Intro To Six Sigma
Intro To Six Sigma
Intro To Six Sigma
SIX - SIGMA
Presented by :
http://www.QualityGurus.com
Agenda
QualityGurus.com
Participants Introduction
Your Name
Department
Your job profile
Your exposure to Quality Management/
Six Sigma
QualityGurus.com
Ground Rules
Program success depends on your participation.
Actively participate.
Please avoid cross-talks.
Observe specified timings.
Please keep your mobile phones switched off.
Feel free to ask question at any point of time.
- Restrict question to specific issue being
discussed, while general
questions can be discussed during Q & A
session.
Enjoy the program !
QualityGurus.com
Introduction to Six Sigma
QualityGurus.com
Origin of Six Sigma
1987 Motorola Develops Six Sigma
Raised Quality Standards
QualityGurus.com
Time Line
Allied Signal
Johnson & Johnson,
Ford, Nissan,
Motorola
General Electric Honeywell
QualityGurus.com
Pilot’s Six-Sigma
Performance
Width of landing
strip 1/2 Width
of landing
strip
QualityGurus.com
Current Leadership Challenges
Delighting Customers.
Reducing Cycle Times.
Keeping up with Technology
Advances.
Retaining People.
Reducing Costs.
Responding More Quickly.
Structuring for Flexibility.
Growing Overseas Markets.
QualityGurus.com
Six Sigma— Benefits?
Generated sustained success
Project selection tied to
organizational strategy
Customer focused
Profits
Project outcomes / benefits tied to
financial reporting system.
Full-time Black Belts in a rigorous,
project-oriented method.
Recognition and reward system
established to provide motivation.
QualityGurus.com
Management involvement?
Executives and upper management
drive the effort through:
Understanding Six Sigma
Significant financial commitments
Actively selecting projects tied to
strategy
Setting up formal review process
Selecting Champions
Determining strategic measures
QualityGurus.com
Management Involvement?
Key issues for Leadership:
How will leadership organize to support
Six Sigma ? (6 σ council, Director 6 σ,
etc)
Transition rate to achieve 6 σ.
Level of resource commitment.
Centralized or decentralized approach.
Integration with current initiatives e.g.
QMS
How will the progress be monitored?
QualityGurus.com
What can it do?
Motorola:
5-Fold growth in Sales
Profits climbing by 20% pa
Cumulative savings of $14 billion
over 11 years
General Electric:
$2 billion savings in just 3 years
The no.1 company in the USA
Bechtel Corporation:
$200 million savings with
investment of $30 million
QualityGurus.com
GE Six Sigma Economics
2000
1500
Cost
1000 Benefit
500
0
1996 1998 2000
2002
Source: 1998 GE Annual Report, Jack Welch Letter to Share Owners and Employees - progress based upon
total corporation cost/benefits attributable to Six Sigma.
QualityGurus.com
Overview of Six
Sigma
CHANGE
6 SIGMA AS A
THE
PHILOSOPHY
WORLD
TRANSFORM THE
ORGANIZATION
6 SIGMA AS
GROWTH
A PROCESS
COSTS OUT
6 SIGMA AS A
STATISTICAL TOOL
PAIN, URGENCY, SURVIVAL
QualityGurus.com
Overview of Six
Sigma
It is a Process
To achieve this level of
performance you need
It is a Philosophy to:
Anything less than Define, Measure,
ideal is an opportunity Analyse, Improve and
for improvement Control
Defects costs money
Understanding
processes and It is Statistics
improving them is the
most efficient way to 6 Sigma processes will
achieve lasting results produce less than 3.4
defects per million
opportunities
QualityGurus.com
Philosophy
Know What’s
Important to the
Customer (CTQ)
Reduce Defects
(DPMO)
Center Around
Target (Mean)
Reduce Variation
(Standard Deviation)
QualityGurus.com
Critical Elements
Genuine Focus on the Customer
Data and Fact Driven Management
Process Focus
Proactive management
Boundary-less Collaboration
Drive for Perfection; Tolerance for
failure
QualityGurus.com
Data Driven
Decision
Y= f(X)
• Y • X1 . . . Xn
• Dependent • Independent
• Output • Input-Process
• Effect • Cause
• Problem
• Symptom
• Control
• Monitor
• Define • Define
• Measure • Measure
• Analyze • Analyze
• Improve • Design
• Verify
• Control
QualityGurus.com
Key Concepts
QualityGurus.com
COPQ (Cost of Poor
Quality) - Inspection
- Warranty
- Scrap
- Rework Traditional Quality Costs:
- Rejects - Tangible
- Easy to Measure
- More Setups
- Expediting Costs
Hidden Costs:
- Lost Sales - Intangible
- Late Delivery - Difficult to Measure
- Lost Customer Loyalty - Lost Opportunities
- Excess Inventory
- Long Cycle Times - The Hidden Factory
- Costly Engineering Changes
QualityGurus.com
COPQ v/s Sigma
Level
50%
Cost of Quality % Sales
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
2 3 4 5 6
Sigma Level
QualityGurus.com
CTQ (Critical-To-
Quality)
CTQ characteristics for the process,
service or process
Measure of “What is important to
Customer”
6 Sigma projects are designed to
improve CTQ
Examples:
Waiting time in clinic
Spelling mistakes in letter
% of valves leaking in operation
QualityGurus.com
Defective and Defect
A nonconforming unit is a defective unit
Defect is nonconformance on one of many
possible quality characteristics of a unit
that causes customer dissatisfaction.
