfur dioxide, picric acid, toluene, xylene.
Photosensitizers: Increase in sensitivity to light, which results in irritation and redness.
Photosensitizers include: tetracyclines, acridine, creosote, pyridine, furfural, and naphtha.
Allergic sensitizers: May produce allergic-type reaction after repeated exposures. They
include: formaldehyde, phthalic anhydride, ammonia, mercury, nitrobenzene, toluene
diisocyanate, chromic acid and chromates, cobalt, and benzoyl peroxide.
Eyes. The eyes are affected by the same chemicals that affect skin, but the eyes are much more
sensitive. Many materials can damage the eyes by direct contact:
Acids: Damage to the eye by acids depends on pH and the protein-combining capacity of
the acid. Unlike alkali burns, the acid burns that are apparent during the first few hours
are a good indicator of the long-term damage to be expected. Some acids and their
properties are:
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
In addition, some compounds act on eye tissue to form cataracts, damage the optic nerve, or
damage the retina. These compounds usually reach the eye through the blood having been
inhaled, ingested or absorbed rather than direct contact. Examples of compounds that can
provide systemic effects damaging to the eyes are:
Central Nervous System. Neurons (nerve cells) have a high metabolic rate but little capacity for
anaerobic metabolism. Subsequently, inadequate oxygen flow (anoxia) to the brain kills cells
within minutes. Some may die before oxygen or glucose transport stops completely.
Because of their need for oxygen, nerve cells are readily affected by both simple asphyxiants and
chemical asphyxiants. Also, their ability to receive adequate oxygen is affected by compounds
that reduce respiration and thus reduce oxygen content of the blood (barbiturates, narcotics).
Other examples are compounds such as arsine, nickel, ethylene chlorohydrin, tetraethyl lead,
aniline, and benzene that reduce blood pressure or flow due to cardiac arrest, extreme
hypotension, hemorrhaging, or thrombosis.
Some compounds damage neurons or inhibit their function through specific action on parts of the
cell. The major symptoms from such damage include: dullness, restlessness, muscle tremor,
convulsions, loss of memory, epilepsy, idiocy, loss of muscle coordination, and abnormal
sensations. Examples are:
Fluoroacetate: Rodenticide.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Some chemicals are noted for producing weakness of the lower extremities and abnormal
sensations (along with previously mentioned symptoms):
Agents that prevent the nerves from producing proper muscle contraction and may result in death
from respiratory paralysis are DDT, lead, botulinum toxin, and allethrin (a synthetic insecticide).
DDT, mercury, manganese, and monosodium glutamate also produce personality disorders and
madness.
Liver. Liver injury induced by chemicals has been known as a toxicologic problem for hundreds
of years. It was recognized early that liver injury is not a simple entity, but that the type of lesion
depends on the chemical and duration of exposure. Three types of response to hepatotoxins can
be identified:
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Biotransformation of toxicants. The liver is the principal organ that chemically alters
all compounds entering the body. For example:
ethanol---> acetaldehyde---> acetic acid---> water + carbon dioxide
This metabolic action by the liver can be affected by diet, hormone activity, and
alcohol consumption. Biotransformation in the liver can also lead to toxic
metabolities. For example:
carbon tetrachloride---> chloroform
Kidneys. The kidney is susceptible to toxic agents for several reasons: (1) The kidneys constitute
1 percent of the body's weight, but receive 20-25 percent of the blood flow (during rest). Thus,
large amounts of circulating toxicants reach the kidneys quickly. (2) The kidneys have high
oxygen and nutrient requirements because of their workload. They filter one-third of the plasma
reaching them and reabsorb 98-99% of the salt and water. As they are reabsorbed, salt
concentrates in the kidneys. (3) Changes in kidney pH may increase passive diffusion and thus
cellular concentrations of toxicants. (4) Active secretion processes may concentrate toxicants. (5)
Biotransformation is high.
A number of materials are toxic to the kidneys:
Heavy metals, may denature proteins as well as produce cell toxicity. Heavy metals
(including mercury, arsenic, gold, cadmium, lead, and silver) are readily concentrated in
the kidneys, making this organ particularly sensitive.
Halogenated organic compounds, which contain chlorine, fluorine, bromine, or iodine.
