Final Thesis Research
Final Thesis Research
Final Thesis Research
A Thesis
Presented to
College of Education
Josefina H. Cerilles State College
Tambulig Campus
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree
Of Bachelor in Elementary Education
by:
Metchel A. Titoy
Merry lovelyn D. Celes
Jocelyn R. Berioso
Joan Perez
Vanbilly S. Betio
MARCH 2011
APPROVAL SHEET
Approved:
The Researchers
ABSTRACT
As Tambulignons, it is the desire of the researchers to gain
insight on the economic status of the 4P’s beneficiaries in
Calolot, Tambulig, Zamboanga del Sur before and after the
implementation of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program.
Page
Title ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1
Approval Sheet …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2
Acknowledgment …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3
Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………… 4
List of Tables …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5
Chapter
I. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………… …………… 6
Background of the Study ---------------------- 7
Statement of the Problem ----------------- 8
Significance of the Study ----------------- 9
Hypothesis------------------------------------ 10
Scope & Limitations of the Study ------------ 11
Definition of Terms …………………………………………………………… 12
PART II
After the Implementation of Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4P’s)
PART III
Comparison of Before & After the
Implementation of 4P’s
V. Summary, Conclusions and Recommendation
Bibliography
Appendices
Questionnaire
Biographical Data
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
To determine how far and how much good wave the program had
brought to the intended beneficiaries, there must be a review on
the previous condition of the members to connect with the current
condition they have with the effect of the 4P’s. Despite of the
controversies the program is facing nowadays, having a clear
insight on the previous economic conditions of the beneficiaries
is a need to justify the effectiveness of the program in battling
poverty in the country.
HYPOTHESIS
Research Hypothesis
1. The beneficiaries improve their way of living.
2. They can purchase immediately their basic needs.
3. Vices are eliminated.
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
DEFINITION OF TERMS
4P’s:
It is the acronym for the program, PANTAWID PAMILYANG
PILIPINO PROGRAM. A program of DSWD, is a poverty reduction
strategy
CCT:
Conditional Cash Transfer. A program which aim to reduce
poverty by making welfare programs conditional upon the
receivers' actions.
BENEFICIARIES:
As used in the study, recipients of funds or other benefits.
Citizens who receive government assistance.
ERADICATE:
To get rid of as if by tearing up by the roots.
Syn. (abolish, eliminate)
DESCRIPTIVE SURVEY METHOD:
Typically seeks to ascertain respondents’ perspective or
experiences on a specified subject in a predetermined
structured manner.
DSWD:
It is the acronym for the agency, Department of Social
Welfare and Development.
ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS:
It is a possibility that an observed effect is genuine. Ha,
is usually the hypothesis for which the researchers.
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE:
Benefits paid to bring incomes up to minimum levels
established by law.
PROXY-MEANS TEST:
It is used to describe a situation where information on
household or individual characteristics correlated with
welfare levels is used in a formal algorithm to proxy
household income, welfare or need.
FIES:
It is the acronym for Family Income and Expenditures Survey.
It is a nationwide survey of households undertaken every
three years by the National Statistics Office (NSO); It is
conducted simultaneously with the quarterly Labor Force
Survey (LFS). The FIES gathers data on family income and
family living expenditures and related information affecting
income and expenditure levels and patterns in the
Philippines.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH DESIGN
METHOD
PROCEDURE
The researchers administered the questionnaire to the
respondents personally on March 03 to March 04, 2011. A letter of
introduction obtained from the Dean of Student Affair and Mrs.
Jalis S. Alim was presented to the barangay captain.
P = x
n
where
x = the number of respondents who answered the
category.
CHAPTER IV
PART I