A defect does not necessarily make the
unit defective
Examples:
Scratch on water bottle
(However if customer wants a scratch free
bottle, then this will be defective bottle)
QualityGurus.com
Defect Opportunity
Circumstances in which CTQ can fail
to meet.
Number of defect opportunities relate
to complexity of unit.
Complex units – Greater
opportunities of defect than simple
units
Examples:
A units has 5 parts, and in each part there are 3
opportunities of defects – Total defect
opportunities are 5 x 3 = 15
QualityGurus.com
DPO (Defect Per
Opportunity)
Number of defects divided by number
of defect opportunities
Examples:
In previous case (15 defect opportunities), if 10
units have 2 defects.
Defects per unit = 2 / 10 = 0.2
DPO = 2 / (15 x 10) = 0.0133333
QualityGurus.com
DPMO (Defect Per Million
Opportunities)
DPO multiplies by one million
Examples:
In previous case (15 defect opportunities), if 10
units have 2 defects.
Defects per unit = 2 / 10 = 0.2
DPO = 2 / (15 x 10) = 0.0133333
DPMO = 0.013333333 x 1,000,000 = 13,333
QualityGurus.com
Forms of Waste
QualityGurus.com
What are the forms of
waste?
Waste of Correction
Waste of Overproduction
Waste of processing
Waste of conveyance (or
transport)
Waste of inventory
Waste of motion
Waste of waiting
QualityGurus.com
1. Waste of correction
Failure Failure
Investigation Investigation
Operation Operation
Test Test Product
1 2
QualityGurus.com
2. Waste of
Overproduction
Producing more than necessary or
producing at faster rate than required
Excess labor, space, money, handling
QualityGurus.com
3. Waste of processing
Processing that does not provide
value to the product
Excess level of approvals
Tying memos that could be handwritten
Cosmetic painting on internals of
equipment
Paint thickness more than specific values
QualityGurus.com
4. Waste of conveyance
Unnecessary movement of material
from one place to other to be
minimized because -
It adds to process time
Goods might get damaged
Convey material and information
ONLY when and where it is needed.
QualityGurus.com
5. Waste of inventory
Any excess inventory is drain on an
organization.
Impact on cash flow
Increased overheads
Covers Quality and process issues
Examples
Spares, brochures, stationary, …
QualityGurus.com
6. Waste of Motion
Any movement of people, equipment,
information that does not contribute
value to product or service
QualityGurus.com
7. Waste of Waiting
Idle time between operations
Period of inactivity in a downstream
process because an upstream activity
does not deliver on time.
Downstream resources are then often
used in activities that do not add
value, or worst result in
overproduction.
QualityGurus.com
Some more sources of
Waste
Waste of untapped human potential.
Waste of inappropriate systems
Wasted energy and water
Wasted materials
Waste of customer time
Waste of defecting customers
QualityGurus.com
What is Sigma?
QualityGurus.com
Have you ever…
Shot a rifle?
Played darts?
QualityGurus.com
Have you ever…
Shot a rifle?
Played darts?
Jack
Jill
8 8 - 8.4 = -0.4
7 7 - 8.4 = -1.4
average
s 8.4 0.0
Jill
QualityGurus.com
Variability
Deviation = distance between
observations and the mean (or
average)
Observations Deviations
Jack
7 7 - 6.6 = 0.4
7 7 - 6.6 = 0.4
7 7 - 6.6 = 0.4
6 - 6.6 = 7
6 -0.6
6 - 6.6 = 6
average 6 -0.6 7
s 6.6 0.0 7
6 Jill
QualityGurus.com
Variability
Variance = average distance
between observations and
the mean squared 8
7
10
8
9
Observation Squared
s Deviations Deviations
10 - 8.4 = Jack
10 1.6 2.56
9 – 8.4 =
9 0.6 0.36
8 – 8.4 =
8 -0.4 0.16
8 – 8.4 =
8 -0.4 0.16
7 – 8.4 =
7 -1.4 1.96
averag 1.0
es 8.4 0.0 Jill
QualityGurus.com
Variance
Variability
Variance = average distance
between observations and
the mean squared
Observation Squared
s Deviations Deviations
Jack
7 7 - 6.6 = 0.4 0.16
7 7 - 6.6 = 0.4 0.16
7 7 - 6.6 = 0.4 0.16
6– 6.6 = 7
6 -0.6 0.36 6
6– 6.6 =
6 -0.6 0.36 7
averag 0.24 7
es 6.6 0.0 6 Jill
QualityGurus.com
Variance
Variability
Standard deviation
= square root of
variance
Jack
QualityGurus.com
Variability
0.2
0.15
Probability
1 die
0.1 2 dice
0.05 3 dice
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Sum of dots
QualityGurus.com
“Normal” bell shaped curve
Special Causes
Non-random variation (unusual)
May exhibit a pattern
Assignable, explainable, controllable
Adjusting the process decreases its variation
QualityGurus.com
Limits
Process and Control limits:
Statistical
Process limits are used for individual items
Control limits are used with averages
Limits = μ ± 3σ
Define usual (common causes) & unusual
(special causes)
Specification limits:
Engineered
Limits = target ± tolerance
Define acceptable & unacceptable
QualityGurus.com
Usual v/s Unusual,
Acceptable v/s Defective
Another View
Off-Target Large Variation
On-Target
Center Reduce
Process Spread
QualityGurus.com
More about limits
Poor quality:
defects are
common (Cpk<1)
Good quality:
defects are μ
target
rare (Cpk>1)
μ
target
If process limits and control limits are at the same location, Cpk = 1. Cpk ≥ 2 is exceptional.
QualityGurus.com
Process capability
Good quality: defects are rare (Cpk>1)
Poor quality: defects are common (Cpk<1)
=
USL – x
= 24 – 20 =.667
3σ 3(2)
Cpk = min
=
x - LSL
= 20 – 15 =.833
3σ 3(2)
14 20 26
= = 15 24
3σ = (UPL – x, or x – LPL)
QualityGurus.com
A Six Sigma Process –
Predictably twice as good as what the
customer wants
LSL −6σ
USL
+6σ
6σ
1σ 1σ 1σ 1σ 1σ 1σ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
QualityGurus.com
3 σ v/s 6 σ
6 Sigma curve
LSL USL
3 Sigma curve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
QualityGurus.com
Process shift
allowed
1.5 SD 1.5 SD
LSL USL
SD = 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
QualityGurus.com
Six Sigma
Measurement
Sigma
7
6
5
4 0.02
3 DPMO
3.4
On one condition :
Calculate the defects 233
and estimate the 6210
opportunities in the
same way... 66810
QualityGurus.com
Six Sigma
Measurement
600,000
Sigma Defects 500,000
numbers per million
QualityGurus.com
Components of Six Sigma
QualityGurus.com
Components
1. Process Power
2. People Power
QualityGurus.com
Process Power
QualityGurus.com
P-D-C-A
Act Plan
A P
Act on what Plan the change
was learned
Check C D Do
Check the results Implement the
change on a small
scale.
QualityGurus.com
Approach
Practical
Problem
Statistical
Problem
Statistical
Solution
Practical
Solution
QualityGurus.com
DMAIC - simplified
Define
What is important?
Measure
How are we doing?
Analyze
What is wrong?
Improve
Fix what’s wrong
Control
Ensure gains are
maintained to guarantee
performance
QualityGurus.com
DMAIC approach
I
Improve Critical milestones and stakeholder review
C
Control Budget allocation
QualityGurus.com
Measure
M
Measure
C
Control Collect data
QualityGurus.com
Analyze
D
Define
How well or poorly processes are working
compared with
M - Best possible (Benchmarking)
Measure - Competitor’s
C
Control
QualityGurus.com
Improve
M
Measure
A
Analyze How will you maintain to gains made?
- Change policy & procedures
I
- Change drawings
Improve
- Change planning
- Revise budget
C
- Training
Control
QualityGurus.com
Omitting a step in
DMAIC?
Step Consequences if the step is
omitted
1. Define
2. Measure
3. Analyze
4. Improve
5. Control
QualityGurus.com
Tools for DMAIC
1. Process Power
2. People Power
Tell me, I forget. Show me , I remember. Involve me, I understand.
QualityGurus.com
6 σ Training
Green Belts
QualityGurus.com
Six Sigma
Organization Master
Black
Belt
Champion
Yellow Yellow
Belt Belt
Yellow Yellow
Belt Belt
QualityGurus.com
6 σ Training
Position in Six Sigma Expected Role
Typical
Organisation Post Training
Training
Champions Champions
Champions /
Process owners
Training - I + Training –II
Process Mgmt. &
Project
2 days 3 days
champion
(Total 5 days)
- Part
of project teams
- Sometime lead the
Green Belt 1 Week Green-Belt Training Project work teams
- Generalprocess
Employees 1 / 2 Days core training on control &
(Yellow-Belt) Six-Sigma improvement
- Project Team
Member
QualityGurus.com
Champion
QualityGurus.com
Green Belt
Roles Responsibilities
- Six Sigma Project originator - Recommends Six Sigma projects
- Part-time Six Sigma change - Participates on Six Sigma project
agent. Continues to perform teams
normal duties while - Leads Six Sigma teams in local
participating on Six Sigma improvement projects
project teams
- Six Sigma champion in local
area
QualityGurus.com
Yellow Belt
Roles Responsibilities
- Learns and applies Six - Actively participates in team
Sigma tools to projects tasks
- Communicates well with other
team members
- Demonstrates basic improvement
tool knowledge
- Accepts and executes
assignments as determined by
team
QualityGurus.com
Financial Analyst
External Sources:
Voice of Customer
What are we falling short of meeting
customer needs?
What are the new needs of customers?
Voice of Market
What are market trends, and are we ready
to adapt?
Voice of Competitors
What are we behind our competitors?
QualityGurus.com
Sources of Projects
Internal Sources:
Voice of Process
Where are the defects, repairs, reworks?
What are the major delays?
What are the major wastes?
Voice of Employee
What concerns or ideas have employees or
managers raised?
What are we behind our competitors?
QualityGurus.com
Project Selection
As a team List down at least 20
improvement projects related to your work
areas …….
SpecificStatement
A Problem - It does should
not solve world hunger
be SMART:
Measurable - It has a way to measure
success
Achievable - It is possible to be
successful
Relevant - It has an impact that can be
quantified
Timely - It is near term not off in the
future
QualityGurus.com
Harvesting the Fruit of Six
Sigma
Sweet Fruit
Design for Repeatability
Process Enhancement
Bulk of Fruit
Process Characterization
and Optimization
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
Ground Fruit
Logic and Intuition
QualityGurus.com
Types of Savings
Hard Savings:
Cost Reduction
Energy Saving
Raw Material saving
Reduced Rejection, Waste, Repair
Revenue Enhancement
Increased production
Yield Improvement
Quality Improvement
QualityGurus.com
Types of Savings
Hard Savings:
Cash flow improvement
Reduced cash tied up in inventory
Reduced late receivables, early payables
Reduced cycle time
Cost and Capital avoidance
Optimizing the current system / resources
Reduced maintenance costs
QualityGurus.com
Types of Savings
Soft Savings:
Customer Satisfaction / Loyalty
Employee Satisfaction
QualityGurus.com
Cost of implementing
Direct Payroll
Full time (Black Belts, Master Black
Belts)
Indirect Payroll
Time by executives, team members,
data collection
Training and Consulting
Black Belt course, Overview for Mgmt
etc.
Improvement Implementation Costs
QualityGurus.com
What Qualifies as a
Six Sigma Project
Three basic qualifications:
-There is a gap between current and
desired / needed performance.
The cause of problem is not clearly
understood.
The solution is not pre-determined,
nor is the optimal solution apparent.
QualityGurus.com
Way forward
Get Started
Look for low hanging fruits
Even poor usage of these tools will
get results
Learn more about Six Sigma
QualityGurus.com