Metabolism of these compounds, like that occurring in the liver, generates toxic
metabolites. Among compounds toxic to the kidneys are carbon tetrachloride,
chloroform, 2,4,5-T (a herbicide), and ethylene dibromide (a fumigant).
Miscellaneous, including carbon disulfide (solvent for waxes and resins) and ethylene
glycol (automobile antifreeze).
Blood. The blood system can be damaged by agents that affect blood cell production (bone
marrow), the components of blood (platelets, red blood cells, and white blood cells), or the
oxygen-carrying capacity of red blood cells.
Bone Marrow. Bone marrow is the source of most components in blood. Agents that suppress
the function of bone marrow include:
Blood Components. Among platelets (thrombocytes) are blood components that help prevent
blood loss by forming blood clots. Among chemicals that affect this action are:
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Leukocytes (white blood cells) are primarily responsible for defending the body against foreign
organisms or materials by engulfing and destroying the material or by producing antibodies.
Chemicals that increase the number of leukocytes include naphthalene, magnesium oxide, boron
hydrides, and tetrachloroethane. Agents that decrease the number of leukocytes include benzene
and phosphorous.
Erythrocytes (red blood cells) transport oxygen in the blood. Chemicals that destroy (hemolyze)
red blood cells include arsine (a gaseous arsenic compound and contaminant in acetylene),
naphthalene (used to make dyes), and warfarin (a rodenticide).
Oxygen Transport. Some compounds affect the oxygen carrying capabilities of red blood cells.
A notable example is carbon monoxide which combines with hemoglobin to form
carboxyhemoglobin. Hemoglobin has an affinity for carbon monoxide 200 times greater than
that for oxygen.
While carbon monoxide combines reversibly with hemoglobin, some chemicals cause the
hemoglobin to change such that it cannot combine reversibly with oxygen. This condition is
called methemoglobinemia. Some chemicals that can cause this are:
Spleen. The spleen filters bacteria and particulate matter (especially deteriorated red blood cells)
from the blood. Iron is recovered from the hemoglobin for recycling. In the embryo, the spleen
forms all types of blood cells. In the adult, however, it produces only certain kinds of leukocytes.
Examples of chemicals that damage the spleen are:
Reproductive System. Experimental results indicate that certain agents interfere with the
reproductive capabilities of both sexes, causing sterility, infertility, abnormal sperm, low sperm
count, and/or affect hormone activity in animals. Many of these also affect human reproduction.
Further study is required to identify reproductive toxins and their effects. Some examples of
chemicals that have been implicated in reproductive system toxicity include:
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Teratogenic potential has been suggested by animal studies under various conditions:
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Far fewer agents have been conclusively shown to be teratogenic in humans: anesthetic gases,
organic mercury compounds, ionizing radiation, german measles and thalidomide.
Mutagenic. Mutagens are agents that cause changes (mutations) in the genetic code, altering
DNA. The changes can be chromosomal breaks, rearrangement of chromosome pieces, gain or
loss of entire chromosomes, or changes within a gene.
Among agents shown to be mutagenic in humans are:
The concern over mutagenic agents covers more than the effect that could be passed into the
human gene pool (germinal or reproductive cell mutations). There is also interest in the
possibility that somatic cell mutations may produce carcinogenic or teratogenic responses.
Carcinogenic. Two types of carcinogenic mechanisms have been identified.
Genotoxic: Electrophilic carcinogens that alter genes through interaction with DNA.
There are three types:
Direct or primary carcinogens: Chemicals that act without any bioactivation; for
example, bis(chloromethyl) ether, ethylene dibromide, and dimethyl sulfate.
Procarcinogens: Chemicals that require biotransformation to activate them to a
carcinogen; for example, vinyl chloride and 2-naphthylamine.
Inorganic carcinogen: Some of these are preliminarily categorized as genotoxic
due to potential for DNA damage. Other compounds in the group may operate
through epigenetic mechanisms.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Epigenetic: These are carcinogens that do not act directly with genetic material. Several
types are possible:
Cocarcinogen: Increases the overall response of a carcinogen when they are
administered together; for example, sulfur dioxide, ethanol, and catechol.
Promoter: Increases response of a carcinogen when applied after the carcinogen
but will not induce cancer by itself; for example, phenol and dithranol.
