Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 38 views

    Walsh v. United States, 241 F.3d 96, 1st Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wesley Walsh sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained in a slip and fall outside a post office in Massachusetts during a snowstorm. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States, finding that under Massachusetts law, a landowner is not liable for injuries caused by natural accumulations of snow and ice. On appeal, the First Circuit affirmed, concluding that the snow and ice where Walsh fell remained a natural accumulation, as there was no evidence post office employees' shoveling of the handicap ramp altered the icy conditions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Walsh v. United States, 241 F.3d 96, 1st Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    38 views3 pages
    Wesley Walsh sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained in a slip and fall outside a post office in Massachusetts during a snowstorm. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States, finding that under Massachusetts law, a landowner is not liable for injuries caused by natural accumulations of snow and ice. On appeal, the First Circuit affirmed, concluding that the snow and ice where Walsh fell remained a natural accumulation, as there was no evidence post office employees' shoveling of the handicap ramp altered the icy conditions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-02 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 241 F.3d 96 Docket: 00-1472

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Wesley Walsh sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained in a slip and fall outside a post office in Massachusetts during a snowstorm. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States, finding that under Massachusetts law, a landowner is not liable for injuries caused by natural accumulations of snow and ice. On appeal, the First Circuit affirmed, concluding that the snow and ice where Walsh fell remained a natural accumulation, as there was no evidence post office employees' shoveling of the handicap ramp altered the icy conditions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    38 views3 pages

    Walsh v. United States, 241 F.3d 96, 1st Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wesley Walsh sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained in a slip and fall outside a post office in Massachusetts during a snowstorm. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States, finding that under Massachusetts law, a landowner is not liable for injuries caused by natural accumulations of snow and ice. On appeal, the First Circuit affirmed, concluding that the snow and ice where Walsh fell remained a natural accumulation, as there was no evidence post office employees' shoveling of the handicap ramp altered the icy conditions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    241 F.3d 96 (1st Cir.

    2001)

    WESLEY WALSH, Plaintiff, Appellant,


    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee.
    No. 00-1472

    United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit


    Heard February 5, 2001
    Decided March 2, 2001

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE


    DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    [Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior District Judge]
    William T. Walsh, Jr. for appellant.
    Karen L. Goodwin, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Donald
    K. Stern, United States Attorney, was on brief for appellee.
    Before Selya, Circuit Judge, Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, and Boudin,
    Circuit Judge.
    CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Plaintiff Wesley Walsh challenges the summary judgment ruling which


    prompted the district court to dismiss his Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA")
    suit for compensatory damages associated with a "slip and fall" on snow and
    ice outside the United States Post Office in East Longmeadow, Massachusetts,
    on January 10, 1996, during the waning hours of an extended snowstorm. Two
    days earlier, a blizzard had blanketed the area with approximately two feet of
    snow, which was followed by a further accumulation the next day and
    windblown snow showers on the day of the accident.

    The district court ruled that summary judgment was in order under the
    controlling Massachusetts caselaw, see Sullivan v. Town of Brookline, 416
    Mass. 825, 827, 626 N.E.2d 870, 872 (1994), absent evidence that the snow

    and ice at the accident site was anything other than a "natural accumulation."
    We affirm the judgment.
    3* BACKGROUND
    4

    According to Walsh, it was snowing as he exited his car to walk to the post
    office. The snow on the sidewalk leading to the post office was "packed down,"
    "very, very uneven," and "discolored." Since the conditions appeared
    somewhat worse on the sidewalk, Walsh decided to walk to the post office
    through the adjacent parking lot. He did so without incident.

    Upon exiting the post office, however, Walsh chose to return to the car by way
    of the sidewalk, largely because it afforded a more direct route than the one he
    had taken earlier through the parking lot. Moments later, at the point where a
    handicap-access ramp meets the sidewalk and the sidewalk slopes slightly to
    accommodate wheelchairs, Walsh suddenly slipped, his "leg came right down
    underneath [him] and [he] went down full force." Walsh could recall no
    preexisting footprints in the snow where he fell, nor had he noticed any
    difference between the conditions at the accident site than elsewhere along the
    route through the parking lot.

    II
    DISCUSSION
    6

    The FTCA subjects the United States to tort liability "in the same manner and
    to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances . . . ." 28
    U.S.C. 2674. Well in advance of its reconfirmation by the Supreme Judicial
    Court in 1994, seeSullivan, 416 Mass. 825, 626 N.E.2d 870, this court had
    concluded that the "natural accumulation" doctrine remained alive and well in
    Massachusetts. See Athas v. United States, 904 F.2d 79, 82 (1st Cir. 1990)
    (failure of postal employees to remove water accumulation on post office steps,
    during ongoing rainstorm, held insufficient to subject landowner to liability
    under Massachusetts law) (citing Lowe v. National Shawmut Bank of Boston,
    363 Mass. 74, 77, 292 N.E.2d 683, 685 (1973); Wexler v. Stanetsky Mem'l
    Chapel of Brookline, Inc., 2 Mass. App. Ct. 750, 751, 321 N.E.2d 686, 687
    (1975)). Nor do we discern any material change in the "natural accumulation"
    doctrine since Athas.

    The district court, quoting Sullivan, 416 Mass. at 827, 626 N.E.2d at 872, ruled
    that "[h]ere, just as in Sullivan, 'the plaintiff's evidence tend[ing] to show that
    the shovelling of the [handicap access] ramp by the [post office] employees

    exposed ice that was already there' is insufficient to generate liability . . . ."
    District Court Order, at 2 (quoting Sullivan, 416 Mass. at 827-28, 626 N.E.2d at
    872). The district court further observed that, as in Sullivan, "there is 'no
    evidence that the employees' shovelling altered the condition of the ice on the
    [handicap access] ramp.' Id. (no liability where 'a property owner removes a
    portion of an accumulation of snow or ice and a person is injured by slipping
    and falling on the remainder because the snow or ice remains as a natural
    accumulation')." Id.
    III
    CONCLUSION
    8

    As the district court correctly ruled that the United States was entitled to
    summary judgment as a matter of Massachusetts law, we affirm its judgment.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy