MIT Preventive Maintenance
MIT Preventive Maintenance
MIT Preventive Maintenance
Principles
SPL 7.2
Scott Couzens, LFM 06
Scott Hiroshige, LFM 06
Erik Smith, LFM 03 Intel Corporation
Presentation for:
ESD.60 Lean/Six Sigma Systems
MIT Leaders for Manufacturing Program (LFM)
Summer 2004
These materials were developed as part of MIT's ESD.60 course on "Lean/Six Sigma Systems." In some cases,
the materials were produced by the lead instructor, Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, and in some cases by student teams
working with LFM alumni/ae. Where the materials were developed by student teams, additional inputs from the
faculty and from the technical instructor, Chris Musso, are reflected in some of the text or in an appendix
DNS Employees:
Roger Nuffer
David Villareal
Marcus Hunsaker
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 2
Part V: Conclusion
Overview
Session Design (20-30 min.)
Learning Objectives
Familiarity with the different
types of maintenance
activities
Appreciation of the benefits of
preventive maintenance
Understanding of lean
principles for designing a
preventive maintenance
schedule
Awareness of specific
challenges to implementing
preventive maintenance
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 3
Part V: Conclusion
Types of Maintenance
Breakdown Maintenance:
Waiting until equipment fails before repairing or servicing it
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 4
Part V: Conclusion
http://www.prenhall.com/divisions/bp/app/russellcd/PROTECT/CHAPTERS/CHAP15/HEAD01.HTM
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 5
Part V: Conclusion
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 6
Part V: Conclusion
Source: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World,
Sterman, John D., 2000.
[LFM Students] ESD.60 Lean/Six Sigma Systems, LFM, MIT
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 7
Part V: Conclusion
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 8
Part V: Conclusion
Optimizing a PM Schedule
Question:
If a certain piece of production equipment requires ~10 hours of
preventive maintenance per week, how should those 10 hours
be scheduled?
Answer:
In a 24x7 manufacturing operation, it is typically better to
perform the ~10 hours of activities in several smaller periods of
time, for instance 5 PM activities that take ~2 hours each
Duration and variability in preventive maintenance are key
factors in whether equipment will be able to maintain a steady
flow of output
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 9
Part V: Conclusion
PM Durations: Simulation 1
Simulation of equipment with a 10 hour average PM duration, std dev 20
hours (85% availability)
Drop Page Fields Here
Trend of Queues for the Toolset
Avg Queuelength
450
400
350
300
250
Scenario
1 - 10h mean, 2 CV
200
150
100
50
0
83 88 99 109114119125133139147152157162167172177182187192198203211216221226231236241246267
Days into Sim ulation
Day
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 10
Part V: Conclusion
PM Durations: Simulation 2
Simulation of equipment with a 5 hour average PM duration, std dev 10
hours (85% availability)
Drop Page Fields Here
Trend of Queues for a Toolset
Avg Queuelength
450
400
350
300
250
Scenario
2 - 5h mean, 2 CV
200
150
100
50
0
83
88
93
98 103 108 113 118 125 137 155 164 194 201 213 228 233 244 259 264 277 285
Days into Sim ulation
Day
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 11
Part V: Conclusion
PM Durations: Simulation 3
Simulation of equipment with a 2 hour average PM duration, std dev 4
hours (85% availability)
Drop Page Fields Here
Trend of Queues for a Toolset
Avg Queuelength
450
400
350
300
250
Scenario
3 - 2h mean, 2 CV
200
150
100
50
0
84
91
102 116
125
138
148 160
173
196
209 225
230
238
261
273 279
287
Day
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 12
Part V: Conclusion
PM Durations: Simulation 4
Simulation of equipment with a 2 hour average PM duration, std dev 6
hours (85% availability)
Drop Page Fields Here
Trend of Queues for a Toolset
450
Avg Queuelength
400
350
300
250
Scenario
4 - 2h mean, 3 CV
200
150
100
50
0
84 98 112 117 122 127 133 138 143 148 153 158 163 168 173 178 183 188 193 204 222 242 258 264 275 286 291
Days into Simulation
Day
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 13
Part V: Conclusion
Avg QueueLength
StdDev QueueLength
1) =10h, =20h
56
63
2) =5h, =10h
38
52
3) =2h, =4h
4) =2h, =6h
56
57
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 14
Part V: Conclusion
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 15
Part V: Conclusion
# of Unsched Downs
60
50
Event_Type
40
REPAIR
QUAL
30
OUT OF CNTRL
20
10
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 16
Part V: Conclusion
Challenges to Implementing
Preventive Maintenance
Social Factors
Technical Factors
Organizations are
frequently structured in
ways that promote local
optimums (cost, shiftly
output goals, etc.)
Breakdown maintenance
is typically cheaper than
preventive maintenance
in the short-term
Under-trained technicians
can cause more damage
than they prevent
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 17
Part V: Conclusion
Concluding Comments
Performing preventive maintenance is almost always the best
long-term strategy to maintain equipment
PM scheduling and strategy are keys to maximizing output
while reducing work-in-process inventory
Due to short-term cost increases and local optimums, there are
barriers to implementing a preventive maintenance strategy at
some plants
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 18
Part V: Conclusion
6/9/04 -- 19
Time
Topic
1-3
2-3 min
4-5
3-5 min
Key Concepts
6-15
7-15 min
Exercises/Activities
16
2-3 min
Disconnects
17
1-2 min
Concluding comments
Part I: Introduction
6/9/04 -- 20
Part V: Conclusion