Solid-state: Works by unknown mechanism, but physical form vital to effect; for
example, asbestos and metal foils.
Hormone: Usually is not genotoxic, but alters endocrine balance; often acts as
promoter (e.g. DES and estrogens).
Immunosuppressor: Mainly stimulates virally induced, transplanted, or metastatic
neoplasms by weakening host's immune system (e.g., antilymphocytic serum,
used in organ transplants).
Genotoxic carcinogens are sometimes effective after a single exposure, can act in a cumulative
manner, or act with other genotoxic carcinogens which affect the same organs. Some epigenetic
carcinogens, however, only cause cancers when concentrations are high and exposure long. The
implication is that while there may be a "safe" threshold level of exposure for some carcinogens,
others may have "zero" threshold; that is, one molecule of the chemical can induce a cancer.
Various considerations indicate that DNA is a critical target for carcinogens:
Many carcinogens are or can be metabolized so that they react with DNA. In these cases,
the reaction can usually be detected by testing for evidence of DNA repair.
Many carcinogens are also mutagens.
Inhibitors and inducers of carcinogens affect mutagenic activity.
Chemicals often are tested for mutagenic and carcinogenic activity in the same cell
systems.
Defects in DNA repair predispose to cancer development.
Several inheritable or chromosomal abnormalities predispose to cancer development.
Initiated dormant tumor cells persist, which is consistent with a change in DNA.
Cancer is inheritable at the cellular level and, therefore, may result from an alteration of
DNA.
Most, if not all, cancers display chromosomal abnormalities.
Although cancer ranks as the second most common cause of death in the United States, the
process of carcinogenesis is not yet clearly defined. As a result, there are several problems
encountered when evaluating the carcinogenic potential of various agents in the environment.
First, human health can be affected by a wide range of factors including the environment,
occupation, genetic predisposition and lifestyle (i.e., cigarette smoking and diet). Therefore, it is
often difficult to determine the relationship between any one exposure and the onset of cancer.
Second, many cancers are latent responses; that is, the disease may not be manifested until many
years after the initial exposure. Third, the mechanisms for carcinogenesis may differ according to
the type and the site of cancer.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES
It is necessary, during response activities involving hazardous materials, to acknowledge and
plan for the possibility that response personnel will be exposed to the materials present at some
time and to some degree. Most materials have levels of exposure which can be tolerated without
adverse health effects. However, it is most important to identify the materials involved and then
determine (1) the exposure levels considered safe for each of these materials; (2) the type and
extent of exposure; and (3) possible health effects of overexposure.
Several reference sources are available that contain information about toxicological properties
and safe exposure limits for many different materials. These sources can be grouped into two
general categories: 1) sources that provide toxicological data and general health hazard
information and warnings and 2) sources that describe specific legal exposure limits or
recommended exposure guidelines.
Both types of sources, considered together, provide useful information that can be used to assess
the exposure hazards that might be present at a hazardous materials incident. In the following
discussion, these sources are described in greater detail.
General Guidelines
The effects of chemical exposure with the route and dosage required can be found in NIOSH's
Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. However, because most of the data is for
animal exposures, there may be problems in trying to use the data for human exposure
guidelines.
Other sources give some general guides on chemical exposure. They may say that the chemical is
an irritant or corrosive, or they may give a warning like "AVOID CONTACT" or "AVOID
BREATHING VAPORS." This gives the user information about the possible route of exposure
and effects of the exposure. However, this does not give a safe exposure limit. One may question
whether the warning means to "AVOID ANY POSSIBLE CONTACT" or whether there is a
certain amount that a person can contact safely for a certain length of time.
Two sources of information go a little further and use a ranking system for exposure to
chemicals. Irving Sax, in Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, gives a Toxic Hazard
Rating (THR) for certain chemicals. These ratings are NONE, LOW, MODERATE, and HIGH.
The route of exposure is also given. For example, butylamine is listed as a HIGH toxic hazard
via oral and dermal routes and a MODERATE toxic hazard via inhalation. HIGH means that the
chemical is "capable of causing death or permanent injury due to the exposures of normal use;
incapacitating and poisonous; requires special handling."
