The Problem
The Problem
The Problem
THE PROBLEM
Introduction
In this generation, a lot of poor people believe that life happens
to them by fate and they always give excuses and blame on the
circumstances and focus on obstacles. Among of the poor people are
just dreaming about their dreams and just think about how good it is
going to be if they are rich, but they will never do anything about their
dreams. And most of them associate with the same people with the
same level in the society.
Poverty is every body`s problem. In every success received by
a part of the society, the other part of course experience poverty. The
meaning of it must be thought to the concerned for them to provide
and contribute a solution to the uneven part of survival. In the world
today, it is a blessing if one does not often bothered by the problem
like this. The people who suffer poverty are mostly the unemployed
people, the elderly, the uneducated and the working poor. They may
experience
lack
of
income,
work,
goods
and
help
from
the
government. Some of them may have jobs but still the earnings is not
enough to sustain the needs for the whole family to a certain period of
time. Poverty also causes malnutrition in some parts of the country; it
also affects the development of the future of our country. They cannot
think of ways on how to improve their lives and country when they
have to think of where they can get their daily needs.
The 4Ps program is currently being implemented by the
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD). It is a
conditional cash transfer program known as PantawidPamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps) that had started in 2008 inspired by the successes of
similar programs in Latin American countries such as Bolsa Familia in
Brazil, Familias en Accion inColombia and OPORTUNIDADES in Mexico
(Defensor, 2010). Mexico OPORTUNIDADES,apart from education and
health cash grants are accompanied by cash transfers for food and
farewith clearly while in Brazil, Bolsa Familia is a part of a larger
economic and social protection Scheme compose of complementary
action
and
services
to
poor
families.
Among
the
2012).
These
programs
are
an
important
relief
in
they
will
provide
tighter
mechanisms
to
get
views
and
respondents
of the
above mentioned
study are
the
Chapter II
Review of related literature and studies
Related literature
An extensive body of literature that evaluated CCT programs
found that participation in such brings positive effects on families use
of education and health services while concurrently reducing poverty
and child labor. The World Bank, after reviewing several evaluation
studies, was able to conclude that CCTs have improved the lives of
poor people. Transfers generally have been well targeted toward poor
households, raised consumption levels, and reduced poverty by a
substantial
amount
in
some
countries.
These
rigorous
impact
programs,
most
empirical
works
analyzes
the
linear
quality of local schools. That is, parents would more likely enroll their
children in school if the latters quality is higher.Llanto (2008) explains
that cash transfers have an intuitive appeal because poor households
are given the choice on the composition of their consumption bundles.
They can choose what they think is best for them in contrast to a price
subsidy for commodities such as rice or other staple food, where the
state assumes it knows what the poor needs. Interestingly, Son and
Florentino (2008) strongly argue that it is imperative to have
conditionalitys in CCT programs, especially in increasing significantly
the school attendance. They maintain that the quality of schooling
would have to be improved when administering cash transfers aimed
at
sustaining
poverty
reduction.
Targeting
children
from
poor
members
of
society
(Bloom,
2008).
food
transportations
and/or
other
and
necessities
such
school
as
medicines,
supplies.
and
conditionalities
(Coady
&
Parker, 2002).
This
is
poverty and limited access to educational and health benefits, but are
not included in the target population of the 4Ps. The 4Ps is
programmed to help only the extremely poor.
Another major disadvantage of the 4Ps implementation is that it
requires a huge amount of finance which we do not have at the
present. The 4Ps is a loan driven program, much of the funds
constituting the conditional cash grants given to beneficiaries are
generated from loans abroad, particularly from the United States. By
the tail-end of August 2010, the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
approved a US$400 million loan specifically for the 4Ps which will run
from 2011 to 2014. This comprises 45.2 per cent of the total cost of
US$884.2 million, where US$484 million serves as the governments
counterpart. Having ADBs US$400 million in addition to the World
Banks US$405 million, makes two-thirds of the whole 4Ps from 2009
to 2014 comprised of loans (Somera, 2010, p. 6). Arguments against
the 4Ps point out that despite the large amounts of financial resources
needed to implement the program; it does not generate guaranteed
returns to the economy as much as infrastructure projects like
construction of roads, bridges, and railways do.
Family socio-eco
1.2.
Family monthly
Definition of Terms
the
4Ps
beneficiaries
are
motivated
to
adapt
family.
CHAPTER 3
Research Design and Methodology
This chapter provides the background and other basic information of
the research paper. It explains the procedures to follow and the
approach used in making the research. It includes the research design,
the respondents profile, the research instrument and the methods
used in data gathering, analysis and data treatment.
