Business Plan Dih
Business Plan Dih
Business Plan Dih
BUSINESS PLAN
FOR THE CREATION
OF DESIGN
INNOVATION HUBS
Produced by Designregio Kortrijk and Lancaster University within
the European project PROUD, supported by INTERREG IVB NWE
December 2014
CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Introduction 6
6.4.Network 35
6.5.Making 35
38
38
7.1.5.Conclusion 45
44
45
business models 45
7.2.2.Conclusion 53
7.3.3.Conclusion 67
53
58
8.2.1.Objectives 71
8.3.Design procurement 71
8.3.1.Definition of design 71
8.3.2.Process thinking 71
Museum 26
28
74
31
6.1.Space 31
6.2.Event 32
6.3.Research 34
References 82
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
up hubs.
hubs sustainability.
(3) Research
website.
2013).
start and operate a Fab Lab as: what is a Fab Lab, what
2013).
(5) Making
Fablab Luxemburg).
What is a fab lab?
This background research shows that there are different
fabrication
(FAB LAB):
to be shared
lab.
for programs
1) T
extbox: The Fab Charter; Neil Gershenfeld 2012;
http://fab.cba.mit.edu/about/charter/
return.
Labs :
instruction
from
knowledge exchange.
in a fab lab, but they must not conflict with other uses,
they should grow beyond rather than within the lab, and
but each Fab Lab has its own business model to self-
4. T
he Replicated/Network business model: provide
space.
the brand.
10
2) The Fab Lab Life Cycle Report of the FAB10 workshops Barcelona 2014 Pieter van der Hijden & Beno Juarez
11
Key Partners
Key activities
Value propositions
Customer segments
Municpality
Tinkers
Technopreneurs (students,
professionals, companies)
Chamber of
commerce
Knowledge management,
2. O
rganizing tours or short
should be included, because
activities for one time
it helps the Fab Lab and its
visitors, like museums do
visitors to know the state-ofthe-art, to reflect on their own
experiences, and to make their
lessons learned available for
other visitors and outsiders.
General public
Schools
Community organizations
Technical infrastructure
management is indispensable
as keeping the machines up
and running as well as the
computers and the software is
essential for daily operations.
3. T
eaching and facilitating
tinkerers; offering a range
of courses and workshops
on all aspects of design and
making, especially in using
the Fab Lab facilities; these
might be part of formal
education as well
T
inkers (from all ages and
backgrounds)
Technopreneurs
School groups
Corporate groups
Master classes for
professionals
Execustive course for
managers, policy makers
Individual technopreneurs
(students, professionals,
companies)
Project groups of
technopreneurs
Museum
People/partners
who help the Fab
Labs and/or their
services up and
running
5. P
articipating in research
and development projects
with other Fab Labs; the
Fab Lab network is a global
distributed research and
development system
M
ain contractor and its
client
6. C
onsulting to other Fab
Labs in how to set-up
the lab; consulting to the
external world, in fact acting
as an engineer consulting
firm
7. P
roducing for the external
world, using the machines
to produce
Wholesale
Cost structure
The initial costs of a Fab Lab
mainly are housing, workspace and
installations, machines and tools
(including computers), an initial
supply of materials / components,
office facilities and other costs
(e.g. the costs of the project itself).
The initial costs of machines and
materials may vary from USD
5,000-10,000 for a grassroots Fab
Lab, up to USD 50,000 - 100,000
for a Fab Lab complying with CBA
specifications (and much more for
super Fab Labs at university level).
thanks to:
Revenu stream
productions
the track record of creating feasible solutions for
social-economic issues e.g. derived from almost all
the Millennium Development Goals 2015 and the
to come.
12
5) B
ased on the document: The Fab Lab Life Cycle Report
of the FAB10 workshops - Barcelona 2014 Pieter van der
Hijden & Beno Juarez
6) The Fab Lab Life Cycle Report of the FAB10 workshops Barcelona 2014 Pieter van der Hijden & Beno Juarez
13
own the space or not; and do they just sell the research
(1)Space
(2)Event
(3)Research
(4)Network
(5)Making
Provide
own space
Workshop
Selling
research
results
Help form
cennetion
Provide
facilities
Provide
venue hire
service
Conference
Help research
process
Provide
platforms
Help skill
provide.
Figure.
5.1.3
five
key
value
proposition
containdifferent
differentcontent
content (Confidence intervals: 95% Standard
Figure
5.1.3.
Fivefive
keykey
value
proposition
contain
content
Figure.
5.1.3
value
proposition
contain
different
Figure.
5.1.3 five key
value 95%
proposition
contain
different
content
Confidence
intervals:
95%Standard
Standard
error:
2(0.01557)
0.03114
intervals:
error:
2(0.01557)
==0.03114
error:Confidence
2(0.01557)
= 0.03144)
Confidence intervals: 95% Standard error: 2(0.01557) = 0.03114
(2)Event
Event
(2)
(2) Event(2) Event
hubs.
re. 5.1.1. The number of 5 key value propositions among 30 design innovation hubs
onfidence intervals:
95%
Figure 5.1.1. The number of 5 key value propositions among 30 design
innovation hubs (Conference intervals 95%)
Network
28%
Space
23
Space
Event
Research
23
18
11
Event
14
18
Research
11
Network
Making
Hub
24
10
30
24
1 offering, 5 offerings,
0%
7%
2 offerings,
37%
4
offerings,
17%
3 offerings,
37%
Figure.
Figure.
5.1.5
5.1.5
thethe
percentages
percentages
of different
of different
content
content
combine
combine
in the
in the
same
same
hubs
hubs
Figure. 5.1.5
the percentages
of different
combine
in the same hubs
Confidence
Confidence
intervals:
intervals:
95%
95%
Standard
Standard
error:
error:
content
2(0.01557)
2(0.01557)
= 0.03114
= 0.03114
Confidence
intervals: 95% Standard error:
2(0.01557) = 0.03114 (5)Making
(2) Event
(4)Network
(2)(2)
Event
Event
(2) Event
(4)(4)
Network
Network
(4) Network
(5)(5)
Making
Making
(5) Making
3"contents"
3"contents"
3"contents"
11%"
11%"
11%"
1"content"
1"content"
56%"1"content"
56%"
56%"
2"contents"
2"contents"
2"contents"
33%"
33%"
33%"
2"contents"
2"contents"
2"contents"
37%"
37%"
37%"
1"content"
1"content"
63%"1"content"
63%"
63%"
1"content"
1"content"
30%"1"content"
30%"
30%"
2"contents"
2"contents"
2"contents"
70%"
70%"
70%"
Network
Event
21%
Whereas, the results show the hubs often use more than
Research
13%
provide$
provide$
58%$
70%$
help$innova1on$ 70%$
58%$
provide$
help$innova1on$
exist$ 58%$
exist$
help$innova1on$
70%$
exist$
conference$
50%$
conference$ 50%$
1$
1$
1$
1$
provide$
1$
1$
conference$ 50%$
provide$
1$
79%$
1$
1$
79%$
provide$
provide$facili1es$
100%$
pla0orm$ 79%$
provide$facili1es$
100%$
pla0orm$
workshops$
67%$
provide$facili1es$
100%$
workshops$
67%$
pla0orm$
workshops$
67%$
0%$ 50%$
50%$ 100%$
100%$
0%$
0%$
50%$100%$
100%$150%$
150%$
0%$
50%$
0%$ 50%$
50%$ 100%$
100%$
0%$ 50%$ 100%$
0%$
0%$ 50%$ 100%$ 150%$
0%$ 50%$ 100%$
exhibi7on$ 39%$
39%$
exhibi7on$
exhibi7on$ 39%$
Making
11%
(5)Making
Making
(5)
(5) Making (5)Making
Exhibition
(4)Network
Network
(4)
(4) Network
(4)Network
Making
samples
10
Hub
samples
30
Figure 5.1.5. The percentages of different content combine in the same hubs (Confidence intervals:
95% Standard error: 2(0.01557) = 0.03144)
15
opportunities.