In the book, Fire Protection Guide on Hazardous Materials, the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) also uses a ranking system to identify the toxic hazards of a chemical. These
numbers are part of the NFPA 704 M identification system. The numbers used range from 0 to 4
where 0 is for "materials which on exposure under fire conditions would offer no health hazard
beyond that of ordinary combustible material" and 4 is for materials where "a few whiffs of the
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
gas or vapor could cause death; or the gas, vapor, or liquid could be fatal on penetrating the fire
fighters' normal full protective clothing which is designed for resistance to heat." The degree of
hazard is based upon the inherent properties of the chemical and the hazard that could exist under
fire or other emergency conditions. This rating is based on an exposure of "a few seconds to an
hour" and the possibility of large quantities of material being present. Thus it is not completely
applicable to long-term exposure to small quantities of chemicals. It is more useful for spills or
fires where a person could come in contact with a large amount of the chemical.
The Sax and NFPA sources provide information about the routes of exposures and some effects
along with a rating system which indicates which chemicals require extra precaution and special
protective equipment.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Some of the standards were exposure guidelines. They gave "acceptable concentrations" which
were "concentrations of air contaminants to which a person may be exposed without discomfort
or ill effects." These exposure limits were withdrawn in 1982. However, some were adopted by
OSHA before the withdrawal and still may be in use.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). In 1971, the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) promulgated Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). These
limits were extracted from the 1968 TLVs, the ANSI standards, and other federal standards. The
PELs are found in 29 CFR 1910.1000. Since then, additional PELs have been adopted and a few
of the originals have been changed. These have been incorporated into specific standards for
chemicals (e.g., 29 CFR 1910.1028 - Benzene). There are also standards for thirteen carcinogens
in which there is no allowable inhalation exposure.
In 1989, OSHA published major revisions to the PELs. Since only a few of the PELs had been
updated since 1971, it was decided to update the entire list of PELs by changing existing ones
and adding new ones. Again, OSHA looked to the TLVs, but also considered recommendations
from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
Because OSHA is a regulatory agency, their PELs are legally enforceable standards and apply to
all private industries and federal agencies. They may also apply to state and local employees
depending upon the state laws.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was formed at the same time as OSHA to act as a
research organization. It is charged, in part, with making recommendations for new standards
and revising old ones as more information is accumulated. The exposure levels NIOSH has
researched have been used to develop new OSHA standards, but there are many Recommended
Exposure Limits (RELs) that have not been adopted. Thus, they are in the same status as the
exposure guidelines of ACGIH and other groups. The RELs are found in the "NIOSH
Recommendations for Occupational Health Standards" (see Appendix II).
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). The American Industrial Hygiene
Association has provided guidance for industrial hygienists for many years. In 1984, AIHA
developed exposure guidelines that it calls Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides
(WEELs). These are reviewed and updated each year. Appendix III has the current list of
WEELs. While the list is not as large as others, AIHA has chosen chemicals for which other
groups do not have exposure guidelines. Thus, they are providing information to fill the gaps left
by others.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Graph 3
Example of an Exposure Compared to a TWA Exposure Limit
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL). The excursions allowed by the TWA could involve very
high concentrations and cause an adverse effect, but still be within the allowable average.
Therefore, some organizations felt there was a need for a limit to these excursions. In 1976,
ACGIH added STELs to its TLVs. The STEL is a 15 minute, TWA exposure. Excursions to the
STEL should be at least 60 minutes apart, no longer than 15 minutes in duration and should not
be repeated more than 4 times per day. Because the excursions are calculated into the 8-hour
TWA, the exposure must be limited to avoid exceeding the TWA. Graph 4 illustrates an
exposure that exceeds the 15 minute limit for an STEL of 1000 ppm.
The STEL supplements the TWA. It reflects an exposure limit that protects against acute effects
from a substance which primarily exhibits chronic toxic effects. This concentration is set at a
level to protect workers against irritation, narcosis, and irreversible tissue damage. OSHA added
STELs to its PELs with the 1989 revisions.
AIHA has some short-term TWAs similar to the STELs. The times used vary from 1 to 30
minutes. These short-term TWAs are used in conjunction with, or in place of, the 8-hour TWA.
There is no limitation on the number of these excursions or the rest period between each
excursion.
