This rubric evaluates analytical essays on four criteria: thesis statement and introduction/conclusion; examples, evidence, and content; organization and structure; and writing mechanics and style. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess performance at four levels - distinguished (***), proficient (**), basic (*), and below basic. For a distinguished score, the thesis must completely and clearly answer the question, and the introduction/conclusion must be clear, complete, and logically organized. Proficient requires a completely clear thesis and summary introduction, while basic may have a weak thesis or introduction. Below basic would have an unclear or missing thesis.
This rubric evaluates analytical essays on four criteria: thesis statement and introduction/conclusion; examples, evidence, and content; organization and structure; and writing mechanics and style. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess performance at four levels - distinguished (***), proficient (**), basic (*), and below basic. For a distinguished score, the thesis must completely and clearly answer the question, and the introduction/conclusion must be clear, complete, and logically organized. Proficient requires a completely clear thesis and summary introduction, while basic may have a weak thesis or introduction. Below basic would have an unclear or missing thesis.
This rubric evaluates analytical essays on four criteria: thesis statement and introduction/conclusion; examples, evidence, and content; organization and structure; and writing mechanics and style. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess performance at four levels - distinguished (***), proficient (**), basic (*), and below basic. For a distinguished score, the thesis must completely and clearly answer the question, and the introduction/conclusion must be clear, complete, and logically organized. Proficient requires a completely clear thesis and summary introduction, while basic may have a weak thesis or introduction. Below basic would have an unclear or missing thesis.
This rubric evaluates analytical essays on four criteria: thesis statement and introduction/conclusion; examples, evidence, and content; organization and structure; and writing mechanics and style. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to assess performance at four levels - distinguished (***), proficient (**), basic (*), and below basic. For a distinguished score, the thesis must completely and clearly answer the question, and the introduction/conclusion must be clear, complete, and logically organized. Proficient requires a completely clear thesis and summary introduction, while basic may have a weak thesis or introduction. Below basic would have an unclear or missing thesis.
**** Thesis Statement and Introduction; Conclusion
Examples, Evidence, Content
Organization and Structure
Writing Mechanics and
Style
***
**
Thesis statement answers the Thesis statement answers the
question completely and question completely and clearly. Introduction presents clearly. Introduction gives clear and complete summary of summary of evidence to be evidence to be used in support used in support of thesis of thesis statement. statement. Organization of the Organization of the introduction introduction may be somewhat is logical. Conclusion extends weak. Conclusion re-states the the argument and explains its thesis statement, but may not significance. extend or explain the arguments significance. Evidence in support of thesis is Evidence in support of thesis is accurate, specific, relevant, and accurate, specific, relevant, and sufficient. Essay clearly and sufficient. Essay may not effectively explains how always clearly explain how particular examples support particular examples support thesis statement. thesis statement.
Thesis statement does not
Thesis statement does not answer the question completely, answer the question and/or does and/or is weak or confusing. not make an argument. Summary of evidence to be Introduction does not give used in support of thesis summary of evidence to be statement may be lacking. used in support of thesis Organization of introduction statement. Conclusion fails to may be weak. Conclusion may re-state the thesis, or is entirely not clearly re-state the thesis absent. statement.
The essay is well-organized.
The essay is well organized. The purpose of each paragraph The purpose of each paragraph is clear, with strong topic is clear, but there may be weak sentences linked to the thesis. topic sentences. Some content The content of each paragraph may be inconsistent or is consistent and appropriate. irrelevant, and there may be The paragraphs are logically minor problems of logic and sequenced. paragraph sequence. Language is clear and powerful, The essay contains only there are no significant errors of occasional errors of spelling, spelling, grammar, or usage. grammar, and usage. The The essay may show a language is clear, but the distinctive and elegant writing writing may not be especially style. powerful or elegant.
The essay is not especially well The essay is poorly organized.
organized. The purpose of The purpose of some some paragraphs is unclear, and paragraphs is unclear, and many some have weak topic have weak topic sentences. sentences. Some content may Content is inconsistent and/or be inconsistent or irrelevant, irrelevant, and there are and there may be problems of significant problems of logic logic and paragraph sequence. and paragraph sequence. The essay suffers from errors of The essay suffers from spelling, grammar, and/or significant errors of spelling, usage. The language is grammar, and usage. The occasionally unclear. language is unclear, and poor writing makes it difficult to ascertain the authors meaning.
Evidence in support of thesis is Evidence in support of thesis is
not entirely accurate, or may be inaccurate, insufficient, or insufficient or irrelevant. irrelevant. Explanations of how examples support thesis may be weak or absent.