opportunities
Figure 5.2.2.1. The environment of Little Mountain (Source: Little mountain website)
LITTLE MOUNTAIN
this research.
development.
stakeholders.
16
17
18
achieve their goals are the main service this hub can
the people first, then build the Fab Lab for them.
centres and Fab Lab are their key partners when they
provide services.
one.
Figure 5.2.7.1. The promotion of local designers (Source: MAD Brussels website)
19
life is about the people you meet, and the things you
HOLSTEE manifesto)
hub, and the public and other branch owners can also
Alexander Osterwalder.
Kortrijk.
BELGIUM)
collaboration.
people who are coming here, the ranges are very broad
or their knowledge, you have a lot new influences in it,
e-newsletter (www.budalab.be)
Website BUDA::lab
20
21
Key Activities
Permanence of
BUDA::lab
Value Propositions
Serial workshops for
children between
5 - 13 Y, maker
holiday camp, STEM
events (science,
technology,...)
Customer
Relationships
Membership +
benefitpackage
Customer Segments
Students primary
school
Intercommunale
Maintenance of
Volunteer working
Leiedal, Howest,
machinery
Province West-Flanders
are partners of
BUDA::lab
Design agencies
Programmation of
Machine use,
Flexibel opening
workshops and events participation
hours
workshops, use space
Students secondary
school
Creative guidance,
Evaluation after a
participation
workshop
workshops, use space
Local citizens of
Kortrijk
DIY companies
Networking
Infosessions
Creative citizens
(outside Kortrijk)
City Kortrijk is a
partner of BUDA::lab
and owner of building
Budafabriek
Voka - Chamer of
commerce is a partner
of BUDA::lab as they
inform their members
(companies) about the
activities of BUDA::lab
Volunteers: are helping
with permanence of
BUDA::lab
Performing machine
training
Quiet workingplace,
access to make
network, coffee,
printer, catering
Space & facility
renting for groups
Accessibility and
visibility at the
facility
Class groups
Performing advice
Frontoffice
Quiet workingplace,
access to make
network, coffee,
printer, catering
Production for
customers
Photography and
exposure of the
BUDA::lab - made
- works: digital and
physical window
Design competition
Quiet workingplace,
access to make
network, coffee,
printer, catering
Rent & advice model Active prospection
construction, contract
work maquettes
Artists
Teachers and
docents: they inform
the students about
the possibilities of
BUDA::lab
OKRA: association for
seniors
Maintenance of
communication tools
Creative workshops
design agencies and
customers
Design agencies /
Flanders In Shape
Development of long
term strategy
New Year
giftsvouchers and
present vouchers
Highschool students
Key Resources
Machines in Fablab
Channels
Facebook
Cost Structure
Staff cost
Revenu streams
Fees
Staff
Infosessions
Machine depreciations
Machine use
Equipment: coffee
machine, printers,
fotoprinter,... for coworking space
Maintenance
Material use
Materials
Workshop fee
Displacements
Funding
Volunteers
E-newsletter
Freelance fees
Communication tools
Communication cost
Markup to partnership
make network
Hour fee: advice
Materials
Website
Rent of BUDA::lab
Machine training
Space
Modelling workshops
Starter in the
creative economy
Stand constructors/
decor constructors /
architects
Figure 5.2.1.1. BUDA::lab Kortrijk
Event and
communication
agencies
Seniors
22
23
Key Activities
An extensive
community of designers
and representatives
of business, public
institutions and
knowledge institutes
Value Propositions
Capital D is the
design platform of
Brainport eindhoven
that facilitates and
connects an extensive
community by a
program of activities
and events. It
organises and hosts
design based iniatives
like workshops,
masterclasses,
exhibitions, lectures
and conferences.
Founders of DIS Capital Capital D is the
D are the City of
design innovation
Eindhoven, the Design platform of Eindhoven
Academy Eindhoven
region
and the University of
Technology Eindhoven
The University of
The keypartners and
Technology Eindhoven founders of Capital
is also involved in
D can make use of
the creation of the
the infrastructure to
multifunctional space
meet their clients, to
network and to learn.
DIS is offering
space for co-design
driven people and
organisations
Capital D is partner
of PROUD. All Proud
members share their
experience and give
support to the creative
ideas of Capital D
Capital D supports
and develops new
ways of knowledge
transfer on design on
innovation, design
thinking and codesign
Proud Academy
where the design
community can
network, meet and
learn, focussing on
co-design
Governmental
organisations such
as the Chamber of
Commerce and the
Ministry of Economy
Capital D organises
the Dutch Design
Week, a worldfamous
Design festival and
several (European)
projects promoting
the added value of
design
Capital D offers
the DIS as a
multifunctional
space that can
be transformed
into different
settings: exhibition
hall, lecture
room, workspace,
meetingrooms,...
The development
and coordination
of projects that
stimulate co-design
thinking on societal
and economical
challenges
Structural sponsors of
events such as Dutch
Design Week
24
Customer
Relationships
Capital D is offering
advice, support
and coaching on
co-design based
projects
Customer Segments
The hub is set
up for the Design
Community
around Brainport
Region Eindhoven,
including all
regional, national
and International
connections.
Capital D offers a
program of activities
in the field of design
innovation.
The stakeholders of
Capital D come out
of the triple helix:
private, public and
knowledge segment
Capital D promotes
and stimulates
collaboration
and knowledge
sharing between
a wide range of
participants.
Capital D offers a
design basis for the
key partners and
their customers
The peer-to-peer
community of Proud
Academy, housed by
Capital D, generates
valuable exchange of
knowledge on codesign
Dutch design.
The general
public: citizens
from Eindhoven
and elsewhere,
communities of
people collaborating
on different societal
themes
Key Resources
The multifunctional
space existing out of
several rooms is the most
important asset of Capital
D
The projects and events of
Capital D are key assets
Channels
Events such as Dutch Design
Week, Dutch Design Awards,
Co-Design Caf are transfer
channels for knowledge
Capital D makes use of
all digital/social media to
communicate about their
programs
Capital D has set up a PR
& Press networking plan
through the channels of the
key partners. The Proud
website is one of them
Cost Structure
Staff
Rent
Revenu streams
Subsidies by PROUD
Subsidies by the
local and regional
government
Sponsor income of the
main events (eg Dutch
Design Week)
Catering
New equipment and
furniture
25
MUSEUM
on design worldwide.
contest worldwide.