Research Design
Methodology
Surv
ey.
This paper makes use of data on two groups: (1) households
that participated in the
program (beneficiaries); and (2) households that were not
enrolled but eligible for the program,
and lived in intervention areas (non
beneficiaries).
The 10 barangays
in Cebu City had a total of
2,665 beneficiaries when the program was implemented. A total
of 265 households, both
beneficiaries and non
beneficiaries from 10 sites, was targeted (Table 1). This sample
included
10 percent of the total number of beneficiarie
s. Both data groups were randomly selected.
Moreover,
structured interviews (comprising of open and closed questions)
were administered
using a survey instrument designed to capture socio
economic and demographic data, program
13
Beneficiary
Households
@10% only
Beneficiaries
Non
beneficiaries
Duljo Fatima
253
25
13
12
Inayawan
414
41
21
20
Kalunasan
324
32
16
16
Mambaling
795
79
40
39
SawangCalero
159
16
8
8
Sudlon I
135
13
7
6
Sudlon II
188
19
10
9
T. Padilla
77
8
4
4
Tagbao
132
13
7
6
Tejero
188
19
10
9
Total
2,665
265
136
129
this stu
dy. The independent variable is participation in the program while
the independent
variables used are profile of household head and spouse,
household composition, asset ownership,
type of construction materials used in the house, type of water
source, mon
thly expenditure on
electricity, and barangay
level characteristics.
Data Processing and Plan for Analysis.
The survey data was processed using statistical software,
and analyzed using simple frequency distributions. Qualitative
results were analyzed ac
cording
to identified
themes. A comparison between the two groups of households
beneficiaries; and
households who were not enrolled but eligible for the program
and lived in intervention areas
(i.e., the non
beneficiaries) were done using descriptive stat
istics.
Discussions
SOCIO
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTIC OF 265 HOUSEHOLDS
(Beneficiaries and Non
Beneficiaries) from Cebu Citys Barangays
Household survey
This section provides selected socio
economic information on both beneficiary and non
households
from 10 target sites to give some context to their views and
impressions on the
implementation of the 4Ps in their respective barangay. Data will
serve as guide when assessing
the extent the 4Ps has contributed to achieving the governments
expected outco
mes on the
education, health, and nutrition of low
income families. The level of acceptability and
satisfaction toward the 4Ps as well as the problems encountered
during the projects
implementation will be presented herein. Beneficiaries
suggestions for
improvement will also be
considered. Results are based on structured and semi
While Sawa
ng Calero, Mambaling, T. Padilla, and Sudlon II registered the
lowest mean age, at
37, Sudlon I registered the highest mean age, at 44, followed by
Inayawan and Tagbao, at 43.
The mean age of respondents in all the 10 barangays is 40.
Table 2: Respondents
Level of Education.
Table 2 also shows the schooling levels of the sample
population. A little over 50 percent of
beneficiaries had reached or finished elementary education;
more than a third have reached or
TOTAL
Code
SC
DF
M
INA
TP
TEJ
KALU
SUD1
SUD2
TAG
N
%
Beneficiaries
Gender
Male
14.3
3
2.2
Female
100
100
100
85.7
100
100
100
100
100
100
133
97.8
Education
None
17.5
6.3
14.3
9
6.6
Elementary
37.5
53.8
45
52.4
30
68.8
57.1
90
57.1
70
51.5
High School
62.5
46.2
37.5
42.9
75
60
25
14.3
10
28.6
52
38.2
College
4.8
25
10
28.6
5
3.7
Mean
h.s
.
elem.
elem.
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
elem.
h.s.
elem.
Elem.
elem.
Non
Beneficiaries
Male
10
2
1.6
Female
100
100
100
90
100
100
100
100
100
100
127
98.4
Education
None
Elementary
25
8.3
20.5
35
25
11.1
18.8
100
44.4
50
36
27.9
High School
62.5
66.7
66.7
60
75
77.8
81.3
55.6
50
82
63.6
College
12.5
25
12.8
5
11.1
11
8.5
Mean
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
elem.
h.s.
h.s.
high school
Mean
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
h.s.
h.s
.
h.s.
h.s.
elem.
h.s.
h.s.
high school
16
41
42
44
37
43
40
Place of
Origin
Cebu City
50
69.2
55
38.1
50
70
50
85.7
70
100
80
58.8
Other places
Cebu Prov.
37.5
7.7
12.5
23.8
10
43.8
14.3
10
24
17.6