Contempt
Contempt
Contempt
(Milwaukee Division)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Now comes pro se Plaintiff William M. Schmalfeldt, Sr., who hereby files the following MOTION FOR
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SARAH PALMER SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT
16
OF COURT. The grounds for this motion are set forth fully herein:
17
1.
This Honorable Court sent a service packet/summons issued to Plaintiff on December 21, 2015.
18
2.
Plaintiff followed the requirements set by the Court to send copies of the Complaint, a Waiver
19
20
Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636)c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
21
a United States Magistrate Judge may, with the consent of the parties, conduct all proceedings in the instant case,
22
23
4.
In the instructions attached to the Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form, each party to
24
the instant suit is required to fill out the form indicating their acceptance or refusal of having the case heard before a
25
26
27
5.
Defendant Johnson has thus far refused service in the instant case, and Plaintiff has moved the Court to
serve him with a summons at his expense, as ordered in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
28
6.
2
3
According to the US Postal Service, Defendant Palmer received and accepted her service packet from
7.
The deadline for Defendant Palmer to sign and return the form to this court was January 18, 2016. As
of this date, she has neither returned a signed copy of the Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, or her
8.
The Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form, electronically signed by the Honorable
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge for the US District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division
states as follows:
9
10
11
While the decision to consent or not to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge
is entirely voluntary, the duty to respond to this order is mandatory. Your response shall be made to
the Clerk of Court only on the reverse side of this notice.
12
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that you complete this form and file it with the Clerk of Court
within twenty-one (21) days from receipt. (Emphasis on original)
13
WHEREFORE as the deadline to respond to the Courts order has passed and Defendant Palmer has written
14
about her knowledge of being a defendant in the instant suit on her Internet blog (Exhibit 2) and has shown no
15
interest whatsoever in abiding by the orders of this Honorable Court, it is respectfully requested that this motion be
16
granted and for any other relief which this Court deems just and proper.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
______________________________________
WILLIAM M. SCHMALFELDT, SR
Pro Se Plaintiff
3209 S. Lake Dr., Apt. 108
Saint Francis, WI 53235
(414) 249-4379
bschmalfeldt@twc.com
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 8th day of February 2016, a true and correct copy of the forgoing
MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE was sent by First Class U.S. Mail to the Clerk of Courts, as well as to
Defendants Palmer and Johnson.
___________________________
William M. Schmalfeldt, Sr.
Pro Se Plaintiff
(Milwaukee Division)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
14
15
__________________, 2016
16
Upon consideration of the Plaintiffs motion for an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT
17
SARAH PALMER SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Sarah
18
Palmer shall appear before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
19
Division, on the _________ day of _________________________ 2016, and show cause why she should not be
20
held in contempt for violating this Courts Order, received by Defendant Palmer on December 28, 2015, to complete
21
and file the CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE in the above-captioned case before the
22
23
24
_______________________________
25
26
27
28