PROUD-objectives.
Museum.
project.
Business Model Canvas - Red Dot Design Museum (Design Innovation Hub Essen)
Key Partners
Key Activities
The permanent
exposition of RDDM
displays a complete
range of current
product design.
RDDM organises
temporary special
exhibitions on design
trends.
RDDM regards
design as an integral
part of economic
and technological
promotion, and as an
essential component
in the striving for
innovation
The community
that has been build
up around the Red
Dot Design Award
generates high
added value in terms
of branding and
reputation.
Key Resources
Most important key
activity of RDDM is the
organisation of highly
reputated Red Dot Design
Award
The Red Dot Design Award
logo for best design has
become an internationally
recognised quality label.
26
Value Propositions
The purpose of
the RDDM is
the promotion of
knowledge, research
and education
concerning design.
One of its core
tasks is to transfer
knowledge on design
and make the public
understand the
importance of design
quality.
Channels
Promotion by means of
social media, internet etc.
is most effective for B2C
communication to promote
guided tours, workshops and
special exhibitions.
Event organisation is
important for branding.
The communication around
the Red Dot Design Award
is essential for the B2B
sponsors.
RDDM has set up a
networking plan to reach
the design industry and the
public institutions.
Customer
Relationships
The museum has a
very diverse public
of about 120,000
visitors per year.
10% of visitors
are professionals
15% of visitors
are students
and teachers
75% of visitors are
consumers
Customer Segments
The consumer
market at large is
the most important
target group
As for B2B
customers, the
RDDM aims at
design-orientated
industrial
enterprises,
design studios,
communication
and multimedia
agencies.
A special segment
is educational
institutions on
secondary and
higher level
Cost Structure
RDDM has a total
budget of 700,000
Revenu streams
Exhibiton fee for
the award presented
products generates
40% of cashflow
30% is personnel +
Entrance fees of the
overhead
consumers, event fees
for B2B events
55% is material,
Subsidies by PROUD
equipment, exhibitions (only for investment
and rental fee for the
into the Design
space (to Stiftung
Experience Exhibition/
Zollverein)
Lab)
15% is communication Result is a "fat zero".
Profits are reinvested
in the further projects.
27
LUXEMBOURG
sponsoring activities.
diversification bank.
Fab Lab will also have to take benefit from the arrival of
fairly moderate.
The Socit
Nationale de Crdit
d' Investisssement:
shareholder
Key Activities
Availability of the
coworking space
A multifunctional
Incubator space with
possibility to work,
prototype, meet,
train, network,
Customer
Relationships
renting of facilities
and equipment
Customer Segments
Starters and
young SME's in
the domain of
innovation and
product oriented
devices
renting out of the
The use of advanced 1-to-1 individual
The hub also
machinery such
equipment and
projects
aims at designas a lasercutter,
machinery for
orientated industrial
3D-printer, milling
prototyping
enterprises,
machines,
design studios,
communication
and multimedia
agencies.
Organising workshops, Exchange of
workshops (corporate A special segment
trainings and
knowledge on
or thematic)
is educational
seminars on codesign codesign between the
institutions on
thinking. Kidslab is a design community
secondary and
specific program for
higher level
secondary school level
Specific programs
The DIH welcomes
Organisation of coAcademic
for product oriented
startups in the IoT
design events
researchers
startup coaching and field
support on innovative
thinking
Open Design
Individuals with
Conference &
a special interest
Workshop
in innovation
technology
Key Resources
Channels
The well equiped coworking Promotion by means of
space (450m)
social media and internet to
announce the events
Fab lab space (150m)
with up-to-date machinery
and materials
Value Propositions
Cost Structure
Staff costs
Revenu streams
Machine renting
Machine depreciation
customised projects
(support in 3D
modelisation and
fabrication)
workshop feeds
Subsidies from
European projects
(PROUD)
28
29
Key Activities
University Of
Lancaster
Research on design
oriented themes such
as design management,
sustainability, service
design, urban design,..
Local authorities of Research projects on
Lancaster
design based solutions
and innovation
Partners and
funders in a wide
range of sectors
Development of digital
and physical tools to
support co-design
Value Propositions
Customer
Relationships
Participants of
the DIH activities,
workshops, events,
projects,
A multifunctional
coworking space
with possibility to
work, meet, train,
network,
Imagination
Customers who
Lancaster facilitates make use of the
innovation for a wide coworking space
range of organisations
Academic
researchers
Bridge between
design practice and
science and social
science methods
Development of
knowledge exchange
tools and approaches
on prototyping and
testing
Sponsors of the
coworking events
Participants of the
events, workshops,
trainings,...
Proud partners
Key Resources
Flexible creative space for
events and teaching
Channels
Communication by means
of social media and
internet to announce the
events, programs,
Network in the public and
private sector
Design
professionals,
artists,
(1) Space
Social enterprises,
charity
organisations,
(2) Event
(3) Research
(4) Network
Companies, mostly
SME's, open
to design and
innovation
(5) Making
Public sector
such as the local
government
The Imagination
Laboratory is a large
space with up-to-date
machinery and materials
Knowledge and experience Events where people
in the field of codesign
can share ideas and
thinking
experiences on desing and
innovation
30
Customer Segments
31
hubs resources.
(4) K
ey resources: The key resource that the hubs need
(3) E
xample: Capital D and MAD Brussels are two
(4) K
ey resources: Activity planners play important roles
6.2. EVENT
(1) B
enefits: Holding events is the best way for existing
required.
this space.
(5) K
ey activities: The key activities mainly focus
(6) P
reparation: The preparations the hubs need to do
(2) V
alue creation: In order to increase the number of
(3) Example
E.g. Strijp-S
Space maintenance
Create and maintain the relationship of target people
Marketing
Sponsor finding
Research of target peoples needs
Internal strengths analysis - what kinds of resources I can use
Market Environment research - help position what kinds of space could gain opportunity to
attract target people
Explore stakeholders - to raise range of services
(6) Preparation
Figure 7.1.1. The value propositions and the relevant criteria - Space
32
(5) K
ey activities: Maintaining stable relationships
(6) P
reparation: Knowing how to identify their key
(3) Example
Activity planner
Key people
Activity space
Facilities for event
Gather relevant people
Marketing and communication
Maintaining relationship with target people
Find sponsors
Target people needs research
To identify internal strengths - what kinds of resources I can use
Market Environment research - help position what kinds of events could gain opportunity to
attract target people
(6) Preparation
Figure 7.2.1. The value propositions and the relevant criteria Event
33
6.3. RESEARCH
6.4. NETWORK
(1) V
alue: Through research programs, hubs have
(1) B
enefits: Hubs can act as brokers to build up a
results.
middleman fees.
(5) K
ey activities: Creating a cross-disciplinary research
revenue.
Intangible benefits: Through the variety of research
6.5 MAKING
(1) Benefits: For the profit value, the hub can ask for a
(2) V
alue creation: In order to maximize benefits for
(6) P
reparation: Looking for potential or target clients,
(2) V
alue creation: Hubs should provide a flexible and
(3) E
xample: Waag Society is an example of conducting
(3) E
xample: Seats2meet and Little Mountain focus on
maintaining relationships with people. Seats2meet
Intellectual property
Service fee
Data fee
A network of people
Better reputation
(2) Value creation The hubs can help target people to do research project or sell their research result.
(1) Benefits
Experts
Facilities
Existing network of target people
To do research activities
Create a cross-disciplinary research environment
Maintain relationship with target people
Create tools for doing research
Find sponsors
Target people needs research
To identify internal strengths - what kinds of resources I can use
Market Environment research - help position what kinds of research could gain opportunity
to attract target people
(6) Preparation
Figure 7.3.1. The value propositions and the relevant criteria Research
(2) V
alue creation: the hubs can get benefits in three
ways: firstly, it can provide machines for people to
Waag Society
services.
(3) Example
34
(6) P
reparation: Identifying the hubs potential users and
cooperation.
(4) K
ey resource: to provide a making service, the hub
has to have its own user community, appropriate
35
Access fee
Membership fee
Middleman fee
A network of people
Better reputation
Increase communication chance
(2) Value creation The hubs can provide specific network for people or provide a platform for P2P connection.
(1) Benefits
(3) Example
(6) Preparation
(5) K
ey activity: the main activity for the hub is to
provide and maintain machines, because this is
(6) P
reparation: before providing a making service, the
(6) Preparation
Experts, staffs
Facilities (Machine, tools, material, software)
Space
Existing a network of people
Provide machines
Maintain facilities
Host training programs (teaching relevant skills of machine)
Build and maintain user communities
Marketing
Find Sponsors
Research on target people
Internal strength clarify - what kinds of resource can be use
Market Environment research - research on brand position and how to communicate its
value and attract target people
Gather target people - to maintain the number of users
Figure 7.5.1. The value propositions and the relevant criteria Making
36
users was low, but after one and half years, the income
Figure 7.4.1. The value propositions and the relevant criteria Network
(1) Benefits
CHAPTER 7 : DISCUSSION OF
FINALISED PROPOSAL OR SOLUTION
Building on the previous sections, we have suggested
five different services modules for hubs to use: Space,
Events, Research, Network and Making. However, it
is clear that each hub should clarify whether they can
afford the costs coming from these multi-functional
services or combine two or three modules to develop a
differential modular business plan.
Although each module can create tangible and
intangible benefits, it would be better if they can
consider how to make their short-term and longterm strategies in order to ensure self-sustaining. For
example, Snijlab and Waag Society have already found
their unique selling propositions to sustain themselves
such as the ability to explore new business potentials,
providing the laser cutting outsourcing service, getting
profits from co-developing products and selling the labs
products or machines. Those can cover their fixed cost
37
(e.g. Seats2meet)
The hubs charge money for
space bookings.
(05) Tenant
venue hire
fees
(e.g. Strijp-S)
Charge money for venue hire.
(06) Brand
license fees
(07) Advertising
fees
(e.g. thelighthouse)
Provide a platform, such as an
online website or presentation
event for clients to advertise
their products or services and
charge for them.
(09) Intellectual
property
(10) Brokerage
fees
Figure 8.1.4.3.1. T
en forms of revenue streams that hubs currently use
38
39
PROPOSITION
proposition.
property protection
(02) Space/facilities
maintenance
(03) Experts/staff
salaries
(05) Intellectual
property
protection
research.
communication.
it (Fig. 8.1.4.7.3).
40
41
willingness of experts.
STREAM
example:
fit the hub, then choose target people from the general
42
43
7.1.5. CONCLUSION
timing is laid out. If profit can cover the cost within the
LI-LIN)
AND TOOLKIT
(3) list the possible profit and costs; (4) make sure the
BUSINESS MODELS
and target people (e.g. events need staff to find the right
making.
SPACE
EVENT
RESEARCH
NETWORK
MAKE
44
45
there for free food and working space; when they need a
events.
Target people
The target customers of the space model are designers
Target people
the space, how the space can help people achieve their
Figure 8.2.7.1.3. Seats2meet use postcard to let people know more detail
information about its space.
Figure 8.2.7.1.2. Capital D organizes Co-Design caf for designers in its space,
then the designers will know Capital D has a multifunction space for them to
use. (Source: Capital D website)
46
47
Target people
academic institutes.
Kortrijk).
events.
by more people.
do, the different types of data the hub can provide, the
reputation.
services that the hub offers (e.g. help them to apply IP).
Marketing communication method
For a design innovation hub, which wants to promote a
research service, it not only needs to let people know
Figure 8.2.7.2.1. Waag society communicates its event information by using
Facebook fan page. (Source: Waag society in Facebook)
48
49
exchange knowledge.
developing.
prototype.
Target people
2011).
help the hub to tell its target customers that the hub
audience.
Firstly, the hub can invite celebrity experts to joint the
50
51
Figure 8.2.7.5.1. Snijlab promotes itself by putting the photos of their work in
famous design websites and blogs. (Source: Hypebeast, 2011; Synthetos, 2011;
Remodelista, 2012)
Figure 8.2.7.5.2. Manchester Fab Lab provides the platform for its users can
share their work and experience to others. (Source: Manchester Fab Lab)
Figure 8.2.7.5.3. Buda Lab organizes events to attract target people to become
user of Budalab.
7.2.2. CONCLUSION
hub can help them achieve their goals via the making
53
challenges.
network.
and conclusion.
54
Figure 8.3.2.2.1. The network impacts in Capital D and MAD Brussels (source: Appendix B-9 and B-3)
55
Figure 8.3.2.3.1. The network impacts in WAAG Society (source: Appendix B-5)
with others.
hub competitive.
accordingly.
56
57
Graph
Theory
STEP 1:
To identify a network structure and the possible route of network development
PLAN
services or products.
The
strength
of weak
ties
STEP 2:
To expand the scale of a network
STEP 3:
To identify networks common aim
Collaborative
Network
Relationship
Analysis
(CNRA)
STEP4:
To analyse how mutual benefits can provide the incentive for tacking challenges
STEP 5:
To analyze the contribution from different networks
STEP 6:
To evaluate whether the network development has improved
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Then, the next part will discuss how to apply these six
network development
58
59
From Network:
From Event:
other.
clients.
Figure 8.3.3.2.3. The relationships and development in the five different services hubs
60
61
From Making:
A making-based network enhances professionals
From Research:
The research group can provide compelling research
directions for design innovation hubs to invite people
coming from different industries to join this cross-
workers.
providing services.
To Event:
From Space:
design.
products.
To Research:
From Making:
Skilled people in Making-based network can support
companies.
As can be seen in Figure 8.3.3.2.4, when the spacebased network starts to expand, all networks can get
To Research:
Launching events can help research groups to find
suitable sponsors and promote the research-based
62
networks reputation.
To Space:
Figure 8.3.3.2.4. The cooperation between the Space hub and the others hubs' networks
To Making:
From Network:
From Space:
design.
63
From Network:
Figure 8.3.3.2.5. The cooperation between the Event hub and the others hubs' networks
results.
From Space:
Professional designers might contribute design
capability to help users in the find strategic ways to
social innovation.
To Event:
From Event:
To Making:
Research ideas coming from social innovation would
stimulate people to try to bring their creative ideas to
life, which may increase the number of users.
Figure 8.3.3.2.6. The cooperation between the Research hub and the other hubs' networks
64
To Research:
65
has improved
7.3.3. CONCLUSION
Figure 8.3.3.2.7. The cooperation between the Making hub and the others hubs' networks
7.3.2.3. RECOMMENDATIONS
project.
To Space:
Professional designers can cooperate with skilled
To Event:
Launching events requires a wide range of people
networks
sustainable way.
67
Figure 8.3.3.2.9. The different contributions for public benefits through the collaborative network
within a network.
challenges.
68
69
CHAPTER 8 PRE-COMMERCIAL
PROCUREMENT (PCP)
vendors
the market.
8.3. DESIGN PROCUREMENT
Public procurement related to design is an interesting
transnational PCPs/PPIs
8.2.1. OBJECTIVES:
supplier.
70
71
process.
Thinking.
to market strategy.
market.
72
73
PROCUREMENT?
regional level
- Support soft, non-legal instruments as well as the
policy instrument
- Deferent interests and incentive systems must be
overcome in order to capture riskpredatory strategies
- Develop skills and methodologies for cooperation,
Formalize the collaboration
- Overcome the asymmetry of information by increased
Communications
74
75
76
Marketing fee
e.g.Middleman fee
strategic team.
Create a cross-disciplinary
people to choose.
for
professional workers
environment to attract
Provide a co-working
products or services.
Explore stakeholders
sustain.
stakeholders network
Space maintenance
TOOLKIT
events.
approaches.
AND/OR
5. Making
4. Network
Renting service
3. Research
2. Event
Own space OR
1. Space
Companies
Designers
Better reputation
A network of people
Network
Plan
offering.
Marketing
communication
strategy
SPACE
as a value proposition
Brokerage fees
Subscription fees
Leading/Renting/Leasing fees
Revenue
Stream
Provide
CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSIONS,
77
78
79
Designers Companies
Companies
Creation a cross-disciplinary
stakeholders network
recognition/publicity
organizations or
Conduct research
research environment
reputation.
Facilities
Existing a network of people
Academic
institutes
exchange
Marketing fee
Usage fee
Brokerage fees
Subscription fees
Licensing fee
Revenue
Stream
Provide a cross-disciplinary
Experts
Students
Companies
Research groups
General public
Network
Plan
their products
Marketing
communication
strategy
their friends.
to extend partnerships
Marketing fee
Advertising fee
Brokerage fees
Subscription fees
Usage fee
Revenue
Stream
visually-attractive media
Independent designers
Design communities
Network
Plan
General
public
Marketing
communication
strategy
Experts
research projects
Better reputation
A network of people
Research result
Research
as a value proposition
Provide
stakeholders network
Activity space
Key partners
Activity planners
relevant people
Better reputation
A network of people
Idea creation
Service income
Event
as a value proposition
Provide
IP
80
81
A physical space
Facilities
products
Better reputation
A network of people
as a value proposition
Making
Provide
external environment
stakeholders network
Facilities
a physical space
A virtual platform OR
Better reputation
An network of people
Service fees
Network
as a value proposition
Provide
Companies
Designers Companies
users communities
e.g. Manchester FabLab
process
experience to others
professional projects
into products
Network
Plan
long-term relationship
of sharing ideas
cooperation
open space
Network
Plan
Through word-of-mouth,
design forums.
General
public
Marketing
communication
strategy
strong connection
Designers
Marketing
communication
strategy
Marketing fee
Licensing fee
Subscription fees
Usage Fees
Asset sale
Revenue
Stream
Marketing fee
Advertising fee
Usage fees
Brokerage fees
Subscription fees
activities
Licensing fees
Revenue
Stream
REFERENCES
Aaker, D. A., Joachimsthaler, E., 2000. The brand relationship spectrum. California Management Review, 42(4),
pp.8-23.
Aalto University Design Factory, 2013. Aalto University Design Factory. [online] Available at: <www.
aaltodesignfactory.fi/>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Alexakis, S., Kolmel, B. and Heep, T., 2004. VO in industry: state of the art. In: L. Camarinha-Matos and H.
Afsarmanesh, eds. 2004. Collaborative networked organizations, a research agenda for emerging business model.
Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic, pp. 15-26.
Amit, R. and Zott, C., 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 493-520.
APCI, 2013. The APCI [online] Available at: < http://www.francedesigninnovation.fr/?cat=27> [Accessed 10 May
2013].
Arana, J. and Castellano, E., 2010. The role of collaborative networks in business model innovation. [e-book]
Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Available through: Springer Link website < http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.
1007%2F978-3-642-15961-9_11> [Accessed 10 August 2013].
Avital, M., 2011. The generative bedrock of open design. IN ABEL, B.V., EVERS, L., KLAASSEN, R. and Troxler, P.
(Eds.) Open design now, why design cannot remain exclusive. Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
Avital, M., 2011. The generative bedrock of open design. In: B.V.ABEL, L. EVERS, R. KLAASSEN, and P.Troxler,
eds. 2011. Open design now, why design cannot remain exclusive. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
Barcelona centre de disseny, 2013. Barcelona centre de disseny. [online] Available at: <www.bcd.es/>[Accessed
10 May 2013].
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. and Sambrook, S., 2009. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation.
Management decision, 47(8), pp. 1323-1339.
Bask, h, A., Tinnila, M. and Rajahonka, M., 2010. Maching service strategies business models and modular
business processes [online] Available at: < www.bus.iastate.edu/nilakant/.../Bask%20et%20al2010.pdf>
[Accessed 25 June 2013].
Batho, M.T.S., 2012. Targeted process for the development of Innovation Centres in academic year 2012/13.
Available at http://www.sfc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Knowledge_Exchange/Innovation_Centres_process_AY2012_13[pdf.
pdf. [Accessed 1 June 2013].
Batho, M.T.S., 2012. Targeted process for the development of Innovation Centres in academic year 2012/13.
Bogers, M. and West, J., 2012. Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation.
Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), pp.61-75.
Boons, F. and Ldeke-Freund, F., 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps
towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, pp. 919
British DesignInnovation (EastSussex) (2013) British DesignInnovation. [online] Available at: <http://www.
britishdesigninnovation.com>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Brousseau, E. and Penard, T. 2006. The economics of digital business models: A framework for analyzing the
economics of platforms. Review of Network Economics, 6(2), pp.81-110.
Butler, R. and Gill, J., 2010. Knowledge and trust in partnership formation. In: J. Genefke and F. McDonald, eds.
2001. Effective collaboration managing the obstacles to success. New York: Palgrave, pp. 17-43.
Bymer, C., 2009. What makes brands great. In: R. Clifton, J. Simmons, ed. 2009. Brands and branding. London:
Profile. Ch.4
C4di - center fordesign and innovation Aberdeen, 2013. [online] Available at: < http://www.c4di.org.uk/who.htm>
[Accessed 10 May 2013].
C4di, 2013. C4di - center fordesign and innovation Aberdeen. [online] Available at: <www.c4di.org.uk/>[Accessed
10 May 2013].
Camarinha-Matos, L.M., 2004. Emerging collaborative forms. In: L. Camarinha-Matos and H. Afsarmanesh, eds.
2004. Collaborative networked organizations, a research agenda for emerging business model. Massachusetts:
Kluwer Academic, pp. 41-46.
Cambridge Dictionary, 2013. Cambridge dictionaries online [online] Available at: <http://dictionary.cambridge.org>
[Accessed 12 June 2013].
Caparo innovation centre, 2013. Caparo innovation centre. [online] Available at: <http://www.
caparoinnovationcentre.com>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Capital D, 2013. Capital D. [online] Available at: <http://www.capitald.nl> [Accessed 10 May 2013].
Cellini, R, S. and Kee, E, J., 2010. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis [online] Available at:<http://home.
gwu.edu/~scellini/CelliniKee21.pdf> [Accessed at 15 July 2013]
Centre for design innovation, 2013. Who we are. [Online] Available at <http://www.c4di.org.uk/who.htm#>
[Accessed 18 July 2013]
Chesbrough, H.W., 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology.
Berry, L. L., 2000. Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), pp. 128137.
Bhat, S., Kelley, G. E., and ODonnell, K. A., 1998. An investigation of consumer reactions to the use of different
brand names. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7(1), pp.41-50.
Big innovation centre, 2013. Big innovation centre. [online] Available at: <www.biginnovationcentre.
com>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
82
83
Collier, R., 2011. Health care system needs new revenue streams, expert argues. CMAJ. September 20; 183(13):
E989E990 [online] Available at: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176884/>[Accessed 10 July
2013].
Cox, G., 2005. Cox Review of Creativity in Business: building on the UKs strengths, Design Council. [Online]
Available at <http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/publications/the-cox-review/> [Accessed 21 April 2013]
Crainer, S., Dearlove, D., 2003. The ultimate book of business brands : insights from the world's 50 greatest
brands. Oxford: Capstone.
Creative Innovation Centre CIC, 2013. Creative Innovation Centre CIC. [online] Available at: <www.
creativeinnovationcentre.co.uk/>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
CSO, 2012. Intellectual Property Protection: The Basics [online] Available at:<http://www.csoonline.com/
article/204600/intellectual-property-protection-the-basics#>[Accessed at 15 July 2013]
Culminatum Innovation, 2013. Culminatum Innovation. [online] Available at: <http://www.culminatum.fi/sivu.php>
[Accessed 1 May 2013 ]
Dahlander, L. and Gann, D.M., 2007. How Open is Innovation?, Copenhagen: DRUID.
Dahlander, L. and Gann, D.M., 2010. How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), pp.699-709.
Danish Design centre, 2013. Danish Design centre. [online] Available at: <www.ddc.dk/>[Accessed 10 May
2013].
Davis, M., 2006. More than a Name: An Introduction to Branding. SA: AVA Publishing.
DCMS, 2001. Creative Industries Mapping Documents 2001 [online] Available at: <https://www.gov.uk/
government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-2001> [Accessed 13 May 2013].
de Chernatony, L., Riley, F.D., 1999. Experts' views about defining services brands and the principles of services
branding. Journal of Business Research, 46(2), pp.181-192.
Demil, B. and Lecocq, X., 2010. Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long range
planning. 43, pp. 227-246.
Desginregio Kortrijk, 2013. Desginregio Kortrijk. [online] Available at: <http://www.designregio-kortrijk.be>
[Accessed 15 May 2013 ]
Design Council, 2012. The Power of branding: a practical guide. [pdf] Available at: <http://www.designcouncil.org.
uk/Documents/Documents/Publications/Power_of_branding.pdf> [Accessed 5 July 2013]
Design Hub, 2013. Design Hub [online] Available at: <www.designhub.jp/eng/>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Design London, 2013. Design London 20072011 [online] Available at: < http://designlondon.rca.ac.uk >
[Accessed 25 June 2013].
Design Wales, 2007. Case Study of Good Design Support Practice, Denmark design: PARTNER, Danish Design
Centre (DDC). [online] Available at: < http://www.seeplatform.eu/uploaded_files/DENMARK%20design%20partner.
pdf> [Accessed 1 June 2013].
Design Wales, 2011. Case Studies in Design Policy and Programmes. [online] Available at: <http://www.
seeplatform.eu/images/file/Case%20Study%20pdfs/Centre%20for%20Design%20and%20Innovation%20c4di.
Designhub RMIT UNI, 2013. Designhub RMIT UNI [online] Available at: <http://www.rmit.edu.au/capitalworks/
designhub>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Designlondon, 2013. Design London 20072011 [online] Available at: < http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk/referencing/
harvard.htm > [Accessed 25 June 2013 ].
Desyllas, P. and Sako, M., 2010. Profiting from business model innovation: evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto
insurance. Research Policy, 42, pp. 101 116.
Devlin, J., 2003. Brand architecture in services: the example of retail financial services. Journal of Marketing
Management, 19(9-10), pp.1043-1065.
Dutta, B. and Jackson, M.O., 2003. On the formation of networks and groups. Networks and Groups, Models
of Strategic Formation. In: B. Dutta and M.O. Jackson, eds. 2003. Networks and groups, models of strategic
formation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1-15.
DZNW/ reddot, 2013. DZNW/ reddot. [online] Available at: < http://en.red-dot.org>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Elliott, R.R., Percy, L., Pervan, S., 2011. Strategic brand management. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eppler, M. J., Will, M., 2001. Branding knowledge: Brand building beyond product and service brands. The
Journal of Brand Management, 8(6), pp.445-456.
Eschenbcher, J., Seifert, M. and Thoben, K., 2009. Managing Distributed Innovation Processes in Virtual
Organizations by Applying the Collaborative Network Relationship Analysis. [online] Available at: http://link.
springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04568-4_2.pdf [Accessed 10 August 2013].
Fab Lab UK, 2013. Fab Lab network UK. [online] Available at: <http://www.fablabsuk.co.uk> [Accessed 8 May
2013]
Facebook, 2013. Waag Society fan page. [online] Available at: <http://www.facebook.com/
Waagsociety?ref=ts&fref=ts
Foster, L, W., Kim, P. and Christiansen, B., 2009. Ten Nonprofit Funding Models. [online] Available at< http://
www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/ten_nonprofit_funding_models> [Accessed 8 May 2013]
Gallaugher, M, J., Auger, P. and BarNir, A., 2001. Revenue streams and digital content providers: an empirical
investigation. Information & Management, 38(7), pp.473485
Gershenfeld, N., 2005. Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop - from personal computers to personal
fabrication. New York: Basic Books.
Gershenfeld, N., 2007. Neil Gershenfeld on Fab Labs. [online] Available at < http://www.ted.com/talks/neil_
gershenfeld_on_fab_labs.html. > [Accessed 1 June 2013].
Gitelson, R., Kerstetter, D.L., 2000. A new perspective on the decision-making process of arts festival visitors. In:
Events Beyond 2000: Setting the Agenda. Sydney, Australia 15 July 2000.
Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C., 2005. Building breakthrough businesses within established organizations.
Harvard Business Review 83, pp.5868.
Granovetter, M.S.,1973. The strength of weak ties. [online] Available at: <http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/
mgranovetter/documents/granstrengthweakties.pdf> [Accessed 10 August 2013].
84
85
Gray, D., 2004. Doing research in the real world. London: SAGE Publication
Grthaug, H., 2011. A Software Roadmap for the Fab Lab Network. [online] Available at: < http://www.nada.kth.
se/utbildning/grukth/exjobb/rapportlistor/2011/rapporter11/grothaug_hans_erik_11130.pdf> [Accessed 1 June
2013].
Hackley, C., 2005. Advertising and promotion : communicating brands. London : SAGE.
Hakansson, H, Ford, D, Gadde, L., Snehota, I. and Waluszewski, A., 2009. Business in networks. Glasgow: Wiley.
Hanna, V. and Walsh, K., 2002. Small firm networks: a successful approach to innovation?. [online] Available at <
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/1467-9310.00253/asset/1467-9310.00253.pdf?v=1&t=hheo5vdq&s
=9b9321c55a7e61feae1f4d91a93a8c792ac97663. >[Accessed 1 June 2013].
Hede, AM., Kellett, P., 2011. Marketing communications for special events: Analysing managerial practice,
consumer perceptions and preferences. European Journal of Marketing, 45(6), pp. 987-1004.
Hemphala, J., Magnusson, m., 2012. Networks for Innovation But What Networks and What Innovation? Creativity
and innovation management, 21(1), pp.3-15.
Henry, C. and Bruin, D, A., 2011. Entrepreneurship and the creative economy: process, practice and policy,
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Holmen, E., Aune, T.B. and Pedersen, A., 2013. Network pictures for managing key supplier relationships.
Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), pp.139-51.
Howkins, John., 2002. The creative economy: how people make money from ideas. London: Penguin.
Hunter, M., 2013. What design is and why it matters. [online] Available at: < http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/
about-design/What-design-is-and-why-it-matters/ > [Accessed 20 May 2013 ].
Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2005. Managing to collaborate, the theory and practice of collaborative advantage.
London: Routledge.
Hypebeast, 2011. SNIJLAB Wooden Notebooks. [online] Available at: <http://hypebeast.com/2011/10/snijlabwooden-notebooks > [Accessed 20 July 2013 ].
IdcN, 2013. International design center Nagoya. [online] Available at: <http://www.idcn.jp> [Accessed 5 May
2013]
Innovation centre Denmark, 2013. Innovation centre Denmark. [online] Available at: <http://icdk.um.dk>[Accessed
10 May 2013].
INTERREG IVB, 2013. 242H PROUD People, Researchers and Organisations, Using Design for co-creation and
innovation. [online] Available at: <http://www.nweurope.eu/index.php?act=project_detail&id=5370
Julier, G., 2006. From visual culture to design culture. [pdf] Available at: <http://www.sfu.ca/cmns/
courses/2008/428/Readings/CMNS%20428,%20(2008)%20Reference%20Readings/Julier%20(2005).pdf>
[Accessed 18 July 2013]
Julier, G., 2007. The culture of design. London: Sage.
Kapfere, JN., 2004. The new strategic brand management : creating and sustaining brand equity long term.
London : Kogan Page
Katzy, B.R., Loeh, H.L. and Zhang, C., 2004. Virtual organizing scenario. In: L. Camarinha-Matos and H.
Afsarmanesh, eds. 2004. Collaborative networked organizations, a research agenda for emerging business model.
Keller, K. L., 2008. Strategic brand management : a European perspective. Harlow : FT Prentice Hall.
Keller, K. L., 2009. Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of
marketing communications, 15(2-3), pp. 139-155.
Korel, H. and Little, C., 2009. Creating an Innovation Center: A Guide. [online] Available at < http://xnet.kp.org/
innovationcenter/docs/KorelLittleCreatingInnovationCentersAGuide.pdf. > [Accessed 1 June 2013].
Kotler, P., 2003, Marketing management, Upper Saddle River. N.J.: Prentice Hall
Kumar, V., 2009. A process for practicing design innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2/3), pp.91-100.
Laforet, S., 2010. Managing brands: a contemporary perspective. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Laforet, S., Saunders, J., 1994. Managing brand portfolios: how the leaders do it. Journal of Advertising Research,
34(5), pp.64-76.
Laurel, B., 2003. Design Research : Methods and Perspectives, Cambridge: MIT Press
Layard, R. and Glaister, S., 1994. Cost-benefit analysis, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leonard, D., Sensiper, S., 1998. The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review,
40, pp.11232.
Lepla, F. J., Parker, L. M., 2002. Integrated Branding: Becoming Brand-driven Through Companywide Action.
London : Kogan Page.
Linden, R.M., 2010. Leading across boundaries, creating collaborative agencies in a networked world. San
Francisco: A Wiley Imprint.
Lindgre, P., 2012. Business model innovation leadership: how do SMEs strategically lead business model
innovation? International Journal of Business and Management. 7(14) p.53.
Luxinnovation, 2013. Luxinnovation. [online] Available at: <www.luxinnovation.lu/>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Macaulay, A., Miles, I., Wilby, J., Tan, Y.L., Zhao, L., and Theodoulidis, B., 2012. Case Studies in Service
Innovation [e-book] Available at< http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-1972-3/page/1>[ Accessed
14 June 2013]
MacLean, D and MacIntosh, R., 2003. Complex Adaptive Social Systems: Towards a Theory for Practice. In: E.
Mitleton-Kelly, ed. 2003. Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations, the application of
complexity theory to organization. Oxford: Elsevier science, pp. 149-165.
MAD Brussels, 2013. MAD Brussels mode and design center. [online] Available at: <http://www.madbrussels.be/
en/MAD> [Accessed 15 May 2013 ]
MAD Brussels, 2013. Wardrobe assistant. [image online] Available at: <http://www.madbrussels.be/en/Profile-ofthe-Week/Wardrobe-Assistant> [Accessed 10 August 2008].
MAD Brussels, 2013. Wardrobe assistant. [image online] Available at: <http://www.madbrussels.be/en/Space>
[Accessed 10 August 2008].
Mahadevan, B. 2000. Business models for Internet-based e-commerce: An anatomy. California Management
Review, 42(4): pp.55-69.
Malins, J., 2012. Centre for Design & Innovation, Project Evaluation. [online] Available at < http://www.c4di.org.
uk/pdfs/c4di_project_report.pdf> [Accessed 6 June 2013].
Man, A. D., 2004. The network economy, strategy, structure and management.
86
87
Mason, K. and Spring, Martin., 2011. The sites and practices of business models. Industrial Marketing
Management, 40(6), pp.1032-1041.
Michelini, L., 2012. social innovation and new business models: Creating Shared Value in Low-Income Markets.
[e-book] Available at:< http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-32150-4/page/1> [Accessed 14 June
2013]
Mul, J.D., 2011. Redesigning Design. In: B.V.ABEL, L. EVERS, R. KLAASSEN, and P.Troxler, eds. 2011. Open
design now, why design cannot remain exclusive. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
Mutlu, B. and Er, A., 2003. Design Innovation: Historical and the theoretical perspectives on product innovation.
Remodelista, 2012. Accessories: Wooden Booklets by Snijlab. [online] Available at: <http://www.remodelista.com/
In: 5th European academy of design conference. Barcelona, Spain April 2003.
Nokia, 2013. Expanding the 3DK now with Lumia 520 goodness! [online] Available at:< http://developer.nokia.
com/Blogs/News/blog/2013/02/25/expanding-the-3dk-now-with-lumia-520-goodness/> [Accessed 25 June 2013 ].
Northern design center, 2013. Northern design center. [online] Available at: < http://www.gateshead.gov.uk/
Business%20and%20Industry/NorthernDesignCentre/Homepage.aspx>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Oakley, M., 1990. Design Management: A Handbook of Issues & Methods, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
OED, 1989. Oxford English Dictionary second edition. [online] Available at: < http://www.oed.com > [Accessed 20
May 2013 ].
Olins, W., 1989. Corporate identity : making business strategy visible through design. London : Thames & Hudson.
Olinw, W., 2002. Corporate Identity the ultimate resource. [pdf] Available at: < http://www.wallyolins.com/
includes/corporateidentity.pdf > [Accessed 10 July 2013].
Osterwalder, A., 2004, The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach [online] Available
at: <http://www.stanford.edu/group/mse278/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/TheBusiness-ModelOntology.pdf> [Accessed 25 June 2013 ].
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., 2010. Business model generation. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
first approach to understand working and sharing principles. [online] Available at: <http://interop-esa05.unige.ch/
Oxford dictionary, 2013. Oxford dictionaries online [online] Avaialble at: < http://oxforddictionaries.com >
Schumpeter, J.A., 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Unwin University.
Searle, N., (2011) Changing business models in the creative industries: the cases of television computer games
and music. [online] Available at: <www.ipo.gov.uk/ipresearch-creativeind-full-201110.pdf> [Accessed 3 May
2013].
Seat2meet, 2013. Seat2meet. [online] Available at: <http://www.seats2meet.com>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Seelos, C., and Mair, J., 2007. Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A
strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21,pp. 49-63.
Shively, G., and Galopin, M., n.d. An Overview of Benefit-Cost Analysis. [online] Available at:< http://www.agecon.
purdue.edu/staff/shively/COURSES/AGEC406/reviews/bca.htm> [Accessed 15 July 2013]
Stewart, D. W. and Zhao, Q., 2000. Internet marketing, business models and public policy. Journal of Public
Policy and Marketing, 19, pp. 287-296.
Stiles, J., 2001. Managing strategic alliances success: determining the influencing factors of intent within
partnerships. In: J. Genefke and F. McDonald, eds. 2001. Effective collaboration managing the obstacles to
success. New York: Palgrave, pp. 17-43.
88
89
Strijp-S, 2013. Strijp-S works. [image online] Available at: <http://www.strijp-s.nl/office-s> [Accessed 10 August
2008].
Synthetos, 2011. Synthetos 20plexi strip SNIJLAB style. [online] Available at: < https://www.synthetos.com/
synthetos-20-plexi-strip-snijlab-style/ > [Accessed 20 July 2013 ].
Talluri, T, K. and Van Ryzin, J, G., (2005) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management. New York: Spring
science + business media, INC.
TechShop, 2013. Welcome. [online] Available at: <http://www.techshop.ws> [Accessed 3 May 2013].
Teece, D., 1980. The diffusion of an administrative innovation. Management Science 26, pp.464470.
Teece, D.J., 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, pp.172-194.
The innovation centre for RCA graduates and business, 2013. The innovation centre for RCA graduates and
business. [online] Available at: <http://www.innovation.rca.ac.uk>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
The International Design Center Berlin, 2013. The International Design Center Berlin [online] Available at: <www.
idz.de/en/>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
The Jewellery Industry (2013) The Jewellery Industry. [online] Available at: < http://www.bcu.ac.uk/business/ourresearch-and-expertise/jewellery-innovation-centre>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
The Light House, 2013. The Light House. [online] Available at: <http://www.thelighthouse.co.uk> [Accessed 25
April 2013 ]
Waag Society, 2013. Call for participation: mobiles for good 2013. [image online] Available at: < http://Waag.org/
en/news/call-participation-mobiles-good-2013> [Accessed 10 August 2008].
Waag Society, 2013. Open wetlab in financial daily newspaper. [image online] Available at: < http://Waag.org/en/
blog/open-wetlab-financial-daily-newspaper> [Accessed 10 August 2008].
Waag, 2013. Waag Society. [online] Available at: <http://Waag.org/nl> [Accessed 25 May 2013]
Wilson, R.J., 2010. Introduction to graph theory. Essex: Pearson education limited.
Winter, S.G. and Szulanski, G., 2001. Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), pp.730743. [online]
Available at: <http://orgsci.highwire.org/content/12/6/730.full.pdf+html> [Accessed 3 May 2013].
Zott, C., Amit, R. and Massa, L., 2011. The business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research, Journal
of Management. 37(4), pp.1019-1042.
Emma Murphy, Jussi Sorssimo, 2013, Masterclass on Design Procurement
Emma Murphy, Sally Collier, Camilla Buchanan, 2013, Buying Design: Where are we now?
Cordis, 2011, Pre-commercial Procurement: Driving Innovation to ensure high quality public services in Europe
Cordis, 2012, Policy related frequently asked questions on Pre-commercial Procurement (PCP)
Decipher, 2014, Pre-commercial procurement
Jussi Sorssimo, 2014, Helsinki Masterclass: Engendering Empathy in Design Procurement Culminatum
Innovation
The storey (2013) The storey. [online] Available at: <http://www.thestorey.co.uk>[Accessed 10 May 2013].
Thompson, J.D. and MacMillan, I.C., 2010. Business models: Creating new markets and societal wealth. Long
InnovationWolfgang Knapp, Nina Widmark, Stephen Hughes, Ilona Lundstrm, Angelica Roschier, 2011, Design
Options Paper - Pre-commercial Procurement of Innovation (PCP) European Commission Enterprise and Industry
90
91
92