The document discusses the Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry Model of Service Quality Gaps, which identifies 5 key gaps that can exist in an organization's service delivery:
1) Gap between customer expectations and management perceptions.
2) Gap between management perceptions and service design/standards.
3) Gap between service design and actual service delivery.
4) Gap between service delivery and external communications about service.
5) Overall gap between customer expectations and their perceptions of the actual service received. Addressing these gaps is important for organizations to improve service quality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Model of Service Quality Gaps: The Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry
The document discusses the Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry Model of Service Quality Gaps, which identifies 5 key gaps that can exist in an organization's service delivery:
1) Gap between customer expectations and management perceptions.
2) Gap between management perceptions and service design/standards.
3) Gap between service design and actual service delivery.
4) Gap between service delivery and external communications about service.
5) Overall gap between customer expectations and their perceptions of the actual service received. Addressing these gaps is important for organizations to improve service quality.
The document discusses the Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry Model of Service Quality Gaps, which identifies 5 key gaps that can exist in an organization's service delivery:
1) Gap between customer expectations and management perceptions.
2) Gap between management perceptions and service design/standards.
3) Gap between service design and actual service delivery.
4) Gap between service delivery and external communications about service.
5) Overall gap between customer expectations and their perceptions of the actual service received. Addressing these gaps is important for organizations to improve service quality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views13 pages
Model of Service Quality Gaps: The Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry
The document discusses the Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry Model of Service Quality Gaps, which identifies 5 key gaps that can exist in an organization's service delivery:
1) Gap between customer expectations and management perceptions.
2) Gap between management perceptions and service design/standards.
3) Gap between service design and actual service delivery.
4) Gap between service delivery and external communications about service.
5) Overall gap between customer expectations and their perceptions of the actual service received. Addressing these gaps is important for organizations to improve service quality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13
The Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry
Model of Service Quality Gaps
Presented to, Presented by,
Nilesh Neelmani Himanshu shekhar 20B (09-11) Gap – 1 Ignorance of Customer’s Expectations
Customers’ expectations versus management
perceptions:
As a result of the lack of a marketing research
orientation, inadequate upward communication and too many layers of management. Eg.
Most of unorganized Retailers assumed that customers
want cheap product or service but one thing that they forgot and that was good shopping experience and that is why organized mega markets are being success.
customers may expect to wait only 20 minutes to see
their doctor but, in fact, have to wait more than thirty minutes. Gap – 2 Requirement for service design standards
Management perceptions versus service
specifications:
As a result of inadequate commitment to service
quality, a perception of unfeasibility, inadequate task standardisation and an absence of goal setting. Eg.
For example, in a fast food environment, the customers
may place a greater emphasis on order accuracy than promptness of service, but management may perceive promptness to be more important Gap – 3 Not delivering to service standards
Gap3: Service specifications versus service delivery:
As a result of role ambiguity and conflict, poor employee-job fit and poor technology-job fit, inappropriate supervisory control systems, lack of perceived control and lack of teamwork. Eg.
Management might perceive that customers expect
someone to answer their telephone calls in a timely fashion. To customers, "timely fashion" may mean within thirty seconds. However, if management designs delivery such that telephone calls are answered within sixty seconds, a service design gap is created. Gap – 4 Inconsistency between performance and promiss
Service delivery versus external communication:
As a result of inadequate horizontal communications
and propensity to over-promise. Eg.
Given the previous example, management may
establish a standard such that telephone calls should be answered within thirty seconds. However, if it takes more than thirty seconds for calls to be answered, regardless of the cause, there is a delivery gap. Gaps 1 to 4 affect the way in which service is delivered and these four gaps lead to Gap 5. Gap – 5 The service short falls
The discrepancy between customer expectations and
their perceptions of the service delivered:
As a result of the influences exerted from the
customer side and the shortfalls (gaps) on the part of the service provider. In this case, customer expectations are influenced by the extent of personal needs, word of mouth recommendation and past service experiences Eg. Advertising, for instance, may indicate to consumers that they can have their cars's oil changed within twenty minutes when, in reality, it takes more than thirty minutes. Thank you,