Graph 4
Example of an Exposure Compared to an STEL and a TWA
Ceiling (C). Ceiling values exist for substances where exposure results in a rapid and particular
type of response. It is used where a TWA (with its allowable excursions) would not be
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
appropriate. ACGIH and OSHA state that a ceiling value should not be exceeded even
instantaneously. . They denote a ceiling valuely a ACT preceding the exposure limit.
NIOSH also uses ceiling values. However, their ceiling values are more like a STEL. Many have
time limits (from 5 to 60 minutes) associated with the exposure. Graph 5 illustrates an exposure
that does not exceed a ceiling value of 5 ppm.
Graph 5
Example of an Exposure Compared to a Ceiling Exposure Limit
Peaks. Until recently ANSI, and OSHA where they have adopted ANSI standards, had used a
peak exposure limit. This peak exposure is an allowable excursion above their ceiling values.
The duration and number of exposures at this peak value is limited. For example, ANSI allowed
the 25 ppm ceiling value for benzene to be exceed to 50 ppm but only for 10 minutes during an 8
hour period. ANSI withdrew its exposure limit standards in 1982. With the revision of the PELs
in 1989, OSHA has dropped most of its peak values.
"Skin" Notation. While these exposure guidelines are based on exposure to airborne
concentrations of chemicals. However, OSHA, NIOSH, ACGIH and AIHA recognize that there
are other routes of exposure in the workplace. In particular, there can be a contribution to the
overall exposure from skin contact with chemicals that can be absorbed through the skin.
Unfortunately, there is very little data available that quantifies the amount of allowable skin
contact. But some organizations provide qualitative information about skin absorbable
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
chemicals. When a chemical has the potential to contribute to the overall exposure by direct
contact with the skin, mucous membranes or eyes, it is given a "skin" notation.
This "skin" notation not only points out chemicals that are readily absorbed through the skin, but
also notes that if there is skin contact, the exposure guideline for inhalation may not provide
adequate protection. The inhalation exposure guidelines are designed for exposures only from
inhalation. If additional routes of exposure are added, there can be detrimental effects even if the
exposure guideline is not exceeded.
Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH). In the May 1987 "NIOSH Respirator
Decision Logic", IDLH is defined as a condition "that poses a threat of exposure to airborne
contaminants when that exposure is likely to cause death or immediate or delayed permanent
adverse health effects or prevent escape from such an environment. The purpose of establishing
an IDLH exposure level is to ensure that the worker can escape from a given contaminated
environment in the event of failure of the respiratory protection equipment.
Other organizations, such as ANSI, OSHA, and the Mine Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA), have defined IDLH similarly. It is accepted by all of these groups that IDLH
conditions include not only toxic concentrations of contaminants, but also oxygen-deficient
atmospheres and explosive, or near-explosive (above, at, or near the lower explosive limits),
environments.
At hazardous material incidents, IDLH concentrations should be assumed to represent
concentrations above which only workers wearing respirators that provide the maximum
protection (i.e., a positive-pressure, full-facepiece, self-contained breathing apparatus [SCBA] or
a combination positive-pressure, full-facepiece, supplied-air respirator with positive-pressure
escape SCBA) are permitted. Specific IDLH concentrations values for many substances can be
found in the NIOSH "Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards." Guidelines for potentially explosive,
oxygen deficient, or radioactive environments can be found in the U.S. EPA "Standard Operating
Safety Guidelines" and the NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA Occupational Safety and Health
Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu
REFERENCES
1. Ariens, Everhard; A.M. Simonis; and J. Offermeir. Introduction to General Toxicology.
Academic Press, New York, NY, 1976.
2. Doull, John; Curtis D. Klaassen; Mary O. Amdur. Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The
Basic Science of Poisons. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, NY, 1986.
3. Loomis, Ted A. Essentials of Toxicology. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1970.
4. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Registry of Toxic Effects of
Chemical Substances. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 83-107, Volumes 1-3, U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1983.
5. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The Industrial Environment: Its
Evaluation and Control. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1973.
6. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Diseases: A Guide
to Their Recognition. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1977.
7. Proctor, Nick H; James P. Hughes. Chemical Hazards of the Workplace. J.B. Lippincott
Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1978.
8. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Safety and Health Toxicology Training Course
100-124-9, December 8-16, 1981, Chicago, IL.
(Created 12/02)
UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu