Lecture 7
Lecture 7
Hector Guimard H. P. Berlage Peter Behrens Gerritt Reitveld Charles Rennie Mackintosh Antonio Gaudi
Arts and Crafts Movement Inuence of Vienna Inuence of Japan Inuence of the Chicago School and
Sullivan
Light Fixture
Date: 1895 -1900 Architect - Victor Horta
Light Fixture
Date: 1895 -1900 Architect - Victor Horta
Chair
Date: 1895 -1900 Architect - Victor Horta
Paris Metro
Date: 1900 Architect - Hector Guimard
Utilitarian Objects
Date: 1902 Architect - Peter Behrens
Utilitarian Objects
Date: 1902 Architect - Peter Behrens
Utilitarian Objects
Date: 1902 Architect - Peter Behrens
AEG Flammeco-Lampen
Date: 1913 Architect - Peter Behrens
Robie House
Date: 1909 - Frank Lloyd Wright
Robie House
Date: 1909 - Frank Lloyd Wright
House Composition
Date: 1913 - Theo van Doesburg
Oval Composition
Date: 1913 - Piet Mondrian
Color Planes
Date: 1913 - Piet Mondrian
Composition #2
Date: 1922 - Piet Mondrian
Composition #2
Date: 1922 - Piet Mondrian
Composition #IV
Date: 1922 - Piet Mondrian
Tree
Date: 1918 - Piet Mondrian
Red Tree
Date: 1918 - Piet Mondrian
Grey Tree
Date: 1918 - Piet Mondrian
Reitveld Chair
Date: 1924 Architect - Gerritt Reitveld
Reitveld Table
Date: 1924 Architect - Gerritt Reitveld
Reitveld Chair
Date: 1924 Architect - Gerritt Reitveld
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Hill House
Date: 1902 - 03 AD Architect: Charles Rennie Mackintosh
Antonio Gaudi
The inuences on Gaudi are derived from three primary sources: Viollet le Duc Ruskin and Wagner. Along with his Mediterranean inuences and the Moorish architecture of Spain he put forth two completely different ideas into his architecture. The idea of designing in a vernacular manner that reected Traditional Spanish buildings and using architecture as an artistic expression in totally new forms. Gaudis main benefactor was Eusebio Guell. They were Catalan separatists and very anti-Madrid. His work reected structural rationalism that was exhibited in the Gothic revival particularly in thee cathedral architecture. When one adds his indigenous inuences such as the Islamic and early Spanish work. Park Guell is perhaps one of his best examples. It is here that a park raised above the ground with a great view of its surroundings. The serpentine bench encompasses the the entire space. The tile was used to show the Barcelona tradition of tile work and was a homage to those who tile for a living. Casa Mila shows Gaudi playing with the rational grid of the Barcelona city. The undulating facade is meant to evoke a sense that this is a building that has been shaped by nature and time. It is as if the sea had its way with a formal block of material and over time shaped it to its whim. The balcony handrails evoke images of seaweed thrown up by the sea on to the building. It is about taking a material and transforming it into a powerful image.
Hector Guimard
Was inuenced by Labrouste and the structural rationalism that was a fundmental part of architecture training in France at the time. The fundamentals of his work are very much in line with the ideas he was trained. However, his approach to ornamentation and decoration were unique. He was searching for the native style that reected location, usage and national spirit. He rmly believed in the idea of vernacular architecture and that buildings need to reect the time and the places. Germans, Englishmen, and Belgians can form their own ideas that are unique to their place and time. But the French must be French. What Guimard seized on was the idea a style that loose, rustic, and expressed mixed-media was to be something that we associate with French ideas about art and culture. When he was chosen to design the entrances for the Paris Metro he really showed how something could emerge from the ground like a plant into the urban landscape. The elements used oin the construction reect nature in the midst of urbanity.
the future, rather than with history and tradition. Heavy ornamentation and inherited styles were discarded. Even though Mackintosh became known as the pioneer of the movement, his designs were far removed from the bleak utilitarianism of Modernism. His concern was to build around the needs of people: people seen, not as masses, but as individuals who needed not a machine for living in but a work of art. Mackintosh took his inspiration from his Scottish upbringing and blended them with the ourish of Art Nouveau and the simplicity of Japanese forms. While working in architecture, Charles Rennie Mackintosh developed his own style: a contrast between strong right angles and oral-inspired decorative motifs with subtle curves,
Gerritt Reitveld Rietveld was born in Utrecht in 1888 as the son of a joiner. He left school at 11 to be apprenticed to his father and enrolled at night school[1] before working as a draughtsman for C. J. Begeer, a jeweller in Utrecht, from 1906 to 1911.[2] By the time he opened his own furniture workshop in 1917, Rietveld had taught himself drawing, painting and modelmaking. He afterwards set up in business as a cabinetmaker.[3] Rietveld designed his famous Red and Blue Chair in 1917. Hoping that much of his furniture would eventually be massproduced rather than handcrafted, Rietveld aimed for simplicity in construction.[4] In 1918, he started his own furniture factory, and changed the chair's colors after becoming inuenced by the 'De Stijl' movement, of which he became a member in 1919, the same year in which he became an architect. The contacts that he made at De Stijl gave him the opportunity to exhibit abroad as well. In 1923, Walter Gropius invited Rietveld to exhibit at the Bauhaus.[5] He designed his rst building, the Rietveld Schrder House, in 1924, in close collaboration with the owner Truus Schrder-Schrder. Built in Utrecht on the Prins Hendriklaan 50, the house has a conventional ground oor, but is radical on the top oor, lacking xed walls but instead relying on sliding walls to create and change living spaces. The design seems like a three-dimensional realization of a Mondrian painting. The house has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 2000. His involvement in the Schrder House exerted a strong inuence on Truus' daughter, Han Schrder, who became one of the rst female architects in the Netherlands.[6]
Peter Behrens
He was one of the leaders of architectural reform at the turn of the century and was a major designer of factories and ofce buildings in brick, steel and glass. In 1903, Behrens was named director of the Kunstgewerbeschule in Dsseldorf, where he implemented successful reforms. In 1907, Behrens and ten other people (Hermann Muthesius, Theodor Fischer, Josef Hoffmann, Joseph Maria Olbrich, Bruno Paul, Richard Riemerschmid, Fritz Schumacher, among others), plus twelve companies, gathered to create the German Werkbund. As an organization, it was clearly indebted to the principles and priorities of the Arts and Crafts movement, but with a decidedly modern twist. Members of the Werkbund were focused on improving the overall level of taste in Germany by improving the design of everyday objects and products. This very practical aspect made it an extremely inuential organization among industrialists, public policy experts, designers, investors, critics and academics. Behrens' work for AEG was the rst large-scale demonstration of the viability and vitality of the Werkbund's initiatives and objectives.
AEG Turbine Factory, 19081909. An early example of industrial classicism. In 1907, AEG (Allgemeine Elektrizitts-Gesellschaft) retained Behrens as artistic consultant. He designed the entire corporate identity (logotype, product design, publicity, etc.) and for that he is considered the rst industrial designer in history. Peter Behrens was never an employee for AEG, but worked in the capacity of artistic consultant. In 1910, Behrens designed the AEG Turbine Factory. From 1907 to 1912, he had students and assistants, and among them were Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier, Adolf Meyer, Jean Kramer and Walter Gropius (later to become the rst director of the Bauhaus). From 1920 and 1924, hes was responsible for the design and construction of the Technical Administration Building (Technische Verwaltungsgebude) of Hoechst AG in Hchst. In 1922, he accepted an invitation to teach at the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna. Peter Behrens remained head of the Department of Architecture at the Prussian Academy of Arts in Berlin. In 1926, Behrens was commissioned by the Englishman Wenman Joseph Bassett-Lowke to design him a family home in Northampton, UK. The house, named 'New Ways' is often regarded as the rst modernist house in Britain. In 1936 Behrens was called from Vienna to conduct a Master class in architecture, in succession to Hans Poelzig, at the Prussian Academy of Arts (now the Akademie der Knste) in Berlin, reportedly with the specic approval of Hitler. Behrens became associated with Hitler's urbanistic dreams for Berlin with the commission for the new head quarters of the AEG on Albert Speer's
famous planned north-south axis. Speer reported that his selection of Behrens for this commission was rejected by the powerful Alfred Rosenberg, but that his decision was supported by Hitler who admired Behrens's Saint Petersburg Embassy. Behrens and the academy helped his cause by reporting to the Ministry that Behrens had joined the then illegal Nazi party in Austria on May Day of 1934. The vast AEG building with its marshalled fenestrations and detailing, like the project of which it was a part, was not built. Behrens died in Hotel Bristol in Berlin on 27th February 1940, while seeking refuge there from the cold of his country estate.[1]
Art Nouveau
is an international philosophy[1] and style of art, architecture and applied art especially the decorative artsthat were most popular during 18901910. [2] The name "Art Nouveau" is French for "new art". It is known also as Jugendstil, pronounced [juntstil ], German for "youth style", named after the magazine Jugend, which promoted it, as Modern () in Russia, perhaps named after Parisian gallery "La Maison Moderne", as Secession in Austria-Hungary and its successor states after the Viennese group of artists, and, in Italy, as Stile Liberty from the department store in London, Liberty & Co., which popularized the style. A reaction to academic art of the 19th century, it was inspired by natural forms and structures, not only in owers and plants but also in curved lines. Architects tried to harmonize with the natural environment. It is also considered a philosophy of design of furniture, which was designed according to the whole building and made part of ordinary life.[3] The style was inuenced strongly by Czech artist Alphonse Mucha, when Mucha produced a lithographed poster, which appeared on 1 January 1895 in the streets of Paris as an advertisement for the play Gismonda by Victorien Sardou, featuring Sarah Bernhardt.[4] It popularised the new artistic style and its creator to the citizens of Paris. Initially named Style Mucha, (Mucha Style), his style soon became known as Art Nouveau.[5] Art Nouveau was most popular in Europe, but its inuence was global. Hence, it is known in various guises with frequent localised tendencies.[6] In France, Hector Guimard's Paris metro entrances were of art nouveau style and Emile Gall practised the style in Nancy. Victor Horta had a decisive effect on architecture in Belgium.[7] Magazines like Jugend helped publicise the style in Germany, especially as a graphic artform, while the Vienna Secessionists inuenced art and architecture throughout Austria-Hungary. Art Nouveau was also a style of distinct individuals such as Gustav Klimt, Charles Rennie Mackintosh, Alphonse Mucha, Ren Lalique, Antoni Gaud and Louis Comfort Tiffany, each of whom interpreted it in their own manner.[8] [9]
De Stijl
(/d stal/; Dutch pronunciation:[d stil]), Dutch for "The Style", also known as neoplasticism, was a Dutch artistic movement founded in 1917. In a narrower sense, the term De Stijl is used to refer to a body of work from 1917 to 1931 founded in the Netherlands.[1][2] De Stijl is also the name of a journal that was published by the Dutch painter, designer, writer, and critic Theo van Doesburg (18831931), propagating the group's theories. Next to van Doesburg, the group's principal members were the painters Piet Mondrian (18721944), Vilmos Huszr (18841960), and Bart van der Leck (1876 1958), and the architects Gerrit Rietveld (18881964), Robert van 't Hoff (18871979), and J.J.P. Oud (18901963). The artistic philosophy that formed a basis for the group's work is known as neoplasticism the new plastic art (or Nieuwe Beelding in Dutch). Proponents of De Stijl sought to express a new utopian ideal of spiritual harmony and order. They advocated pure abstraction and universality by a reduction to the essentials of form and colour; they simplied visual compositions to the vertical and horizontal directions, and used only primary colors along with black and white. Indeed, according to the Tate Gallery's online article on neoplasticism, Mondrian himself sets forth these delimitations in his essay 'Neo-Plasticism in Pictorial Art'. He writes, "... this new plastic idea will ignore the particulars of appearance, that is to say, natural form and colour. On the contrary, it should nd its expression in the abstraction of form and colour, that is to say, in the straight line and the clearly dened primary colour." The Tate article further summarizes that this art allows "only primary colours and non-colours, only squares and rectangles, only straight and horizontal or vertical line."[3] The Guggenheim Museum's online article on De Stijl summarizes these traits in similar terms: "It [De Stijl] was posited on the fundamental principle of the geometry of the straight line, the square, and the rectangle, combined with a strong asymmetricality; the predominant use of pure primary colors with black and white; and the relationship between positive and negative elements in an arrangement of non-objective forms and lines."[4] Principles and inuences The name De Stijl is supposedly derived from Gottfried Semper's Der Stil in den technischen und tektonischen Knsten oder Praktische sthetik (1861 3), which Curl[2] suggests was mistakenly believed to advocate materialism and functionalism. In general, De Stijl proposed ultimate simplicity and abstraction, both in architecture and painting, by using only straight horizontal and vertical lines and rectangular forms. Furthermore, their formal vocabulary
was limited to the primary colours, red, yellow, and blue, and the three primary values, black, white, and grey. The works avoided symmetry and attained aesthetic balance by the use of opposition. This element of the movement embodies the second meaning of stijl: a post, jamb or support; this is best exemplied by the construction of crossing joints, most commonly seen in carpentry. In many of the group's three-dimensional works, vertical and horizontal lines are positioned in layers or planes that do not intersect, thereby allowing each element to exist independently and unobstructed by other elements. This feature can be found in the Rietveld Schrder House and the Red and Blue Chair. De Stijl was inuenced by Cubist painting as well as by the mysticism and the ideas about "ideal" geometric forms (such as the "perfect straight line") in the neoplatonic philosophy of mathematician M.H.J. Schoenmaekers. The works of De Stijl would inuence the Bauhaus style and the international style of architecture as well as clothing and interior design. However, it did not follow the general guidelines of an ism (Cubism, Futurism, Surrealism), nor did it adhere to the principles of art schools like the Bauhaus; it was a collective project, a joint enterprise. In music, De Stijl was an inuence only on the work of composer Jakob van Domselaer, a close friend of Mondrian. Between 1913 and 1916, he composed his Proeven van Stijlkunst (Experiments in Artistic Style), inspired mainly by Mondrian's paintings. This minimalisticand, at the time, revolutionarymusic dened "horizontal" and "vertical" musical elements and aimed at balancing those two principles. Van Domselaer was relatively unknown in his lifetime, and did not play a signicant role within the De Stijl group.